Wetland ecosystem service function and its value accounting:A case study of Fuzhou City, China

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.017

Abstract

Abstract: Wetland plays an important role in ecological protection and social development. Scientific and rational evaluation of the values of wetland ecosystem service is the basis of protection and sustainable utilization of wetland resources. How to scientifically and effectively assess the wetland ecosystem gross ecosystem product (GEP) and make it into the national GDP accounting system are the focus of the scientific community and government departments. In this study, the accounting framework of wetland ecosystem GEP was constructed. Based on multi-source data and from the aspects of function and value, the accounting of wetland GEP in Fuzhou City was carried out. The results showed that the GEP of wetland ecosystem in Fuzhou City was 239.23 billion yuan in 2015. Such value mainly came from the ecological regulation service value (157.869 billion yuan), which accounted for 66.0% of the total and was about 2.2 and 15.6 times of the product supply service value and cultural service value. Among the ecological regulation services of wetlands, hydrodynamic regulation service and climate regulation service were the highest. Together, they accounted for 82.9% of the ecological regulation service value. The ecological regulation value per unit area of wetland in Fuzhou City was 1347.8 thousand yuan·hm^-2, which was higher than the mean level of the whole country. In the districts and counties of Fuzhou City, the value of wetland ecosystem in Minqing County was the largest, about 88.83 billion yuan, accounting for 40.1% of the total value of product supply and ecological regulation. In terms of types, coastal wetlands in Fuzhou City had the largest function of ecological regulation services, which was about 2.5 times of that of river wetlands and constructed wetlands. The accounting of GEP of wetland ecosystem in Fuzhou City is an important practice for the conviction of “lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets”, which would provide technical support for guiding local government to scientifically manage wetland ecosystem.

Key words: wetland ecosystem, gross ecosystem product (GEP), service function, Fuzhou City.

WANG Jiao-yue, BING Long-fei, YIN Yan, XI Feng-ming, MA Ming-jing, ZHANG Wen-feng. Wetland ecosystem service function and its value accounting:A case study of Fuzhou City, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11): 3824-3834.

