Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 4333-4343.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201912.004
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
LUO Dan-dan, WANG Chuan-kuan*, JIN Ying
Received:
2019-08-11
Online:
2019-12-15
Published:
2019-12-15
Contact:
* Evmail: wangck-cf@nefu.edu.cn
Supported by:
LUO Dan-dan, WANG Chuan-kuan, JIN Ying. Stomatal regulation of plants in response to drought stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(12): 4333-4343.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjae.net/EN/10.13287/j.1001-9332.201912.004
[1] Hetherington AM, Woodward FI. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature, 2003, 424: 901-908 [2] Fan J-Z (范嘉智), Wang D (王 丹), Hu Y-L (胡亚林), et al. Optimal stomatal behavior theory for simulating stomatal conductance. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 2016, 40(6): 631-642 (in Chinese) [3] Sperry JS, Venturas MD, Anderegg WRL, et al. Predicting stomatal responses to the environment from the optimization of photosynthetic gain and hydraulic cost. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2017, 40: 816-830 [4] Jones HG. Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1998, 49: 387-398 [5] Chaves MM, Zarrouk O, Francisco R, et al. Grapevine under deficit irrigation: Hints from physiological and molecular data. Annals of Botany, 2010, 105: 661-676 [6] Tardieu F, Simonneau T. Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: Modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1998, 49: 419-432 [7] Moshelion M, Halperin O, Wallach R, et al. Role of aquaporins in determining transpiration and photosynthesis in water-stressed plants: Crop water-use efficiency, growth and yield. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2015, 38: 1785-1793 [8] Tyree MT, Sperry JS. Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? Answers from a model. Plant Physiology, 1988, 88: 574-580 [9] Chen L (陈 亮), Hou S-W (侯岁稳). Molecular genetic control of plant stomatal development. Scientia Sinica Vitae (中国科学:生命科学), 2017, 47(8): 798-807 (in Chinese) [10] Gao C-J (高春娟), Xia X-J (夏晓剑), Shi K (师恺), et al. Response of stomata to global climate changes and the underlying regulation mchanism of stress responses. Plant Physiology Journal (植物生理学报), 2012, 48(1): 19-28 (in Chinese) [11] Jia R-L (贾瑞玲), Qin Q-Q (秦倩倩), Zhang Y-P (张彦萍), et al. Molecular genetic mechanism of stoma-tal development of Arabidopsis. Chinese Journal of Cell Biology (细胞生物学杂志), 2009, 31(6): 817-822 (in Chinese) [12] Cai S, Chen G, Wang Y, et al. Evolutionary conservation of ABA signaling for stomatal closure. Plant Physio-logy, 2017, 174: 732-747 [13] Sussmilch FC, Brodribb TJ, McAdam SAM. Up-regulation of NCED3 and ABA biosynthesis occur within minutes of a decrease in leaf turgor but AHK1 is not required. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017, 68: 2913-2918 [14] Lösch R, Shenk B. Humidity responses of stomata and the potassium content of guard cells. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1978, 29: 781-787 [15] McAdam SA, Brodribb TJ. The evolution of mechanisms driving the stomatal response to vapor pressure deficit. Plant Physiology, 2015, 167: 833-843 [16] Lange OL, Lösch R, Schulze ED, et al. Responses of stomata to changes in humidity. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1971, 29: 781-787 [17] Franks PJ, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD. A study of stomatal mechanics using the cell pressure probe. Plant, Cell & Environment, 1998, 21: 94-100 [18] Buckley TN. The control of stomata by water balance. New Phytologist, 2005, 168: 275-292 [19] Buckley TN, Mott KA, Farquhar GD. A hydromechanical and biochemical model of stomatal conductance. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2003, 26: 1767-1785 [20] Maier-Maercker U. The role of peristomatal transpiration in the mechanism of stomatal movement. Plant, Cell & Environment, 1983, 6: 369-380 [21] Demichele DW, Sharpe PJ. An analysis of the mecha-nics of guard cell motion. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1973, 41: 77-96 [22] Buckley TN. How do stomata respond to water status? New Phytologist, 2019, 224: 21-36 [23] Geiger D, Maierhofer T, Al-Rasheid KAS, et al. Stomatal closure by fast abscisic acid signaling is mediated by the guard cell anion channel SLAH3 and the receptor RCAR1. Science Signaling, 2011, 4: ra32 [24] Mori IC, Murata Y, Yang Y, et al. CDPKs CPK6 and CPK3 function in ABA regulation of guard cell S-type anion- and Ca2+-permeable channels and stomatal closure. PLoS Biology, 2006, 4: 1749-1762 [25] Tardieu F, Davies WJ. Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conduc-tance and water status of droughted plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 1993, 16: 341-349 [26] Holbrook NM, Shashidhar VR, James RA, et al. Stomatal control in tomato with ABA-deficient roots: Response of grafted plants to soil drying. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2002, 53: 1503-1514 [27] Brodribb TJ, McAdam SA. Passive origins of stomatal control in vascular plants. Science, 2011, 331: 582-585 [28] McAdam SA, Brodribb TJ. Stomatal innovation and the rise of seed plants. Ecology Letters, 2012, 15: 1-8 [29] McAdam SA, Brodribb TJ. Separating active and passive influences on stomatal control of transpiration. Plant Physiology, 2014, 164: 1578-1586 [30] Franks PJ, Farquhar GD. The mechanical diversity of stomata and its significance in gas-exchange control. Plant Physiology, 2007, 143: 78-87 [31] Xie X, Wang Y, Williamson L, et al. The identification of genes involved in the stomatal response to reduced atmospheric relative humidity. Current Biology, 2006, 16: 882-887 [32] Chater C, Kamisugi Y, Movahedi M, et al. Regulatory mechanism controlling stomatal behavior conserved across 400 million years of land plant evolution. Current Biology, 2011, 21: 1025-1029 [33] Hõrak H, Kollist H, Merilo E. Fern stomatal responses to ABA and CO2 depend on species and growth conditions. Plant Physiology, 2017, 174: 672-679 [34] Cardoso AA, Randall JM, McAdam SA. Hydraulics regu-late stomatal responses to changes in leaf water status in the fern Athyrium filix-femina. Plant Physiology, 2019, 179: 533-543 [35] McAdam SA, Brodribb TJ. Fern and lycophyte guard cells do not respond to endogenous abscisic acid. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2012, 24: 1510-1521 [36] Mcadam SA, Brodribb TJ. Linking turgor with ABA biosynthesis: Implications for stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit across land plants. Plant Physiology, 2016, 171: 2008-2016 [37] Ruszala EM, Beerling DJ, Franks PJ, et al. Land plants acquired active stomatal control early in their evolutionary history. Current Biology, 2011, 21: 1030-1035 [38] Chater CC, Caine RS, Fleming AJ, et al. Origins and evolution of stomatal development. Plant Physiology, 2017, 174: 624-638 [39] Brodribb TJ, McAdam SA. Abscisic acid mediates a divergence in the drought response of two conifers. Plant Physiology, 2013, 162: 1370-1377 [40] McAdam SAM, Brodribb TJ, Ross JJ, et al. Augmentation of abscisic acid (ABA) levels by drought does not induce short-term stomatal sensitivity to CO2 in two divergent conifer species. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010, 62: 195-203 [41] Brodribb TJ, McAdam SA, Jordan GJ, et al. Conifer species adapt to low-rainfall climates by following one of two divergent pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111: 14489-14493 [42] McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytologist, 2008, 178: 719-739 [43] Buckley TN. Stomatal responses to humidity: Has the ‘black box’ finally been opened? Plant, Cell & Environment, 2016, 39: 482-484 [44] Bauer H, Ache P, Lautner S, et al. The stomatal response to reduced relative humidity requires guard cell-autonomous ABA synthesis. Current Biology, 2013, 23: 53-57 [45] Christmann A, Hoffmann T, Teplova I, et al. Generation of active pools of abscisic acid revealed by in vivo imaging of water-stressed Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 2005, 137: 209-219 [46] Okamoto M, Tanaka Y, Abrams SR, et al. High humi-dity induces abscisic acid 8′-hydroxylase in stomata and vasculature to regulate local and systemic abscisic acid responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 2009, 149: 825-834 [47] Pantin F, Monnet F, Jannaud D, et al. The dual effect of abscisic acid on stomata. New Phytologist, 2013, 197: 65-72 [48] Creelman RA, Zeevaart JA. Abscisic acid accumulation in spinach leaf slices in the presence of penetrating and nonpenetrating solutes. Plant Physiology, 1985, 77: 25-28 [49] McAdam SA, Brodribb TJ, Banks JA, et al. Abscisic acid controlled sex before transpiration in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113: 12862-12867 [50] Christmann A, Grill E, Huang J. Hydraulic signals in long-distance signaling. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2013, 16: 293-300 [51] Meinzer FC, Smith DD, Woodruff DR, et al. Stomatal kinetics and photosynthetic gas exchange along a conti-nuum of iso- to anisohydric regulation of plant water status. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2017, 40: 1618-1628 [52] Hartmann H, Ziegler W, Kolle O, et al. Thirst beats hunger-declining hydration during drought prevents carbon starvation in Norway spruce saplings. New Phytologist, 2013, 200: 340-349 [53] Mitchell PJ, O’Grady AP, Tissue DT, et al. Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality. New Phytologist, 2013, 197: 862-872 [54] Sevanto S, McDowell NG, Dickman LT, et al. How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2014, 37: 153-161 [55] Martínez-Vilalta J, Poyatos R, Aguade D, et al. A new look at water transport regulation in plants. New Phytologist, 2014, 204: 105-115 [56] Martínez-Vilalta J, Garcia-Forner N. Water potential regulation, stomatal behaviour and hydraulic transport under drought: Deconstructing the iso/anisohydric concept. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2017, 40: 962-976 [57] Schultz HR. Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2003, 26: 1393-1405 [58] Hochberg U, Rockwell FE, Holbrook NM, et al. Iso/anisohydry: A plant-environment interaction rather than a simple hydraulic trait. Trends in Plant Science, 2018, 23: 112-120 [59] Klein T, Niu S. The variability of stomatal sensitivity to leaf water potential across tree species indicates a continuum between isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Functional Ecology, 2014, 28: 1313-1320 [60] Cochard H, Coll L, Le Roux X, et al. Unraveling the effects of plant hydraulics on stomatal closure during water stress in walnut. Plant Physiology, 2002, 128: 282-290 [61] Sperry J, Hacke U, Oren R, et al. Water deficits and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2002, 25: 251-263 [62] Martinez-Vilalta J, Prat E, Oliveras I, et al. Xylem hydraulic properties of roots and stems of nine Mediterranean woody species. Oecologia, 2002, 133: 19-29 [63] Nardini A, Battistuzzo M, Savi T. Shoot desiccation and hydraulic failure in temperate woody angiosperms during an extreme summer drought. New Phytologist, 2013, 200: 322-329 [64] Tombesi S, Nardini A, Farinelli D, et al. Relationships between stomatal behavior, xylem vulnerability to cavitation and leaf water relations in two cultivars of Vitis vini-fera. Physiologia Plantarum, 2014, 152: 453-464 [65] Cocozza C, Cherubini P, Regier N, et al. Early effects of water deficit on two parental clones of Populus nigra grown under different environmental conditions. Functional Plant Biology, 2010, 37: 244-254 [66] Anderegg WRL, Wolf A, Arango-Velez A, et al. Woody plants optimise stomatal behaviour relative to hydraulic risk. Ecology Letters, 2018, 21: 968-977 [67] Jarvis PG. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1976, 273: 593-610 [68] Li Y-X (李永秀), Lou Y-S (娄运生), Zhang F-C (张富存). Comparison of stomatal conductance models for winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 2011, 32(1): 106-110 (in Chinese) [69] Ball JT, Woodrow IE, Berry JA. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions//Biggins J, ed. Progress in Photosynthesis Research. Dordrecht: MartinusNijhoff Publishers, 1987: 221-224 [70] Leuning R. A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 1995, 18: 339-355 [71] Medlyn BE, Duursma RA, Eamus D, et al. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stoma-tal conductance. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17: 2134-2144 [72] Manzoni S, Vico G, Katul G, et al. Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: A meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates. Functional Ecology, 2011, 25: 456-467 [73] Buckley TN, Sack L, Farquhar GD. Optimal plant water economy. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2017, 40: 881-896 [74] Cowan I.Regulation of water use in relation to carbon gain in higher plants. Physiological Plant Ecology Ⅱ, 1982: 589-613 [75] Wolf A, Anderegg WRL, Pacala SW. Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113: 7222-7230 [76] Anderegg WR, Klein T, Bartlett M, et al. Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality across the globe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113: 5024-5029 [77] Rodriguez-Dominguez CM, Buckley TN, Egea G, et al. Most stomatal closure in woody species under moderate drought can be explained by stomatal responses to leaf turgor. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2016, 39: 2014-2026 [78] Choat B, Brodribb TJ, Brodersen CR, et al. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature, 2018, 558: 531-539 [79] Poyatos R, Granda V, Molownyhoras R, et al. SAPFLUXNET: Towards a global database of sap flow mea-surements. Tree Physiology, 2016, 36: 1449-1455 [80] Deans RM, Brodribb TJ, McAdam SA. An integrated hydraulic-hormonal model of conifer stomata predicts water stress dynamics. Plant Physiology, 2017, 174: 478-486 |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||