福州市生态系统破坏损失评估

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202100.000

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3781-3792.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202100.000

• 生态系统服务与生态产品价值核算专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

福州市生态系统破坏损失评估

王娇月^1,2,邴龙飞^1,2,尹岩^1,2,郗凤明^1,2*,马铭婧^1,3,张文凤^1,3,牛乐^1,3, 张丽霞⁴

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
²中国科学院污染生态与环境工程重点实验室, 沈阳 110016;
³中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
⁴辽宁省信息中心, 沈阳 110002

出版日期:2021-11-15 发布日期:2022-05-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: xifengming@iae.ac.cn
作者简介:王娇月, 女, 1985年生, 助理研究员。主要从事碳循环研究。E-mail:wangjiaoyue@iae.ac.cn
基金资助:
本文由国家自然科学基金项目(41603068,41977290)、中国科学院青年创新促进会项目(2020201,Y202050)和福州市生态系统价值核算科研服务项目([350100]HH[CS]2019001)资助

Accounting for the cost of ecological degradation in Fuzhou City, China

WANG Jiao-yue^1,2, BING Long-fei^1,2, YIN Yan^1,2, XI Feng-ming^1,2*, MA Ming-jing^1,3, ZHANG Wen-feng^1,3, NIU Le^1,3, ZHANG Li-xia⁴

¹Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
²Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
⁴Liaoning Province Information Center, Shenyang 110002, China

Online:2021-11-15 Published:2022-05-15
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41603068, 41977290), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2020201, Y202050), and the Scientific Research on the Project of Ecosystem Service Value Accounting in Fuzhou City ([350100]HH[CS]2019001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态系统破坏损失核算是构建绿色国民经济和经济生态生产总值核算体系的关键内容。本研究以福州市生态系统为研究对象,根据其人类不合理利用生态情况,构建了符合福州市的生态系统破坏损失核算框架体系,对2015和2018年福州市生态系统破坏损失进行核算。结果表明: 福州市2015年生态破坏损失成本为90.81亿元,占GDP比重的1.6%。在系统类型上,海洋的生态破坏损失最大,为63.11亿元,占总生态破坏损失的69.5%,其次为湿地生态系统,占比28.7%,农田生态破坏损失最小,占比仅为1.8%;在功能组成上,产品供给功能损失最大,为63.13亿元,占总生态破坏损失的69.5%,其次为调节功能损失,占比27.5%,主要源于水流动调节功能和气候调节功能损失;在区域分布上,生态破坏损失成本主要集中在罗源县、连江县、福清市和闽清县,累计高达80.92亿元,占总生态破坏损失的89.7%。与2015年相比,2018年福州市生态系统破坏损失成本减少26.08亿元,呈明显降低趋势,降幅达28.7%,主要源于连江县、罗源县、福清市和闽清县生态破坏损失成本的降低,降幅分别为86.4%、14.8%、19.9%和12.6%,主要源于海洋和湿地生态系统类型人为破坏率的降低,表明福州市人民生态保护意识不断增强,海洋与湿地系统人为生态破坏现象明显好转。本研究对生态系统生态破坏损失的定价为促进区域可持续发展和生态文明建设提供了数据支撑。

关键词: 生态系统, 生态破坏, 生态调节服务, 福州市

Abstract: Ecological degradation accounting is a critical content of building green GDP and gross economic-ecological product (GEEP) accounting systems. With ecosystems in Fuzhou City as a research object, we built an accounting framework for the cost of ecological degradation according to the unreasonable human activity. Following the accounting framework, we calculated the ecological degradation cost in Fuzhou City of 2015 and 2018. The results showed that the ecological degradation cost in Fuzhou City of 2015 was 9.08 billion yuan, accounting for 1.6% of local GDP. For different ecosystem types, marine ecological degradation cost was the largest, about 6.311 billion yuan, accounting for 69.5% of the total loss, followed by wetland ecosystem, accounting for 28.7%, and then arable land, contributing only 1.8%. In term of functions, the cost of provisioning degradation was the largest, about 6.313 billion yuan, accounting for 69.5% of the total loss, followed by regulation loss, accounting for 27.5%, mainly from the loss of climate regulation and hydrological regulation. In the regional distribution, the ecological degradation cost was mainly concentrated in Lianjiang County, Luoyuan County, Fuqing City, and Minqing County, up to 8.092 billion yuan in total, accounting for 89.7% of total loss. Compared with 2015, the ecological degradation cost in 2018 decreased by 2.608 billion yuan, showing an obvious downward trend, with a decrease rate of 28.7%. The reductions were major in Lianjiang County (86.4%), Luoyuan County (14.8%), Fuqing City (19.9%), and Minqing County (12.6%), and mainly concentrated in marine and wetland ecosystems. Such a result indicated that people’s awareness of ecological protection in Fuzhou City was increasing, and that the ecological damage due to human activity in marine and wetland system was obviously decreased. This study provided data support for promoting regional sustainable development and ecological civilization construction.

