Environmental impact differences in Qingtian rice-fish culture system at different management scales in the context of land transfer: An empirical study with the carbon footprint method.

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202012.017

Abstract

Abstract: Under rapid industrialization and urbanization, the conservation and management of agricultural heritage systems is facing many threats and challenges, such as the massive outflow of working labor, land abandonment, and the difficulty in maintaining traditional knowledge systems. Promoting land transfer and carrying out moderate-scale management play an active role in the conservation of agricultural heritage systems. While land transfer brings economic benefits to heritage sites, its environmental impacts to heritage sites are worthy of attention. However, empirical studies are scarce. This study took Qingtian rice-fish culture system in Zhejiang Province as an example, which was designated as Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) in 2005. Small farmer management model and land scale management model were distinguished, while the life cycle method was used to calculate the carbon footprints of two models. The results showed that the carbon footprints of small farmer management model and land scale management model were 6510.80 and 5917.00 kg CO₂-eq·hm^-2, respectively, while the carbon footprints per unit output were 0.13 and 0.10 kg CO₂-eq·yuan^-1, respectively. Compared with small farmer management model, land scale management model had lower greenhouse gas emission and lower environmental impact of per unit output. As farmers expanded the scale of land management, local greenhouse gas emissions had been reduced by 4097.20 kg CO₂-eq. Furthermore, the accumulation of CH₄ in agricultural production accounted for the largest proportion of carbon footprint. The input of compound fertilizer among agricultural production materials was next to CH₄ accumulation, becoming the second largest source of greenhouse gas emission. Corn and wheat being used as fish feed also had a significant impact on greenhouse gas emission in small farmer management model. Therefore, the promotion of moderate scale land management is conducive to the win-win of economic and environmental benefits of traditional agricultural systems and plays an important role in the conservation of agricultural heritage systems.

Key words: rice-fish culture, carbon footprint, environmental impact, land transfer, Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS).

CUI Wen-chao, JIAO Wen-jun, MIN Qing-wen, SUN Ye-hong, LIU Mou-cheng, WU Min-fang. Environmental impact differences in Qingtian rice-fish culture system at different management scales in the context of land transfer: An empirical study with the carbon footprint method.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(12): 4125-4133.

