应用生态学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 3303-3315.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201910.010
• 第九届全国青年生态学工作者学术研讨会会议专栏 • 上一篇 下一篇
曹雅琴1,2, 陈樟昊1,2, 黄甘霖1,2*, 陈力原1,2, 姜亚琼1,2, 张征恺1,2, 屠星月1,2, 华野毓1,2
收稿日期:
2019-04-01
出版日期:
2019-10-20
发布日期:
2019-10-20
通讯作者:
*E-mail: ghuang@bnu.edu.cn
作者简介:
曹雅琴, 女, 1995年生, 硕士研究生. 主要从事城市生态系统服务与人类福祉研究. E-mail: 201721480016@mail.bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
CAO Ya-qin1,2, CHEN Zhang-hao1,2, HUANG Gan-lin1,2*, CHEN Li-yuan1,2, JIANG Ya-qiong1,2, ZHANG Zheng-kai1,2, TU Xing-yue1,2, HUA Ye-yu1,2
Received:
2019-04-01
Online:
2019-10-20
Published:
2019-10-20
Contact:
*E-mail: ghuang@bnu.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要: 城市绿地为居民提供重要的生态系统服务,是居民接触自然、放松身心的重要场所.居民能否便捷地使用绿地,与其社会经济特征存在一定关联,该关联性是研究者和城市管理者关注的议题.以往的研究多针对单个城市,分析其绿地格局与居民特征的空间关系.本文对国内外相关的案例研究进行梳理,通过整合分析,归纳其主要研究结果,并探讨研究区、指标和分析方法的选择对研究结果的可能影响;其次,汇总以往研究所提出的城市绿地格局与居民特征间关系的主要影响因素,并结合案例进行分析.整合分析结果表明: 超过一半的案例(58.2%)认为绿地格局更有利于优势居民群体,但也有约四分之一的研究(25.4%)得到了相反的结果,发现弱势居民群体能够更便捷地使用绿地,余下(16.4%)的研究认为绿地格局与居民社会经济特征并不存在显著关联.研究者采用的分析单元、指标和分析方法多样,整体而言,没有发现研究方案的选择与研究结论存在明显联系.已有的案例以西方国家的城市为主,其研究地的发展历程和城市特点与我国城市存在很大差异.我国迫切需要依据自身城市的发展特点和时代需要开展本土研究,并分析影响我国城市绿地与居民特征间关系的主要因素.在城市化迅速发展时期,为建设人居和谐的可持续城市提供科学依据.
曹雅琴, 陈樟昊, 黄甘霖, 陈力原, 姜亚琼, 张征恺, 屠星月, 华野毓. 城市绿地格局与居民社会经济特征关系研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(10): 3303-3315.
CAO Ya-qin, CHEN Zhang-hao, HUANG Gan-lin, CHEN Li-yuan, JIANG Ya-qiong, ZHANG Zheng-kai, TU Xing-yue, HUA Ye-yu. Research progress on relationship between urban greenspace distribution and the socioeconomic characteristics of residents[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(10): 3303-3315.