Key words: ecosystem, ecological degradation, ecological regulation service, Fuzhou City.

王娇月, 邴龙飞, 尹岩, 郗凤明, 马铭婧, 张文凤, 牛乐, 张丽霞. 福州市生态系统破坏损失评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3781-3792.

WANG Jiao-yue, BING Long-fei, YIN Yan, XI Feng-ming, MA Ming-jing, ZHANG Wen-feng, NIU Le, ZHANG Li-xia. Accounting for the cost of ecological degradation in Fuzhou City, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11): 3781-3792.

参考文献 45

[1]	王金南, 於方, 马国霞, 等. 中国经济生态生产总值核算报告(2017). 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2019 [Wang J-N, Yu F, Ma G-X, et al. Report onGross Economic-Ecological Product Accounting Research in China (2017). Beijing: China Environment Publishing Group, 2019]
[2]	马国霞, 周夏飞, 彭菲, 等. 2015年中国生态系统生态破坏损失核算研究.地理科学, 2019, 39(6): 1008-1015 [Ma G-X, Zhou X-F, Peng F, et al. Cost of ecological degradation accounting in China in 2015. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(6): 1008-1015]
[3]	张云芝, 胡云锋, 韩月琪, 等. 全球主要生态退化区和研究热点区的空间分布与演变. 生态学报, 2021, 41(19): 1-15 [Zhang Y-Z, Hu Y-F, Han Y-Q, et al. Spatial distributions and evolutions of global major ecological degradation regions and research hotspot regions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(9): 1-15]
[4]	张复明. 矿产开发负效应与资源生态环境补偿机制研究. 中国工业经济, 2009(12): 5-15 [Zhang F-M. Study on ecological environment compensation mechanism based on negative effect in mining. China Industrial Economics, 2009(12): 5-15]
[5]	Xiang HX, Wang ZM, Mao DH, et al. Surface mining caused multiple ecosystem service losses in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 290, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112618
[6]	Li XJ, Zhang J, Xu LY. An evaluation of ecological losses from hydropower development in Tibet. Ecologial Engineering, 2015, 76: 178-185
[7]	马国霞, 石敏俊, 李玫. 中国水土流失经济损失的货币化评价. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009, 7(1): 162-168 [Ma G-X, Shi M-J, Li M. Economical cost evaluation of ecological environment degradation in China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2009, 7(1): 162-168]
[8]	马国霞, 石敏俊, 赵学涛, 等. 中国北方沙漠化经济损失价值核算. 中国沙漠, 2008, 28(4): 627-633 [Ma G-X, Shi M-J, Zhao X-T, et al. Monetary accounting of economic loss of sandy desertification in North China. Journal of Desert Research, 2008, 28(4): 627-633]
[9]	郭振仁, 刘明清. 我国南方沿海水体污染与生境退化的经济损失. 2010中国环境科学学会学术年会论文集(第二卷), 上海: 267-271 [Guo Z-R, Liu M-Q. Economic loss of water pollution and habitat degradation in coastal areas of South China. 2010 Annual Meeting of China Society of Environmental Science (Volume 2), Shanghai: 267-271]
[10]	王乙. 野生动物保护价值评价研究. 博士论文. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2018 [Wang Y. Study on the Eva-luation of Wildlife Protection Walue. PhD Thesis. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2018]
[11]	赵鸿雁, 陈英, 谢保鹏, 等. 甘肃省违法占用耕地的生态服务价值损失计量研究. 草原与草坪, 2020, 40(5): 83-90 [Zhao H-Y, Chen Y, Xie B-P, et al. Study on the estimation of ecological service value loss caused by illegal occupation of arable land in Gansu province. Grassland and Turf, 2020, 40(5): 83-90]
[12]	刘峰, 高云芳, 李秀启. 我国湿地退化研究概况. 长江大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 17(5): 84-89 [Liu F, Gao Y-F, Li X-Q. Research on wetland degradation in China. Journal of Yangtze University: Natural Science, 2020, 17(5): 84-89]
[13]	邱凌, 王丽娟, 赵磊, 等. 四川省草地生态系统破坏损失价值评估. 四川环境, 2012, 31(6): 70-74 [Qiu L, Wang L-J, Zhao L, et al. Evaluation of economic losses from damage of grassland ecosystem in Sichuan Province. Sichuan Environment, 2012, 31(6): 70-74]
[14]	Shan JZ, Li JM. Valuing marine ecosystem service dama-ge caused by land reclamation; insights from a delibera-tive choice experiment in Jiaozhou Bay. Marine Policy, 2020, 122, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104249
[15]	Yan FQ, Zhang SW. Ecosystem service decline in response to wetland loss in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Ecological Engineering, 2019, 130: 117-121