References 41

[1]	王强, 王立, 马放, 等. 湿地生态系统服务功能评估研究进展. 城市环境与城市生态, 2009, 22(4): 1-4 [Wang Q, Wang L, Ma F, et al. Evaluation research of wetland ecosystem services. Urban Environment and Urban Ecology, 2009, 22(4): 1-4]
[2]	刘晓辉, 吕宪国, 姜明, 等. 湿地生态系统服务功能的价值评估. 生态学报, 2008, 28(11): 5625-5631 [Liu X-H, Lyu X-G, Jiang M, et al. Research on the valuation of wetland ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(11): 5625-5631]
[3]	国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于印发湿地保护修复制度方案的通知国办发〔2016〕89号. 北京: 国务院办公厅, 2016 [General Office of the Chinese State Council. Circular of the General Office of the State Council on Printing and Distributing the Scheme of Wetland Protection and Restoration System (2016-89). Beijing: General Office of the Chinese State Council, 2016]
[4]	国家发展改革委、财政部、国土资源部, 等. 国家发展改革委等9部委印发《关于加强资源环境生态红线管控的指导意见》的通知发改环资〔2016〕1162号. 北京: 国家发展改革委, 2016 [National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Guidance on Strengthening the Management and Control of Ecological Red Line of Resources and Environment. Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission, 2016]
[5]	全国人民代表大会常务委员会. 中华人民共和国湿地保护法(草案)征求意见北京: 全国人民代表大会常务委员会, 2021 [The National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. Solicit Opinions on Wetland Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China (Draft). Beijing: The National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China, 2021]
[6]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: General Synthesis. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2005
[7]	Xiang HX, Wang ZM, Mao DH, et al. What did China’s national wetland conservation program achieve? Observations of changes in land cover and ecosystem services in the Sanjiang Plain. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 267: 110623
[8]	Zhou JJ, Zhao YR, Huang P, et al. Impacts of ecological restoration projects on the ecosystem carbon storage of inland river basin in arid area, China. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 118: 106803
[9]	Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260
[10]	de Groot R, Wilson MA, Boumans RM. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41: 393-408
[11]	de Groot RS, Stuip MAM, Finlayson CM, et al. Valuing Wetlands: Guidance for Waluing the Benefits Derived from Wetland Ecosystem Services, Ramsar Technical Report No. 3/CBD Technical Series No. 27. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 2006
[12]	邓培雁, 陈桂珠. 湿地价值及其有关问题探讨. 湿地科学, 2003, 1(2): 136-140 [Deng P-Y, Chen G-Z. Discussion on the values of wetlands and related problems. Wetland Science, 2003, 1(2): 136-140]
[13]	Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. Defining and classi-fying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68: 643-653
[14]	Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Müller F. Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators: A theoretical matrix exercise. Ecolo-gical Indicators, 2013, 28: 54-78
[15]	吕宪国, 邹元春, 薛振山, 等. 大兴安岭地区湿地生态系统价值评估报告. 长春: 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究, 2016 [Lyu X-G, Zou Y-C, Xue Z-S, et al. Evaluation Report of Wetland’s Ecosystem Value in Daxing’an Mountains. Changchun: Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2016]
[16]	张林波, 高艳妮, 李凯, 等. 生态系统生产价值核算与业务化体系研究——以厦门市为例. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020 [Zhang L-B, Gao Y-N, Li K, et al. Study on Ecosystem Gross Ecosystem Product Accounting and Business System: A Case Study of Xiamen. Beijing: Science Press, 2020]
[17]	张林波, 高艳妮. 厦门生态系统价值核算的基本原则[EB/OL]. (2019-06-25) [2021-05-21]. https://www.cenews.com.cn/opinion/201906/t20190625_900960.html [Zhang L-B, Gao Y-N. Basic Principles of Ecosystem Gross Ecosystem Product Accounting in Xiamen [EB/OL]. (2019-06-25) [2021-05-21]. https://www.cenews.com.cn/opinion/201906/t20190625_900960.html]
[18]	国家市场监督管理总局. 生态系统评估生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算技术规范(征求意见稿). 北京: 国家标准化管理委员会, 2020 [State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration, Ecosystem Assessment Guidelines for Gross Ecosystem Product Accounting (Draft). Beijing: State Standardization Administration Commission, 2020]
[19]	中华人民共和国林业行业标准. 湿地生态系统服务评估规范. LY/T 2899—2017. 北京: 国家林业局, 2017 [Forestry Industry Standard of the people’s Republic of China. Specifications for Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Services. LY/T 2899-2017. Beijing: State Forestry Administration of China, 2017]
[20]	深圳市市场和质量监督管理委员会. 深圳市标准化指导性技术文件. 盐田区城市生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算技术规范. SZDB/Z 342—2018. 深圳市: 深圳市市场和质量监督管理委员会, 2018 [Shenzhen Market and Quality Supervision and Administration Commission. Shenzhen Standardization Guiding Technical Document. Technical Specification for Accounting of Urban Gross Ecosystem Product of Yantian District. SZDB/Z 342-2018. Shenzhen: Shenzhen Market and Quality Supervision and Administration Commission, 2018]
[21]	胡涛, 李延风, 黄盼盼, 等. 区域物种保育更新服务功能综合评估. 环境科学研究, 2018, 31(12): 2112-2123 [Hu T, Li Y-F, Huang P-P, et al. Comprehensive assessment of regional species conservation and updating services. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2018, 31(12): 2112-2123]
