欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (10): 3089-3097.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.015

• 目次 • 上一篇    下一篇

长白山云冷杉林优势树种的竞争

任玫玫, 杨华*   

  1. 北京林业大学林学院, 北京 100083;
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-08 发布日期:2016-10-18
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: huayang@bjfu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:任玫玫,女,1992年生,硕士研究生. 主要从事林木竞争与更新关系的研究. E-mail: 283304794@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家林业局“948”项目(2013-4-66)资助

Competition among dominant tree species in a natural spruce-fir forest in Changbai Mountain

REN Mei-mei, YANG Hua*   

  1. College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
  • Received:2016-04-08 Published:2016-10-18
  • Contact: * E-mail: huayang@bjfu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the ‘948’ Project of State Bureau of Forestry.

摘要: 优势种是植物群落各层次中占优势的植物种,混交林优势树种竞争关系的研究对合理经营混交林具有重要意义.本研究在吉林省汪清县金沟岭林场内,选择立地条件一致的云冷杉天然林,设置大小100 m×100 m样地.首先,用优势度分析法确定群落优势树种;其次,以优势树种为对象木,采用可描述单株林木侧方上方、种内种间竞争强度的林木竞争指数分析优势树种的竞争关系.结果表明: 该云冷杉天然林有3个优势树种:臭冷杉、红皮云杉、红松.样地中,小径级林木较多,群落林木趋于小龄化,3个优势树种的竞争树种主要有臭冷杉、红皮云杉、红松、枫桦、紫椴、青楷槭和白桦.3个优势树种受到的竞争最激烈的是臭冷杉(1412.48),其次是红皮云杉(439.17)、红松(245.28),都主要承受侧方挤占,臭冷杉、红皮云杉、红松的侧方挤占分别占各优势树种竞争强度的64.9%、65.2%、66.0%;3个优势树种侧方上方平均竞争强度大致随个体胸径的增大而减少,小径级林木的侧方上方平均竞争强度几乎相等,对象木径级越大,所承受的侧方挤占比例越大,大径级林木几乎不承受上方遮盖;3个优势树种的侧方上方竞争主要来源于臭冷杉、红皮云杉、红松、紫椴、枫桦、青楷槭和白桦.3个优势树种种间竞争均比种内竞争激烈,臭冷杉、红皮云杉、红松的种间竞争分别占各优势树种竞争强度的58.4%、87.1%、83.7%,且竞争强度大致随个体胸径的增大而减少.

Abstract: Dominant tree species are the main species in different layers of mixed-species forests. Examining competitive relationships among dominant tree species is important for proper management of mixedwood forests. In this study, we established a 100 m×100 m plot of uniform condition on Jingouling Forest Farm, Wangqing County, Jilin Province. The dominant tree species of the young forest community were first determined through dominance index analysis approach and the competitive relationships among dominant tree species were then examined using tree competition index that described intra- and inter-specific competition from the above and sides of individual tree crown. The results indicated three dominant tree species in this mixed-species community were Abies nephrolepis, Picea koraiensis and Pinus koraiensis. A. nephrolepis, Picea koraiensis, Pinus koraiensis, Betula costata, Tilia amurensis, Acer tegmentosum and Betula platyphylla were the main competitors of the dominant tree species, while A. nephrolepis was the major competitor for all three dominant tree species (1412.48), followed by Picea koraiensis (439.17) and Pinus koraiensis (245.28), they all had side squeeze effect (64.9%, 65.2% and 66.0% of the total competition for the three dominant tree species, respectively). The level of side and above competition decreased with individual tree DBH (diameter at breast height); the percentage of side competition was nearly equal to that of above competition in small trees and increased with tree size, reaching nearly 100% in large canopy trees. For the three dominant tree species, the side and above competition of three dominant tree species mainly came from A. nephrolepis, Picea koraiensis, Pinus koraiensis, T. amurensis, B. costata, A. tegmentosum and B. platyphylla, and the inter-specific competition was more intense than intra-specific competition (58.4%, 87.1%, 83.7% of the total competition for the three dominant species), both of which decreased with the increase of individual tree DBH.