[16]	Wang JN, Yu F, Ma GX, et al. Gross economic-ecologi-cal product as an integrated measure for ecological ser-vice and economic products. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2021, 171, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105566
[17]	Ma GX, Wang JN, Yu F, et al. Framework construction and application of China’s Gross Economic-Ecological Product accounting. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 264, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109852
[18]	Costanza R, De Groot R, Sutton P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 2014, 26: 152-158
[19]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Wetlands and Water. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 2005
[20]	欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761 [Ouyang Z-Y, Zhu C-Q, Yang G-B, et al. Gross ecosystem product: Concept, accounting framework and case study. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761]
[21]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746 [Xie G-D, Zhang C-X, Zhang C-S, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746]
[22]	国家林业局. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范. LY/T 1721—2008. 北京: 国家标准化管理委员会, 2017 [State Forestry Administration of China. Specifications for Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services in China. LY/T 1721-2008. Beijing: State Standardization Administration Commission, 2017]
[23]	徐嵩龄. 生态资源破坏经济损失计量中概念和方法的规范化. 自然资源学报, 1997, 12(2): 160-168 [Xu S-L. The standardization of the concepts and methods in the calculation of the economic loss of ecological resources destruction. Journal of Natural Resources, 1997, 12(2): 160-168]
[24]	国家市场监督管理总局. 生态系统评估生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算技术规范(征求意见稿). 北京: 国家标准化管理委员会, 2020 [State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration. Ecosystem Assessment Guidelines for Gross Ecosystem Product Accounting (Draft). Beijing: State Standardization Administration Commission, 2020]
[25]	国家市场监督管检验检疫理总局. 海洋生态资本评估技术导则. BG/T 28058—2011. 北京: 国家标准化管理委员会, 2011 [State Administration of Market Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine. Technical Directives for Marine Ecological Capital Assessment. BG/T 28058-2011. Beijing: State Standardization Administration Commission, 2011]
[26]	国家林业局. 湿地生态系统服务评估规范. LY/T 2899—2017. 北京: 国家林业局, 2017 [State Forestry Administration of China. Specifications for Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Services. LY/T 2899-2017. Beijing: State Forestry Administration of China, 2017]
[27]	国家林业局. 自然资源(森林)资产评估技术规范. LY/T 2735—2016. 北京: 国家林业局, 2016 [State Forestry Administration of China. Norm of Technique for Valuation of Forest Resources Assets. LY/T 2735-2016. Beijing: State Forestry Administration of China, 2016]
[28]	生态环境部环境规划院. 陆地生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算技术指南. 北京: 生态环境部环境规划院, 2020 [Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning. Technical Guideline on Gross Ecosystem Product(GEP). Beijing: Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, 2020]
[29]	深圳市市场和质量监督管理委员会. 深圳市标准化指导性技术文件. 盐田区城市生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算技术规范. SZDB/Z 342—2018. 深圳: 深圳市市场和质量监督管理委员会, 2018 [Shenzhen Market and Quality Supervision and Administration Commission. Shenzhen Standardization Guiding Technical Document. Technical Specification for Accounting of Urban Gross Ecosystem Product of Yantian District. SZDB/Z 342-2018. Shenzhen: Shenzhen Market and Quality Supervision and Administration Commission, 2018]
[30]	厦门市人民政府办公厅. 厦门市生态系统生产价值统计核算技术导则(厦府办〔2018〕139号). 厦门:厦门市人民政府办公厅, 2018 [General Office of Xiamen Municipal People’s Government. Technical Guidelines for Statistical Accounting of Ecosystem Production Value in Xiamen (XMB
	[2018] No. 139). Xiamen: General Office of Xiamen Municipal People’s Government, 2018]
[31]	黄闽东. 福州市自然保护区现状及可持续发展对策. 绿色科技, 2019(24): 35-38 [Huang M-D. Status and sustainable development countermeasures of Fuzhou nature reserve. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2019(24): 35-38]
