煤气炮和声波驱鸟器有效距离的评估

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202101.038

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 326-332.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202101.038

煤气炮和声波驱鸟器有效距离的评估

金麟雨^1,3, 李舒萌², 赵小英³, 刘泰杉³, 范陈³, 李东来^1*

¹辽宁大学生命科学院, 沈阳 110036;
²沈阳桃仙国际机场股份有限公司, 沈阳 100043;
³四川省机场集团有限公司成都天府国际机场分公司, 成都 641419

收稿日期:2020-05-05 接受日期:2020-10-20 出版日期:2021-01-15 发布日期:2021-07-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: lidonglai@lnu.edu.cn; lidonglaibnu@163.com
作者简介:金麟雨, 男, 1994年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事鸟类生态学和鸟击防范研究。E-mail: jinlinyulnu@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31672316,3191101017)、辽宁大学本科教学改革研究项目(YG2018YB25)和桃仙机场鸟情生态调研专项

Comparative evaluation of efficient bird repeller distance between gas gun and sound bird repeller

JIN Lin-yu^1,3, LI Shu-meng², ZHAO Xiao-ying³, LIU Tai-shan³, FAN Chen³, LI Dong-lai^1*

¹College of Life Sciences, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China;
²Shenyang Tao-xian International Airport, Shenyang 100043, China;
³Chengdu Tianfu International Airport Branch of Sichuan Airport Group Limited Company, Chengdu 641419, China

Received:2020-05-05 Accepted:2020-10-20 Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-07-15
Contact: * E-mail: lidonglai@lnu.edu.cn; lidonglaibnu@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672316, 3191101017), the Undergraduate Teaching Reform Research Project of Liaoning University (YG2018YB25) and the Special Fund for Bird Strike and Ecology Survey of Shenyang Taoxian Airport.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 鸟击事故主要发生在机场区域,通过使用驱鸟设备减少机场鸟类活动是预防鸟击的主要措施之一。本研究以家鸽和红隼两种高危险鸟类作为受试对象,选择沈阳桃仙国际机场使用的煤气炮和定向声波驱鸟器,观察在设备正常运行期间鸟类位于不同距离上的行为反应,探究两种驱鸟设备的有效作用距离以及效果。结果表明: 家鸽和红隼在距离煤气炮驱鸟器10、30 m时的警戒、逃跑行为显著高于对照,而在50 m处的各种行为次数与对照没有显著差别。家鸽和红隼在距离定向声波驱鸟器50、100 m时能够显著引起警戒和逃跑行为,在300 m处仍能显著引起红隼的警戒行为。可见,煤气炮的有效驱鸟距离为30 m,定向声波的有效驱鸟距离可达300 m,即定向声波的驱鸟效果要强于煤气炮。本研究可为机场引进驱鸟设备以及合理使用提供依据。

关键词: 桃仙机场, 鸟击, 定向声波驱鸟器, 驱鸟效果, 行为反应

Abstract: Bird strike accidents mainly occur in the airport area. Reducing bird activities through bird repeller equipment is one of the main measures to prevent bird strike. In this study, two bird species with high-risk, pigeon (Columba livia domestica) and kestrel (Falco tinnunculus), were selected as the subjects and the gas gun and directional acoustic bird repeller were selected as the evaluation objects in Shenyang Taoxian International Airport. This study aimed to examine the behavioral responses of birds at different distances during the normal operation of these equipment to explore their effective distance and effects. The results showed that the vigilant and escape behaviors of pigeons and kestrels at 10 m and 30 m away from the gas gun bird repeller which were significantly higher than those of the control, while the number of these behaviors at 50 m away was not significantly different from that of the control. Pigeons and kestrels at 50 m and 100 m away from the directional acoustic bird repeller could significantly increase their vigilant and escape behaviors, whereas the repeller could significantly cause kestrels to increase their vigilant behavior at 300 m away. We concluded that the effective bird expel distance of the gas gun was 30 m, and the directional acoustic bird repeller could effectively expel to 300 m, and that the effect of the directional acoustic bird repeller on birds was stronger than the gas gun. Our results could provide a reference for the introduction and rational use of bird expel equipment in the airports.

Key words: Shenyang Taoxian International Airport, bird strike, directional acoustic bird repeller, bird expel effect, behaviour response

金麟雨, 李舒萌, 赵小英, 刘泰杉, 范陈, 李东来. 煤气炮和声波驱鸟器有效距离的评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 326-332.