References

[1] 葛霖, 高明, 胡正峰, 等. 基于农户视角的山区耕地撂荒原因分析. 中国农业资源与区划, 2012, 33(4): 42-46 [Ge L, Gao M, Hu Z-F, et al. Reasons of cultivated land abandonment in mountainous area based on farmers' perspective. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2012, 33(4): 42-46]
[2] Lesschen JP, Cammeraat LH, Nieman T. Erosion and terrace failure due to agricultural land abandonment in a semi-arid environment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2008, 33: 1574-1584
[3] Soliman K. Changes in concentration of pesticide residues in potatoes during washing and home preparation. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2001, 39: 887-891
[4] Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010, 327: 1008-1010
[5] Frei M, Khan MA, Razzak MA, et al. Effects of a mixed culture of common carp, Cyprinus carpio L., and Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.), on terrestrial arthropod population, benthic fauna, and weed biomass in rice fields in Bangladesh. Biological Control, 2007, 41: 207-213
[6] Xie J, Hu LL, Tang JJ, et al. Ecological mechanisms underlying the sustainability of the agricultural heritage rice-fish coculture system. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108: 1381-1387
[7] Altieri MA. Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the search for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2004, 2: 35-42
[8] Ren WZ, Hu LL, Guo L, et al. Preservation of the genetic diversity of a local common carp in the agricultural heritage rice-fish system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115: 201709582, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1709582115
[9] Zhu YY, Chen HR, Fan JH, et al. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature, 2000, 406: 718-722
[10] 闵庆文. 全球重要农业文化遗产——一种新的世界遗产类型. 资源科学, 2006, 28(4): 206-208 [Min Q-W. GIAHS: A new kind of world heritage. Resources Science, 2006, 28(4): 206-208]
[11] Min QW, Zhang YX, Jiao WH, et al. Responding to common questions on the conservation of agricultural heritage systems in China. Journal of Geographical Science, 2016, 26: 969-982
[12] 闵庆文, 何露, 孙业红, 等. 中国GIAHS 保护试点: 价值、问题与对策. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(6): 668-673 [Min Q-W, He L, Sun Y-H, et al. On the value, conservation and sustainable development of GIAHS pilot sites in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(6): 668-673]
[13] Jiao WJ, Fuller A, Xu SY, et al. Socio-Ecological adaptation of agricultural heritage systems in modern China: Three cases in Qingtian County, Zhejiang Pro-vince. Sustainability, 2016, 8: 1260-1270
[14] 张永勋, 闵庆文. 稻作梯田农业文化遗产保护研究综述. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(4): 460-469 [Zhang Y-X, Min Q-W. A review of conservation of rice terraces as agricultural heritage systems. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(4): 460-469]
[15] Zhang YX, Min QW, Li HY, et al. A conservation approach of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS): Improving traditional agricultural patterns and promoting scale-production. Sustainability, 2017, 9: 295-299
[16] Zhang YX, Li XD, Min QW. How to balance the relationship between conservation of Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS) and socio-economic development? A theoretical framework of sustainable industrial integration development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 204: 553-563
[17] Sun YH, Zhou HJ, Zhang LY, et al. Adapting to droughts in Yuanyang Terrace of SW China: Insight from disaster risk reduction. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2013, 18: 759-771
[18] 王珊珊, 张广胜. 非农就业对农户碳排放行为的影响研究: 来自辽宁省辽中县的证据. 资源科学, 2013, 35(9): 1855-1862 [Wang S-S, Zhang G-S. The impact of off-farm employment on the agricultural carbon emission behavior of farmers: Evidence from Liaozhong County, Liaoning Province. Resources Science, 2013, 35(9): 1855-1862]
[19] 李玉红. 农业规模化经营的外部性分析: 一个生态环境角度的考察. 重庆理工大学学报: 社会科学版, 2016, 30(7): 37-43 [Li Y-H. Externality analysis of agricultural scale management: An ecological environment perspective. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology: Social Science, 2016, 30(7): 37-43]
[20] Hu LL, Ren WZ, Tang JJ, et al. The productivity of traditional rice-fish co-culture can be increased without increasing nitrogen loss to the environment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2013, 177: 28-34
[21] Xie J, Hu LL, Tang JJ, et al. Ecological mechanisms underlying the sustainability of the agricultural heritage rice-fish coculture systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108: 1381-1387
[22] Wang Y, Frei M. Stressed food: The impact of abiotic environmental stresses on crop quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2011, 141: 271-286
[23] 张剑, 胡亮亮, 任伟征, 等. 稻鱼系统中田鱼对资源的利用及对水稻生长的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(1): 299-307 [Zhang J, Hu L-L, Ren W-Z, et al. Effects of fish on field resource utilization and rice growth in rice-fish co-culture. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(1): 299-307]
[24] Wiedmann T, Minx J. A Definition of ‘Carbon Footprint' [EB/OL]. (2020-01-02) [2020-03-01]. http://www.doc88.com/p-3803859980158.html
[25] Dubey A, Lal R. Carbon footprint and sustainability of agricultural production systems in Punjab, India, and Ohio, USA. Journal of Crop Improvement, 2009, 23: 332-350
[26] IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013
[27] IPCC. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Hayama: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2006
[28] 袁伟玲, 曹凑贵, 李成芳, 等. 稻鸭、稻鱼共生生态系统CH₄和N₂O温室效应及经济效益评估. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(6): 2052-2060 [Yuan W-L, Cao C-G, Li C-F, et al. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice-fish and rice-duck complex ecosystems and the evaluation of their economic significance. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(6): 2052-2060]
[29] 刘夏璐, 王洪涛, 陈建, 等. 中国生命周期参考数据库的建立方法与基础模型. 环境科学学报, 2010, 30(10): 2136-2144 [Liu X-L, Wang H-T, Chen J, et al. Method and basic model for development of Chinese reference life cycle database. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2010, 30(10): 2136-2144]
[30] Ecoinvent Database. Ecoinvent V3 [EB/OL]. (2011-05-11) [2016-06-30]. http: //www.ecoinvent.ch
[31] 王钰乔, 濮超, 赵鑫, 等. 中国小麦、玉米碳足迹历史动态及未来趋势. 资源科学, 2018, 40(9): 1800-1811 [Wang Y-Q, Pu C, Zhao X, et al. Historical dinamycs and future trends of carbon footprint of wheat and maize in China. Resources Science, 2018, 40(9): 1800-1811]
[32] Lal R. Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International, 2004, 30: 981-990