杉木林下植物氮磷重吸收对微尺度土壤养分异质性的响应

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202305.003

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 1187-1193.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202305.003

杉木林下植物氮磷重吸收对微尺度土壤养分异质性的响应

植可翔^1,2, 关欣^1,3, 李仁山⁴, 王娇¹, 段萱⁵, 陈波翰^1,2, 张伟东^1,3, 杨庆朋^1,3*

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 中国科学院森林生态与管理重点实验室, 沈阳 110016;
²中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 101408;
³湖南会同森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站/亚热带森林生态系统结构与服务功能湖南省重点实验室, 湖南会同 418307;
⁴洛阳师范学院生命科学学院, 河南洛阳 471023;
⁵山西师范大学地理科学学院, 太原 030000

收稿日期:2022-12-04 接受日期:2023-02-28 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-11-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: yqp226@iae.ac.cn
作者简介:植可翔, 男, 1998年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事植物叶片养分重吸收研究。E-mail: zhikexiang21@mails.ucas.ac.cn
基金资助:
“十四五”国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1303003)和国家自然科学基金项目(41977092, U22A20612)

Responses of nitrogen and phosphorus resorption of understory plants to microscale soil nutrient hetero-geneity in Chinese fir plantation

ZHI Kexiang^1,2, GUAN Xin^1,3, LI Renshan⁴, WANG Jiao¹, DUAN Xuan⁵, CHEN Bohan^1,2, ZHANG Weidong^1,3, YANG Qingpeng^1,3*

¹Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
²College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China;
³Huitong National Research Station of Forest Ecosystem/Hunan Key Laboratory for Structure and Ecosystem Service of Subtropical Forest, Huitong 418307, Hunan, China;
⁴College of Life Science, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471023, Henan, China;
⁵College of Geographical Sciences, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan 030000, China

Received:2022-12-04 Accepted:2023-02-28 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以杉木人工林林下优势物种淡竹叶和求米草为对象,比较了2个物种间叶片养分重吸收过程的差异,分析了同一物种内养分重吸收效率与叶片和土壤养分性质之间的关系。结果表明: 杉木人工林土壤养分异质性较高,无机氮和有效磷含量的变化范围分别为8.58～65.29和2.43～15.20 mg·kg^-1。求米草群落中土壤无机氮含量为淡竹叶群落的2.4倍,但两者间土壤有效磷含量无显著差异。采用叶片重量、面积和叶片木质素含量作为测算基准,求米草的叶片氮磷重吸收效率均显著低于淡竹叶。对于淡竹叶,基于叶片重量的养分重吸收效率显著低于基于叶片面积和木质素含量的重吸收效率,而对于求米草,基于叶片面积的养分重吸收效率最低。同一物种的叶片氮磷重吸收效率与叶片氮磷含量呈显著正相关,而与土壤氮磷含量的相关性较弱,仅淡竹叶氮重吸收效率与土壤无机氮含量呈显著正相关。研究表明,杉木人工林林下不同植物间叶片养分重吸收效率差异显著,但土壤养分异质性对同一物种不同个体间的养分重吸收影响较弱,这可能归因于杉木人工林较高的土壤养分有效性以及冠层凋落物的潜在干扰。

