[1] Jaynes ET. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physics Reviews, 1957, 106: 620-630 [2] Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 190: 231-259 [3] Guo J (郭 杰), Liu X-P (刘小平), Zhang Q (张 琴), et al. Prediction for the potential distribution area of Codonopsis pilosula at global scale based on MaxEnt model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2017, 28(3): 992-1000 (in Chinese) [4] Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Elith J, et al. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: Implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecological Applications, 2009, 19: 181-197 [5] Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM, Hortal J. Not as good as they seem: The importance of concepts in species distribution modeling. Diversity and Distributions, 2008, 14: 885-890 [6] Wintle BA, McCarthy MA, Parris KM, et al. Precision and bias of methods for estimating point survey detection probabilities. Ecological Applications, 2004, 14: 703-712 [7] Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, et al. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for Ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 2011, 17: 43-57 [8] Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, 2006, 29: 129-151 [9] Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, et al. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography, 2006, 29: 773-785 [10] Fourcade Y, Engler JO, Rodder D, et al. Mapping species distributions with MAXENT using a geographically biased sample of presence data: A performance assessment of methods for correcting sampling bias. PLoS One, 2014, 9(5): e97122, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097122 [11] Luo M (罗 玫), Wang H (王 昊), Lyu Z (吕 植). Evaluating the performance of species distribution models Biomod2 and MaxEnt using the giant panda distribtion data. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2017, 28(12): 4001-4006 (in Chinese) [12] Warren DL, Seifert SN. Ecological niche modeling in MaxEnt: The importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecological Applications, 2011, 21: 335-342 [13] Syfert MM, Smith MJ, Coomes DA. The effects of sampling bias and model complexity on the predictive performance of MaxEnt species distribution models. PLoS One, 2013, 8(2): e55158, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0055158 [14] Dudík M, Schapire RE, Phillips SJ. Correcting sample selection bias in maximum entropy density estimation. International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, 2005: 323-330 [15] Reddy S, D’avalos LM. Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa. Journal of Biogeography, 2003, 30: 1719-1727 [16] Yackulic CB, Chandler R, Zipkin EF, et al. Presence-only modelling using MAXENT: When can we trust the inferences? Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2013, 4: 236-243 [17] Kadmon R, Farber O, Danin A. Effect of roadside bias on the accuracy of predictive maps produced by bioclimatic models. Ecological Applications, 2004, 14: 401-413 [18] Reese GC, Wilson KR, Hoeting JA, et al. Factors affecting species distribution predictions: A simulation modeling experiment. Ecological Applications, 2005, 15: 554-564 [19] Araujo MB, Guisan A. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography, 2006, 33: 1677-1688 [20] Zadrozny B. Learning and evaluating classifiers under sample selection bias. Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning, Banff, Canada, 2004: 1-9 [21] Radosavljevic A, Robert PA. Making better MAXENT models of species distributions: Complexity, overfitting and evaluation. Journal of Biogeography, 2014, 41: 629-643 [22] Anderson RP. Harnessing the world’s biodiversity data: Promise and peril in ecological niche modeling of species distributions. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 2012, 1260: 66-80 [23] Shcheglovitova M, Anderson RP. Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. Ecological Modelling, 2013, 269: 9-17 [24] Varela S, Anderson RP, García-Valdés R, et al. Environmental filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models. Ecography, 2014, 37: 1-8 [25] Osborne PE, Suárez-Seoane S. Should data be partitioned spatially before building large-scale distribution models? Ecological Modelling, 2002, 157: 249-259 [26] Fourcade Y, Engler JO, Besnard AG, et al. Confronting expert-based and modelled distributions for species with uncertain conservation status: A case study from the Corncrake (Crex crex). Biological Conservation, 2013, 167: 161-171 [27] Phillips SJ, Dudík M. Modeling of species distributions with MaxEnt: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 2008, 31: 161-175 [28] Warton DI, Renner IW, Ramp D. Model-based control of observer bias for the analysis of presence-only data in ecology. PLoS One, 2013, 8(11): e79168, doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0079168 [29] Warren DL, Wright AN, Seifert SN, et al. Incorporating model complexity and spatial sampling bias into ecological niche models of climate change risks faced by 90 California vertebrate species of concern. Diversity and Distributions, 2014, 20: 334-343 [30] Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips SJ. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2010, 1: 330-342 [31] Warton DI, Shepherd LC. Poisson point process models solve the “pseudo-absence problem” for presence-only data in ecology. Annals of Applied Statistics, 2010, 4: 1383-1402 [32] El-Gabbas A, Carsten FD. Improved species-occurrence predictions in data-poor regions: Using large-scale data and bias correction with down-weighted Poisson regression and MaxEnt. Ecography, 2018, 41: 1161-1172 [33] Kramer-Schadt S, Niedballa J, Pilgrim JD, et al. The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions, 2013, 19: 1366-1379 [34] Austin MP. Spatial prediction of species distribution: An interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling, 2002, 157: 101-118 [35] Rivers MC, Taylor L, Brummitt NA, et al. How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species? Biological Conservation, 2011, 144: 2541-2547 [36] Brummitt NA, Bachman SP, Moat J. Applications of the IUCN Red List: Towards a global barometer for plant diversity. Endangered Species Research, 2008, 6: 127-135 [37] Anderson RP, Gonzalez Jr I. Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with MaxEnt. Ecological Modelling, 2011, 222: 2796-2811 [38] Moreno-Amat E, Mateo RG, Nieto-Lugilde D, et al. Impact of model complexity on cross-temporal transferability in MaxEnt species distribution models: An assessment using paleobotanical data. Ecological Modelling, 2015, 312: 308-317 [39] Baldwin RA. Use of maximum entropy modeling in Wildlife Research. Entropy, 2009, 11: 854-866 [40] Muscarella R, Galante PJ, Soley-Guardia M, et al. ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially indepen-dent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for MAXENT ecological niche models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2014, 5: 1198-1205 [41] Phillips SJ. Transferability, sample selection bias and background data in presence-only modelling: A response to Peterson, et al. (2007). Ecography, 2008, 31: 272-278 [42] Porfirio LL, Harris RM, Lefroy EC, et al. Improving the use of species distribution models in conservation planning and management under climate change. PLoS One, 2014, 9(11): e113749, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0113749 [43] Lobo JM, Jimenez-Valverde A, Real R. AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2008, 17: 145-151 [44] Liu C, White M, Newell G. Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. Journal of Biogeography, 2013, 40: 778-789 [45] Manel S, Dias JM, Ormerod SJ. Comparing discriminant analysis, neural networks and logistic regression for predicting species distributions: A case study with a Himalayan river bird. Ecology Modelling, 1999, 120: 337-347 [46] Liu C, Berry PM, Dawson TP, et al. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography, 2005, 28: 385-393 [47] Liu C, Newell G, White M. On the selection of thresholds for predicting species occurrence with presence-only data. Ecology and Evolution, 2016, 6: 337-348 [48] Braunisch V, Suchant R. Predicting species distributions based on incomplete survey data: The trade-off between precision and scale. Ecography, 2010, 33: 826-840 [49] Smith AB. On evaluating species distribution models with random background sites in place of absences when test presences disproportionately sample suitable habitat. Diversity and Distributions, 2013, 19: 867-872 [50] Bahn V, McGill BJ. Testing the predictive performance of distribution models. Oikos, 2013, 122: 321-331 [51] Hijmans RJ. Cross-validation of species distribution models: Removing spatial sorting bias and calibration with a null model. Ecology, 2012, 93: 679-688 [52] MacKenzie DK, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, et al. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology, 2002, 83: 248-255 [53] Gu W, Swihart RK. Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models. Biological Conservation, 2004, 116: 195-203 [54] Merckx B, Steyaert M, Vanreuse A, et al. Null models reveal preferential sampling, spatial autocorrelation and overfitting in habitat suitability modelling. Ecological Modelling, 2011, 222: 588-597 [55] Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, Kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 43: 1223-1232 [56] Raes N, ter Steege H. A null-model for significance testing of presence-only species distribution models. Eco-graphy, 2007, 30: 727-736 |