欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 433-441.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202302.003

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

放牧压力表述的分异及其适用场景

谷昌军1,2,3, 张镱锂1,2, 刘林山1,2*, 魏博1,2, 宫殿清1,2, 崔伯豪1,2   

  1. 1中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所/陆地表层格局与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101;
    2中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3应急管理部国家减灾中心, 北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-08 接受日期:2022-11-17 出版日期:2023-02-15 发布日期:2023-08-15
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: liuls@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:谷昌军, 男, 1992年生, 博士。主要从事高寒草地变化与放牧活动关系研究。E-mail: gucj.18 @igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0603)和中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)子课题(XDA20040201)

Differentiation of grazing pressure expressions and its applicable scenarios

GU Changjun1,2,3, ZHANG Yili1,2, LIU Linshan1,2*, WEI Bo1,2, GONG Dianqing1,2, CUI Bohao1,2   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3National Disaster Reduction Center of China, Ministry of Emergency Management, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2022-07-08 Accepted:2022-11-17 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-08-15

摘要: 高强度放牧被认为是造成草地退化的重要原因。放牧活动对草地生态系统影响的研究众多,但是对于放牧活动本身,特别是放牧压力的量化方法和梯度划分的研究相对不足。本研究检索了包含“放牧压力”“放牧强度”等关键词的中英文文献,并筛选出明确放牧压力具体量化方法和划分标准的中英文文献141篇,梳理了放牧压力的定义、量化方法和分级标准。结果表明: 当前研究中对于放牧压力的定义可以归结为两类:一是仅从放牧牲畜量的角度考虑当前草地生态系统中所承载的牲畜数量;二是从生态系统响应的角度考虑放牧对当前草地生态系统的影响或带来的后果。小尺度控制试验主要通过控制牲畜数量、放牧时长、放牧面积等方式量化和划分放牧压力,生态系统对放牧活动的响应也通过上述指标折算;大尺度的数据空间化方法则仅考虑单位面积的牲畜数量。遥感反演的方法则侧重于生态系统的响应,即放牧活动对草地的影响,但难以剥离气候因素。不同草地类型区放牧压力的量化标准存在较大的差异,即使相同草地类型区也存在较大的差异,这种差异与草地生产力直接相关。

关键词: 草地利用, 放牧压力, 放牧强度, 文献计量, 量化方法

Abstract: High intensity grazing is considered as an important cause of grassland degradation. Numerous studies have explored effects of grazing activities on grassland ecosystems. Nevertheless, the research regarding grazing activity itself, especially the quantification methods and gradient division of grazing pressure, is relatively insufficient. Based on a total of 141 Chinese and English papers containing keywords such as ‘grazing pressure', ‘grazing intensity', and giving specific quantification methods and classification standards, we sorted out the definition, quantification methods, and grading standards of grazing pressure. The results showed that the definition of grazing pressure in current studies could be classified into two categories: considering the number of livestock carried in the current grassland ecosystem only from the perspective of the amount of grazing livestock; or considering the impacts or consequences on grassland ecosystems. Small-scale manipulative experiments mainly quantified and divided gra-zing pressure by controlling the number of livestock, grazing duration, grazing area, etc. Ecosystem responses to grazing activities were also converted by the above indicators, while the large-scale data spatialization method only considered number of livestock per unit area. The method of remote sensing inversion focused on ecosystem responses, that is, the impacts of grazing activities on grasslands, and it was difficult to separate the role of climatic factors. The quantitative standards of grazing pressure in different grassland types were quite different, even in the same grassland type, and such difference was directly related to grassland productivity.

Key words: grassland utilization, grazing pressure, grazing intensity, bibliometrics, qualification