Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2010, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (09): 2389-2396.

• Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Impacts of uncertainty in data processing on estimation of CO2 flux components.

LIU Min1,2, HE Hong-lin1, YU Gui-rui1, SUN Xiao-min1, ZHU Xu-dong1,2,ZHANG Li1, ZHAO Xin-quan3, WANG Hui-min1, SHI Pei-li1, HANShi-jie4   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China|2Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China|3Northwest Plateau Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810001, China|4Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
  • Online:2010-09-18 Published:2010-09-18

Abstract: Based on the eddy covariance observations at 4 sites (2 forested sites and 2 grassland sites) in Chinese Terrestrial Ecosystem Flux Research Network (ChinaFLUX), this paper analyzed the effects of three data processing methods, i.e., spike detection, threshold (u*c) determination of nocturnal friction velocity (u*), and gap-filling model selection, on the estimation of CO2 flux components. All the three methods had significant impacts on the estimation of annual net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and the determination of (u*c) was an important factor affecting the annual NEE estimation. The estimation deviation of the annual NEE caused by spike detection, determination of (u*c), and gap-filling model selection was 0.62-21.31 gC·m-2·a-1 (0.84%-65.31%), 4.06-30.28g C·m-2·a-1(3.76%-21.58%), and 0.69-27.73 g C·m-2·a-1(0.23%-55.62%), respectively. Comparing with that of forested ecosystem, the NEE estimation of grassland ecosystem was more sensitive to the parameter setting of data processing method, and the relative estimation deviation of annual gross ecosystem exchange and ecosystem respiration induced by the uncertainty in data processing was 3.88%-11.41% and 6.45%-24.91%, respectively.

Key words: eddy covariance technique, CO2 flux, data processing, variance analysis, uncertainty, Ecopath massbalance model, Yellow River estuary and adjacent waters, energy flow, swimming crab, ecological carrying capacity.