Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is Share:

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 1147-1158.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202503.028

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Carbon footprint of major crop production under the goal of ‘double carbon' in Xinjiang, China

YANG Lu, YUE Kaidi, ZHANG Lijie*   

  1. College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830049, China
  • Received:2024-09-19 Accepted:2025-01-10 Online:2025-04-18 Published:2025-10-18

Abstract: As the main cotton-producing area and an important production base of food in China, Xinjiang is facing the dual pressures of ensuring national food security and achieving low-carbon agriculture. A comprehensive accounting of carbon footprint of major crops can contribute to decision-making in agricultural structure adjustment and the environmental management in Xinjiang from the perspective of carbon emission reduction. Based on data of the planting area, yield, and agricultural input of wheat, maize, and cotton in Xinjiang from 2005 to 2021, we used the life cycle assessment method to calculate the production carbon footprint of the aforementioned three major crops and used the grey relational analysis to analyze their influencing factors. Results showed that during 2005-2021, the planting areas of wheat and maize varied with the planting area of cotton. The average annual carbon footprint per unit area of wheat, maize, and cotton were 2.21, 2.67, and 3.61 t CE·hm-2, and the average annual carbon footprint per unit yield were 0.41, 0.35, and 1.91 t CE·t-1 respectively. The carbon ecological efficiency of the three crops was in an order of wheat (10.99 t CE·t CE-1) > maize (9.68 t CE·t CE-1) > cotton (2.96 t CE·t CE-1), the carbon production efficiency was maize (2.88 t·t CE-1) > wheat (2.48 t·t CE-1) > cotton (0.53 t·t CE-1), and the carbon economic efficiency was cotton (7148.74×103 yuan·t CE-1) > maize (6094.32×103 yuan·t CE-1) > wheat (5904.23×103 yuan·t CE-1). As for carbon input structure, farmland N2O emission and chemical fertilizer input were the main sources of the production carbon footprint. Total mechanical power, crop planting area, effective irrigation area, agricultural film usage, compound fertilizer and nitrogen fertilizer input were the main driving factors. Based on our analysis of carbon footprint of wheat, maize, and cotton in Xinjiang in 2022 and 2023, we found that this area need to moderately adjust the planting structure in the future. At the same time, it should develop science and technology to improve the utilization efficiencies of chemical fertilizers, agricultural films, irrigation and mechanical operations to achieve the low-carbon production of crops while ensuring the national food security strategy.

Key words: carbon footprint, life cycle assessment, carbon efficiency, grey relation analysis