Welcome to Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology! Today is

Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 2871-2885.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202609.045

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Assessment methods for wetland habitat functions and stability.

WU Haitao1*, YANG Tao2, HE Chunguang3, SHENG Lianxi3   

  1. 1Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110801, China;
    2Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China;
    3School of Environment, Northeast Normal University/Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Changchun 130117, China
  • Received:2026-07-17 Accepted:2026-07-30 Online:2026-09-18 Published:2026-10-12

Abstract: Wetlands support rich biodiversity and provide unique habitat functions, playing a critical role in maintaining regional biodiversity and ecological processes. Evaluating the stability of habitat function is fundamental for identifying the quality and health status of wetlands and for guiding wetland conservation, restoration, and sustainable management. However, available habitat function assessments have mainly focused on individual indicators, lacking systematic multidimensional indicator frameworks and integrated evaluation approaches. To address this knowledge gap, we proposed a systematic methodological framework for assessing the stability of wetland habitat function. First, an evaluation indicator system comprising 11 sub-criteria layers and 43 candidate indicators was developed from four criterion layers, including environmental factors, biological composition, landscape patterns, and stress disturbances and conservation management. According to the temporal characteristics, those indicators were further classified into time-series ones and structural-state ones. Based on the constructed annual habitat function index (HFI) time series, stability was quantified from three dimensions: variability, resistance, and recovery. Specifically, the coefficient of variation was used to characterize long-term fluctuations. The relative change in HFI before and after disturbance was used to quantify resistance. Recovery rate, recovery magnitude, and recovery time were employed to describe recovery capacity. Furthermore, two approaches, including dimension-specific representation and a comprehensive habitat function stability index (HFSI), were established for integrated stability assessment. This framework systematically incorporated ecosystem stability theory into wetland habitat function evaluation, providing a quantitative basis for identifying wetland degradation, implementing conservation and restoration interventions, and supporting adaptive management.

Key words: wetland, habitat function, habitat function stability, assessment indicator, assessment method