
应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 609-621.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202602.035
党建毓1,2, 麻小见2,3, 杨馨逸2, 盘昱良1, 何寻阳2, 王克林2, 李德军2, 段鹏鹏2*
收稿日期:2025-07-02
接受日期:2026-01-04
出版日期:2026-02-18
发布日期:2026-08-18
通讯作者:
* E-mail: pengpengduan@isa.ac.cn
作者简介:党建毓, 女, 2001年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事土壤碳循环研究。E-mail: dddjy422@163.com
基金资助:DANG Jianyu1,2, MA Xiaojian2,3, YANG Xinyi2, PAN Yuliang1, HE Xunyang2, WANG Kelin2, LI Dejun2, DUAN Pengpeng2*
Received:2025-07-02
Accepted:2026-01-04
Online:2026-02-18
Published:2026-08-18
摘要: 土壤微生物碳利用效率(CUE),即微生物将吸收的碳分配于生长与维持的比例,是调控陆地土壤有机碳(SOC)储量的关键参数。CUE对气候变化的响应及其反馈过程深刻影响着全球碳循环和土壤碳汇功能。然而,当前关于CUE对气候变化的响应机制及其生态后果仍存在诸多不确定性。本文梳理了近20年关于土壤微生物CUE的研究进展: 首先,明确了CUE的基本概念及计算方法,并比较了3种主流测定技术(同位素标记法、计量学模型和热力学效率法)的原理、优势与局限性;其次,总结了影响CUE变化的关键生物与非生物因子,重点评述了大气CO2浓度升高、气候变暖和降水格局改变对微生物CUE的单独及交互作用机制,并基于“资源-成本权衡”理论框架,探讨了不同生态系统中CUE响应异质性的潜在机制;概括了当前研究在方法学标准化、深层土壤过程解析、多因子交互效应量化以及CUE在地球系统模型(ESM)应用等方面仍存在的瓶颈与挑战;提出了从微观代谢机制到宏观碳循环格局的整合性研究框架,强调通过方法学创新、多尺度联网观测以及模型-试验融合,深入揭示气候变化背景下CUE的动态变化与适应性机制。
党建毓, 麻小见, 杨馨逸, 盘昱良, 何寻阳, 王克林, 李德军, 段鹏鹏. 土壤微生物碳利用效率对气候变化响应的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(2): 609-621.
DANG Jianyu, MA Xiaojian, YANG Xinyi, PAN Yuliang, HE Xunyang, WANG Kelin, LI Dejun, DUAN Pengpeng. Research advances in soil microbial carbon use efficiency in response to climate change[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(2): 609-621.
| [1] Gu L, Schumacher DL, Wang HM, et al. Land-atmosphere feedbacks drive dryland drought and expansion under climate warming. The Innovation, 2025, 6: 100863 [2] Ham YG, Kim JH, Min SK, et al. Anthropogenic fingerprints in daily precipitation revealed by deep learning. Nature, 2023, 622: 301-307 [3] Wang MM, Zhang S, Guo XW, et al. Responses of soil organic carbon to climate extremes under warming across global biomes. Nature Climate Change, 2024, 14: 98-105 [4] Chabbi A, Lehmann J, Ciais P, et al. Aligning agriculture and climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7: 307-309 [5] Tao F, Huang YY, Hungate BA, et al. Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage. Nature, 2023, 618: 981-985 [6] 冯晓娟, 戴国华, 刘婷, 等. 从生物地球化学视角理解土壤碳封存的机制和潜在途径. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2024, 54(11): 3421-3432 [7] Sokol NW, Sanderman J, Bradford MA. Pathways of mineral-associated soil organic matter formation: Integrating the role of plant carbon source, chemistry, and point of entry. Global Change Biology, 2018, 25: 12-24 [8] McMurtry AR, Kasmerchak CS, Vaughan EA, et al. Getting to the root of the problem: Soil carbon and microbial responses to root inputs within a buried paleosol along an eroding hillslope in southwestern Nebraska, USA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2024, 198: 109549 [9] Tan J, Huang JF, Quan WH, et al. Divergence of microbial carbon use efficiency and soil organic carbon along a tidal flooding gradient in a subtropical coastal wetland. Water Research, 2025, 280: 123527 [10] Shi Z, Hoffman FM, Xu M, et al. Global-scale convergence obscures inconsistencies in soil carbon change predicted by earth system models. AGU Advances, 2024, 5: e2023AV001068 [11] Sinsabaugh RL, Turner BL, Talbot JM, et al. Stoichio-metry of microbial carbon use efficiency in soils. Ecolo-gical Monographs, 2016, 86: 172-189 [12] Manzoni S, Taylor P, Richter A, et al. Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytologist, 2012, 196: 79-91 [13] Bölscher T, Vogel C, Olagoke FK, et al. Beyond growth: The significance of non-growth anabolism for microbial carbon-use efficiency in the light of soil carbon stabilisation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2024, 193: 109400 [14] Liu WX, Qiao CL, Yang S, et al. Microbial carbon use efficiency and priming effect regulate soil carbon storage under nitrogen deposition by slowing soil organic matter decomposition. Geoderma, 2018, 332: 37-44 [15] Creamer CA, de Menezes AB, Krull ES, et al. Micro-bial community structure mediates response of soil C decomposition to litter addition and warming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 80: 175-188 [16] Geyer KM, Dijkstra P, Sinsabaugh R, et al. Clarifying the interpretation of carbon use efficiency in soil through methods comparison. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 128: 79-88 [17] Hu JX, Cui YX, Manzoni S, et al. Microbial carbon use efficiency and growth rates in soil: Global patterns and drivers. Global Change Biology, 2025, 31: e70036 [18] Frey SD, Lee J, Melillo JM, et al. The temperature response of soil microbial efficiency and its feedback to climate. Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3: 395-398 [19] Qu LR, Wang C, Bai E. Evaluation of the 18O-H2O incubation method for measurement of soil microbial carbon use efficiency. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 145: 107802 [20] Canarini A, Wanek W, Watzka M, et al. Quantifying microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in dry soil environments via 18O water vapor equilibration. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26: 5333-5341 [21] Rosinger C, Rousk J, Sandén H. Can enzymatic stoichio-metry be used to determine growth-limiting nutrients for microorganisms? A critical assessment in two subtropical soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 128: 115-126 [22] Sinsabaugh RL, Manzoni S, Moorhead DL, et al. Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: Stoichio-metry, methodology and modelling. Ecology Letters, 2013, 16: 930-939 [23] Wasner D, Schnecker J, Han XG, et al. Environment and microbiome drive different microbial traits and functions in the macroscale soil organic carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 2024, 30: e17465 [24] Widdig M, Schleuss PM, Biederman LA, et al. Microbial carbon use efficiency in grassland soils subjected to nitrogen and phosphorus additions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 146: 107815 [25] Islam MR, Singh B, Dijkstra FA. Microbial carbon use efficiency of glucose varies with soil clay content: A meta-analysis. Applied Soil Ecology, 2023, 181: 104636 [26] Nottingham AT, Scott JJ, Saltonstall K, et al. Microbial diversity declines in warmed tropical soil and respiration rise exceed predictions as communities adapt. Nature Microbiology, 2022, 7: 1650-1660 [27] Liu XF, Tian Y, Heinzle J, et al. Long-term soil warming decreases soil microbial necromass carbon by adversely affecting its production and decomposition. Global Change Biology, 2024, 30: e17379 [28] Luo ZY, Ren JN, Manzoni S, et al. Temperature controls the relation between soil organic carbon and microbial carbon use efficiency. Global Change Biology, 2024, 30: e17492 [29] Zheng Q, Hu YT, Zhang SS, et al. Growth explains microbial carbon use efficiency across soils differing in land use and geology. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 128: 45-55 [30] Ullah MR, Carrillo Y, Dijkstra FA. Drought-induced and seasonal variation in carbon use efficiency is asso-ciated with fungi:bacteria ratio and enzyme production in a grassland ecosystem. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 155: 108159 [31] Na M, Hicks LC, Rousk J. How do root exudates prime the decomposition of soil organic matter following drought? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2025, 205: 109789 [32] Horn EL, Cooledge EC, Jones DL, et al. Addition of base cations increases microbial carbon use efficiency and biomass in acidic soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 161: 108392 [33] Jones DL, Cooledge EC, Hoyle FC, et al. pH and exchangeable aluminum are major regulators of microbial energy flow and carbon use efficiency in soil microbial communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 138: 107584 [34] Hu YL, Chen J, Hui DF, et al. Mycorrhizal fungi alleviate acidification-induced phosphorus limitation: Evidence from a decade-long field experiment of simulated acid deposition in a tropical forest in south China. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28: 3605-3619 [35] Ochoa-Hueso R, Eldridge DJ, Berdugo M, et al. Unearthing the soil-borne microbiome of land plants. Global Change Biology, 2024, 30: e17295 [36] Shi JW, Deng L, Wu JZ, et al. Global change modulates microbial carbon use efficiency: Mechanisms and impacts on soil organic carbon dynamics. Global Change Biology, 2025, 31: e70240 [37] Schroeder J, Damatîrca C, Bölscher T, et al. Response to Čapek and Šantrůčková’s comment to “Liming effects on microbial carbon use efficiency and its potential consequences for soil organic carbon stocks”. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2024, 196: 109501 [38] 吴佳芯, 李邵宇, 韩国栋, 等. 不同放牧强度下荒漠草原土壤化学计量失衡与微生物碳利用效率的联系. 应用生态学报, 2025, 35(8): 2108-2118 [39] Soares M, Rousk J. Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in soil: Links to fungal-bacterial dominance, SOC-quality and stoichiometry. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 131: 195-205 [40] Fang YY, Tavakkoli E, Weng Z, et al. Disentangling carbon stabilization in a Calcisol subsoil amended with iron oxyhydroxides: A dual-13C isotope approach. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 170: 108711 [41] Duan PP, Fu RT, Nottingham AT, et al. Tree species diversity increases soil microbial carbon use efficiency in a subtropical forest. Global Change Biology, 2023, 29: 7131-7144 [42] Wilhelm RC, Lynch L, Webster TM, et al. Susceptibi-lity of new soil organic carbon to mineralization during dry-wet cycling in soils from contrasting ends of a precipitation gradient. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 169: 108681 [43] Shabtai IA, Wilhelm RC, Schweizer SA, et al. Calcium promotes persistent soil organic matter by altering microbial transformation of plant litter. Nature Communications, 2023, 14: 6609 [44] Konrad A, Hofmann D, Siemens J, et al. Microbial carbon use efficiency of mineral-associated organic matter is related to its desorbability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2025, 203: 109740 [45] Bonner MTL, Shoo LP, Brackin R, et al. Relationship between microbial composition and substrate use efficiency in a tropical soil. Geoderma, 2018, 315: 96-103 [46] Wang XD, Feng JG, Ao G, et al. Globally nitrogen addition alters soil microbial community structure, but has minor effects on soil microbial diversity and richness. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2023, 179: 108982 [47] Hu PL, Zhang W, Nottingham AT, et al. Lithological controls on soil aggregates and minerals regulate micro-bial carbon use efficiency and necromass stability. Environmental Science & Technology, 2024, 58: 21186-21199 [48] Ma SL, Zhu WZ, Wang WW, et al. Microbial assemblies with distinct trophic strategies drive changes in soil microbial carbon use efficiency along vegetation primary succession in a glacier retreat area of the southeastern tibetan Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 867: 161587 [49] Li YZ, Bao XL, Zhu XF, et al. Parent material influences soil properties to shape bacterial community assembly processes, diversity, and enzyme-related functions. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 927: 172064 [50] Li YZ, Bao XL, Tang SX, et al. Toward soil carbon storage: The influence of parent material and vegetation on profile-scale microbial community structure and necromass accumulation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2024, 193: 109399 [51] Wu XJ, Peng JJ, Malik AA, et al. A global relationship between genome size and encoded carbon metabolic strategies of soil bacteria. Ecology Letters, 2025, 28: e70064 [52] Zhao FZ, Wang JY, Li Y, et al. Microbial functional genes driving the positive priming effect in forest soils along an elevation gradient. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 165: 108498 [53] Morrison EW, Whitney SA, Geyer KM, et al. Evidence for a genetic basis in functional trait tradeoffs with microbial growth rate but not growth yield. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 172: 108765 [54] Cui JL, Zheng M, Bian ZH, et al. Elevated CO2 levels promote both carbon and nitrogen cycling in global forests. Nature Climate Change, 2024, 14: 511-517 [55] Chen Y, Zhang YJ, Bai E, et al. The stimulatory effect of elevated CO2 on soil respiration is unaffected by N addition. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 813: 151907 [56] Simon E, Canarini A, Martin V, et al. Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency show seasonal responses in a multifactorial climate change experiment. Communications Biology, 2020, 3: 584 [57] Zhou ZH, Wang CK, Luo Y. Meta-analysis of the impacts of global change factors on soil microbial diversity and functionality. Nature Communications, 2020, 11: 3072 [58] Li JW, Wang GS, Mayes MA, et al. Reduced carbon use efficiency and increased microbial turnover with soil warming. Global Change Biology, 2018, 25: 900-910 [59] Wang XY, Liang C, Dini-Andreote F, et al. Impacts of trophic interactions on carbon accrual in soils. Trends in Microbiology, 2025, 33: 277-284 [60] Qin SQ, Zhang DY, Wei B, et al. Dual roles of microbes in mediating soil carbon dynamics in response to warming. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 6439 [61] Walker TWN, Gavazov K, Guillaume T, et al. Lowland plant arrival in alpine ecosystems facilitates a decrease in soil carbon content under experimental climate warming. eLife, 2022, 11: e78555 [62] Shen J, Ou BF, Lei YB, et al. Mechanisms of soil persistent organic carbon loss in alpine ecosystems: Insights into microbial and calcium spatial footprint. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2025, 204: 109765 [63] Domeignoz-Horta LA, Pold G, Erb H, et al. Substrate availability and not thermal acclimation controls micro-bial temperature sensitivity response to long-term warming. Global Change Biology, 2023, 29: 1574-1590 [64] Tájmel D, Cruz-Paredes C, Rousk J. Heat wave-induced microbial thermal trait adaptation and its reversal in the Subarctic. Global Change Biology, 2024, 30: e17032 [65] Zhang WX, Zhou TJ, Wu PL. Anthropogenic amplification of precipitation variability over the past century. Science, 2024, 385: 427-432 [66] Zhang ZY, Li YX, Williams RA, et al. Responses of soil respiration and its sensitivities to temperature and precipitation: A meta-analysis. Ecological Informatics, 2023, 75: 102057 [67] Liu XJA, Pold G, Domeignoz-Horta LA, et al. Soil aggregate-mediated microbial responses to long-term warming. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 152: 108055 [68] Chen J, Luo YQ, Sinsabaugh RL. Subsoil carbon loss. Nature Geoscience, 2023, 16: 284-285 [69] Zhu EX, Cao ZJ, Jia J, et al. Inactive and inefficient: Warming and drought effect on microbial carbon processing in alpine grassland at depth. Global Change Biology, 2021, 27: 2241-2253 [70] Dove NC, Torn MS, Hart SC, et al. Metabolic capabilities mute positive response to direct and indirect impacts of warming throughout the soil profile. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 2089 [71] Zhang QF, Qin WK, Feng JG, et al. Whole-soil-profile warming does not change microbial carbon use efficiency in surface and deep soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023, 120: e2302190120 [72] Ren CJ, Zhou ZH, Delgado-Baquerizo M, et al. Thermal sensitivity of soil microbial carbon use efficiency across forest biomes. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 6269 [73] Yu KL, He L, Niu SL, et al. Nonlinear microbial thermal response and its implications for abrupt soil organic carbon responses to warming. Nature Communications, 2025, 16: 2763 [74] Tian J, Dungait JAJ, Hou RX, et al. Microbially mediated mechanisms underlie soil carbon accrual by conservation agriculture under decade-long warming. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 377 [75] Li XK, Leizeaga A, Rousk J, et al. Recovery of soil microbial metabolism after rewetting depends on interacting environmental conditions and changes in functional groups and life history strategies. Global Change Bio-logy, 2024, 30: e17522 [76] Butcher KR, Nasto MK, Norton JM, et al. Physical mechanisms for soil moisture effects on microbial carbon-use efficiency in a sandy loam soil in the western United States. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 150: 107969 [77] Canarini A, Schmidt H, Fuchslueger L, et al. Ecological memory of recurrent drought modifies soil processes via changes in soil microbial community. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 5308 [78] Sokol NW, Foley MM, Blazewicz SJ, et al. The path from root input to mineral-associated soil carbon is dictated by habitat-specific microbial traits and soil moisture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2024, 193: 109367 [79] Pei JM, Fang CM, Li B, et al. Aridity-driven change in microbial carbon use efficiency and its linkage to soil carbon storage. Global Change Biology, 2024, 30: e17565 [80] Sun XD, Zhang CY, Zhou ZH, et al. Contrasting exogenous and endogenous soil microbial carbon use efficiencies under global changes. Global Ecology and Biogeo-graphy, 2025, 34: e70027 [81] He XJ, Abs E, Allison SD, et al. Emerging multiscale insights on microbial carbon use efficiency in the land carbon cycle. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 8010 [82] Mason-Jones K, Breidenbach A, Dyckmans J, et al. Intracellular carbon storage by microorganisms is an overlooked pathway of biomass growth. Nature Communications, 2023, 14: 2240 [83] Hicks Pries E, Ryals R, Zhu B, et al. The deep soil organic carbon response to global change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2023, 54: 375-401 [84] Pallandt M, Schrumpf M, Lange H, et al. Modelling the effect of climate-substrate interactions on soil organic matter decomposition with the Jena Soil Model. Biogeosciences, 2025, 22: 1907-1928 [85] Li JQ, Pei JM, Dijkstra FA, et al. Microbial carbon use efficiency, biomass residence time and temperature sensitivity across ecosystems and soil depths. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 154: 108117 [86] Pei JM, Li JQ, Luo YQ, et al. Patterns and drivers of soil microbial carbon use efficiency across soil depths in forest ecosystems. Nature Communications, 2025, 16: 5218 [87] Zhou GY, Eisenhauer N, Terrer C, et al. Resistance of ecosystem services to global change weakened by increasing number of environmental stressors. Nature Geoscience, 2024, 17: 882-888 [88] Sáez-Sandino T, Maestre FT, Berdugo M, et al. Increasing numbers of global change stressors reduce soil carbon worldwide. Nature Climate Change, 2024, 14: 740-745 [89] Metcalfe DB. Microbial change in warming soils. Science, 2017, 358: 41-42 [90] Walker TWN, Kaiser C, Strasser F, et al. Microbial temperature sensitivity and biomass change explain soil carbon loss with warming. Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8: 885-889 [91] Allison SD. Rethinking microbial carbon use efficiency in soil models. Nature Climate Change, 2025, 15: 10-12 [92] Canarini A, Fuchslueger L, Schnecker J, et al. Soil fungi remain active and invest in storage compounds during drought independent of future climate conditions. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 10410 [93] Schnecker J, Böckle T, Horak J, et al. Improving mea-surements of microbial growth, death, and turnover by accounting for extracellular DNA in soils. Soil, 2024, 10: 521-531 [94] 朱雪峰, 孔维栋, 黄懿梅, 等. 土壤微生物碳泵概念体系2.0. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 102-110 [95] 肖可青, 李心男, 邢稳, 等. 土壤“矿物碳泵(MnCP)”介导有机碳的固存与稳定机制. 土壤学报, 2025, 62(3): 595-609 |
| [1] | 朱文聪, 赵秋兰, 刘亚龙, 全先奎. 兴安落叶松根系非结构性碳水化合物对气候变暖的响应及种源差异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(8): 2547-2555. |
| [2] | 马婷, 杨光磊, 王紫娟. 气候变化下中国3种桫椤科植物的分布格局变迁及优先保护区域识别 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(7): 2257-2270. |
| [3] | 许树涛, 李超骕, 杨华杰. 中国主要地级及以上城市空间形态与极端高温事件的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(7): 2343-2352. |
| [4] | 杨阳, 王宝荣, 陈骥, 方临川, 王云强, 安韶山. 土壤胞外酶对全球变化响应研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(7): 2441-2452. |
| [5] | 虎生园, 冯海萍, 胡皓楠, 金学兰, 石琳, 吴宏亮, 康建宏. 不同蔬菜根系浸提液对连作芹菜根际土壤特性和微生物群落的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(6): 1981-1990. |
| [6] | 张云, 杨艺婷, 文晓晨, 张万涛, 朱许可, 马理辉. 2000—2020年黄土高原植被净初级生产力的时空变化及驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(6): 1991-1999. |
| [7] | 金睿, 罗肇河, 刘璇, 刘锦荃, 苏尚柯, 杜虹, 杜建国, 康建华, 胡文佳. 中国近海具刺环胺藻分布及其对气候变化的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(6): 2020-2030. |
| [8] | 陈晓霞, 石福孙, 陶伯山, 李婧怡, 马文宝. 四川大沟流域优势树种径向生长及其对气候的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(5): 1449-1458. |
| [9] | 吕文璇, 高露双, 李军锋, 王佳茜, 李国雷, 张志艺, 张昕宇, 李思杰. 气候变化背景下栓皮栎在中国的适生区格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(5): 1466-1476. |
| [10] | 何晓茜, 李攀, 丁虎, 李晶, 王金枝, 崔丽娟, 晏智锋. 河口湿地碳氮耦合过程与调控 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(5): 1685-1696. |
| [11] | 李素新, 张艺轩, 庞晓静, 何松骏, 张芙蓉, 王家琪, 王星如. 华北落叶松林土壤微生物群落结构及多样性对长期氮添加的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(4): 993-1002. |
| [12] | 冯娟, 买吾拉夏·木巴热克, 刘卫平. 玛纳斯河流域植被生态质量变化及驱动力 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(4): 1134-1140. |
| [13] | 刘一丹, 黄海广, 李晓兰, 李雪华. 毛乌素沙地归一化植被指数时空演变及其驱动力:以内蒙古乌审旗为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(3): 805-813. |
| [14] | 谢涵琦, 张庆吉, 马小雪, 田琳琳. 气候变化对凤眼莲在长江中下游地区潜在适生区的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(3): 917-925. |
| [15] | 王金睿, 胡爱莲, 杨娟. 气候变化对南极阿德利属企鹅潜在适宜生境分布的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(3): 926-932. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
辽公网安备21010302000574号
辽ICP备05000862号-2
版权所有 © 《应用生态学报》编辑部