[1] Wu J, Xiang WN, Zhao J. Urban ecology in China: Historical developments and future directions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 125: 222-233 [2] Jiang L, O’Neill BCO. Global urbanization projections for the shared socioeconomic pathways. Global Environmental Change, 2017, 42: 193-199 [3] Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部). Urban Green Space Classification Standard. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2002 (in Chinese) [4] Hardin PJ, Jensen RR. The effect of urban leaf area on summertime urban surface kinetic temperatures: A Terre Haute case study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2007, 6: 63-72 [5] Bolund P, Hunhammar S. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29: 293-301 [6] Xiao Q, McPherson EG. Rainfall interception by Santa Monica’s municipal urban forest. Urban Ecosystems, 2002, 6: 291-302 [7] Hartig T, Mitchell R, de Vries, et al. Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 2014, 35: 207-228 [8] Smith T, Nelischer M, Perkins N. Quality of an urban community: A framework for understanding the relationship between quality and physical form. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1997, 39: 229-241 [9] Maas J, Van DSM, Verheij RA, et al. Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health & Place, 2009, 15: 586-595 [10] Dennis M, Barlow D, Cavan G, et al. Mapping urban green infrastructure: A novel landscape-based approach to incorporating land use and land cover in the mapping of human-dominated systems. Land, 2018, 7: 25-30 [11] Chiang YC, Li D. Metric or topological proximity? The associations among proximity to parks, the frequency of residents’ visits to parks, and perceived stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 38: 205-214 [12] Gao WX, Lyu Q, Fan X, et al. Building-based analysis of the spatial provision of urban parks in Shenzhen, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, 14: 18-23 [13] Greene CS, Robinson PJ, Millward AA. Canopy of advantage: Who benefits most from city trees? Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 208: 24-35 [14] Abercrombie LC, Sallis JF, Conway TL, et al. Income and racial disparities in access to public parks and private recreation facilities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2008, 34: 9-15 [15] Watkins SL, Gerrish E. The relationship between urban forests and race: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 209: 152-168 [16] Flocks J, Escobedo F, Wade J, et al. Environmental justice implications of urban tree cover in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Environmental Justice, 2011, 4: 125-134 [17] Ferguson M, Roberts HE, McEachan RR, et al. Contrasting distributions of urban green infrastructure across social and ethno-racial groups. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 175: 136-148 [18] Sachs, JD. The Age of Sustainable Development. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015 [19] Xiao Y, Wang Z, Li ZG, et al. An assessment of urban park access in Shanghai: Implications for the social equity in urban China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 157: 383-393 [20] Liu WP, Chen WJ, Dong CL. Spatial decay of recreational services of urban parks: Characteristics and influencing factors. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 25: 130-138 [21] Nero BF. Urban green space dynamics and socio-environmental inequity: Multi-resolution and spatiotemporal data analysis of Kumasi, Ghana. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2017, 38: 6993-7020 [22] Yuan YH, Xu JG, Wang ZB. Spatial equity measure on urban ecological space layout based on accessibility of socially vulnerable groups: A case study of Changting, China. Sustainability, 2017, 9: 20-25 [23] Xing LJ, Liu YF, Liu XJ, et al. Spatio-temporal dispa-rity between demand and supply of park green space service in urban area of Wuhan from 2000 to 2014. Habitat International, 2018, 71: 49-59 [24] Wei F. Greener urbanization? Changing accessibility to parks in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 157: 542-552 [25] Martinuzzi S, Ramos-Gonzalez OM, Munoz-Erickson TA, et al. Vegetation cover in relation to socioeconomic factors in a tropical city assessed from sub-meter resolution imagery. Ecological Applications, 2018, 28: 681-693 [26] Zhang XY, Lu H, Holt JB. Modeling spatial accessibility to parks: A national study. