1997—2018年生态系统服务研究热点变化与动向

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201910.009

应用生态学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 3265-3276.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201910.009

• 第九届全国青年生态学工作者学术研讨会会议专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

1997—2018年生态系统服务研究热点变化与动向

巩杰^1*, 徐彩仙¹, 燕玲玲¹, 郭青海^2,3

¹兰州大学资源环境学院/西部环境教育部重点实验室, 兰州 730000;
²浙江理工大学建筑工程学院, 杭州 310018;
³中国科学院城市环境研究所, 福建厦门 361021

收稿日期:2019-04-23 出版日期:2019-10-20 发布日期:2019-10-20
通讯作者: *E-mail: jgong@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:巩杰, 男, 1975年生, 副教授. 主要从事景观生态学、土地变化科学、生态系统服务、环境遥感与生态评价研究. E-mail: jgong@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0501701)和国家自然科学基金项目(41771196)资助

A critical review of progresses and perspectives on ecosystem services from 1997 to 2018

GONG Jie^1*, XU Cai-xian¹, YAN Ling-ling¹, GUO Qing-hai^2,3

¹Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
²School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
³Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, Fujian, China

Received:2019-04-23 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-10-20
Contact: *E-mail: jgong@lzu.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0501701) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41771196).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态系统服务研究已成为生态学、地理学、环境经济学等学科的热点议题.基于Citespace与Carrot 2文献分析工具,以Web of Science为数据源,本文分析了1997—2018年生态系统服务研究热点与发展趋势.结果表明: 近20年来,生态系统服务研究文献数量、研究机构均明显增加,主要的发文国家有美国、英国、德国、中国、澳大利亚,其中,美国的发文量与影响力最大.综合来看,中国在生态系统服务研究方面起步较晚,近期发展势头迅猛,科研产出量显著增加;但与国际相比还存在一定差距,文献质量及影响力还有待提高,国际合作交流有待提升.生态系统服务的热点主要集中在评估方法与模型、气候变化、生物多样性、土地利用变化、权衡与协同关系、科学研究决策及管理6方面.未来亟需加强的研究方向主要包括:生态系统服务的形成机制、评估指标及方法与模型、权衡与协同关系的时空动态与影响因素、生态系统服务与人类福祉的耦合关系、面向可持续发展的生态系统服务科学研究与决策管理等.

Abstract: Ecosystem services (ESs) are the research highlight and hot topic in ecology, geography and environmental economics. Based on the literature database on ecosystem services from Web of Science, Citespace, Carrot 2 and textual analysis were used to review the progresses of ESs research during 1997-2018. The results showed that ESs research institutions and its publications increased quickly in the latest 20 years. The main leading countries on ecosystem services research were the United States, UK, Germany, China and Australia, with the United States being the first in terms of literature volume and the influence. Although the research of ESs in China started relatively late, its development was rapid and the scientific research output increased significantly. Meanwhile, there was a huge gap to the international level, the quality and influence of literature should be improved, and the international cooperation and exchange need to be enhanced too. The hotspots and frontiers of ecosystem services mainly included evaluation methods and models, climate change, biodiversity, land use change, trade-off and synergy, scientific research for decision-making and management. The further research and practice trends include the mechanism of ESs, the indicators and methods for ESs evaluation, the spatiotemporal dynamics of ESs trade-offs and synergies and influencing factors, the coupling relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being, and the scientific research and social needs for sustainable development for decision-making and management.

巩杰, 徐彩仙, 燕玲玲, 郭青海. 1997—2018年生态系统服务研究热点变化与动向[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(10): 3265-3276.

GONG Jie, XU Cai-xian, YAN Ling-ling, GUO Qing-hai. A critical review of progresses and perspectives on ecosystem services from 1997 to 2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(10): 3265-3276.