关键词: 养分重吸收, 林下植物, 土壤养分异质性, 淡竹叶, 求米草, 杉木人工林

Abstract: We compared the interspecific differences in leaf nutrient resorption of two dominant understory species (Lophatherum gracile and Oplimenus unulatifolius), and analyzed the correlations between the intraspecific efficiency of leaf nutrient resorption and nutrient properties of soil and leaves in Chinese fir plantation. The results showed high soil nutrient heterogeneity in Chinese fir plantation. Soil inorganic nitrogen content and available phosphorus content varied from 8.58 to 65.29 mg·kg^-1 and from 2.43 to 15.20 mg·kg^-1 in the Chinese fir plantation, respectively. The soil inorganic nitrogen content in O. undulatifolius community was 1.4 times higher than that in L. gra-cile community, but there was no significant difference in soil available phosphorus content between the two communities. Both leaf nitrogen and phosphorus resorption efficiency of O. unulatifolius was significantly lower than that of L. gracile under the three measurement bases of leaf dry weight, leaf area, and lignin content. Resorption efficiency in L. gracile community expressed on leaf dry weight was lower than that expressed on leaf area and lignin content, while resorption efficiency expressed on leaf area was the lowest in O. unulatifolius community. The intraspecific resorption efficiency was significantly correlated with leaf nutrient contents, but was less correlated with soil nutrient content, and only the nitrogen resorption efficiency of L. gracile had significant positive correlation with soil inorganic nitrogen content. The results indicated that there was significant difference in the leaf nutrient resorption efficiency between the two understory species. Soil nutrient heterogeneity exerted a weak effect on the intraspecific nutrient resorption, which might be attributed to high soil nutrient availability and potential disturbance from canopy litter in Chinese fir plantation.

Key words: nutrient resorption, understory plant, soil nutrient heterogeneity, Lophatherum gracile, Oplimenus unulatifolius, Chinese fir plantation

植可翔, 关欣, 李仁山, 王娇, 段萱, 陈波翰, 张伟东, 杨庆朋. 杉木林下植物氮磷重吸收对微尺度土壤养分异质性的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1187-1193.

ZHI Kexiang, GUAN Xin, LI Renshan, WANG Jiao, DUAN Xuan, CHEN Bohan, ZHANG Weidong, YANG Qingpeng. Responses of nitrogen and phosphorus resorption of understory plants to microscale soil nutrient hetero-geneity in Chinese fir plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(5): 1187-1193.