JIN Lin-yu, LI Shu-meng, ZHAO Xiao-ying, LIU Tai-shan, FAN Chen, LI Dong-lai. Comparative evaluation of efficient bird repeller distance between gas gun and sound bird repeller[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(1): 326-332.

参考文献

[1] 陈成. 机场鸟类动态与防治研究. 硕士论文. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2013 [Chen C. Study on the Dynamics and Prevention of Avian in Airport Area. Master Thesis. Bao-ding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2013]
[2] Servoss W, Engeman RM, Fairaizl S, et al. Wildlife hazard assessment for phoenix sky harbor international airport. International Biodeterioration & Bio-degradation, 2000, 45: 111-127
[3] Devault TL, Blackwell BF, Belant JY. Wildlife in Airport Environments Preventing Animal-Aircraft Collisions through Science-Based Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013
[4] Dolbeer RA. Height distribution of birds recorded by collisions with civil aircraft. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2006, 70: 1345-1350
[5] Reiter DK, Schmidt BRH. Public attitudes toward wildlife damage management and policy. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 1999, 27: 746-758
[6] Wenning KM, Begier MJ, Dolbeer RA. Wildlife hazard management at airports: Fifteen years of growth and progress for wildlife services. Proceedings of 21^st Vertebrate Pest Conference, Davis, CA, USA, 2004: 295-301
[7] Lambertucci SA, Shepard ELC, Wilson RP. Human-wildlife conflicts in a crowded airspace. Science, 2015, 348: 502-504
[8] Koehler AE, Marsh RE, SalmonTP. Frightening methods and devices/stimuli to prevent mammal damage: A review. Proceedings of 14^th Vertebrate Pest Conference, Davis, CA, USA, 1990: 168-173
[9] Mott DF, Glahn JF, Smith PL, et al. An evaluation of winter roost harassment for dispersing double-crested cormorants away from catfish production areas in Mississippi. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 1998, 26: 584-591
[10] Belant JL. Gulls in urban environments: Landscape-level management to reduce conflict. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1997, 38: 245-258
[11] Belant JL, Mastrangelo TPA. Effects of lethal control at aquaculture facilities on populations of piscivorous birds. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2000, 28: 379-384
[12] 明莉, 胡伟. 物理驱鸟技术概况. 农业工程, 2013, 3(suppl.1): 26-28 [Ming L, Hu W. Overview of physical bird driving technoloy. Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 3(suppl.1): 26-28]
[13] Gilsdorf JM, Hygnstrom SE, Vercauteren KC. Use of frightening devices in wildlife damage management. Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 2002, 7: 29-45
[14] 明莉, 胡伟. 几种驱鸟方式的对比. 农业工程, 2014, 4(1): 60-61 [Ming L, Hu W. Contrast of several bird scaring modes. Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 4(1): 60-61]
[15] Conover M. Comparative effectiveness of avitrol, explo-ders, and hawk-kites in reducing blackbird damage to corn. Journal of Wildlife Management, 1984, 48:109-116
[16] Schlichting PE, Holland AE, Beasley JC, et al. Efficacy of an acoustic hailing device as an avian dispersal tool. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2017, 41: 1-8
[17] 丁振军, 李东来, 万冬梅, 等. 沈阳桃仙国际机场鸟类多样性及鸟撞防范. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(9) : 183-189 [Ding Z-J, Li D-L, Wan D-M, et al. Avian diversity and bird strike avoidance at Shenyang Taoxian International Airport. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(9): 183-189]
[18] 王莹, 施媛, 金麟雨, 等. 沈阳桃仙国际机场鸟类夜间迁徙规律. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1): 295-303 [Wang Y, Shi Y, Jin L-Y, et al. Patterns of bird nocturnal migration at Shenyang Taoxian International Airport, northeast china. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(1): 295-303]
[19] 马金生, 刘常春. 飞机场净空区鸽患防治专题研究. 齐鲁师范学院学报, 2015, 30(6): 112-115 [Ma J-S, Liu C-C. The research on the pigeon prevention in airport clearance area. Journal of Qilu Normal University, 2015, 30(6): 112-115]
[20] 李永民, 姜双林, 聂传朋, 等. 阜阳机场鸟类多样性及其危险性. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(7):1914-1920 [Li Y-M, Jiang S-L, Nie C-P, et al. Avian diversity and bird strike risk at fuyang airport. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(1): 295-303]
[21] 相桂权, 冯贺林, 高玮, 等. 红隼的繁殖习性及领域选择的研究. 动物学杂志, 1993, 28(2): 38-43 [Xiang G-Q, Feng H-L, Gao W, et al. Study on breeding habits and field selection of kestrel. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 1993, 28(2): 38-43]
[22] 沈阳市统计局. 沈阳统计年鉴2018. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019 [Shenyang Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Shenyang Statistical Yearbook 2018. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2019]
[23] Conover MR. Comparative effectiveness of avitrol, exploders, and hawk-kites in reducing blackbird damage to corn. Journal of Wildlife Management, 1984, 48: 109-116
[24] 那顺得力格尔, 刘刚, 龚明昊, 等. 煤气炮噪声暴露对家鸽粪便皮质酮变化的影响. 动物学杂志, 2019, 54(2) : 181-188 [Nasendelger, Liu G, Gong M-H, et al. Effects of gas cannon noise exposure on corticosterone stress in feces of domestic pigeons. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2019, 54(2): 181-188]
[25] Hutchinson A. Effectiveness of gas cannons on the bird community at sydney airport. Bird Strike Committee-USA/Canada, Third Joint Annual Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2001: 116-125
[26] 赖从沛, 于金山. 定向声波技术在机场驱鸟中的应用. 中国民用航空, 2017(11) : 109-110 [Lai C-P, Yu J-S. Discussion on application of technologyin airport driving directional acoustic wave birds. China Civil Aviation , 2017(11) :109-110]
[27] Aubin T. Synthetic bird calls and their application to scaring methods. Ibis, 1990, 132: 290-299
[28] Ydenberg RC, Butler RW, Lank DB, et al. Trade-offs, condition dependence and stopover site selection by migrating sandpipers. Journal of Avian Biology, 2002, 33:47-55
[29] Zmihorski M, Rejt L. Weather-dependent variation in the cold-season diet of urban kestrels Falco tinnunculus. Acta Ornithologica, 2007, 42: 107-113
[30] Stevens GR, Rogue J, Weber R, et al. Evaluation of a radar-activated, demand-performance bird hazing system. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2000, 45:129-137
[31] Tobin ME. Research and management of bird depredations at catfish farms. Proceedings of 18^th Vertebrate Pest Conference, Davis, CA, USA, 1998: 67-70

