Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Root anatomical structure and hydraulic traits of three typical shrubs on the sandy lands of northern Shaanxi Province, China.

AI Shao-shui1, LI Yang-yang2,3, CHEN Jia-cun3, CHEN Wei-yue1   

  1. (1College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; 2Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; 3Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China)
  • Online:2015-11-18 Published:2015-11-18

Abstract: Root xylem anatomical structure and hydraulic traits of three typical shrubs, i.e., Salix psammophila, Caragana korshinskii and Hippophae rhamnoides, within two soil layers (0-20 cm and 30-50 cm) were compared. The results showed that S. psammophila had a higher leaf water potential than C. korshinskii and H. rhamnoides, the average maximum and minimum lumen diameter (dmax and dmin, respectively), the average lumen area of vessels (Alum) and the ratio of lumen area of all vessels to xylem area (Aves/Axyl) in S. psammophila roots were also significantly higher than those in C. korshinskii and H. rhamnoides, and the root vessel density (VD) in S. psammophila was the same as that in H. rhamnoides but significantly higher than that in C. korshinskii. Root hydraulic conductivity in S. psammophila was 5  times of C. korshinskii and 2.8 times of H. hamnoides. The vulnerability index in S. psammophila roots was similar to that in C. korshinskii but higher than that in H. hamnoides. S. psammophila belonged to a waterspending species, whereas both C. korshinskii and H. rhamnoides were watersaving species, and C. korshinskii was more droughtresistant than H. rhamnoides. There was no difference of dmax, dmin and Alum between roots in two soil layers, but roots within in the 30-50 cm soil layer had larger VD and Aves/Axyl. The root specific hydraulic conductivity within the 30-50 cm soil layer was significantly higher than within the surface soil layer, whereas the vulnerability index within the 30-50 cm soil layer was smaller, indicating roots in deep soil layers had higher hydraulic transport efficiency and lower hydraulic vulnerability.