参考文献

[1] See CR, Yanai RD, Fisk MC, et al. Soil nitrogen affects phosphorus recycling: Foliar resorption and plant-soil feedbacks in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology, 2015, 96: 2488-2498
[2] Aerts R, Chapin FS. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research, 2000, 30: 1-67
[3] 张耀艺, 倪祥银, 杨静, 等. 中亚热带同质园不同树种氮磷重吸收及化学计量特征. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1154-1162
[4] Lyu XT, Freschet GT, Flynn DFB, et al. Plasticity in leaf and stem nutrient resorption proficiency potentially reinforces plant-soil feedbacks and microscale heterogeneity in a semi-arid grassland. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100: 144-150
[5] Deng MF, Liu LL, Jiang L, et al. Ecosystem scale trade-off in nitrogen acquisition pathway. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2018, 2: 1724-1734
[6] 许淼平, 张欣怡, 李文杰, 等. 不同林龄刺槐叶片养分重吸收特征及其对土壤养分有效性的响应. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10): 3357-3364
[7] Eckstein RL, Karlsson PS, Weih M. Leaf life span and nutrient resorption as determinants of plant nutrient conservation in temperate-arctic regions. New Phytologist, 1999, 143: 177-189
[8] 龙靖, 黄耀, 刘占锋, 等. 西沙热带珊瑚岛典型乔木叶片性状和养分再吸收特征. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(2): 248-256
[9] Killingbeck KT. Nutrients in senesced leaves: Keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology, 1996, 77: 1716-1727
[10] Wright IJ, Westoby M. Nutrient concentration, resorption and lifespan: Leaf traits of Australian sclerophyll species. Functional Ecology, 2003, 17: 10-19
[11] Ren HY, Kang J, Yuan ZY, et al. Responses of nutrient resorption to warming and nitrogen fertilization in contrasting wet and dry years in a desert grassland. Plant and Soil, 2018, 432: 65-73
[12] Norris MD, Reich PB. Modest enhancement of nitrogen conservation via retranslocation in response to gradients in N supply and leaf N status. Plant and Soil, 2009, 316: 193-204
[13] Yuan ZY, Chen HYH. Negative effects of fertilization on plant nutrient resorption. Ecology, 2015, 96: 373-380
[14] van Heerwaarden LM, Toet S, Aerts R. Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption efficiency and proficiency in six sub-arctic bog species after 4 years of nitrogen fertilization. Journal of Ecology, 2003, 91: 1060-1070
[15] Lu XT, Han XG. Nutrient resorption responses to water and nitrogen amendment in semi-arid grassland of Inner Mongolia, China. Plant and Soil, 2010, 327: 481-491
[16] Li YL, Kronzucker HJ, Shi WM. Microprofiling of nitrogen patches in paddy soil: Analysis of spatiotemporal nutrient heterogeneity at the microscale. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 27064
[17] de Souza CR, Morel JD, Santos ABM, et al. Small-scale edaphic heterogeneity as a floristic-structural complexity driver in Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests tree communities. Journal of Forestry Research, 2020, 31: 2347-2357
[18] 杨昆, 管东生. 林下植被的生物量分布特征及其作用. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(10): 1252-1256
[19] 张利荣, 李惠通, 郑立津, 等. 不同林龄杉木人工林的林下植被与土壤理化特性. 亚热带农业研究, 2021, 17(3): 165-172
[20] Grime JP. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: Immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology, 1998, 86: 902-910
[21] Bardgett RD. Causes and consequences of biological diversity in soil. Zoology, 2002, 105: 367-374
[22] 刘丽, 段争虎, 汪思龙, 等. 不同发育阶段杉木人工林对土壤微生物群落结构的影响. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(12): 2417-2423
[23] 霍常富, 王朋, 陈龙池, 等. 杉木人工林蓄积量和生态系统碳数量成熟龄的关系. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(9): 94-99
[24] 肖复明, 汪思龙, 杜天真, 等. 湖南会同林区杉木人工林呼吸量测定. 生态学报, 2005, 25(10): 2514-2519
[25] Yang QP, Zhang WD, Li RS, et al. Different responses of non-structural carbohydrates in above-ground tissues/organs and root to extreme drought and re-watering in Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) saplings. Trees-Structure and Function, 2016, 30: 1863-1871
[26] 张瑛, 徐庆, 高德强, 等. 湖南会同不同林分类型杉木人工林凋落物水文效应. 林业科学研究, 2021, 37(6): 81-89
[27] 李媛良, 汪思龙, 颜绍馗. 杉木人工林剔除林下植被对凋落层养分循环的短期影响. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(10): 2560-2566
[28] 王清奎, 汪思龙, 冯宗炜. 杉木纯林与常绿阔叶林土壤活性有机碳库的比较. 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(5): 1-6
[29] Liu X, Zhao WR, Meng MJ, et al. Comparative effects of simulated acid rain of different ratios of SO₄^2- to NO₃^- on fine root in subtropical plantation of China. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 618: 336-346
[30] 王娇, 关欣, 张伟东, 等. 杉木幼苗生物量分配格局对氮添加的响应. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(11): 1231-1240
[31] Vergutz L, Manzoni S, Porporato A, et al. Global resorption efficiencies and concentrations of carbon and nutrients in leaves of terrestrial plants. Ecological Monographs, 2012, 82: 205-220
[32] Tully KL, Wood TE, Schwantes AM, et al. Soil nutrient availability and reproductive effort drive patterns in nutrient resorption in Pentaclethra macroloba. Ecology, 2013, 94: 930-940
[33] Hofmann K, Heuck C, Spohn M. Phosphorus resorption by young beech trees and soil phosphatase activity as dependent on phosphorus availability. Oecologia, 2016, 181: 369-379
[34] Wang M, Murphy MT, Moore TR. Nutrient resorption of two evergreen shrubs in response to long-term fertilization in a bog. Oecologia, 2014, 174: 365-377
[35] Drenovsky RE, Pietrasiak N, Short TH, et al. Global temporal patterns in plant nutrient resorption plasticity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2019, 28: 728-743
[36] Wright IJ, Cannon K. Relationships between leaf life-span and structural defences in a low-nutrient, sclerophyll flora. Functional Ecology, 2001, 15: 351-359
[37] Aerts R. Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: Are there general patterns? Journal of Eco-logy, 1996, 84: 597-608
[38] Han W, Tang L, Chen Y, et al. Relationship between the relative limitation and resorption efficiency of nitrogen vs. phosphorus in woody plants. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e83366
[39] Deng Q, Hui DF, Dennis S, et al. Responses of terrestrial ecosystem phosphorus cycling to nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2017, 26: 713-728
[40] 陶宝先, 王晶东, 陈庆海, 等. 氮添加对黄河三角洲滨海湿地芦苇养分再吸收效率的影响. 生态学报, 2022, 42(3): 914-921
[41] van Heerwaarden LM, Toet S, Aerts R. Current mea-sures of nutrient resorption efficiency lead to a substantial underestimation of real resorption efficiency: Facts and solutions. Oikos, 2003, 101: 664-669

