Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 3144-3156.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202311.010
Previous Articles Next Articles
YE Junlong1, GUO Liang2, ZHAO Lufeng1, TANG Jianjun1, HU Liangliang1,3*, CHEN Xin1
Received:
2023-05-10
Revised:
2023-09-23
Online:
2023-11-15
Published:
2024-05-15
YE Junlong, GUO Liang, ZHAO Lufeng, TANG Jianjun, HU Liangliang, CHEN Xin. Research progress on plant functional traits in agroecosystems.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(11): 3144-3156.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjae.net/EN/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202311.010
[1] Violle C, Navas ML, Vile D, et al. Let the concept of trait be functional. Oikos, 2007, 116: 882-892 [2] Garnier E, Cortez J, Billes G, et al. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology, 2004, 85: 2630-2637 [3] McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, et al. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Eco-logy & Evolution, 2006, 21: 178-185 [4] de Bello F, Lavorel S, Díaz S, et al. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19: 2873-2893 [5] Lohbeck M, Winowiecki L, Aynekulu E, et al. Trait-based approaches for guiding the restoration of degraded agricultural landscapes in East Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 55: 59-68 [6] Drenovsky RE, Grewell BJ, D’antonio CM, et al. A functional trait perspective on plant invasion. Annals of Botany, 2012, 110: 141-153 [7] Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 2011, 478: 337-342 [8] Tomich TP, Brodt S, Ferris H, et al. Agroecology: A review from a global-change perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2011, 36: 193-222 [9] Martin AR, Isaac ME, Manning P. Plant functional traits in agroecosystems: A blueprint for research. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 52: 1425-1435 [10] Garnier E, Navas ML. A trait-based approach to comparative functional plant ecology: Concepts, methods and applications for agroecology: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2012, 32: 365-399 [11] Wood SA, Karp DS, Declerck F, et al. Functional traits in agriculture: Agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2015, 30: 531-539 [12] Grime JP. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. The American Naturalist, 1977, 111: 1169-1194 [13] Diaz S, Cabido M. Vive la différence: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Eco-logy & Evolution, 2001, 16: 646-655 [14] Lavorel S, Garnier E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: Revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology, 2002, 16: 545-556 [15] Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, et al. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 2003, 51: 335-380 [16] Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 2004, 428: 821-827 [17] Díaz S, Lavorel S, de Bello F, et al. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104: 20684-20689 [18] de Bello F, Thuiller W, Leps J, et al. Partitioning of functional diversity reveals the scale and extent of trait convergence and divergence. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2009, 20: 475-486 [19] Schleuter D, Daufresne M, Massol F, et al. A user’s guide to functional diversity indices. Ecological Monographs, 2010, 80: 469-484 [20] Gunton RM, Petit S, Gaba S. Functional traits relating arable weed communities to crop characteristics. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2011, 22: 541-550 [21] Kattge J, Diaz S, Lavorel S, et al. TRY: A global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17: 2905-2935 [22] Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 2013, 61: 167-234 [23] Damour G, Dorel M, Quoc HT, et al. A trait-based characterization of cover plants to assess their potential to provide a set of ecological services in banana cropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 2014, 52: 218-228 [24] Brooker RW, Bennett AE, Cong WF, et al. Improving intercropping: A synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist, 2015, 206: 107-117 [25] Reich PB. The world-wide ‘fast-slow’ plant economics spectrum: A traits manifesto. Journal of Ecology, 2014, 102: 275-301 [26] Damour G, Navas ML, Garnier E, et al. A revised trait-based framework for agroecosystems including decision rules. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 55: 12-24 [27] Freschet GT, Pages L, Iversen CM, et al. A starting guide to root ecology: Strengthening ecological concepts and standardising root classification, sampling, proces-sing and trait measurements. New Phytologist, 2021, 232: 973-1122 [28] 宋贺, 于鸿莹, 陈莹婷, 等. 北京植物园不同功能型植物叶经济谱. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(6): 1861-1869 [29] Niinemets U. Is there a species spectrum within the world-wide leaf economics spectrum? Major variations in leaf functional traits in the Mediterranean sclerophyll Quercus ilex. New Phytologist, 2015, 205: 79-96 [30] Siefert A, Violle C, Chalmandrier L, et al. A global meta-analysis of the relative extent of intraspecific trait variation in plant communities. Ecology Letters, 2015, 18: 1406-1419 [31] Martin AR, Hale CE, Cerabolini BEL, et al. Inter- and intraspecific variation in leaf economic traits in wheat and maize. AoB Plants, 2018, 10: ply006 [32] Xiong D, Flexas J. Leaf economics spectrum in rice: Leaf anatomical, biochemical, and physiological trait trade-offs. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2018, 69: 5599-5609 [33] Martin AR, Rapidel B, Roupsard O, et al. Intraspecific trait variation across multiple scales: The leaf economics spectrum in coffee. Functional Ecology, 2017, 31: 604-612 [34] Hayes FJ, Buchanan SW, Coleman B, et al. Intraspecific variation in soy across the leaf economics spectrum. Annals of Botany, 2019, 123: 107-120 [35] Weemstra M, Mommer L, Visser EJW, et al. Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: A tree root review. New Phytologist, 2016, 211: 1159-1169 [36] Isaac ME, Martin AR, De Melo Virginio Filho E, et al. Intraspecific trait variation and coordination: Root and leaf economics spectra in coffee across environmental gradients. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1196 [37] Roucou A, Violle C, Fort F, et al. Shifts in plant functional strategies over the course of wheat domestication. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 55: 25-37 [38] Milla R, Osborne CP, Turcotte MM, et al. Plant domestication through an ecological lens. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2015, 30: 463-469 [39] Borden KA, Isaac ME. Management strategies differen-tially affect root functional trait expression in cocoa agroforestry systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2019, 39: 21 [40] Martin AR, Hayes FJ, Borden KA, et al. Integrating nitrogen fixing structures into above- and belowground functional trait spectra in soy (Glycine max). Plant and Soil, 2019, 440: 53-69 [41] Fulthorpe R, Marin AR, Isaac ME. Root endophytes of coffee (Coffea arabica): Variation across climatic gradients and relationships with functional traits. Phytobiomes Journal, 2020, 4: 27-39 [42] Wen ZH, Li HB, Shen, et al. Tradeoffs among root morphology, exudation and mycorrhizal symbioses for phosphorus-acquisition strategies of 16 crop species. New Phytologist, 2019, 223: 882-895 [43] Honvault N, Houben D, Nobile C, et al. Tradeoffs among phosphorus-acquisition root traits of crop species for agroecological intensification. Plant and Soil, 2021, 461: 137-150 [44] Larson JE, Funk JL. Seedling root responses to soil moisture and the identification of a belowground trait spectrum across three growth forms. New Phytologist, 2016, 210: 827-838 [45] He N, Li Y, Liu C, et al. Plant trait networks: Improved resolution of the dimensionality of adaptation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2020, 35: 908-918 [46] Li Y, Liu CC, Xu L, et al. Leaf trait networks based on global data: Representing variation and adaptation in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 710530 [47] Meyer RS, Duval AE, Jensen HR. Patterns and processes in crop domestication: An historical review and quantitative analysis of 203 global food crops. New Phytologist, 2012, 196: 29-48 [48] Garibaldi LA, Aizen MA, Saez A, et al. The influences of progenitor filtering, domestication selection and the boundaries of nature on the domestication of grain crops. Functional Ecology, 2021, 35: 1998-2011 [49] Cunniff J, Wilkinson S, Charles M, et al. Functional traits differ between cereal crop progenitors and other wild grasses gathered in the Neolithic Fertile Crescent. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): e87586 [50] Milla R, Morente-Lopez J, Alonso-Rodrigo JM, et al. Shifts and disruptions in resource-use trait syndromes during the evolution of herbaceous crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2014, 281: 20141429 [51] Faucon MP, Houben D, Lambers H. Plant functional traits: Soil and ecosystem services. Trends in Plant Science, 2017, 22: 385-394 [52] Grime JP. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: Immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology, 1998, 86: 902-910 [53] Petchey OL, Gaston KJ. Functional diversity: Back to basics and looking forward. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9: 741-758 [54] 韩涛涛, 唐玄, 任海, 等. 群落/生态系统功能多样性研究方法及展望. 生态学报, 2021, 41(8): 3286-3295 [55] Buchanan SW, Baskerville M, Oelbermann M, et al. Plant diversity and agroecosystem function in riparian agroforests: Providing ecosystem services and land-use transition. Sustainability, 2020, 12: 568 [56] Cadotte MW, Cavender-Bares J, Tilman D, et al. Using phylogenetic, functional and trait diversity to understand patterns of plant community productivity. PLoS One, 2009, 4(5): e5695 [57] Flynn DFB, Mirotchnick N, Jain M, et al. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity-ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology, 2011, 92: 1573-1581 [58] Gaba S, Lescourret F, Boudsocq S, et al. Multiple cropping systems as drivers for providing multiple ecosystem services: From concepts to design. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2014, 35: 607-623 [59] Hanisch M, Schweiger O, Cord AF, et al. Plant functional traits shape multiple ecosystem services, their trade-offs and synergies in grasslands. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 57: 1535-1550 [60] Martin AR, Isaac ME. Functional traits in agroecology: Advancing description and prediction in agroecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 55: 5-11 [61] dos Santos D, Joner F, Shipley B, et al. Crop functional diversity drives multiple ecosystem functions during early agroforestry succession. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 58: 1718-1727 [62] Kuester A, Conner JK, Culley T, et al. How weeds emerge: A taxonomic and trait-based examination using United States data. New Phytologist, 2014, 202: 1055-1068 [63] Gabriel D, Thies C, Tscharntke T. Local diversity of arable weeds increases with landscape complexity. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2005, 7: 85-93 [64] Petit S, Boursault A, Le Guilloux M, et al. Weeds in agricultural landscapes: A review. Agronomy for Sustai-nable Development, 2011, 31: 309-317 [65] Gaba S, Perronne R, Fried G, et al. Response and effect traits of arable weeds in agro-ecosystems: A review of current knowledge. Weed Research, 2017, 57: 123-147 [66] Moles AT, Westoby M. Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle. Oikos, 2006, 113: 91-105 [67] Ciaccia C, Martinez LA, Testani E, et al. Weed functional diversity as affected by agroecological service crops and no-till in a Mediterranean organic vegetable system. Plants, 2020, 9: 689 [68] Pakeman RJ, Brooker RW, Karley AJ, et al. Increased crop diversity reduces the functional space available for weeds. Weed Research, 2020, 60: 121-131 [69] Barberi P, Bocci G, Carlesi S, et al. Linking species traits to agroecosystem services: A functional analysis of weed communities. Weed Research, 2018, 58: 76-88 [70] Villora RA, Plaza EH, Navarrete L, et al. Climate and tillage system drive weed communities’ functional diversity in a Mediterranean cereal-legume rotation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 28: 106574 [71] 蹇述莲, 李书鑫, 刘胜群, 等. 