欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 3829-3840.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202512.022

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国生态产品价值实现的时空演化及收敛特征

毕文泰, 薛瑶, 梁远*   

  1. 渤海大学管理学院, 辽宁锦州 121013
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-08 修回日期:2025-10-08 出版日期:2025-12-18 发布日期:2026-07-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: liangyuan@bhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:毕文泰, 男, 1994年生, 副教授。主要从事农业生态系统研究。E-mail: biwentai@bhu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省社会科学规划基金青年项目(L24CGL001)

Spatio-temporal variations and convergence characteristics of ecological product value realization in China

BI Wentai, XUE Yao, LIANG Yuan*   

  1. College of Management, Bohai University, Jinzhou 121013, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2025-04-08 Revised:2025-10-08 Online:2025-12-18 Published:2026-07-18

摘要: 生态产品价值实现是经济高质量发展和产业绿色转型的新路径。本研究基于生态产品及其价值内涵,构建涵盖供给类、调节类、文化类的三维指标体系,测度2013—2022年中国除香港特别行政区、澳门特别行政区、台湾省、西藏自治区之外的其余30个省区生态产品价值实现水平,综合运用核密度估计法、基尼系数及σβ收敛模型,解析中国生态产品价值的时空演进、地区分异和动态收敛特征。结果表明: 2013—2022年,中国30个省区生态产品价值实现率总体持续增强,均值由0.25升至0.68,区域间具有显著的梯级差异;在空间上呈现东高西低的分布格局。核密度估计结果表明,全国层面和三大地区(东部、中部和西部)生态产品价值指数均呈上升趋势,东部和中部地区内省际间生态产品发展水平差异较小,西部地区内省际发展不平衡。基尼系数及其分解结果表明,区域间差异是中国生态产品价值实现率差异的主要来源,东、中、西三大地区的地区内差异均呈小幅上升趋势。各地区生态产品价值实现率仅在2017—2021年具有σ收敛,2013—2022年全国及东部、中部地区存在β收敛,但收敛速度较缓慢。研究结果有助于精准识别生态产品价值实现的空间非均衡性,可为全国及三大地区制定差异化生态政策、促进区域协同发展提供科学依据。

关键词: 生态产品价值实现, 时空分异, 收敛性, 区域差异

Abstract: The realization of the value of ecological products offers a novel pathway for achieving high-quality economic development and facilitating green industrial transformation. Building upon the connotations of ecological products and their value, we constructed a three-dimensional indicator system covering supply-based, regulatory, and cultural categories to measure the value realization level of ecological products in 30 provinces of China except Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macao Special Administrative Region, Taiwan Province and Tibet Autonomous Region from 2013 to 2022. By comprehensively applying kernel density estimation, the Gini coefficient, and σ and β convergence models, we analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution, regional differentiation, and convergence characteristics of ecological product value. The results showed that from 2013 to 2022, the overall realization rate of ecological product value exhibited a continuous upward trend, with the mean value increasing from 0.25 to 0.68. However, there were significant gradient disparities among regions, manifesting as a spatially decreasing gradient pattern of “higher in the east and lower in the west.” The kernel density estimation results showed that the ecological product value index demonstrated an upward trend for the national level and for the three major regions (eastern, central and western regions). Notably, there was little inter-provincial difference in the development level of ecological products within the eastern and central regions, with pronounced inter-provincial development imba-lances within the western region. The Gini coefficient and its decomposition results showed that inter-regional differences constituted the primary source of variation in the realization rate of ecological product value in China. Meanwhile, intra-regional differences within the eastern, central, and western regions showed a slight upward trend. σ convergence was observed in the realization rate of ecological product value across regions from 2017 to 2021. Moreover, β convergence was identified at the national level and within the eastern and central regions from 2013 to 2022, albeit at a relatively slow pace. The results would be helpful for accurately identifying the spatial imbalance of ecological product value realization, and provide scientific basis for the formulation of differentiated ecological policies and the promotion of regional coordinated development in China and its three major regions.

Key words: ecological product value realization, spatio-temporal differentiation, convergence, regional difference