基于WaSSI模型的珠江流域水-碳耦合模拟

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.022

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 流域水循环和碳循环通过植物光合作用与蒸散发(ET)过程紧密相联,两者在流域尺度上的耦合模拟研究是实现水、碳资源综合管理的重要基础。本研究通过对WaSSI(供水压力指数)生态水文模型进行适当改进,建立并验证了珠江流域水-碳耦合模拟模型(WaSSI-PRB),将珠江流域划分为1715个子流域,选定1980—2004年为率定期、2005—2016年为验证期,并对径流、蒸散发和总初级生产力(GPP)等3个关键水-碳通量的模拟结果进行验证。结果表明: 西江、北江、东江的水文控制站,径流模拟纳什效率系数(NSE)和决定系数(R²)在率定期均达0.80以上,在验证期均达0.75以上;相较于MODIS、PML、SSEBop、VPM等大尺度遥感数据产品,WaSSI-PRB模型能更好地模拟ET和GPP的时空分布特征。总体而言,WaSSI-PRB模型在珠江流域具有较好的适用性,可作为量化分析流域水-碳平衡及其对变化环境响应关系的一种有效工具。

关键词: WaSSI-PRB模型, 水碳耦合, 珠江流域, 适用性评价

Abstract: Watershed water and carbon cycles are closely linked through plant photosynthesis and evapotranspiration (ET). Simulation of coupled water-carbon cycles at the watershed scale is important for the comprehensive management of water and carbon resources. By improving the WaSSI (water supply stress index) eco-hydrological model, we established and verified a water-carbon coupling simulation model for the Pearl River Basin in south China (WaSSI-PRB). The Pearl River Basin was divided into 1715 watersheds. The simulations of three water-carbon flux parameters, such as runoff, ET and gross primary productivity (GPP), were verified with 1980-2004 as the calibration period and 2005-2016 as the validation period. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) and the coefficient of determination (R²) of the simulated runoff at the controlling hydrological stations of Xijiang, Beijiang and Dongjiang were greater than 0.80 during calibration period and greater than 0.75 during validation period. Compared with MODIS, PML, SSEBop, VPM and other large-scale remote sensing data products, WASSI-PRB showed a better performance in capturing the spatiotemporal variations of ET and GPP. In general, WaSSI-PRB model had good applicability in the study area, and could be used as an effective tool to quantitatively analyze water-carbon balance and their responses to environmental changes in the Pearl River Basin.

Key words: WaSSI-PRB model, coupling of water and carbon, Pearl River Basin, applicability assessment

王小辣, 段凯, 韦林. 基于WaSSI模型的珠江流域水-碳耦合模拟[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1377-1386.

WANG Xiao-la, DUAN Kai, WEI Lin. Simulation of water and carbon coupling of the Pearl River basin based on the WaSSI model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(5): 1377-1386.