煤气炮和声波驱鸟器有效距离的评估

Comparative evaluation of efficient bird repeller distance between gas gun and sound bird repeller

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王莹,施媛,金麟雨,关爽,黄子强,郝恒宇,万冬梅,李东来. 沈阳桃仙国际机场鸟类夜间迁徙规律 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1): 292-300.
[2]	李永民,姜双林,聂传朋,周厚龙,李焰焰,陈乃堂,赵志华. 阜阳机场鸟类多样性及其危险性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(07): 1914-1920.
[3]	陈炳旭;董易之;梁广文;陆恒. 板栗挥发物对桃蛀螟成虫寄主选择行为的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(2): 464-469.
[4]	郝德君¹;马凤林²;王焱²;张永慧¹;戴华国¹. 松墨天牛对不同生理状态黑松挥发物的触角电生理和行为反应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(06): 1070-1074 .
[5]	胡文利, 杜家纬. 中国印度谷螟性信息素次级组份的研究 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(9): 1745-1750.
[6]	胡文利^1，2 杜家纬¹. 中国印度谷螟性信息素次级组份的研究 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(09): 1751-1755 .
[7]	余月书, 杨益众, 陆宴辉. 棉田棉铃虫寄生峰对常规棉及转Bt棉品种的趋性反应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, (5): 845-848.
[8]	余月书, 杨益众, 陆宴辉. 棉田棉铃虫寄生峰对常规棉及转Bt棉品种的趋性反应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, (5): 845-848.
[9]	韩宝瑜, 陈宗懋. 异色瓢虫4变种成虫对茶和茶蚜气味行为反应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11(3): 413-416.
[10]	韩宝瑜, 陈宗懋. 异色瓢虫4变种成虫对茶和茶蚜气味行为反应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, (3): 413-416.