中国西南地区不同类型生态系统服务的关系

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202003.015

应用生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 978-986.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202003.015

中国西南地区不同类型生态系统服务的关系

林子雁^1,2, 肖燚^1*, 饶恩明³, 史雪威^1,4, 张平^1,5

¹中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085;
²中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100049;
³四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院, 成都 610101;
⁴生态环境部卫星环境中心, 北京 100094;
⁵西安工程大学环境与化学工程学院, 西安 710048

收稿日期:2019-08-26 出版日期:2020-03-15 发布日期:2020-03-15
通讯作者: E-mail: xiaoyi@rcees.ac.cn
作者简介:林子雁, 女, 1994年生, 博士研究生。主要从事生态系统服务评估相关研究。E-mail: zylin_st@rcees.ac.cn
基金资助:
本文由国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0502102)资助

Relationships among different types of ecosystem service in Southwest China

LIN Zi-yan^1,2, XIAO Yi^1*, RAO En-ming³, SHI Xue-wei^1,4, ZHANG Ping^1,5

¹State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
²College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
³Faculty of Geography Resources Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China;
⁴Satellite Application Center for Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100094, China;
⁵School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Xi’an Polytechnic University, Xi’an 710048, China

Received:2019-08-26 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-03-15
Contact: E-mail: xiaoyi@rcees.ac.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Plan (2016YFC0502102)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 明晰不同类型生态系统服务之间关系是优化生态保护策略和实现可持续生态管理的基础。在明确中国西南地区各类生态系统服务功能和空间格局的基础上,运用统计分析原理、ArcGIS技术和GeoDa软件分析了水源涵养、土壤保持、固碳、生物多样性保护、水质净化5项调节服务,以及水稻生产、小麦生产、玉米生产、蔬菜生产、水果生产5项供给服务之间的权衡和协同关系,并通过叠置分析识别生态系统服务共赢区域,探讨生态系统类型对共赢格局的影响。结果表明: 西南地区各类调节服务之间、各类供给服务之间主要呈协同关系,而调节服务与供给服务之间既有协同关系也有权衡关系;西南地区生态系统服务总共赢格局的高共赢区域主要分布在邛崃山、哀牢山和大瑶山以及怒江、澜沧江流域等地区;森林和农田面积比例对各类共赢趋势均有显著影响。

Abstract: Understanding the relationships among different ecosystem services is the basis for optimizing ecological protection strategy and achieving sustainable ecological management. Based on the ecosystem services and their spatial patterns in Southwest China, we analyzed tradeoffs and synergies of five ecosystem regulation services (water retention, soil retention, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and water purification) and five provision services (rice production, wheat production, corn production, vegetable production, and fruit production) using statistical analysis, ArcGIS technology and GeoDa software. Further, we identified the win-win areas of ecosystem servi-ces through overlay analysis, and discussing the influence of ecosystem types on win-win pattern. There were synergistic relationships among different types of regulation or provision services in Southwest China, while there were both synergies and trade-offs between regulation and provision services. The high win-win areas of the total ecosystem services in Southwest China were mainly distributed in Qionglai Mountains, Ailao Mountains, Dayao Mountains, as well as Lujiang River and Lancang River basins. The proportion of forest and farmland areas significantly affected all kinds of win-win trend.

林子雁, 肖燚, 饶恩明, 史雪威, 张平. 中国西南地区不同类型生态系统服务的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(3): 978-986.

LIN Zi-yan, XIAO Yi, RAO En-ming, SHI Xue-wei, ZHANG Ping. Relationships among different types of ecosystem service in Southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(3): 978-986.

