Mountain-water-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland holistic protection and restoration engineering and landscape ecology

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202301.026

Abstract

Abstract: Theoretical researches and practices on the life community of mountain-water-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland mosaic and its protection and restoration have been gradually developed in China, which demands the support of a systematic disciplinary theory. Landscape ecology, as an interdisciplinary science of geography and ecology, can meet such demand thanks to its macroscopic spatial theory and technical system. Here, landscape ecology is taken as the supporting discipline of holistic protection and restoration for mountain-water-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland mosaic. Firstly, we clarified that life community of mountain-water-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland is a heterogeneously mosaic landscape, which bears all the characteristics of landscape and thus follows the principles of landscape ecology. Secondly, we expounded how the basic principles of landscape-ecological construction could be applied to the planning and evaluation of holistic protection and restoration for mountain-water-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland mosaic. Finally, we summarized the new trend of landscape-ecological construction research, listed the theoretical and practical problems to be solved, and discussed how the projects of holistic protection and restoration for the mountain-water-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland mosaic can provide a variety of practices for seeking the solutions. The combination of landscape ecology and practical restoration projects would generate effective solutions to realize sustainable development in terms of ecology, economy, and society in China and even the whole world.

Key words: mountain-water-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland life community, holistic mountain-water-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland protection and restoration engineering, landscape ecology, landscape pattern and process, landscape-ecological construction.

LI Yue-hui, HU Yuan-man, WANG Zheng-wen. Mountain-water-forest-farmland-lake-grassland-sandland holistic protection and restoration engineering and landscape ecology[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(1): 249-256.