覆盖作物及其作用的研究进展. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 1-14 [72] Blanco-Canqui H, Shaver TM, Lindquist JL, et al. Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils. Agronomy Journal, 2015, 107: 2449-2474 [73] Christina M, Negrier A, Marnotte P, et al. A trait-based analysis to assess the ability of cover crops to control weeds in a tropical island. European Journal of Agronomy, 2021, 128: 126316 [74] Damour G, Quoc HT, Tardy F, et al. A trait-based approach for the choice of cover crops in banana cropping systems: Theoretical developments and practical applications. Acta Horticulturae, 2018, 1196: 33-39 [75] 薛敬荣. 利用功能性状途径研究绿肥种类与数量对土壤线虫群落的影响. 硕士论文. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020 [76] Finney DM, Kaye JP. Functional diversity in cover crop polycultures increases multifunctionality of an agricultural system. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 54: 509-517 [77] Blesh J. Functional traits in cover crop mixtures: Biolo-gical nitrogen fixation and multifunctionality. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 55: 38-48 [78] Ranaldo M, Carlesi S, Costanzo A, et al. Functional diversity of cover crop mixtures enhances biomass yield and weed suppression in a Mediterranean agroecosystem. Weed Research, 2019, 60: 96-108 [79] Herrick E, Blesh J. Intraspecific trait variation improves understanding and management of cover crop outcomes. Ecosphere, 2021, 12: e03817 [80] Li L, Tilman D, Lambers H, et al. Plant diversity and overyielding: Insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytologist, 2014, 203: 63-69 [81] Malezieux E. Designing cropping systems from nature. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2012, 32: 15-29 [82] Litrico I, Violle C. Diversity in plant breeding: A new conceptual framework. Trends in Plant Science, 2015, 20: 604-613 [83] Hillerislambers J, Adler PB, Harpole WS, et al. Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2012, 43: 227-248 [84] Kraft NJ, Godoy O, Levine JM. Plant functional traits and the multidimensional nature of species coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112: 797-802 [85] Louarn G, Barillot R, Combes D, et al. Towards intercrop ideotypes: Non-random trait assembly can promote overyielding and stability of species proportion in simulated legume-based mixtures. Annals of Botany, 2020, 126: 671-685 [86] Loreau M, Hector A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature, 2001, 412: 72-76 [87] 李春杰. 种内/种间互作调控小麦/蚕豆间作体系作物生长与氮磷吸收的机制. 博士论文. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2018 [88] Huang MJ, Liu X, Cadotte MW, et al. Functional and phylogenetic diversity explain different components of diversity effects on biomass production. Oikos, 2020, 129: 1185-1195 [89] Yang H, Xu HS, Zhang WP, et al. Overyielding is accounted for partly by plasticity and dissimilarity of crop root traits in maize/legume intercropping systems. Functional Ecology, 2022, 36: 2163-2175 [90] Li SW, van Der Werf W, Zhu JQ, et al. Estimating the contribution of plant traits to light partitioning in simultaneous maize/soybean intercropping. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2021, 72: 3630-3646 [91] Chacon-Labella J, Palacios PG, Matesanz S, et al. Plant domestication disrupts biodiversity effects across major crop types. Ecology Letters, 2019, 22: 1472-1482 [92] Bittebiere AK, Saiz H, Mony C. New insights from multidimensional trait space responses to competition in two clonal plant species. Functional Ecology, 2019, 33: 297-307 [93] Hart SP, Schreiber SJ, Levine JM. How variation between individuals affects species coexistence. Ecology Letters, 2016, 19: 825-838 [94] Gruber K. The living library. Nature, 2017, 544: S8-S10 [95] 米湘成, 王绪高, 沈国春, 等. 中国森林生物多样性监测网络: 二十年群落构建机制探索的回顾与展望. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(10): 211-233 [96] Dore T, Makowski D, Malezieux E, et al. Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy, 2011, 34: 197-210 |
