Landscape ecological risk assessment and influencing factors in ecological conservation area in Sichuan-Yunnan provinces, China.

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.018

Abstract

Abstract: It is important for preventing and resolving landscape ecology risk and promoting regional sustainable development to explore the characteristics of temporal and spatial variations of landscape ecology risk of key ecological function zone and to reveal the potential influence of human activity on aggravation of landscape ecological risk. Based on the land cover data of 2000, 2010, and 2020, we constructed a model of risk assessment on landscape ecology, incorporating a landscape index and an assessment of ecological vulnerability, with the support of ArcGIS 10.8 and Fragstats 4.2. The spatial analysis method was used to examine the temporal and spatial variations of landscape ecology risk in ecological conservation in Sichuan-Yunnan provinces. We used the Geodetector to quantify the impacts of natural and social-economy factors in different ranges of region on landscape ecological risk. The results showed that from 2000 to 2020, the area of artificial land surface, water body, shrubland in the study area showed an upward trend, while the area of forest, cultivated land, grassland, wetlands, barren land, and permanent snow cover and glacier showed an downward trend. There was remarkable transfer of landscape types among forest, grassland and cultivated land, especially for the transfer from cultivated land to artificial surface. The mean value of landscape ecological risk had been reducing. The classes of landscape ecological risk was consistent with the changes and shifts of landscape. Landscape ecological risk was mainly at lower, low, and high levels in ecological conservation in Sichuan-Yunnan provinces. Natural factors, including elevation and precipitation, generally drove the temporal-spatial variations of landscape ecological risk. In addition, factors such as economy, society and regional accessibility could contribute to prominent impacts on local area suffering from pejorative risk.

Key words: ecological risk assessment, landscape pattern, dominating factor, ecological conservation area in Sichuan-Yunnan provinces

GAO Bin-pin, LI Chen, WU Ying-mei, ZHENG Ke-jun, WU Yan. Landscape ecological risk assessment and influencing factors in ecological conservation area in Sichuan-Yunnan provinces, China.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(5): 1603-1613.