参考文献

[1] Daily GC. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997
[2] Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260
[3] Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, et al. Ecology for a crowded planet. Science, 2004, 304: 1251-1252
[4] Pearce D, Moran D. The economic value of biodiversity, Overview. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, 2001, 32: 291-304
[5] Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA. Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. Bioscience, 1983, 33: 248-254
[6] Constanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, et al. Change in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26: 152-158
[7] Turner RK, Daily GC. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2008, 39: 25-35
[8] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Our Human Planer: Summary for Decision-makers. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005
[9] The United Nations Environment Programme. The Inter-governmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services [EB/OL]. (2013-12-19) [2014-01-18]. http: / /www. ipbes. net/about-ipbes. html
[10] Liu L-Y (刘绿怡), Liu H-M (刘慧敏), Ren J-Y (任嘉衍), et al. Research progress on the mechanism of ecosystem services generation, Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2017, 28(8): 2731-2738 (in Chinese)
[11] Zhao J (赵军), Gao C (高超), Hu X-F (胡秀芳), et al. Ecosystem services: Research hot-spots, frontiers and development trends based on document analysis. Chinese Agricultural Science (中国农学通报), 2018, 34(34): 132-137 (in Chinese)
[12] Li L (李丽), Wang X-Y (王心源), Luo L (骆磊), et al. A systematic review on the methods of ecosystem services value assessment. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 2018, 37(4): 1233-1245 (in Chinese)
[13] Li J (李杰), Chen C-M (陈超美). CiteSpace: Text Mining and Visualization in Scientific Literature. Beijing: Capital University of Economics & Business Press, 2016 (in Chinese)
[14] Fu BJ, Wang S, Su C, et al. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5: 4-10
[15] Gong J (巩杰), Xie Y-C (谢余初). Spatiotemporal Changes of Watershed Landscape Pattern and Ecosystem Services: A case Study of Bailongjiang Basin Watershed in Gansu. Beijing: Science Press, 2018 (in Chinese)
[16] Huang C-H (黄从红), Yang J (杨军), Zhang W-J (张文娟). Development of ecosystem services evaluation models: Research progress. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 2013, 32(12): 3360-3367 (in Chinese)
[17] Bagstad KJ, Johnson GW, Voigt B, et al. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 4: 117-125
[18] Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2009, 7: 4-11
[19] Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1: 31-39
[20] Chen L, Xie G, Zhang C, et al. Modelling ecosystem water supply services across the Lancang River Basin. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2011, 2: 322-327
[21] Hu HT, Fu BJ, Lü YH, et al. SAORES: A spatially explicit assessment and optimization tool for regional ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30: 547-560
[22] Bagstad KJ, Villa F, Batker D, et al. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecology & Society, 2014, 19: 706-708
[23] Mooney H, Larigauderie A, Cesario M, et al. Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2009, 1: 46-54
[24] Bhattaria U. Impacts of climate change on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Direction for future research. Journal of Water, Energy and Environment, 2017, 20: 41-48
[25] Runting RK, Bryan BA, Dee LE, et al. Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions: A review. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23: 28-41
[26] Vihervaara P, D’Amato D, Forsius M, et al. Using long-term ecosystem service and biodiversity data to study the impacts and adaptation options in response to climate change: Insights from the global ILTER sites network. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5: 53-66
[27] Scholes RJ. Climate change and ecosystem services. Climate Change, 2016, 7: 537-550
[28] Matondo JI, Peter G, Msibi KM. Evaluation of the impact of climate change on hydrology and water resources in Swaziland: Part I. Physics & Chemistry of the Earth, 2004, 29: 1181-1191
[29] Shaw MR, Pendleton L, Cameron DR, et al. The impact of climate change on California’s ecosystem services. Climatic Change, 2011, 109: 465-484
[30] Chiang LC, Lin YP, Huang T, et al. Simulation of ecosystem service responses to multiple disturbances from an earthquake and several typhoons. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 122: 41-55
