[1] Cardinale M, Doering-Arjes P, Kastowsky M, et al. Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2004, 61: 158-167 [2] Capoccioni F, Costa C, Aguzzi J, et al. Ontogenetic and environmental effects on otolith shape variability in three Mediterranean European eel (Anguilla anguilla, L.) local stocks. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2011, 397: 1-7 [3] Castonguay M, Simard P, Gagnon P. Usefulness of Fourier analysis of otolith shape for Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) stock discrimination. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1991, 48: 296-302 [4] Campana SE, Casselman JM. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1993, 50: 1062-1083 [5] Lombarte A, Lleonart J. Otolith size changes related with body growth, habitat depth and temperature. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 1993, 37: 297-306 [6] Lombarte A, Cruz A. Otolith size trends in marine fish communities from different depth strata. Journal of Fish Biology, 2007, 71: 53-76 [7] Hüssy K. Otolith shape in juvenile cod (Gadus morhua): Ontogenetic and environmental effects. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2008, 364: 35-41 [8] Morat F, Gibert P, Reynaud N, et al. Spatial distribution, total length frequencies and otolith morphometry as tools to analyse the effects of a flash flood on populations of roach (Rutilus rutilus). Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 2018, 27: 421-432 [9] Gutiérrez E, Morales-Nin B. Time series analysis of daily growth in Dicentrarchus labrax L. otoliths. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1986, 103: 163-179 [10] Ponton D. Is geometric morphometrics efficient for comparing otolith shape of different fish species? Journal of Morphology, 2006, 267: 750-757 [11] Parisi-Baradad V, Lombarte A, García-Ladona E, et al. Otolith shape contour analysis using affine transformation invariant wavelet transforms and curvature scale space representation. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2005, 56: 795-804 [12] Tuset VM, Lombarte A, González JA, et al. Comparative morphology of the sagittal otolith in Serranus spp. Journal of Fish Biology, 2003, 63: 1491-1504 [13] Ferguson GJ, Ward TM, Gillanders BM. Otolith shape and elemental composition: Complementary tools for stock discrimination of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus) in southern Australia. Fisheries Research, 2011, 110: 75-83 [14] Eastman JT, DeVries AL. Aspects of body size and gonadal histology in the Antarctic toothfish, Dissostichus mawsoni, from McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Polar Bio-logy, 2000, 23: 189-195 [15] Near TJ, Russo SE, Jones CD, et al. Ontogenetic shift in buoyancy and habitat in the Antarctic toothfish, Dissostichus mawsoni (Perciformes: Nototheniidae). Polar Biology, 2003, 26: 124-128 [16] Lister AM. The role of behavior in adaptive morphological evolution of African proboscideans. Nature, 2013, 500: 331-334 [17] Wei L, Zhu GP, Okuda T, et al. Otolith morphological analysis cannot distinguish Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) stocks in the Southern Ocean. CCAMLR Working Group on Fish Stock Assessment, Hobart, 2019, WG-FSA-19/59 [18] Wei L, Zhu GP, Somhlaba S, et al. Otolith chemistry reveals local population structure of Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) within the CCAMLR Subarea 48.6. CCAMLR Working Group on Fish Stock Assessment, Hobart, 2018, WG-FSA-18/75 [19] Hanchet SM, Rickard GJ. A hypothetical life cycle for Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in the Ross sea region. CCAMLR Science, 2008, 15: 35-54 [20] Ashford J, Dinniman M, Brooks C, et al. Does large-scale ocean circulation structure life history connectivity in Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni)? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2012, 69: 1903-1919 [21] Hanchet SM. Updated species profile for Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni). CCAMLR Scientific Papers, 2010, 10: 33 [22] Gaemers PAM. Taxonomic position of the Cichlidae (Pisces, Perciformes) as demonstrated by the morpho-logy of their otoliths. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 1983, 34: 566-595 [23] 宇鑫, 曹亮, 南鸥, 等. 基于矢耳石形态分析的凤鲚(Coilia mystus)群体识别研究. 海洋与湖沼, 2013, 44(3): 768-774 [24] Lestrel PE. Introduction and overview of Fourier descriptors// Lestrel PE, ed. Fourier Descriptors and Their Application in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997: 22-44 [25] Crampton JS. Elliptic Fourier shape analysis of fossil bivalves: Some practical considerations. Lethaia, 1995, 28: 179-186 [26] Carlo JM, Barbeitos MS, Lasker HR. Quantifying complex shapes: Elliptical Fourier analysis of octocoral sclerites. The Biological Bulletin, 2011, 220: 224-237 [27] Libungan LA, Pálsson S. ShapeR: An R package to study otolith shape variation among fish populations. PLoS One, 2015, 10(3): e0121102 [28] DeWitt HH, Heemstra PC, Gon O. Nototheniidae// Gon O, Heemstra PC, ed. Fishes of the Southern Ocean. Grahamstown: Smith Institute of Ichthyology, 1990: 279-331 [29] Elsdon TS, Wells BK, Campana SE, et al. Otolith chemistry to describe movements and life-history para-meters of fishes: Hypotheses, assumptions, limitations and inferences. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 2008, 46: 297-330 [30] Gauldie RW. A measure of metabolism in fish otoliths. Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology Part A Physiology, 1990, 97: 475-480 [31] Smith MK. Regional differences in otolith morphology of the deep slope red snapper Etelis carbunculus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1992, 49: 795-804 [32] Vignon M. Ontogenetic trajectories of otolith shape du-ring shift in habitat use: Interaction between otolith growth and environment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2012, 420: 26-32 [33] Vøllestad LA. Geographic variation in age and length at metamorphosis of maturing European eel: Environmental effects and phenotypic plasticity. Journal of Animal Eco-logy, 1992, 61: 41-48 [34] Stransky C. Morphometric outlines// Cadrin SX, Kerr LA, Mariani S, eds. Stock Identification Methods. New York: Academic Press, 2014: 129-140 |