福州市生态系统生产总值核算

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.018

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3835-3844.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.018

• 生态系统服务与生态产品价值核算专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

福州市生态系统生产总值核算

邓娇娇¹,常璐¹,张月¹,周旺明¹,齐麟²,周莉¹,于大炮^1*,

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所森林生态与管理重点实验室, 沈阳 110016;
²沈阳大学生物入侵中心, 沈阳 110003

出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2022-05-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: yudp2003@iae.ac.cn
作者简介:邓娇娇, 女, 1989年生, 博士。主要从事森林生态学研究。E-mail:jiaojiaod@iae.ac.cn
基金资助:
本文由福州市生态系统价值核算科研服务资助项目([350100]HH[CS]2019001)资助

Accounting of gross ecosystem product in Fuzhou City,China

DENG Jiao-jiao¹, CHANG Lu¹, ZHANG Yue¹, ZHOU Wang-ming¹, QI Lin², ZHOU Li¹, YU Da-pao^1*

¹CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, China;
²Biological Invasion Center, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110003, China

Online:2021-11-15 Published:2022-05-15
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Research Services of Ecosystem Value Accounting in Fuzhou City ([350100]HH[CS]2019001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 开展生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算是推进生态文明制度建设的必要措施,也是将生态效益纳入经济社会发展评价体系的重要举措。本研究以福州市为研究对象,通过构建具有“山、海、城”特色的生态系统价值核算体系,对2015和2018年福州市GEP进行核算,从时空变化角度对福州市GEP进行对比。结果表明: 2015、2018年福州市GEP分别为9205.92、10472.42亿元,人均GEP分别为13.02、14.39万元,生态产品供给服务价值分别为941.81、1102.61亿元,生态调节服务价值分别为6364.20、5988.51亿元,生态文化服务价值分别为1899.91、3381.3亿元。与2015年相比,2018年福州市GEP增加1266.50亿元,增幅为13.8%,主要得益于生态产品供给服务价值和生态文化服务价值的增加。然而,生态调节服务价值减少375.69亿元,降幅为5.9%,主要源于气候调节、水流动调节和水质净化服务价值的减少。福州率先探索建立一套具有山、海、城特色的核算体系,可以为福建省其他城市及我国其他地区的核算工作提供“福州样板”,同时助推建立生态价值实现的长效机制。

关键词: “山、海、城”特色, 核算体系, 生态系统生产总值, 福州市

Abstract: Carrying out the accounting of ecological system gross ecosystem product (GEP) is a necessary measure to promote the construction of ecological civilization system and an important measure for the integration of ecological benefits into the economic and social development evaluation system. Taking Fuzhou City as the object, we constructed an ecosystem value accounting system with the characteristics of “mountain, sea, and city” to calculate the GEP of Fuzhou City in 2015 and 2018, and compared them from the perspective of temporal and spatial changes. The results showed that the GEP of Fuzhou in 2015 and 2018 was 920.592 and 1047.242 billion yuan, respectively. The per capita GEP in 2015 and 2018 was 130200 and 143900 yuan, the supply service value of ecological products was 94.181 and 110.261 billion yuan, the value of ecological regulation was 636.42 and 598.851 billion yuan, and the service value of ecological culture was 189.991 and 338.13 billion yuan, respectively. Compared with that in 2015, the GEP of Fuzhou City in 2018 increased by 126.65 billion yuan, with an increase of 13.8%, which was mainly due to the increases in ecological product supply service and cultural service. The value of ecological regulation services decreased by 37.569 billion yuan, with a reduction of 5.9%, which was mainly due to the decreases in climate regulation, water flow regulation and water purification services. Fuzhou City took the lead in exploring the establishment of accounting system with the characteristics of “mountain, sea, and city”, which could provide a “Fuzhou model” for the accounting work of other cities in Fujian Province and other regions in China, and promote the establishment of a long-term mechanism for realizing the value of ecological products.

Key words: “mountain, sea, and city” feature, accounting system, gross ecosystem product, Fuzhou City.

邓娇娇,常璐,张月,周旺明,齐麟,周莉,于大炮,. 福州市生态系统生产总值核算[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3835-3844.

DENG Jiao-jiao, CHANG Lu, ZHANG Yue, ZHOU Wang-ming, QI Lin, ZHOU Li, YU Da-pao. Accounting of gross ecosystem product in Fuzhou City,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11): 3835-3844.

