Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 673-688.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201702.004

• Reviews • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Greenhouse gas emissions, carbon leakage and net carbon sequestration from afforestation and forest management: A review.

LIU Bo-jie1, 2, LU Fei2, 3*, WANG Xiao-ke2, 3, LIU Wei-wei2   

  1. 1China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd, Beijing 100840, China;
    2State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
    3Joint Center for Global Change Studies, Beijing 100875, China.

  • Received:2016-05-20 Online:2017-02-18 Published:2017-02-18
  • Contact: * E-mail: feilu@rcees.ac.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Mayor Research Program (2016YFC0503403-2), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA05060102, XDA05050602) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Abstract: Forests play an important role in climate change mitigation and concentration of CO2 reduction in the atmosphere. Forest management, especially afforestation and forest protection, could increase carbon stock of forests significantly. Carbon sequestration rate of afforestation ranges from 0.04 to 7.52 t C·hm-2·a-1, while that of forest protection is 0.33-5.20 t C·hm-2·a-1. At the same time, greenhouse gas (GHG) is generated within management boundary due to the production and transportation of the materials consumed in relevant activities of afforestation and forest management. In addition, carbon leakage is also generated outside boundary from activity shifting, market effects and change of environments induced by forest management. In this review, we summarized the definition of emission sources of GHG, monitoring methods, quantity and rate of greenhouse gas emissions within boundary of afforestation and forest management. In addition, types, monitoring methods and quantity of carbon leakage outside boundary of forest management were also analyzed. Based on the reviewed results of carbon sequestration, we introduced greenhouse gas emissions within boundary and carbon leakage, net carbon sequestration as well as the countervailing effects of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon leakage to carbon sequestration. Greenhouse gas emissions within management boundary counteract 0.01%-19.3% of carbon sequestration, and such counteraction could increase to as high as 95% considering carbon leakage. Afforestation and forest management have substantial net carbon sequestration benefits, when only taking direct greenhouse gas emissions within boundary and measurable carbon leakage from activity shifting into consideration. Compared with soil carbon sequestration measures in croplands, afforestation and forest management is more advantageous in net carbon sequestration and has better prospects for application in terms of net mitigation potential. Along with the implementation of the new stage of key ecological stewardship projects in China as well as the concern on carbon benefits brought by projects, it is necessary to make efforts to increase net carbon sequestration via reducing greenhouse gas emissions and carbon leakage. Rational planning before start-up of the projects should be promoted to avoid carbon emissions due to unnecessary consumption of materials and energy. Additionally, strengthening the control and monitoring on greenhouse gas emissions and carbon leakage during the implementation of projects are also advocated.

Key words: afforestation and forest management, carbon leakage, net carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emission