[1] Zhao J, Yue C, Wang JM, et al. Forest fire size amplifies postfire land surface warming. Nature, 2024, 633: 828-834 [2] Lopez AM, Avila CCE, VanderRoest JP, et al. Molecular insights and impacts of wildfire-induced soil chemical changes. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2024, 5: 431-446 [3] Tang XH, Yang JJ, Lin DH, et al. Community assembly of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in pure and mixed Pinus massoniana forests. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 362: 121312 [4] Stevens JT, Haffey CM, Coop JD, et al. Tamm review: Postfire landscape management in frequent-fire conifer forests of the southwestern United States. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 502: 119678 [5] 王译庆, 袁朝祥, 岳楷, 等. 植被恢复对矿区土壤微生物群落结构影响的整合分析. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(4): 1141-1149 [6] Patoine G, Eisenhauer N, Cesarz S, et al. Drivers and trends of global soil microbial carbon over two decades. Nature Communications, 2022, 13: 4195 [7] Hao ZG, Zhao YF, Wang X, et al. Thresholds in aridity and soil carbon-to-nitrogen ratio govern the accumulation of soil microbial residues. Communications Earth & Environment, 2021, 2: 236 [8] Xing TT, Cai AD, Lu CA, et al. Increasing soil microbial biomass nitrogen in crop rotation systems by improving nitrogen resources under nitrogen application. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21: 1488-1500 [9] Peng Y, Duan YS, Huo WG, et al. Soil microbial biomass phosphorus can serve as an index to reflect soil phosphorus fertility. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2021, 57: 657-669 [10] Gao DC, Bai E, Wang SY, et al. Three-dimensional mapping of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in soil microbial biomass and their stoichiometry at the global scale. Global Change Biology, 2022, 28: 6728-6740 [11] Cleveland CC, Liptzin D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: Is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry, 2007, 85: 235-252 [12] Yan YC, Wang C, Zhang JM, et al. Response of soil microbial biomass C, N, and P and microbial quotient to agriculture and agricultural abandonment in a meadow steppe of Northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2022, 223: 105475 [13] 梁裕华, 曹瑞, 王芝慧, 等. 不同经营模式茶园土壤微生物熵对台风干扰的响应. 生态学报, 2023, 43(17): 7216-7225 [14] Sun TT, Wang YG, Hui DF, et al. Soil properties rather than climate and ecosystem type control the vertical varia-tions of soil organic carbon, microbial carbon, and microbial quotient. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 148: 107905 [15] Gao DC, Shi WJ, Wang HM, et al. Contrasting global patterns of soil microbial quotients of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems. Catena, 2024, 243: 108145 [16] Wang Y, Niu DC, Yuan XB, et al. Dominant plant species alter stoichiometric imbalances between soil microbes and their resources in an alpine grassland: Implications for soil microbial respiration. Geoderma, 2023, 431: 116336 [17] Li B, Li YB, Fanin N, et al. Stoichiometric imbalances between soil microorganisms and their resources regulate litter decomposition. Functional Ecology, 2023, 37: 3136-3149 [18] 王绪高, 李秀珍, 贺红士. 1987年大兴安岭特大火灾后不同管理措施对落叶松林的长期影响. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(4): 915-921 [19] 蔡慧颖, 李兰慧, 林阳, 等. 白桦叶片和细根非结构性碳水化合物对火后时间的响应. 植物生态学报, 2024, 48(6): 780-793 [20] Hu TX, Zhao BQ, Li F, et al. Effects of fire on soil respiration and its components in a Dahurian larch (Larix gmelinii) forest in Northeast China: Implications for forest ecosystem carbon cycling. Geoderma, 2021, 402: 115273 [21] 张宇婧, 吴志伟, 顾先丽, 等. 火烧强度和火后恢复时间对大兴安岭森林土壤有机碳含量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8): 2455-2462 [22] 胡宗达, 刘世荣, 刘兴良, 等. 川西亚高山天然次生林不同演替阶段土壤-微生物生物量及其化学计量特征. 