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2011, 10: 14-20 [27] Forman RTT, Wu J. Where to put the next billion people. Nature, 2016, 537: 608-611 [28] Hoalstpullen N, Patterson MW, Gatrell JD. Empty spaces: Neighbourhood change and the greening of Detroit, 1975-2005. Geocarto International, 2011, 26: 417-434 [29] Danford RS, Cheng C, Strohbach MW, et al. What does it take to achieve equitable urban tree canopy distribution? A Boston case study. Cities and the Environment, 2014, 7: 2-6 [30] Xiao Y, Lu Y, Guo Y, et al. Estimating the willingness to pay for green space services in Shanghai: Implications for social equity in urban China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 26: 95-103 [31] Iverson LR, Cook EA. Urban forest cover of the Chicago region and its relation to household density and income. Urban Ecosystems, 2000, 4: 105-124 [32] Lortie CJ. Formalized synthesis opportunities for ecology: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Oikos, 2014, 123: 897-902 [33] Fang X, Zhou B, Tu X, et al. What kind of a science is sustainability science? An evidence-based reexamination. Sustainability, 2018, 10: 1478-1493 [34] Erkip F. The distribution of urban public services: The case of parks and recreational services in Ankara. Cities, 1997, 14: 353-361 [35] Heynen N, Perkins HA, Roy P. The political ecology of uneven urban green space: The impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Affairs Review, 2006, 42: 3-25 [36] Omer I. Evaluating accessibility using house-level data: A spatial equity perspective. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 2006, 30: 254-274 [37] Macedo J, Haddad MA. Equitable distribution of open space: Using spatial analysis to evaluate urban parks in Curitiba, Brazil. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 2016, 43: 1096-1117 [38] Wolch J, Wilson JP, Fehrenbach J. Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis. Urban Geography, 2005, 26: 4-35 [39] Lotfi S, Koohsari MJ. Measuring objective accessibility to neighborhood facilities in the city (A case study: Zone 6 in Tehran, Iran). Cities, 2009, 26: 133-140 [40] Steenberg JWN, Millward AA, Duinker PN, et al. Neighbourhood-scale urban forest ecosystem classification. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 163: 134-145 [41] Lindsey G, Maraj M, Kuan S. Access, equity, and urban greenways: An exploratory investigation. Professional Geographer, 2001, 53: 332-346 [42] Carrier M, Apparicio P, Kestens Y, et al. Application of a global environmental equity index in Montreal: Diagnostic and further implications. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2016, 106: 1268-1285 [43] Li XJ, Zhang CR, Li WD, et al. Environmental inequities in terms of different types of urban greenery in Hartford, Connecticut. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016, 18: 163-172 [44] Tan PY, Samsudin R. Effects of spatial scale on assessment of spatial equity of urban park provision. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 158: 139-154 [45] Wolch JR, Byrne J, Newell JP. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2014, 125: 234-244 [46] Comber A, Brunsdon C, Green E. Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 86: 103-114 [47] Macintyre S, Macdonald L, Ellaway A. Do poorer people have poorer access to local resources and facilities? The distribution of local resources by area deprivation in Glasgow, Scotland. Social Science & Medicine, 2008, 67: 900-914 [48] Zhang Y, Tarrant MA, Green GT. The importance of differentiating urban and rural phenomena in examining the unequal distribution of locally desirable land. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 88: 1314-1319 [49] Boone CG, Buckley GL, Grove JM, et al. Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2009, 99: 767-787 [50] Li Y-C (李月辰). Research on the Fairness of Urban Green Space Allocation Based on a Behavioral Accessibility Model and with the Xigang District of Dalian City as an Example. Master Thesis. Dalian: Liaoning Normal University, 2015 (in Chinese) [51] Li Y (李 远). Research on Fairness Evaluation of Urban Park Layout Based on Supply and Demand Balance: A case study of Banan District of Chongqing. Master Thesis. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2017 (in Chinese) [52] Zhou XL, Kim J. Social disparities in tree canopy and park accessibility: A case study of six cities in Illinois using GIS and remote sensing. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2013, 12: 88-97 [53] Ngom R, Gosselin P, Blais C. Reduction of disparities in access to green spaces: Their geographic insertion and recreational functions matter. Applied Geography, 2016, 66: 35-51 [54] Dawson T, Sandoval JS, Sagan V, et al. A spatial analy-sis of the relationship between vegetation and poverty. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2018, 7: 26-32 [55] Omer I, Or U. Distributive environmental justice in the city: Differential access in two mixed Israeli cities. Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 2005, 96: 433-443 [56] Byrne J, Wolch J, Zhang J. Planning for environmental justice in an urban national park. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2009, 52: 365-392 [57] Booth JE, Gaston KJ, Armsworth PR. Who benefits from recreational use of protected areas? Ecology and Society, 2010, 15: 21-27 [58] Kweon BS, Marans RW, Yi CW. Parks and quality of life: Differences among African American and white residents. Landscape Journal, 2016, 35: 97-108 [59] Browning M, Rigolon A. Do income, race and ethnicity, and sprawl influence the greenspace-human health link in city-level analyses? Findings from 496 cities in the United States. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15: 22-28 [60] De la Barrera F, Reyes-Paecke S, Banzhaf E. Indicators for green spaces in contrasting urban settings. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 62: 212-219 [61] Cutts BB, Darby KJ, Boone CG, et al. City structure, obesity, and environmental justice: An integrated analysis of physical and social barriers to walkable streets and park access. Social Science & Medicine, 2009, 69: 1314-1322 [62] Cohen M, Baudoin R, Palibrk M, et al. Urban biodiversity and social inequalities in built-up cities: New evidences, next questions. The example of Paris, France. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 106: 277-287 [63] Ibes DC. A multi-dimensional classification and equity analysis of an urban park system: A novel methodology and case study application. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 137: 122-137 [64] Foster A, Dunham IM. Volunteered geographic information, urban forests, & environmental justice. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 2015, 53: 65-75 [65] Maroko AR, Maantay JA, Sohler NL, et al. The complexities of measuring access to parks and physical activity sites in New York City: A quantitative and quali-tative approach. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2009, 8: 23-30 [66] Weiss CC, Purciel M, Bader M, et al. Reconsidering access: Park facilities and neighborhood disamenities in New York City. Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2011, 88: 297-310 [67] Jenerette GD, Harlan SL, Stefanov WL, et al. Ecosystem services and urban heat riskscape moderation: Water, green spaces, and social inequality in Phoenix, USA. Ecological Applications, 2011, 21: 2637-2651 [68] Lin B, Meyers J, Barnett G. Understanding the potential loss and inequities of green space distribution with urban densification. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2015, 14: 952-958 [69] Kimpton A. A spatial analytic approach for classifying greenspace and comparing greenspace social equity. Applied Geography, 2017, 82: 129-142 [70] Chang HS, Liao CH. Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks. Cities, 2011, 28: 361-371 [71] Yin H-W (尹海伟), Kong F-H (孔繁花), Zong Y-G (宗跃光). Accessibility and equity assessment on urban greenspace. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2008, 28(7): 3375-3383 (in Chinese) [72] Jiang H-Y (江海燕), Xiao R-B (肖荣波), Zhou C-S (周春山). The comsumption’s social differentiation and supply’s strategies of Guangzhou central district’s public parks. Planners (规划师), 2010, 26(2): 66-72 (in Chinese) [73] Jiang H-Y (江海燕), Zhou C-S (周春山), Xiao R-B (肖荣波). Spatial differentiation and social equity of public parks in Guangzhou. City Planning Review (城市规划), 2010, 34(4): 43-48 (in Chinese) [74] Wang D, Brown G, Liu Y. The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 133: 53-66 [75] Xu MY, Xin J, Su SL, et al. Social inequalities of park accessibility in Shenzhen, China: The role of park quality, transport modes, and hierarchical socioeconomic characteristics. Journal of Transport Geography, 2017, 62: 38-50 [76] Song X-H (宋秀华). Evaluation Research on the Social Service Function of Urban Park: Take Tai’an City as An Example. Master Thesis. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2011 (in Chinese) [77] Hu Y (胡 玥), Cai Y-L (蔡永立). Analyzing the spatial equity of urban parks’ social functioning quantitatively: A case study for the central area of Shanghai. Journal of East Normal Univercity (Natural Science) (华东师范大学学报:自然科学版), 2017, 63(1): 91-103 (in Chinese) [78] Silva CD, Viegas I, Panagopoulos T, et al. Environmental justice in accessibility to green infrastructure in two European cities. Land, 2018, 7: 23-30 [79] Bahrini F, Bell S, Mokhtarzadeh S. The relationship between the distribution and use patterns of parks and their spatial accessibility at the city level: A case study from Tehran, Iran. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 27: 332-342 [80] Vaughan KB, Kaczynski AT, Stanis SA, et al. Exploring the distribution of park availability, features, and quality across Kansas City, Missouri by income and race/ethnicity: An environmental justice investigation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2013, 45: S28-S38 [81] Wen M, Zhang XY, Harris CD, et al. Spatial disparities in the distribution of parks and green spaces in the USA. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 2013, 45: S18-S27 [82] Lara-Valencia F, Garcia-Perez H. Space for equity: Socioeconomic variations in the provision of public parks in Hermosillo, Mexico. Local Environment, 2015, 20: 350-368 [83] Lakes T, Bruckner M, Kramer A. Development of an environmental justice index to determine socio-economic disparities of noise pollution and green space in residential areas in Berlin. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2014, 57: 538-556 [84] Saporito S, Casey D. Are there relationships among racial segregation, economic isolation, and proximity to green space? Human Ecology Review, 2015, 21: 113-131 [85] Apparicio P, Pham TT, Seguin AM, et al. Spatial distribution of vegetation in and around city blocks on the Island of Montreal: A double environmental inequity? Applied Geography, 2016, 76: 128-136 [86] Frey N. Equity in the distribution of urban environmental amenities: The case of Washington, DC. Urban Geography, 2017, 38: 1534-1549 [87] Shanahan DF, Lin BB, Gaston KJ, et al. Socio-economic inequalities in access to nature on public and private lands: A case study from Brisbane, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 130: 14-23 [88] Willemse L. A class-differentiated analysis of park use in Cape Town, South Africa. Geojournal, 2018, 83: 915-934 [89] Li HB, Liu YL. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and urban public green spaces availability: A localized modeling approach to inform land use policy. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57: 470-478 [90] Mills JR, Cunningham P, Donovan GH. Urban forests and social inequality in the Pacific Northwest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016, 16: 188-196 [91] Fernandez-Alvarez R. Inequitable distribution of green public space in the Mexico City: An environmental injustice case. Economy Society and Territory, 2017, 17: 399-428 [92] Rigolon A. Parks and young people: An environmental justice study of park proximity, acreage, and quality in Denver, Colorado. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 165: 73-83 [93] Chen SL, Christensen KM, Li SJ. A comparison of park access with park need for children: A case study in Cache County, Utah. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 187: 119-128 [94] Shen YA, Sun F, Che YY. Public green spaces and human wellbeing: Mapping the spatial inequity and mismatching status of public green space in the Central City of Shanghai. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 27: 59-68 [95] Ye CD, Hu LQ, Li M. Urban green space accessibility changes in a high-density city: A case study of Macau from 2010 to 2015. Journal of Transport Geography, 2018, 66: 106-115 [96] Almohamad H, Knaack AL, Habib BM. Assessing spatial equity and accessibility of public green spaces in Aleppo City, Syria. Forests, 2018, 9: 22-30 [97] Gao J-J (高家骥), Li X-M (李雪铭), Chen D-C (陈大川), et al. Study on the equity of GIS-based urban green space in Shahekou district of Dalian: From the perspective of sustainable human living environment. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping (测绘通报), 2017, 63(6): 40-44 (in Chinese) [98] Davis AY, Belaire JA, Farfan MA, et al. Green infrastructure and bird diversity across an urban socioeconomic gradient. Ecosphere, 2012, 3: 18-29 [99] Dahmann N, Wolch J, Joassart-Marcelli P, et al. The active city? Disparities in provision of urban public recreation resources. Health & Place, 2010, 16: 431-445 [100] Romero H, Vasquez A, Fuentes C, et al. Assessing urban environmental segregation (UES). The case of Santiago de Chile. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 23: 76-87 [101] Stewart IT, Bacon CM, Burke WD. The uneven distribution of environmental burdens and benefits in Silicon Valley’s backyard. Applied Geography, 2014, 55: 266-277 [102] Xu C, Haase D, Pribadi DO, et al. Spatial variation of green space equity and its relation with urban dynamics: A case study in the region of Munich. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 93: 512-523 [103] Lara-Valencia F, Garcia-Perez H. Disparities in the provision of public parks in neighbourhoods with varied Latino composition in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. Local Environment, 2018, 23: 1107-1120 [104] Jennings V, Floyd MF, Shanahan D, et al. Emerging issues in urban ecology: Implications for research, social justice, human health, and well-being. Population and Environment, 2017, 39: 69-86 [105] Goldenberg R, Kalantari Z, Destouni G. Increased access to nearby green-blue areas associated with greater metropolitan population well-being. Land Degradation & Development, 2018, 29: 3607-3616 [106] Willemse L. A flowmap-geographic information systems approach to determine community neighbourhood park proximity in Cape Town. South African Geographical Journal, 2013, 95: 149-164 [107] Heckert M, Rosan CD. Developing a green infrastructure equity index to promote equity planning. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2016, 19: 263-270 [108] Reyes M, Paez A, Morency C. Walking accessibility to urban parks by children: A case study of Montreal. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 125: 38-47 [109] Xiao X, Aultman-Hall L, Manning R, et al. The impact of spatial accessibility and perceived barriers on visitation to the US national park system. Journal of Transport Geography, 2018, 68: 205-214 [110] Tang Z-L (唐子来), Gu S (顾 姝). An evaluation of social performance in the distribution of urbanparks in the central city of Shanghai: From social equity to social justice. Urban Plannning Forum (城市规划学刊). 