欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 3322-3330.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202010.003

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于不同可加性方法的黑龙江省红松人工林林分生物量模型

辛士冬, 严云仙, 姜立春*   

  1. 东北林业大学林学院/森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室, 哈尔滨 150040
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-01 接受日期:2020-07-10 出版日期:2020-10-15 发布日期:2021-04-15
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: jlichun@nefu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:辛士冬, 男, 1993年生, 博士研究生。主要从事林分生长与收获模型研究。E-mail: 774933353@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFB0502700)和黑龙江省应用技术研究与开发计划项目(GA19C006)资助

Stand biomass model for Pinus koraiensis plantation based on different additive methods in Heilongjiang Province, China

XIN Shi-dong, YAN Yun-xian, JIANG Li-chun*   

  1. College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University/Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management of Ministry of Education, Harbin 150040, China
  • Received:2020-05-01 Accepted:2020-07-10 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2021-04-15
  • Contact: * E-mail: jlichun@nefu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB0502700) and the Heilongjiang Province Applied Technology Research and Deve-lopment Plan Project of China (GA19C006).

摘要: 大尺度估算森林生物量一直是人们关注的焦点,而构建林分水平的生物量模型是一种估算森林乔木层生物量的方法。本研究基于聚合法1、聚合法2、平差法、分解法构建红松人工林林分生物量模型,并对比分析4种可加性方法的预测精度,为黑龙江省红松人工林的生物量预测提供科学依据。各模型均使用权函数来消除各模型的异方差,并以留一交叉验证法(LOOCV)作为各模型的检验方法。结果表明: 平差法的整体预测能力略优于聚合法1、聚合法2和分解法,预测精度排序为平差法>聚合法1>聚合法2>分解法;分别对比不同林分断面积的预测能力时,4种可加性方法的预测精度不一致。当红松人工林的林分断面积分布于0~10或50~60 m2·hm-2区间时,建议采用分解法的参数估计值,而林分断面积分布于其他区间时,建议采用平差法的参数估计值。

关键词: 红松人工林, 可加性方法, 林分生物量模型, 留一交叉验证法, 预测精度

Abstract: Large-scale estimation of forest biomass has received much attention. Constructing a stand-level biomass model is a method for estimating tree layer biomass. In this study, we constructed stand biomass models of Korean pine plantations based on aggregation method 1, aggregation method 2, adjustment method, and disaggregation method. The prediction precision of four additive methods was compared and analyzed to provide theoretical basis for biomass prediction of Korean pine plantations in Heilongjiang Province. Weighted functions were used to eliminate the heteroscedasticity of each model, with the leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) as the validation method. The results showed that the overall prediction ability of the adjustment method was slightly better than other methods. The specific prediction precision was ranked as adjustment method > aggregation method 1 > aggregation method 2 > disaggregation method. The prediction precision of four additive methods was not consistent when considering their prediction ability of different stand basal areas. When the stand basal area of Korean pine plantations was distributed in the interval of 0-10 or 50-60 m2·hm-2, the parameter estimation values of disaggregation method performed better. When the stand basal area was distributed in other intervals, the parameter estimation values of adjustment method was better.

Key words: Pinus koraiensis plantation, additivity method, stand biomass model, leave-one-out cross validation, prediction precision