参考文献 21

[1]	欧阳志云, 靳乐山. 面向生态补偿的生态系统生产总值(GEP)和生态资产核算. 北京: 科学出版社, 2017 [Ouyang Z-Y, Jin L-S. Gross Ecosystem Product Accounting for Ecological Benefits Assessment: A Case Study of Qinghai Province. Beijing: Science Press, 2017]
[2]	王莉雁, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 国家级重点生态功能区县生态系统生产总值核算研究——以阿尔山市为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(3): 146-154 [Wang L-Y, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Gross ecosystem product accounting in the national key ecological function area: An example of Arxan. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(3): 146-154]
[3]	Camacho-Valdez V, Ruiz-Luna A, Ghermandi A, et al. Effects of land use changes on the ecosystem service values of coastal wetlands. Environmental Management, 2014, 54: 852-864
[4]	Duraiappah AK. Ecosystem services and human well-being: Do global findings make any sense? Bioscience, 2011, 61: 7-8
[5]	李涛, 甘德欣, 杨知建, 等. 土地利用变化影响下洞庭湖地区生态系统服务价值的时空演变. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(12): 3787-3796 [Li T, Gan D-X, Yang Z-J, et al. Spatial-temporal evolvement of ecosystem service value of Dongting Lake area influenced by changes of land use. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(12): 3787-3796]
[6]	马国霞, 於方, 王金南, 等. 中国2015年陆地生态系统生产总值核算研究. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(4): 1474-1482 [Ma G-X, Yu F, Wang J-N, et al. Measuring gross ecosystem product (GEP) of 2015 for terrestrial ecosystems in China. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37(4): 1474-1482]
[7]	Zhao AZ, Zhang AB, Cao S, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of water use efficiency in China and responses to multi-scale drought. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2020, 140: 559-570
[8]	马国霞, 赵学涛, 吴琼, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算概念界定和体系构建. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 27-33 [Ma G-X, Zhao X-T, Wu Q, et al. Concept definition and system construction of gross ecosystem production. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 27-33]
[9]	于淼, 金海珍, 李强, 等. 呈贡区生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算研究. 西部林业科学, 2020, 49(3): 41-48 [Yu M, Jin H-Z, Li Q, et al. Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) accounting for Chenggong District. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2020, 49(3): 41-48]
[10]	Wei HJ, Fan WG, Wang XC, et al. Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 25: 15-27
[11]	白玛卓嘎, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 基于生态系统生产总值核算的习水县生态保护成效评估. 生态学报, 2020, 40(2): 499-509 [Bai M-Z-G, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Assessment of ecological conservation effect in Xishui County based on gross ecosystem product. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 499-509]
[12]	宋昌素, 欧阳志云. 面向生态效益评估的生态系统生产总值核算研究——以青海省为例. 生态学报, 2020, 40(10): 57-67 [Song C-S, Ouyang Z-Y. Gross ecosystem product accounting for ecological benefits assessment: A case study of Qinghai Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(10): 57-67]
[13]	Tang XG, Zhou YL, Li HP, et al. Remotely monitoring ecosystem respiration from various grasslands along a large-scale east-west transect across northern China. Carbon Balance and Management, 2020, 15: 6
[14]	董天, 张路, 肖燚, 等. 鄂尔多斯市生态资产和生态系统生产总值评估. 生态学报, 2019, 39(9): 47-59 [Dong T, Zhang L, Xiao Y, et al. Assessment of ecological assets and gross ecosystem product value in Ordos City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(9): 47-59]
[15]	白杨, 李晖, 王晓媛, 等. 云南省生态资产与生态系统生产总值核算体系研究. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(7): 1100-1112 [Bai Y, Li H, Wang X-Y, et al. Evaluating natural resource assets and gross ecosystem products using ecological accounting system: A case study in Yunnan Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(7): 1100-1112]
[16]	翟琇. 给绿水青山定价给“两山”转化找路——关于内蒙古生态产品价值核算与转化应用研究的思考. 北方经济, 2021(5): 16-18 [Zhai X. Price green water and green mountains and find a way for the transformation of “two mountains”: Reflections on the application research of ecological product value accounting and transformation in Inner Mongolia. Northern Economy, 2021(5): 16-18]
[17]	欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算:概念,核算方法与案例研究. 生态学报, 2013, 21(21): 6747-6761 [Ouyang Z-Y, Zhu C-Q, Yang G-B, et al. Gross ecosystem product: Concept, accounting framework and case study. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 21(21): 6747-6761]
[18]	Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Xiao Y, et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 2016, 352: 1455-1459
[19]	Costanza R, Groot R, Sutton PC, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26: 152-158
[20]	Kubiszewski I, Costanza R, Anderson S, et al. The future value of ecosystem services: Global scenarios and national implications: ScienceDirect. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 26: 289-301
[21]	中国国家标准化管理委员会. 土地利用现状分类 (GB/T 21010—2017). (2017-11-01) [2017-11-01]. https://m.wang1314.com/doc/webapp/topic/209360-79.html [China National Standardization Management Committee. Current Land Use Classification (GB/T 21010-2017). (2017-11-01) [2017-11-01]. https://m.wang1314.com/doc/webapp/topic/2093-6079.html]

福州市生态系统生产总值核算

Accounting of gross ecosystem product in Fuzhou City,China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋家鹏, 陈松林. 基于生态系统服务簇的福州市生态系统服务格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 1045-1053.
[2]	陈宗铸,雷金睿,吴庭天,陈德祥,周璋,李苑菱,洪小江,杨众养,李意德. 国家公园生态系统生产总值核算——以海南热带雨林国家公园为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3883-3892.
[3]	王娇月,邴龙飞,尹岩,郗凤明,马铭婧,张文凤. 湿地生态系统服务功能及其价值核算——以福州市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3824-3834.
[4]	牛乐,王娇月,郗凤明,尹岩,邴龙飞,马铭婧,张文凤. 基于生态系统服务付费模型的福州市区域生态补偿额度核算 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3805-3814.
[5]	牛乐,王娇月,郗凤明,尹岩,邴龙飞,马铭婧,张文凤. 福州市经济生态生产总值核算 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3793-3804.
[6]	王娇月, 邴龙飞, 尹岩, 郗凤明, 马铭婧, 张文凤, 牛乐, 张丽霞. 福州市生态系统破坏损失评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3781-3792.
[7]	朱玉娇, 姚晓婧, 陈伟, 何贞健, 陈六嘉, 杨丽娜, 陈曙光, 池天河. 基于多源数据的福州市中心城区人居环境质量评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2721-2730.
[8]	陈铸,黄雅冰,朱志鹏,郑祈全,阙晨曦,董建文. 基于地形梯度特征的福州市景观格局演变 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 4135-4144.