2016, 60(1): 15-21 (in Chinese) [111] Sathyakumar V, Ramsankaran R, Bardhan R. Linking remotely sensed urban green space (UGS) distribution patterns and socio-economic status (SES): A multi-scale probabilistic analysis based in Mumbai, India. Giscience & Remote Sensing, 2019, 56: 645-669 [112] Arshad HS, Routray JK. From socioeconomic disparity to environmental injustice: The relationship between housing unit density and community green space in a medium city in Pakistan. Local Environment, 2018, 23: 536-548 [113] Wu JY, Feng Z, Peng YS, et al. Neglected green street landscapes: A re-evaluation method of green justice. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 41: 344-353 [114] Chen YY, Gu WY, Liu T, et al. Increasing the use of urban greenways in developing countries: A case study on Wutong Greenway in Shenzhen, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, 14: 18-27 [115] Shen Y-N (沈娅男). Analyzing the Spatial Distribution of Public Green Space in the Central City of Shanghai in Terms of Environmental Justice. Master Thesis. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2017 (in Chinese) [116] Talen E. The social equity of urban service distribution an exploration of park access in Pueblo, Colorado, and Macon, Georgia. Urban Geography, 1997, 18: 521-541 [117] Flacke J, Schule SA, Kockler H, et al. Mapping environmental inequalities relevant for health for informing urban planning interventions: A case study in the city of Dortmund, Germany. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016, 13: 19-30 [118] Zhu G-L (朱高栎). A Study on the Accessibility of Urban Parks from the Perspective of Justice: A Con-trastive Study between Representative British and Chinese Cities. Master Thesis. Hefei: University of Technology, 2017 (in Chinese) [119] Miller S. Park access and equity in a Segregated, Southern U.S. City: A case study of Tallahassee, FL. Environmental Justice, 2019, 12: 85-91 [120] Watkins SL, Mincey SK, Vogt J, et al. Is planting equitable? An examination of the spatial distribution of nonprofit urban tree-planting programs by canopy cover, income, race, and ethnicity. Environment and Behavior, 2017, 49: 452-482 [121] Schule SA, Gabriel KMA, Bolte G. Relationship between neighbourhood socioeconomic position and neighbourhood public green space availability: An environmental inequality analysis in a large German city applying generalized linear models. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 2017, 220: 711-718 [122] Xiao Y, Wang D, Fang J. Exploring the disparities in park access through mobile phone data: Evidence from Shanghai, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 181: 80-91 [123] Rahman KM, Zhang DF. Analyzing the level of accessibility of public urban green spaces to different socially vulnerable groups of people. Sustainability, 2018, 10: 27-32 [124] Fernandez IC, Wu JG. A GIS-based framework to identify priority areas for urban environmental inequity mitigation and its application in Santiago de Chile. Applied Geography, 2018, 94: 213-222 [125] Chen D-C (陈大川). Fairness Study of Urban Green Space based on Sustainable Human Settlements: Taking Shahekou District in Dalian as a Case. Master Thesis. Dalian: Liaoning Normal University, 2016 (in Chinese) [126] Schwarz K, Berland A, Herrmann DL. Green, but not just? Rethinking environmental justice indicators in shrinking cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 41: 816-821 [127] Nesbitt L, Meitner MJ, Girling C, et al. Who has access to urban vegetation? A spatial analysis of distributional green equity in 10 US cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 181: 51-79 [128] Kolosna C, Spurlock D. Uniting geospatial assessment of neighborhood urban tree canopy with plan and ordinance evaluation for environmental justice. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 40: 215-223 [129] Berland A, Schwarz K, Herrmann DL, et al. How environmental justice patterns are shaped by place: Terrain and tree canopy in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. Cities and the Environment, 2015, 8: 17-25 [130] Nesbitt L, Meitner MJ. Exploring Relationships between socioeconomic background and urban greenery in Portland, OR. Forests, 2016, 7: 14-20 [131] Sorrensen CL, Carter PL, Phelps J. Urban landscape as mirror of ethnicity: Trees of the South Plains. Urban Geography, 2015, 36: 1042-1063 [132] Schwarz K, Fragkias M, Boone CG, et al. Trees grow on money: urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4): e0122051 [133] Mavoa S, Koohsari MJ, Badland HM, et al. Area-level disparities of public open space: A geographic information systems analysis in Metropolitan Melbourne. Urban Policy and Research, 2015, 33: 306-323 [134] Tu X, Huang G, Wu J. Contrary to common observations in the west, urban park access is only weakly related to neighborhood socioeconomic conditions in Beijing, China. Sustainability, 2018, 10: 12-17 |
No related articles found! |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||