References

[1] 彭建, 吕丹娜, 张甜, 等. 山水林田湖草生态保护修复的系统性认知. 生态学报, 2019, 39(23): 78-85
[2] 史芳宁, 刘世梁, 安毅, 等. 基于生态网络的山水林田湖草生物多样性保护研究——以广西左右江为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(23): 8930-8938
[3] 孔令桥, 郑华, 欧阳志云. 基于生态系统服务视角的山水林田湖草生态保护与修复——以洞庭湖流域为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(23): 8903-8910
[4] Turner MG, Gardner RH, O'Neill RV. Landscape Eco-logy in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. New York: Springer, 2001
[5] Pinto-Correia T, Kristensen L. Linking research to practice: The landscape as the basis for integrating social and ecological perspectives of the rural. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 120: 248-256
[6] 肖笃宁, 李秀珍, 高峻, 等. 景观生态学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003
[7] Wu J. Landscape ecology// Leemans R, ed. Ecological Systems: Selected Entries from the Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. New York: Sprin-ger, 2013: 56-63
[8] Johnson EA, Miyanishi K. The Boreal Forest as a Cultural Landscape [EB/OL]. (2012-12-12) [2022-01-01]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22243366/
[9] Forman RTT, Godron M. Landscape Ecology. New York: Wiley, 1986
[10] Tress G, Tress B, Fry G. Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 2005, 20: 479-493
[11] Turner MG. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1989, 20: 171-197
[12] Wu J. Thirty years of Landscape Ecology (1987-2017): Retrospects and prospects. Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32: 2225-2239
[13] Motew M, Chen X, Carpenter SR, et al. Comparing the effects of climate and land use on surface water quality using future watershed scenarios. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 693: 133484
[14] 王军, 钟莉娜. 景观生态学在土地整治中的应用研究进展. 生态学报, 2017, 37(12): 3982-3990
[15] Neuendorf F, Von Haaren C, Albert C. Assessing and coping with uncertainties in landscape planning: An overview. Landscape Ecology, 2018, 33: 861-878
[16] Solecka I. The use of landscape value assessment in spatial planning and sustainable land management: A review. Landscape Research, 2019, 44: 966-981
[17] Ruzicka MML. Theoretical and Metodical Foundation of Biological Planning of Landscape. Bratisalava: Report IEBE SAS, 1979
[18] 俞孔坚. 景观生态战略点识别方法与理论地理学的表面模型. 地理学报, 1998, 53(12): 11-18
[19] 何兴元. 应用生态学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004
[20] Costanza R. Forum on valuation of ecosystem services: The value of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25: 1-2
[21] Fu BJ, Pan NQ. Integrated studies of physical geography in China: Review and prospects. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26: 771-790
[22] Qiu JX, Carpenter SR, Booth EG, et al. Understanding relationships among ecosystem services across spatial scales and over time. Environmental Research Letters, 2018, 13: 054020
[23] Qiu JX, Carpenter SR, Booth EG, et al. Scenarios reveal pathways to sustain future ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Applications, 2018, 28: 119-134
[24] 田野, 冯启源, 唐明方, 等. 基于生态系统评价的山水林田湖草生态保护与修复体系构建研究——以乌梁素海流域为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(23): 8826-8836
[25] Yeoman K, Jiang BB, Mitsch WJ. Phosphorus concentrations in a Florida Everglades water conservation area before and after El Nino events in the dry season. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 108: 391-395
[26] Sun JF, Yuan XZ, Liu H, et al. Emergy and eco-exergy evaluation of wetland reconstruction based on ecological engineering approaches in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 122: e07278
[27] Anawar HM, Chowdhury R. Remediation of polluted river water by biological, chemical, ecological and engineering processes. Sustainability, 2020, 12: 1-18
[28] Kvitek T, Zlabek P, Bystricky V, et al. Changes of nitrate concentrations in surface waters influenced by land use in the crystalline complex of the Czech Republic. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2009, 34: 541-551
[29] Milovanovic A, Rodic DM, Maruna M. Eighty-year review of the evolution of landscape ecology: From a spatial planning perspective. Landscape Ecology, 2020, 35: 2141-2161
[30] Soini K, Vaarala H, Pouta E. Residentś sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural-urban interface. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 104: 124-134
[31] Wartmann FM, Koblet O, Purves RS. Assessing expe-rienced tranquillity through natural language processing and landscape ecology measures. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36: 2347-2365
[32] Roy ED. Phosphorus recovery and recycling with ecological engineering: A review. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 98: 213-227
[33] Passeport E, Vidon P, Forshay KJ, et al. Ecological engineering practices for the reduction of excess nitrogen in human-influenced landscapes: A guide for watershed managers. Environmental Management, 2013, 51: 392-413
[34] Zheng J, Wei XH, Liu YQ, et al. Review of regional carbon counting methods for the Chinese major ecological engineering programs. Journal of Forestry Research, 2016, 27: 727-738
[35] Liversage K, Chapman MG. Coastal ecological enginee-ring and habitat restoration: Incorporating biologically diverse boulder habitat. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2018, 593: 173-185
[36] Krovakova K, Semeradova S, Mudrochova M, et al. Landscape functions and their change: A review on methodological approaches. Ecological Engineering, 2015, 75: 378-383
[37] 刘志民, 余海滨. “山水林田湖草沙生命共同体”理念下的科尔沁沙地生态治理. 中国沙漠, 2022, 42(1): 34-40
[38] Berkes F. Sacred Ecology. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis, 2008
[39] Martin JF, Roy ED, Diemont SAW, et al. Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK): Ideas, inspiration, and designs for ecological engineering. Ecological Enginee-ring, 2010, 36: 839-849
[40] Mariscal A, Tigabu M, Savadogo P, et al. Regeneration status and role of traditional ecological knowledge for cloud forest ecosystem restoration in Ecuador. Forests, 2022, 13: 92
[41] Ramos SC. Understanding Yurok traditional ecological knowledge and wildlife management. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2022, 86: e22140
[42] Robinson JM, Gellie N, Maccarthy D, et al. Traditional ecological knowledge in restoration ecology: A call to listen deeply, to engage with, and respect indigenous voices. Restoration Ecology, 2021, 29: e13381
[43] Veitayaki J. Taking advantage of indigenous knowledge: The Fiji case. International Social Science Journal, 2002, 54: 395-402
[44] Winqvist C, Ahnstrom J, Bengtsson J. Effects of organic farming on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Taking landscape complexity into account. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2012, 1249: 191-203
[45] Golley FB. Introducing landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 1987, 1: 1-3