欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 877-884.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201703.037

• 目次 • 上一篇    下一篇

越冬期测墒补灌对小麦耗水特性和光合有效辐射截获利用的影响

张瑞1, 于振文1, 张永丽1*, 石玉1, 赵俊晔2   

  1. 1山东农业大学农业部作物生理生态与栽培重点开放实验室, 山东泰安 271018
    2中国农业科学院农业信息研究所, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-06 发布日期:2017-03-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: zhangyl@sdau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张瑞,女,1987年生,硕士研究生.主要从事小麦节水高产高效研究.E-mail:zhangrui0627@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家自然科学基金项目(31171498)、农业部现代小麦产业技术体系项目(CARS-3-1-19)和山东省科技发展计划项目(2014GNC111017)资助

Effects of supplemental irrigation by measuring soil moisture on water consumption chara-cteristics and radiation utilization in wheat

ZHANG Rui1, YU Zhen-wen1, ZHANG Yong-li1*, SHI Yu1, ZHAO Jun-ye2   

  1. 1Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
    2Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2016-07-06 Published:2017-03-18
  • Contact: *E-mail: zhangyl@sdau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31171498), the Project of Technology System in Modern Wheat Industry, Ministry of Agriculture, China (CARS-3-1-19) and the Project of Science and Technology Development of Shandong Province (2014GNC111017)

摘要: 于2013—2014和2014—2015年两个小麦生长季进行田间试验,供试品种为‘济麦22’,设置5个处理,分别为W0(全生育期不灌水)、W1(越冬期不灌水,拔节期和开花期分别补灌至0~40 cm土层土壤相对含水量为65%和70%)、W2(越冬期、拔节期和开花期分别补灌至土壤相对含水量为70%、65%和70%)、W3(越冬期、拔节期和开花期分别补灌至土壤相对含水量为75%、65%和70%)和W4(越冬期、拔节期和开花期均定量灌溉60 mm),研究越冬期测墒补灌对小麦耗水特性和光合有效辐射截获利用的影响.结果表明: 总灌水量及其占总耗水量的比例为W4>W3>W2>W1>W0;土壤贮水消耗量占总耗水量的比例为W0>W1、W2>W3、W4;总耗水量和开花至成熟期的耗水量均为W4>W2、W3>W1>W0.两生长季小麦开花后冠层光合有效辐射(PAR)截获率为W4>W2、W3>W1>W0,而花后冠层PAR反射率各处理间的表现与之相反.灌水处理中干物质净积累量为W4处理最高,W1处理最低.两生长季小麦越冬期0~40 cm土层土壤相对含水量补灌至70%的W2处理籽粒产量仅低于定量灌溉的W4处理,水分利用效率和灌溉效益最高,是本试验条件下节水高产的最优处理.

Abstract: Field experiments were conducted during 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 winter wheat growing seasons by using Jimai 22 as test material. Five treatments were designed: W0(non-irrigation during growth season), W1(non-irrigation at overwintering, but irrigated to 65% of field capacity (FC) at jointing and 70% of FC at anthesis in 0-40 cm soil layer), W2(irrigated to 70% of FC at overwintering, 65% of FC at jointing and 70% of FC at anthesis in 0-40cm soil layer, respectively) and W3(irrigated to 75% of FC at overwintering, 65% of FC at jointing and 70% of FC at anthesis in 0-40cm soil layer, respectively), W4(irrigated 60 mm at overwintering, jointing and anthesis stages, respectively). The aim was to clarify the effects of supplemental irrigation on water consumption characteristics and photosynthetically active radiation utilization in wheat. Results showed that the total irrigation amount and its ratio to total water consumption in each treatment were ranked as W4>W3>W2>W1>W0. However, the percentage of water consumption in soil to total water consumption was presented as W0>W1, W2>W3, W4. The total water consumption, water consumption from anthesis to maturity were ranked as W4>W2, W3>W1>W0. The order of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) capture ratio was W4>W2, W3>W1>W0, but the order was contrary in PAR reflect ratio among the treatments. The net accumulation of dry matter was ranked as W4>W2>W3>W1>W0 in the two growing seasons. During the two winter wheat growing seasons, the grain yield in W2 was higher than in the other treatments, except W4, but the irrigation efficiency and water use efficiency in W2 were the highest. Concerning both the high-yield and high-water use efficiency in this experiment, the most appropriate irrigation regime was W2 treatment.