References

[1] 李青圃, 张正栋, 万露文, 等. 基于景观生态风险评价的宁江流域景观格局优化. 地理学报, 2019, 74(7): 1420-1437 [Li Q-P, Zhang Z-D, Wan L-W, et al. Landscape pattern optimization in Ningjiang River Basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(7): 1420-1437]
[2] 娄妮, 王志杰, 何嵩涛. 基于景观格局的阿哈湖国家湿地公园景观生态风险评价. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1): 233-239 [Lou N, Wang Z-J, He S-T. Assessment on ecological risk of Aha Lake National Wetland Park based on landscape pattern. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(1): 233-239]
[3] 韩晓佳, 刘小鹏, 王亚娟, 等. 基于景观格局的干旱区绿洲生态风险评价与管理——以青铜峡市为例. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(5): 285-290 [Han X-J, Liu X-P, Wang Y-J, et al. Ecological risk assessment and its management of oasis in arid area based on landscape pattern: A case study in Qingtongxia. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 24(5): 285-290]
[4] DT Heggem, CM Edmonds, AC Neale, et al. A landscape ecology assessment of the Tensas River Basin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2000, 64: 41-54
[5] Kapustka LA, Galbraith H, Luxon BM. et al. Using landscape ecology to focus ecological risk assessment and guide risk management decision-making. Toxicology and Industrial Health, 2001, 17: 236-246
[6] Estoque RC, Murayama Y, Lasco RD, et al. Changes in the landscape pattern of the La Mesa Watershed: The last ecological frontier of Metro Manila, Philippines. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 430: 280-290
[7] 吕乐婷, 张杰, 孙才志, 等. 基于土地利用变化的细河流域景观生态风险评估. 生态学报, 2018, 38(16): 5952-5960 [Lyu L-T, Zhang J, Sun C-Z, et al. Landscape ecological risk assessment of Xi River Basin based on land-use change. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(16): 5952-5960]
[8] 梁二敏, 张军民, 杨卫红. 新疆玛纳斯河流域绿洲景观生态脆弱性时空分异. 干旱区研究, 2017, 34(4): 950-957 [Liang E-M, Zhang J-M, Yang W-H. Spatiotemporal variation of landscape ecological vulnerability in oasis in the Manas River basin, Xinjiang. Arid Zone Research, 2017, 34(4): 950-957]
[9] 陈心怡, 谢跟踪, 张金萍. 海口市海岸带近30年土地利用变化的景观生态风险评价. 生态学报, 2021, 41(3): 1-12 [Chen X-Y, Xie G-Z, Zhang J-P. Landscape ecological risk assessment of land use changes in the coastal area of Haikou City in the past 30 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 41(3): 1-12]
[10] 余敦, 梁珍宝, 肖志娟, 等. 基于景观生态思维的南昌市土地生态风险时空特征分析. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1): 213-220 [Yu D, Liang Z-B, Xiao Z-J, et al. Temporal and spatial characteristics of land ecolo-gical risk in Nanchang City based on landscape ecology. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(1): 213-220]
[11] 巩杰, 赵彩霞, 谢余初, 等. 基于景观格局的甘肃白龙江流域生态风险评价与管理. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(7): 2041-2048 [Gong J, Zhao C-X, Xie Y-C, et al. Ecological risk assessment and its management of Bailongjiang watershed, southern Gansu based on landscape pattern. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(7): 2041-2048]
[12] 黄木易, 何翔. 近20年来巢湖流域景观生态风险评估与时空演化机制. 湖泊科学, 2016, 28(4): 785-793 [Huang M-Y, He X. Landscape ecological risk assessment and its mechanism in Chaohu basin during the past almost 20 years. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2016, 28(4): 785-793]
[13] 刘世梁, 刘琦, 张兆苓, 等. 云南省红河流域景观生态风险及驱动力分析. 生态学报, 2014, 34(13): 3728-3734 [Liu S-L, Liu Q, Zhang Z-L, et al. Landscape ecological risk and driving force analysis in Red river basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(13): 3728-3734]
[14] 王瑞杰, 裘钱玲琳, 李国祥, 等. 宁波月湖水体中抗生素的分布与生态风险评价. 湖泊科学, 2018, 30(6): 1616-1624 [Wang R-J, Qiu Q-L-L, Li G-X, et al. Distribution characteristics and ecological risk assessment of selected antibiotics in Moon Lake, Ningbo City. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2018, 30(6): 1616-1624]
[15] 王鹏, 王亚娟, 刘小鹏, 等. 基于景观结构的生态移民安置区生态风险评价——以宁夏红寺堡区为例. 生态学报, 2018, 38(8): 2672-2682 [Wang P, Wang Y-J, Liu X-P, et al. Ecological risk assessment of an ecological migrant resettlement region based on landscape structure: A case study of Hongsibu in Ningxia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(8): 2672-2682]
[16] 张玲玲, 史云飞, 刘玉华. 空间粒度变化对沂蒙山区景观格局指数的影响. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(2): 459-464 [Zhang L-L, Shi Y-F, Liu Y-H. Effects of spatial grain change on the landscape pattern indices in Yimeng Mountain area of Shandong Province, East China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(2): 459-464]