参考文献 32

[1]	Daily GC. Nature’ s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Pacific Conservation Biology, 1997, 6: 220-221
[2]	Costanza R, D’Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260
[3]	MA. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005
[4]	Nelson E, Polasky S, Lewis DJ, et al. Efficiency of incentives to jointly increase carbon sequestration and species conservation on a landscape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105: 9471-9476
[5]	Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TKE, et al. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highligh-ting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2007, 32: 67-98
[6]	Barbier EB, Koch EW, Silliman BR, et al. Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science, 2008, 319: 321-323
[7]	Willemen L, Hein L, Mensvoort MEF, et al. Space for people, plants, and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10: 62-73
[8]	Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12: 1394-1404
[9]	郑华, 李屹峰, 欧阳志云, 等. 生态系统服务功能管理研究进展. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 39-47 [Zheng H, Li Y-F, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Progress and perspectives of ecosystem services management. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 702-710]
[10]	曹祺文, 卫晓梅, 吴健生. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(11): 3102-3111 [Cao Q-W, Wei X-M, Wu J-S. A review on the tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(11): 3102-3111]
[11]	Onaindia M, Beatriz FM, Madariaga I, et al. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 289: 1-9
[12]	Chisholm RA. Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 1973-1987
[13]	Bai Y, Zhuang C, Ouyang ZY, et al. Spatial characte-ristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed. Ecological Complexity, 2011, 8: 177-183
[14]	Raudsepphearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107: 5242-5247
[15]	Ruiz-Frau A, Hinz H, Edwards-Jones G, et al. Spatially explicit economic assessment of cultural ecosystem ser-vices: Non-extractive recreational uses of the coastal environment related to marine biodiversity. Marine Policy, 2013, 38: 90-98
[16]	Mcnally CG, Uchida E, Gold AJ, et al. The effect of a protected area on the tradeoffs between short-run and long-run benefits from mangrove ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108: 13945-13950
[17]	Farber S, Costanza R, Childers DL, et al. Linking eco-logy and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience, 2006, 56: 121-133
[18]	Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Xiao Y, et al. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 2016, 352: 1455-1459
[19]	国家林业局. 国家重点保护野生动物名录. 北京: 国家林业局, 2010 [State Forestry Administration of China. Lists of Wildlife under Special Protection. Beijing: State Forestry Administration of China, 2010]
[20]	国家林业局. 国家重点保护野生植物名录. 北京: 国家林业局, 2010 [State Forestry Administration of China. National Important Wild Conservation Plants List. Beijing: State Forestry Administration of China, 2010]
[21]	Baillie JEM, Hilton TC, Stuart SN, et al. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, A Global Species Assessment. Cambridge: IUCN Publications Services Unit, 2004
[22]	Sharp R. InVEST + VERSION + User’s Guide. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Stanford University, 2015
[23]	Kareica P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, et al. Natural Capi-tal: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011
[24]	武文欢, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等. 鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(12): 1571-1581 [Wu W-H, Peng J, Liu Y-X, et al. Tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos City. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(12): 1571-1581]
[25]	孙泽祥, 刘志锋, 何春阳, 等. 中国快速城市化干燥地区的生态系统服务权衡关系多尺度分析——以呼包鄂榆地区为例. 生态学报, 2016, 36(15): 4881-4891 [Sun Z-X, Liu Z-F, He C-Y, et al. Multi-scale analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs in urbanizing drylands of China: A case study in the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos-Yulin region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(15): 4881-4891]
[26]	Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2009, 7: 4-11
[27]	Yang G, Ge Y, Xue H, et al. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2015, 136: 110-121
[28]	Turner KG, Odgaard MV, Bcher PK, et al. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2014, 125: 89-104
[29]	Groot RSD, Alkemade R, Braat L, et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7: 260-272
[30]	Bryan BA. Incentives, land use, and ecosystem servi-ces: Synthesizing complex linkages. Environmental Science & Policy, 2013, 27: 124-134
[31]	李双成, 张才玉, 刘金龙, 等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题. 地理研究, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390 [Li S-C, Zhang C-Y, Liu J-L, et al. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390]
[32]	Tobler WR. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, 1970, 46: 234-240

中国西南地区不同类型生态系统服务的关系

Relationships among different types of ecosystem service in Southwest China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 32

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价