[31] Zia J-B (张家宝), Yuan Y-J (袁玉江). On the influence of climate on water resources in Xinjiang. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2002, 17(1): 28-34 (in Chinese)
[32] Han H-Q (韩会庆), Zhang J-Y (张娇艳), Ma G (马庚), et al. Advances on impact of climate change on ecosystem services. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences) (南京林业大学学报:自然科学版), 2018, 42(2): 184-190 (in Chinese)
[33] Wu J-G (邬建国), He C-Y (何春阳), Zhang Q-Y (张庆云), et al. Integrative modeling and strategic planning for regional sustainability under climate change. Advance in Earth Science (地球科学进展), 2014, 29(12): 1315-1324 (in Chinese)
[34] Alamgir M, Pert PL, Turton SM. A review of ecosystem services research in Australia reveals a gap in integrating climate change and impacts on ecosystem services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Servi-ces & Management, 2014, 10: 112-127
[35] Fu B-J (傅伯杰), Tian H-Q (田汉勤), Tao F-L (陶福禄), et al. The impact of global change on ecosystem services. China Basic Science (中国基础科学), 2017, 19(6): 14-18 (in Chinese)
[36] Tittensor DP, Walpole M, Hills LL, et al. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science, 2014, 346: 241-244
[37] Pan Y-X (潘玉雪), Tian Y (田瑜), Xu J (徐靖), et al. Methodological assessment on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services and impacts on China within the IPBES framework. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 2018, 26(1): 89-95 (in Chinese)
[38] Butchart SH, Scharlemann JP, Evans MI, et al. Protecting important sites for biodiversity contributes to meeting global conservation targets. PLoS One, 2012, 7(3): e32529
[39] Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, et al. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters, 2005, 8: 857-874
[40] Robertson GP, Swinton SM. Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2005, 3: 38-46
[41] Perrings C, Naeem S, Ahrestani F, et al. Ecosystem services for 2020. Science, 2010, 330: 323-324
[42] Christie M, Fazey I, Cooper R, et al. An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecological Economics, 2012, 83: 67-78
[43] Li Q (李奇), Zhu J-H (朱建华), Xiao W-F (肖文发). Relationships and trade-offs between, and management of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2019, 39(8): 2655-2666 (in Chinese)
[44] Jaarsveld AS, Biggs R, Scholes RJ, et al. Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: The Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philosophical Transa-ctions of the Royal Society of London, 2005, 360: 425-441
[45] Dade MC, Mitchell MG, Mcalpine CA, et al. Assessing ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: The need for a more mechanistic approach. Ambio, 2019, 10: 1116-1128
[46] Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, et al. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109: 7565-7570
[47] Dai E-F (戴尔阜), Wang X-L (王晓莉), Zhu J-J (朱建佳), et al. Methods, tools and research framework of ecosystem service trade-offs. Geographical Research (地理研究), 2016, 35(6): 1005-1016 (in Chinese)
[48] Peng J (彭建), Hu X-X (胡晓旭), Zhao M-Y (赵明月), et al. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making. Acta Geographica Sinica (地理学报), 2017, 72(6): 960-973 (in Chinese)
[49] Fu B-J (傅伯杰), Yu D-D (于丹丹). Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services. Resources Science (资源科学), 2016, 38(1): 1-9 (in Chinese)
[50] Li S-C (李双成). Ecosystem Services Geography. Beijing: Science Press, 2014 (in Chinese)
[51] Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM. Ecosystem ser-vice bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107: 5242-5247
[52] Butler JRA, Wong GY, Metcalfe DJ, et al. An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality mana-gement in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2013, 180: 176-191
[53] Grasso M. Ecological-economic model for optimal mangrove tradeoff between forestry and fishery production: Comparing a dynamic optimization and a simulation model. Ecological Modelling, 1998, 112: 131-150
[54] Luck GW, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003, 18: 330-336
[55] Xie Y-C (谢余初). Spatiotemporal Change of Ecosystem Services based on InVEST Model in the Bailong River Watershed, Gansu. PhD Thesis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2015(in Chinese)
[56] Bryan BA. Incentives, land use, and ecosystem servi-ces: Synthesizing complex linkages. Environmental Science & Policy, 2013, 27: 124-134