参考文献

[1] 段凯, 孙阁, 刘宁. 变化环境下流域水-碳平衡演化研究综述. 水利学报, 2021, 52(3): 300-309
[2] Gentine P, Green JK, Guérin M, et al. Coupling between the terrestrial carbon and water cycles: A review. Environmental Research Letters, 2019, 14: 083003
[3] Feng X, Fu B, Piao S, et al. Revegetation in China's Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6: 1019-1022
[4] Green JK, Konings AG, Alemohammad SH, et al. Regionally strong feedbacks between the atmosphere and terrestrial biosphere. Nature Geoscience, 2017, 10: 410-414
[5] 李修仓, 姜彤, 温姗姗, 等. 珠江流域实际蒸散发的时空变化及影响要素分析. 热带气象学报, 2014, 30(3): 483-494
[6] 王洁, 边宇晗, 陈裕迪, 等. 基于GRACE陆地水储量估算土壤湿度变化——以中国东部季风区为例. 南水北调与水利科技, 2021, 19(3): 459-468
[7] Yan D, Werners SE, Ludwig F, et al. Hydrological response to climate change: The Pearl River, China under different RCP scenarios. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2015, 4: 228-245
[8] Wang T. Dynamic changes of net primary productivity and its response to temperature and precipitation in China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 186: 012044
[9] 张连凯, 覃小群, 杨慧, 等. 珠江流域河流碳输出通量及变化特征. 环境科学, 2013, 34(8): 3025-3034
[10] Zhang L, Qin X, Liu P, et al. Estimation of carbon sink fluxes in the Pearl River basin (China) based on a water-rock-gas-organism interaction model. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 74: 945-952
[11] Wu C, Ji C, Shi B, et al. The impact of climate change and human activities on streamflow and sediment load in the Pearl River basin. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2019, 34: 307-321
[12] 李天生, 夏军. 基于Budyko理论分析珠江流域中上游地区气候与植被变化对径流的影响. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(12): 1248-1258
[13] Wang YX, Zeng JS, Tang L, et al. Water vapor transport in the Pearl River basin and its influence on NDVI. ITM Web of Conferences, 2016, 7: 04007
[14] Sun G, Caldwell P, Noormets A, et al. Upscaling key ecosystem functions across the conterminous United States by a water-centric ecosystem model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2011, 116: G00J05
[15] Zhang Y, Song C, Sun G, et al. Development of a coupled carbon and water model for estimating global gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration based on eddy flux and remote sensing data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2016, 223: 116-131
[16] Potter CS, Randerson JT, Field CB, et al. Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993, 7: 811-841
[17] Yuan W, Liu S, Yu G, et al. Global estimates of evapotranspiration and gross primary production based on MODIS and global meteorology data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114: 1416-1431
[18] 刘宁, 孙鹏森, 刘世荣, 等. 流域水碳过程耦合模拟——WaSSI-C模型的率定与检验. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(6): 492-502
[19] Bagstad KJ, Cohen E, Ancona ZH, et al. The sensitivity of ecosystem service models to choices of input data and spatial resolution. Applied Geography, 2018, 93: 25-36
[20] Liu N, Shaikh MA, Kala J, et al. Parallelization of a distributed ecohydrological model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2018, 101: 51-63
[21] Sun G, Zuo C, Liu S, et al. Watershed evapotranspiration increased due to changes in vegetation composition and structure under a subtropical climate. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2008, 44: 1164-1175
[22] 杨远东, 王永红, 蔡斯龙, 等. 珠江流域下游近60年输沙率年际与年内变化特征. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(2): 155-162
[23] 童娟. 珠江流域概况及水文特性分析. 水利科技与经济, 2007(1): 31-33
[24] Lehner B, Verdin KL, Jarvis A. New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 2008, 89: 93-94
[25] Shi XZ, Yu DS, Xu SX, et al. Cross-reference for relating genetic soil classification of China with WRB at different scales. Geoderma, 2010, 155: 344-350
[26] Brown de Colstoun EC, Huang C, Wang P, et al. Glo-bal Man-made Impervious Surface (GMIS) Dataset from Landsat, Palisades: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) [EB/OL]. (2017-12-12) [2021-01-01]. https://doi.org/10.7927/H4P55-KKF
[27] Yuan H, Dai Y, Xiao Z, et al. Reprocessing the MODIS Leaf Area Index products for land surface and climate modelling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115: 1171-1187
[28] Friedl M, Sulla-Menashe D. MCD12Q1 MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Cover Type Yearly L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V006, Sioux Falls: NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC [EB/OL]. (2019-12-12) [2021-01-01]. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MCD12Q1.006
[29] Konarska KM, Sutton PC, Castellon M. Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: A comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets. Ecolo-gical Economics, 2002, 41: 491-507
