欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

小果油茶与普通油茶居群遗传结构及种间杂交渐渗

黄勇**   

  1. (福建省林业科学研究院国家林业局南方山地用材林培育重点实验室, 福州 350012)
  • 出版日期:2013-08-18 发布日期:2013-08-18

Population genetic structure and interspecific introgressive hybridization between Camellia meiocarpa and C. oleifera.

HUANG Yong   

  1. (State Forestry Adminstration Laboratory of Southern Mountain Timber Forest Cultivation, Fujian Academy of Forestry, Fuzhou 350012, China)
  • Online:2013-08-18 Published:2013-08-18

摘要:

利用11对SSR引物对5个同域分布的小果油茶和普通油茶居群进行了遗传多样性、居群遗传结构,以及种间杂交渐渗的研究.结果表明: 两物种的共有等位基因数为57个,占总数的96.6%;在普通油茶中仅检测到2个特异等位基因,而在小果油茶中没有检测到特异等位基因,但两物种的等位基因频率存在一定的差别.两物种的遗传多样性均较高.在物种和居群层次上,两物种的多态信息含量的变化幅度均为0.25~0.50,属于中度多态性.同域分布的两物种间的平均遗传分化系数为0.057,明显低于物种内异域居群间的遗传分化系数的平均值(小果油茶0.332,普通油茶0.201),也低于木本被子植物种内居群间平均水平(0.102).5个同域分布物种间基因流的平均值为10.072,明显高于物种内异域间基因流的平均值(小果油茶1006,普通油茶1.990).UPGMA聚类结果显示,小果油茶和普通油茶之间的亲缘关系非常接近,明显存在着因杂交而产生的基因渐渗.小果油茶或许是普通油茶的一个变种.

 

Abstract: A total of 11 pairs of SSR primers were applied to study the genetic diversity of five sympatric populations of Camellia meiocarpa and C. oleifera, the populations’ genetic structure, and the interspecific introgressive hybridization. The alleles shared by the two species were 57, accounting for 96.6% of the total. There were two specific alleles in C. oleifera, but no specific alleles in C. meiocarpa. Certain difference was observed in the phenotypic frequency between the two species, and the intraspecific genetic diversity of the two species was high. At species level and population level, the polymorphism information content of the two species was between 0.25 and 0.50, suggesting that the genetic polymorphism was moderate. The mean value of genetic differentiation among the sympatric species was 0.057, being obviously lower than that of the foreign species (C. meiocarpa 0.332; C. oleifera 0.201) and of xyloid angiosperms (0.102). The mean value of gene flow among the sympatric species was 10.072, which was significantly higher than that among the foreign species (C. meiocarpa 1.006, C. oleifera 1.990). The UPGMA cluster results showed that the genetic relationship of the two species was very close to, meaning that there existed an obvious interspecific introgressive hybridization. C. meiocarpa was possibly a variety of C. oleifera as a result of the introgressive hybridization.