[17] 国家发展改革委自然资源部. 全国重要生态系统保护和修复重大工程总体规划(2021—2035年)[EB/OL]. (2020-06-03) [2020-12-31]. http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202006/t20200611_2525741.html [National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China. National Master Plan for Major Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Projects (2021-2035) [EB/OL]. (2020-06-03) [2020-12-31] .http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202006/t20-200611_2525741.html]
[18] 谢小平, 陈芝聪, 王芳, 等. 基于景观格局的太湖流域生态风险评估. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(10): 3369-3377 [Xie X-P, Chen Z-C, Wang F, et al. Ecological risk assessment of Taihu Lake basin based on landscape pattern. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(10): 3369-3377]
[19] 张月, 张飞, 王娟, 等. 基于LUCC的艾比湖区域生态风险评价及预测研究. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(11): 3465-3474 [Zhang Y, Zhang F, Wang J, et al. Ecological risk assessment and prediction of Ebinur Lake region based on land use/land cover change. China Environmental Science, 2016, 36(11): 3465-3474]
[20] Zhang F, Yu SJ, Wang DF. Ecological risk assessment due to land use/cover changes (LUCC) in Jinghe County, Xinjiang, China from 1990 to 2014 based on landscape patterns and spatial statistics. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, 77: 491
[21] 李谢辉, 李景宜. 基于GIS的区域景观生态风险分析——以渭河下游河流沿线区域为例. 干旱区研究, 2008, 25(6): 899-903 [Li X-H, Li J-Y. Analysis on regional landscape ecological risk based on GIS: A case study along the lower reaches of the Weihe River. Arid Zone Research, 2008, 25(6): 899-903]
[22] 张雅洲, 谢小平. 基于RS和GIS的南四湖生态风险评价. 生态学报, 2015, 35(5): 1371-1377 [Zhang Y-Z, Xie X-P. Ecological risk assessment of Nansi Lake based on RS and GIS. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(5): 1371-1377]
[23] 刘焱序, 王仰麟, 彭建, 等. 基于生态适应性循环三维框架的城市景观生态风险评价. 地理学报, 2015, 70(7): 1052-1067 [Liu Y-X, Wang Y-L, Peng J, et al. Urban landscape ecological risk assessment based on the three-dimensional framework of ecological adaptability cycle. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(7): 1052-1067]
[24] 魏伟, 石培基, 雷莉, 等. 基于景观结构和空间统计方法的绿洲区生态风险分析——以石羊河武威、民勤绿洲为例. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(12): 2023-2035 [Wei W, Shi P-J, Lei L, et al. Ecological risk analysis of oasis area based on landscape structure and spatial statistics method: Taking Shiyang River Wuwei and Minqin Oasis as examples. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(12): 2023-2035]
[25] Jin X, Jin YX, Mao XF. Ecological risk assessment of cities on the Tibetan Plateau based on land use land cover changes: Case study of Delingha City. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 101: 185-191
[26] 肖琳, 田光进. 天津市土地利用生态风险评价. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(2): 469-476 [Xiao L, Tian G-J. Ecological risk assessment of land use in Tianjin. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014, 33(2): 469-476]
[27] 常小燕, 李新举, 李西灿, 等. 矿区土地利用生态风险的时空异质性. 生态学报, 2019, 39(9): 3075-3088 [Chang X-Y, Li X-J, Li X-C, et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of ecological risks in land use in mining areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(9): 3075-3088]
[28] 杨丰硕, 杨晓梅, 王志华, 等. 江西省典型县域经济差异影响因子地理探测研究. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(1): 79-88 [Yang F-S, Yang X-M, Wang Z-H, et al. Research on geographical exploration of influen-cing factors of economic differences in typical counties in Jiangxi Province. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2018, 20(1): 79-88]
[29] 奚世军, 蔡沛伶, 安裕伦. 2000—2018年贵州喀斯特山区小流域综合生态风险变化及其驱动因素. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(9): 1106-1114 [Xi S-J, Cai P-L, An Y-L. Changes in integrated ecological risks and their driving factors in small watersheds in Guizhou karst mountainous areas from 2000 to 2018. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020, 36(9): 1106-1114]
[30] 王洁, 摆万奇, 田国行. 青藏高原景观生态风险的时空特征. 资源科学, 2020, 42(9): 1739-1749 [Wang J, Bai W-Q, Tian G-H. Temporal and spatial characteri-stics of landscape ecological risks on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Resources Science, 2020, 42(9): 1739-1749]