[32]	郝林华, 陈尚, 夏涛, 等. 用海建设项目海洋生态损失补偿评估方法及应用. 生态学报, 2017, 37(20): 6884-6894 [Hao L-H, Chen S, Xia T, et al. Assessment method and application of compensation for marine ecological loss caused by marine construction projects. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(20): 6884-6894]
[33]	曹东, 於方, 朱文泉, 等. 遥感技术支持下的草地生态系统破坏经济损失评价. 环境科学学报, 2011, 31(8): 1799-1807 [Cao D, Yu F, Zhu W-Q, et al. Va-luation of economic losses from grassland ecosystem degradation using remote sensing data. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2011, 31(8): 1799-1807]
[34]	唐小军, 李富华, 邱凌, 等. 基于生态破坏损失的甘孜州草地生态保护与建设投入研究. 宁夏农林科技, 2019, 60(6): 38-41 [Tang X-J, Li F-H, Qiu L, et al. Performance evaluation of ecological protection and construction based on economic losses from grassland ecosystem damage in Ganzi. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forest Science and Technology, 2019, 60(6): 38-41]
[35]	中华人民共和国国家标准. 土地利用现状分类.GB/T 21010—2017. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017 [National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. Current Land Use Classification. GB/T 21010-2017. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2017]
[36]	牛乐, 王娇月, 郗凤明, 等. 福州市经济生态生产总值核算. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11), doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.015 [Niu L, Wang J-Y, Xi F-M, et al. Gross economic-ecological product accounting of Fuzhou City, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(11), doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.015]
[37]	郭强, 戴文远, 苏木兰. 快速城镇化地区建设用地扩张对生态用地及生态服务价值的影响——以福建省晋江市为例. 福建师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 13(5): 91-98 [Guo Q, Dai W-Y, Su M-L. Construction land expansion and its impact on ecological land use in rapid urbanization area. Journal of Fujian Normal University: Natural Science, 2015, 13(5): 91-98]
[38]	福建省水产研究所. 福州市海洋功能区划(2013—2020年)研究报告. 厦门: 福建省水产研究所, 2018 [Fisheries Research Institute of Fujian. Research Report on Marine Functional Zoning in Fuzhou City (2013-2020). Xiamen: Fisheries Research Institute of Fujian, 2018]
[39]	福州新闻网. 向海要地冲动强烈: 我国出台最严围填海管控措施 [EB/OL]. (2018-01-18) [2021-03-14]. http://news.fznews.com.cn/dsxw/20180118/5a5feae-72a626.shtml [Fuzhou News Network. Strong Impulse to the Sea: The Strictest Reclamation Control Measures in China [EB/OL]. (2018-01-18) [2021-03-14]. http://news.fznews.com.cn/dsxw/20180118/5a5feae72a626.shtml]
[40]	福建省水产研究所. 福州市海洋功能区规划(2013—2020年). 福州: 福建省水产研究所, 2018 [Fujian Fisheries Research Institute. Fuzhou Marine Functional Area Planning (2013-2020). Fuzhou: Fisheries Research Institute of Fujian, 2018]
[41]	福州市林业局, 福建省林业调查规划院. 福州市湿地保护规划(2014—2025年). 福州: 福州市林业局, 2015 [Fuzhou Forestry Bureau, Fujian Forestry Investigation and Planning Institute. Fuzhou Wetland Protection Planning (2014-2025). Fuzhou: Fuzhou Forestry Bureau, 2015]
[42]	福建省人民代表大会常务委员会. 福州市湿地保护管理办法. 福州: 福建省人民代表大会常务委员会, 2016 [Standing Committee of Fujian Provincial People’s Congress. Measures of Fuzhou Municipality for the Administration of Wetland Protection. Fuzhou: Standing Committee of Fujian Provincial People’s Congress, 2016]
[43]	福建闽江河口湿地国家级自然保护区管理处. 闽江河口湿地生态保护提升规划. 福州: 福建闽江河口湿地国家级自然保护区管理处, 2020 [Fujian Minjiang Estuary Wetland National Nature Reserve Management Office. Ecological Protection and Improvement Planning of Minjiang Estuary Wetland. Fuzhou: Fujian Minjiang Estuary Wetland National Nature Reserve Management Office, 2020]
[44]	台海网. 福州市湿地保护工作走在全省前列 [EB/OL]. (2021-02-07) [2021-06-01]. http://www.taihainet.com/news/fujian/szjj/2021-02-27/2482842.html [Taihai Network. Fuzhou Wetland Protection is in the Forefront of the Province [EB/OL]. (2021-02-07) [2021-06-01]. http://www.taihainet.com/news/fujian/szjj/2021-02-27/2482842.html]
[45]	福州市人民政府. 福州森林覆盖率提升至58.06% [EB/OL]. (2020-03-13) [2021-03-14]. http://www.fuzhou.gov.cn/gzdt/rcyw/202003/t20200313_3218237.htm [Fuzhou Government. The Forest Coverage Rate in Fuzhou Increased to 58.06% [EB/OL]. (2020-03-13) [2021-03-14]. http://www.fuzhou.gov.cn/gzdt/rcyw/202003/t20200313_3218237.htm]