杉木林下植物氮磷重吸收对微尺度土壤养分异质性的响应

Responses of nitrogen and phosphorus resorption of understory plants to microscale soil nutrient hetero-geneity in Chinese fir plantation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	田宁, 黄雪梅, 陈龙池, 黄苛, 陶晓. 施石灰对杉木人工林土壤呼吸及其温度敏感性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1194-1202.
[2]	闫媛媛, 郭琪, 管俊泽, 刘志, 王东男, 谷加存. 红松和水曲柳叶生态化学计量及养分重吸收特征的地理变异 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 977-984.
[3]	王依瑞, 王彦辉, 段文标, 李平平, 于澎涛, 甄理, 李志鑫, 尚会军. 黄土高原刺槐人工林郁闭度对林下植物多样性特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 305-314.
[4]	高军, 杨建英, 史常青, 公博, 刘子敬. 密云水库上游油松人工水源涵养林林下植物多样性与土壤理化特性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2305-2313.
[5]	代林利, 陈义堂, 伍丽华, 刘丽, 叶义全, 邱静雯, 曹世江, 曹光球. 不同林分密度杉木林养分积累与垂直空间分配 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 311-320.
[6]	李澳归, 林成芳, 胡明艳, 刘小飞, 宋豪威, 张磊, 杨玉盛. 增温对亚热带杉木枝和叶凋落物理化性质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2711-2717.
[7]	肖意, 陈慧娴, 邱丽君, 张扬, 万松泽. 林下植物剔除对毛竹林土壤微生物群落结构的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3089-3096.
[8]	张耀艺, 倪祥银, 杨静, 谭思懿, 廖姝, 吴福忠. 中亚热带同质园不同树种氮磷重吸收及化学计量特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(4): 1154-1162.
[9]	黄永珍, 王晟强, 叶绍明. 杉木林分类型对表层土壤团聚体有机碳及养分变化的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(9): 2857-2865.
[10]	卢立华, 农友, 李华, 曾冀, 孙冬婧, 陈琳, 明安刚, 杨予静. 保留密度对杉木人工林生长和生物量及经济效益的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3): 717-724.
[11]	刘冬, 张剑, 包雅兰, 赵海燕, 齐璇璇, 谢欢杰, 张静白. 敦煌阳关湿地芦苇叶片养分重吸收模式及其对土壤水分的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3): 807-813.
[12]	许淼平, 张欣怡, 李文杰, 任成杰, 杨改河, 韩新辉. 不同林龄刺槐叶片养分重吸收特征及其对土壤养分有效性的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10): 3357-3364.
[13]	周丽丽, 钱瑞玲, 李树斌, 董博微, 陈宝英, 潘辉. 滨海沙地主要造林树种叶片功能性状及养分重吸收特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(7): 2320-2328.
[14]	尹艳, 刘岩, 尹云锋, 马红亮, 高人, 杨玉盛. 生物质炭添加对杉木人工林土壤原有有机碳矿化的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(5): 1389-1396.
[15]	樊伟, 许崇华, 崔珺, 王晶晶, 刘西军, 徐小牛. 基于混合效应的大别山地区杉木树高-胸径模型比较 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(9): 2831-2839.