Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 3303-3315.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201910.010

• Special Features of the 13th National Symposium on Young Ecologists • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research progress on relationship between urban greenspace distribution and the socioeconomic characteristics of residents

CAO Ya-qin1,2, CHEN Zhang-hao1,2, HUANG Gan-lin1,2*, CHEN Li-yuan1,2, JIANG Ya-qiong1,2, ZHANG Zheng-kai1,2, TU Xing-yue1,2, HUA Ye-yu1,2   

  1. 1Center for Human-Environment System Sustainability (CHESS), State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
    2Center for Land Resources and Regional Development, School of Natural Resources, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2019-04-01 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-10-20
  • Contact: *E-mail: ghuang@bnu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31670702).

Abstract: Urban greenspace, which serves as a place for residents to connect with nature and relax, provides important ecosystem services. Access to greenspace is often related to the socio-economic characteristics of residents, which received a lot attention from researchers and practitioners. Previous studies have mostly focused on single city to analyze the spatial relationship between greenspace distribution and residents’ characteristics. We conducted a meta-analysis with global studies. The objectives were to classify findings from different cases and investigate the impacts from the location of research area, indicator and analytical method, and summarized major factors influen-cing the relationship between greenspace distribution and residents’ characteristics. The results showed that more than half of the cases (58.2%) found that the socially advantaged population benefited more from greenspace. About a quarter cases (25.4%) revealed the opposite, that was, the disadvantaged population benefited more from greenspace. The remaining case studies (16.4%) did not find significant correlation between them. The studies reviewed here were diverse in terms of scale, indicator selection, and analytical method. Overall, we found no connection between finding and the choice of scale/indicator/analytical method. The reviewed case studies were mostly conducted in cities of western countries, which differed in their development trajectories and urban characteristics from cities in China. To understand association between urban greenspace and residents’ characteristics in China, we urged to carry out more local studies, which would potentially provide scientific evidence for building sustainable cities during rapid urbanization.