[57] Martín-Lpez H, Berta A, Iniesta-Arandia I, et al. Uncov-ering ecosystem service bundles through social prefe-rences. PLoS One, 2012, 7(6): e38970
[58] Mouchet MA, Lamarque P, Martín-Lpez B, et al. An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 28: 298-308
[59] Lin S-W (林世伟). Spatial Trade-offs and Synergies Among Ecosystem Services in the Three Parallel Rivers Region. Master Thesis. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2016 (in Chinese)
[60] Fu B-J (傅伯杰), Zhang L-W(张立伟). Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geography (地理科学进展), 2014, 33(4): 441-446 (in Chinese)
[61] Su C-H (苏常红), Fu B-J (傅伯杰). Discussion on links among landscape pattern, ecological process, and ecosystem services. Chinese Journal of Nature(自然杂志), 2012, 34(5): 277-283 (in Chinese)
[62] Fu BJ, Wang YF, Lu YH, et al. The effects of land-use combinations on soil erosion: A case study in the Loess Plateau of China. Progress in Physical Geography, 2009, 33: 793-804
[63] Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108: 3465-3472
[64] Su SL, Xiao R, Jiang Z, et al. Characterizing landscape pattern and ecosystem service value changes for urbanization impacts at an eco-regional scale. Applied Geography, 2012, 34: 295-305
[65] Liu Y-X (刘源鑫), Zhao W-W (赵文武). Future earth-global sustainability research program. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2013, 33(23): 7610-7613 (in Chinese)
[66] Silvis H. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in national and international policymaking. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2012, 39: 186-188
[67] Bohlen PJ, Lynch S, Shabman L, et al. Paying for environmental services from agricultural lands: An example from the northern Everglades. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7: 46-55
[68] Liu J, Li S, Ouyang Z, et al. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105: 9477-9482
[69] Ministry of Environmental Protection of the people’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国环境保护部), Chinese Academy of Sciences (中国科学院). National Ecological Functional Regionalization [EB/OL]. (2008-08-02) [2008-08-02]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/ 2008-08/02/content_1062543.html (in Chinese)
[70] Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Xiao Y, et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 2016, 352: 1455-1459
[71] Chinese Society of Ecology. 2016-2017 Landscape Eco-logy Discipline Development Report. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 2018 (in Chinese)
[72] Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. Defining and classi-fying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68: 643-653
[73] Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, et al. Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Servi-ces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011
[74] Posner SM, McKenzie E, Ricketts TH. Policy impacts of ecosystem services knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113: 1760-1765
[75] Daily GC. Securing nature and people: Can we replicate and scale success. Potschin: Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 2016
[76] Granek EF, Polasky S, Kappel CV, et al, Ecosystem services as a common language for coastal ecosystem-based management. Conservation Biology, 2010, 24: 207-216
[77] Davies KK, Fisher KT, Dickson ME, et al. Improving ecosystem service frameworks to address wicked problems. Ecology and Society, 2015, 20: 37-47
[78] Zhang YM, Zhao SD, Guo RC. Recent advances and challenges in ecosystem service research. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2014, 5: 82-90
[79] Zhao W-W (赵文武), Liu Y (刘月), Feng Q (冯强), et al. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems. Progress in Geography (地理科学进展), 2018, 37(1): 139-151 (in Chinese)
[80] Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, et al. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: Approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 48: 630-636
[81] McCallen E, Knott J, Nuez-Mir G, et al. Trends in eco-logy: Shifts in ecological research themes over the past four decades. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2019, 17: 109-116
[82] He X-J (何霄嘉), Wang M (王敏), Feng X-Z (冯相昭). Analysis on the feasibility and pathway of integrating ecosystem service into climate change governance solution. Advances in Earth Science (地球科学进展), 2017, 32(5): 560-567 (in Chinese)

1997—2018年生态系统服务研究热点变化与动向

A critical review of progresses and perspectives on ecosystem services from 1997 to 2018

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价