[22]	欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761 [Ouyang Z-Y, Zhu C-Q, Yang G-B, et al. Gross ecosystem product: Concept, accounting framework and case study. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761]
[23]	陈鹏. 厦门湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估. 湿地科学, 2006, 4(2): 101-107 [Chen P. Evaluation on service value of wetland ecosystem in Xiamen City. Wetland Science, 2006, 4(2): 101-107]
[24]	陈铸, 傅伟聪, 黄钰麟, 等. 福州市土地利用景观格局变化及驱动力研究. 西南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 45(1): 99-107 [Chen Z, Fu W-C, Huang Y-L, et al. On land use landscape pattern change and driving forces in Fuzhou. Journal of Southwest China Normal University: Natural Science, 2020, 45(1): 99-107]
[25]	福州市林业局, 福建省林业调查规划院. 福州市湿地保护规划(2014—2025年). 福州: 福州市林业局, 2015 [Fuzhou Forestry Bureau, Fujian Forestry Investigation and Planning Institute. Fuzhou Wetland Protection Plan (2014-2025). Fuzhou: Fuzhou Forestry Bureau, 2015]
[26]	中华人民共和国国家标准. 土地利用现状分类. GB/T 21010—2017. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017 [National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. Current Land use Classification. GB/T 21010-2017. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2017]
[27]	福州市水利局. 2015年福州市水资源公报. 福州: 福州市水利局, 2015 [Fuzhou Municipal Water Resources Bureau. 2015 Fuzhou Water Resources Bulletin. Fuzhou: Fuzhou Municipal Water Resources Bureau, 2015]
[28]	福州市物价局. 福州市物价局转发关于调整城区自来水价格的通知: 榕价商〔2010〕32号. 福州: 福州市物价局, 2010 [Fuzhou Price Bureau. Notice of Fuzhou Price Bureau on Adjusting the Price of Tap Water in Urban Areas (Rongjiashang
	[2010] No. 32). Fuzhou: Fuzhou Price Bureau, 2010]
[29]	马新辉, 任志远, 孙根年. 城市植被净化大气价值计量与评价——以西安市为例. 中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12(2): 180-182 [Ma X-H, Ren Z-Y, Sun G-N. The calculation and assessment to the values of air purification by vegetation in Xi'an City. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2004, 12(2): 180-182]
[30]	张虹, 黄民生, 胡晓辉. 基于能值分析的福建省绿色GDP核算. 地理学报, 2010, 65(11): 1421-1428 [Zhang H, Huang M-S, Hu X-H. Green GDP calculation of Fujian province based on energy analysis. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(11): 1421-1428]
[31]	福州市物价局. 福州市物价局转发关于贯彻执行国家发展改革委调整电价有关问题的通知: 榕价商〔2015〕12号. 福州: 福州市物价局, 2015 [Fuzhou Price Bureau. Notice of Fuzhou Price Bureau on Forwarding Issues Related to the Implementation of the Adjustment of Electricity Price by the National Development and Reform Commission (Rongjiashang
	[2015] No. 12). Fuzhou: Fuzhou Price Bureau, 2015]
[32]	丁冬静, 李玫, 廖宝文, 等. 海南省滨海自然湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(9): 1472-1477 [Ding W-J, Li M, Liao B-W, et al. Evaluation of value of coastal natural wetland ecosystem services of Hainan Province. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(9): 1472-1477]
[33]	崔丽娟, 庞丙亮, 李伟, 等. 扎龙湿地生态系统服务价值评价. 生态学报, 2016, 36(3): 828-836 [Cui L-J, Pang B-L, Li W, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem services in the Zhalong wetland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(3): 828-836]
[34]	陈晓辉, 曾晓莹, 赵超超, 等. 基于遥感生态指数的道路网络生态效应研究——以福州市为例. 生态学报, 2021, 41(12): 1-14 [Chen X-H, Zeng X-Y, Zhao C-C, et al. The ecological effect of road network based on remote sensing ecological index: A case study of Fuzhou City, Fujian Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(12): 1-14]
[35]	王金南, 於方, 马国霞, 等. 中国经济生态生产总值核算报告(2017). 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2019 [Wang J-N, Yu F, Ma G-X, et al. Report on Gross Economic-Ecological Product Accounting Research in China (2017). Beijing: China Environment Publishing Group, 2019]
[36]	尤龙辉, 林捷, 谭芳林, 等. 福建省岩石性海岸、潮间沙石海滩生态系统服务及其价值研究. 防护林科技, 2016(10): 10-14 [You L-H, Lin J, Tan F-L, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem services and value of rocky coast and sandy beach wetland in Fujian Province. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2016(10): 10-14]
[37]	Zhou JB, Wu J, Gong YZ. Valuing wetland ecosystem services based on benefit transfer: A meta-analysis of China wetland studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276: 122988
[38]	叶有华, 陈礼, 孙芳芳, 等. 城市生态系统生产总值核算与实践研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019 [Ye Y-H, Chen L, Sun F-F, et al. Accounting and Practice of Urban Ecosystem GEP. Beijing: Science Press, 2019]
[39]	王兵, 李景全, 牛香, 等. 山东省济南市森林与湿地生态系统服务功能研究. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2017 [Wang B, Li J-Q, Niu X, et al. Study on Forest and Wetland Ecosystem Services in Ji’nan City, Shandong Province. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 2017]
[40]	高艳妮, 张林波, 李凯, 等. 生态系统价值核算指标体系研究. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(1): 58-65 [Gao Y-N, Zhang L-B, Li K, et al. An indicator system for estimating ecosystem values. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(1): 58-65]
[41]	Song F, Su F, Mi C, et al. Analysis of driving forces on wetland ecosystem services value change: A case in Northeast China. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 751: 141778