生态学报, 2021, 41(12): 4900-4912 [23] Wang ZQ, Zhao MY, Yan ZB, et al. Global patterns and predictors of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems. Catena, 2022, 211: 106037 [24] Bai XJ, Zhai GQ, Yan ZF, et al. Effects of microbial groups on soil organic carbon accrual and mineralization during high- and low-quality litter decomposition. Catena, 2024, 241: 108051 [25] Redfield AC. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. American Scientist, 1958, 46: 230A, 205-230A, 221 [26] Fanin N, Fromin N, Buatois B, et al. An experimental test of the hypothesis of non-homeostatic consumer stoichiometry in a plant litter-microbe system. Ecology Letters, 2013, 16: 764-772 [27] Wang XL, Zhang WX, Shao YH, et al. Fungi to bacteria ratio: Historical misinterpretations and potential implications. Acta Oecologica, 2019, 95: 1-11 [28] 丁令智, 满秀玲, 肖瑞晗, 等. 寒温带森林根际土壤微生物量碳氮含量生长季内动态变化. 林业科学, 2019, 55(7): 178-186 [29] Koranda M, Kaiser C, Fuchslueger L, et al. Fungal and bacterial utilization of organic substrates depends on substrate complexity and N availability. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2014, 87: 142-152 [30] Song SS, Yang X, Zhu JL, et al. Plant functional diversity regulates the composition and diversity of soil microbial communities in temperate grasslands of northern China. Functional Ecology, 2025, 39: 2314-2326 [31] Du EZ, Terrer C, Pellegrini AFA, et al. Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. Nature Geoscience, 2020, 13: 221-226 [32] Yu WY, Wang CW, Cornelissen JHC, et al. Litter position and stoichiometry regulate plant litter decomposition and nitrogen release in terrestrial ecosystems. Catena, 2025, 256: 109093 [33] Yu YL, Li L, Yang JK, et al. Global synthesis on the responses of microbial- and plant-derived carbon to conservation tillage. Plant and Soil, 2025, 513: 1971-1985 [34] Li ZL, Tian DS, Wang BX, et al. Microbes drive global soil nitrogen mineralization and availability. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25: 1078-1088 [35] Wang WB, Chen DS, Zhang Q, et al. Effects of mixed coniferous and broad-leaved litter on bacterial and fungal nitrogen metabolism pathway during litter decomposition. Plant and Soil, 2020, 451: 307-323 [36] Maranguit D, Guillaume T, Kuzyakov Y. Land-use change affects phosphorus fractions in highly weathered tropical soils. Catena, 2017, 149: 385-393 [37] Baldrian P. Forest microbiome: Diversity, complexity and dynamics. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2017, 41: 109-130 [38] Li P, Yang YH, Han WX, et al. Global patterns of soil microbial nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in forest ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014, 23: 979-987 [39] Chen J, Xu H, Seven J, et al. Microbial phosphorus recycling in soil by intra- and extracellular mechanisms. ISME Communications, 2023, 3: 135 [40] Prommer J, Walker TWN, Wanek W, et al. Increased microbial growth, biomass, and turnover drive soil organic carbon accumulation at higher plant diversity. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26: 669-681 [41] Liang C, Schimel JP, Jastrow JD. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nature Microbiology, 2017, 2: 17105 [42] Mooshammer M, Wanek W, Hämmerle I, et al. Adjustment of microbial nitrogen use efficiency to carbon: Nitrogen imbalances regulates soil nitrogen cycling. Nature Communications, 2014, 5: 3694 [43] Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Follstad Shah JJ. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature, 2009, 462: 795-798 [44] Yeste A, Blanco JA, Imbert JB, et al. Pinus sylvestris L. and Fagus sylvatica L. effects on soil and root properties and their interactions in a mixed forest on the Southwestern Pyrenees. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 481: 118726 |