福州市生态系统破坏损失评估

Accounting for the cost of ecological degradation in Fuzhou City, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 45

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王进, 周广胜, 何奇瑾, 周莉. 内蒙古克氏针茅草原净生态系统碳交换的物候特征及遥感监测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 659-668.
[2]	梁华秋, 沈梦晗, 邵明, 姚朋. 基于生态系统服务供需的临沂市固碳生态网络构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 759-768.
[3]	梁仕豪, 李文, 高宇, 刘保住. 吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(3): 769-779.
[4]	蔡露露, 孙守家, 施光耀, 杜灵通, 倪细炉, 张劲松, 孟平. 自然状态下栓皮栎林空气负离子与PM_2.5的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 347-353.
[5]	路昌, 蔡雪芹, 郝灿书, 刘玉珍, 王之语, 马亚男. 黄河三角洲高效生态经济区生态系统服务权衡协同关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 457-468.
[6]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[7]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[8]	孔东彦, 杨灵芳, 刁静文, 郭鹏. 不同生境下氮沉降对土壤N₂O通量影响的整合分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2171-2177.
[9]	熊昕莹, 孟梅. 基于生态系统服务供需关系及空间流动的新疆生态管理分区与优化策略 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2237-2248.
[10]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[11]	陈红莲, 李瑞, 张玉珊, 吴清林, 袁江, 高家勇. 赤水河流域不同地貌区生态系统健康对比 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1912-1922.
[12]	黄庆阳, 谢立红, 曹宏杰, 王立民, 杨帆, 王继丰, 刘赢男, 倪红伟. 细菌对五大连池火山森林凋落物早期分解的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1941-1948.
[13]	庞丹波, 吴梦瑶, 赵娅茹, 杨娟, 董立国, 吴旭东, 陈林, 李学斌, 倪细炉, 李静尧, 梁咏亮. 贺兰山东坡不同海拔土壤微生物群落特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1957-1967.
[14]	晨阳, 李慧融, 李冬楠, 孙鹏飞, 宿江华. 锡林浩特草原净生态系统碳交换量特征及源区分布 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1509-1516.
[15]	李成龙, 周广胜, 周梦子, 周莉, 刘杰. 1971—2020年盘锦芦苇湿地净生态系统生产力及其影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1331-1340.