[30] 阳坤, 何杰. 中国区域地面气象要素驱动数据集(1979—2018). 北京: 国家青藏高原科学数据中心, 2019
[31] Yang K, He J, Tang W, et al. On downward shortwave and longwave radiations over high altitude regions: Observation and modeling in the Tibetan Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2010, 150: 38-46
[32] He J, Yang K, Tang W, et al. The first high-resolution meteorological forcing dataset for land process studies over China. Scientific Data, 2020, 7: 25
[33] Running S, Mu Q, Zhao M. MOD16A2 MODIS/Terra Net Evapotranspiration 8-Day L4 Global 500m SIN Grid V006, Sioux Falls: NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC [EB/OL]. (2017-12-12) [2021-01-01]. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD16A2.006
[34] 张永强. 全球PML_V2陆地蒸散发与总初级生产力数据集(2002.07—2019.08). 北京: 国家青藏高原科学数据中心, 2020
[35] Zhang Y, Peña-Arancibia JL, McVicar TR, et al. Multi-decadal trends in global terrestrial evapotranspiration and its components. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 19124
[36] Zhang Y, Kong D, Gan R, et al. Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8-day resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002-2017. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019, 222: 165-182
[37] Senay GB, Kagone S, Velpuri NM. Operational Global Actual Evapotranspiration Using the SSEBop Model [EB/OL]. (2020-01-01) [2021-01-01]. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9OUVUUI
[38] Senay GB, Kagone S, Velpuri NM. Operational global actual evapotranspiration: Development, evaluation and dissemination. Sensors, 2020, 20: 1915
[39] Running SW, Nemani RR, Heinsch FA, et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. BioScience, 2004, 54: 547-560
[40] Running SW, Zhao M. User's Guide—Daily GPP and Annual NPP (MOD17A2/A3) Products—NASA Earth Observing System MODIS Land Algorithm, Sioux Falls: NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC [EB/OL]. (2015-12-12) [2021-01-01]. https://modis-land.gsfc.nasa.gov/pdf/MOD17UsersGuide2015v3.pdf
[41] Zhang Y, Xiao X, Wu X, et al. A global moderate resolution dataset of gross primary production of vegetation for 2000-2016. Scientific Data, 2017, 4: 170165
[42] Caldwell PV, Sun G, McNulty SG, et al. Impacts of impervious cover, water withdrawals, and climate change on river flows in the conterminous US. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2012, 16: 2839-2857
[43] Burnash RJC, Ferral RL, McGuire RA. A generalized streamflow simulation system: Conceptual modeling for digital computers. Washington DC: Joint Federal and State River Forecast Center, U.S., 1973
[44] Burnash RJC. The NWS river forecast system: Catchment modeling// Singh VP, ed. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Littleton, CO, USA: Water Resources Publications, 1995: 311-366
[45] Koren V, Smith M, Duan Q. Use of a priori parameter estimates in the derivation of spatially consistent parameter sets of rainfall-runoff models// Duan Q, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, eds. Calibration of Watershed Models. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union, 2003: 239-254
[46] Koren V, Moreda F, Reed S, et al. Evaluation of a grid-based distributed hydrological model over a large area. The 7th International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) Scientific Assembly, Brazil, 2006: 47-56
[47] McKenney MS, Rosenberg NJ. Sensitivity of some potential evapotranspiration estimation methods to climate change. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1993, 64: 81-110
[48] Gong L, Xu C, Chen D, et al. Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key clima-tic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin. Journal of Hydrology, 2006, 329: 620-629
[49] 任国玉, 郭军, 徐铭志, 等. 近50年中国地面气候变化基本特征. 气象学报, 2005, 63(6): 942-956
[50] Duan K, Guo J, Hu T, et al. Assessing the roles of terrestrial stilling and solar dimming in land surface drying/wetting across China. Water, 2020, 12: 1996
[51] Hamon WR. Computation of direct runoff amounts from storm rainfall. International Association of Scientific Hydrology Publication, 1963, 63: 52-62
[52] Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, et al. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No 56. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998
[53] Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta VK. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology, 1994, 158: 265-284
[54] Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part Ⅰ: A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 1970, 10: 282-290
[55] 牛忠恩, 闫慧敏, 陈静清, 等. 基于VPM与MOD17产品的中国农田生态系统总初级生产力估算比较. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(4): 191-198