[1] | DONG Shiqi, ZHANG Heye, SUN Guoqing, LI Lei, AN Wencong, ZHANG Yanchao, WANG Zhaoguo, GAO Dongkui, TIAN Tao, WU Zhongxin. Seasonal variations of macrozoobenthic community trophic structure in the waters adjacent to the seaweed beds of Dalian Island in the North Yellow Sea [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(7): 1763-1770. |
[2] | BA Xiaobo, SUI Xin, LIU Mingda, XIE Hongtu, LIANG Chao, BAO Xuelian. Ecosystem service value of conservation tillage with cover crop-maize intercropping in the black soil region of Northeast China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891. |
[3] | LI Wenhui, LIN Yanmin, NAN Xiongxiong, WANG Fang, ZHU Lizhen. Soil carbon and nitrogen sequestration and associated influencing factors in a sustainable cultivation system of fruit trees intercropped with cover crops [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(2): 471-480. |
[4] | GU Jiacheng, WANG Wenmin, WANG Zhen, LI Luhua, JIANG Guiju, WANG Jiaping, CHENG Zhibo. Effects of maize and soybean intercropping on soil phosphorus bioavailability and microbial community structure in rhizosphere. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(11): 3030-3038. |
[5] | CHEN Junnan, JIANG Wenyang, ZAN Zhiman, WANG Jiangtao, ZHENG Bin, LIU Ling, LIU Juan, JIAO Nianyuan. Effects of maize and peanut co-ridge intercropping on crop photosynthetic characteristics and intercropping advantages [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(10): 2672-2682. |
[6] | WANG Xue, LIU Xiaojing, WANG Jing, TONG Changchun, WU Yong. Temporal-spatial variations of root and soil nutrient under continuous intercropping of alfalfa and oat [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(10): 2683-2692. |
[7] | QIAN Bi-chang, ZHAO Chen, ZHAO Ji-hao, LAI Hua-jiang, LI Xiang-dong, LIU Zhao-xin. Effects of different peanut-cotton intercropping modes on physiological characteristics and yield of peanut in late growth stage [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(9): 2422-2430. |
[8] | CAI Li-jun, ZHANG Jing-tao, GAI Zhi-jia, LIU Jing-qi, GUO Zhen-hua, ZHAO Gui-fan, MENG Qing-ying. The planting effect of cover crop in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(10): 2736-2742. |
[9] | MI Yong-wei, GONG Cheng-wen, SHAO Wu-ping, DUN Zhi-heng. Effects of plastic film mulching on soil quality, growth of Angelica sinensis, and weed occurrence in cold and humid areas [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(9): 3152-3158. |
[10] | QIN Xiao-min, PAN Hao-nan, XIAO Jing-xiu, TANG Li, ZHENG Yi. Root morphological changes in maize and soybean intercropping system under different phosphorus levels [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(9): 3223-3230. |
[11] | SUI Xin, HUO Hai-nan, BAO Xue-lian, HE Hong-bo, ZHANG Xu-dong, LIANG Chao, XIE Hong-tu. Research advances on cover crop plantation and its effects on subsequent crop and soil environment [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(8): 2666-2674. |
[12] | ZHANG Wen, HAN Shou-an, WANG Min, Alemujiang Aubrey, PAN Ming-qi, Aiermaike Caik Aaasimu, ZHANG Ping, XIE Hui. Effects of fruit tree canopy shading on grain filling of intercropping winter wheat [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(7): 2458-2468. |
[13] | WANG Ya-jun, WANG Teng-qi, HOU Zhi-jie, WANG Xue-hao, SU Gao-jie, LIU Yi-qiang, ZHOU Quan. Responses of root exudates to intercropping of Chinese milk vetch with rape. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(5): 1783-1790. |
[14] | BAI Wen-lian, ZHANG Meng-yao, LIU Zhen-yang, ZHENG Yi, TANG Li, XIAO Jing-xiu. Quantitative analysis of root morphology and phosphorus absorption in wheat and faba bean intercropping system. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(4): 1317-1326. |
[15] | LIN Fang, LIU Xiao-jing, TONG Chang-chun, WU Yong. Characteristics of light energy utilization of intercropping alfalfa/gramineae forage based on yield effect [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(9): 2963-2976. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||