组蛋白修饰调控植物对胁迫的记忆与警备抗性的研究进展

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.039

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 844-854.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.039

组蛋白修饰调控植物对胁迫的记忆与警备抗性的研究进展

郑月琴^1,2, 王琼丽², 陈道钳^2,3, 陈冬梅^2,3, 曾任森^2,3, 宋圆圆^2,3*

¹福建省农业科学院植物保护研究所, 福州 350013;
²福建农林大学农学院, 作物遗传育种与综合利用教育部重点实验室, 福州 350002;
³福建农林大学作物抗性与化学生态学研究所, 福州 350002

收稿日期:2021-04-29 接受日期:2021-11-30 出版日期:2022-03-15 发布日期:2022-09-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: yyuansong@163.com
作者简介:郑月琴, 女, 1988年生, 博士。主要从事植物与昆虫互作及表观遗传调控机制研究。E-mail: Cyqzheng@163.com
基金资助:
福建省青年拔尖创新人才项目(2016)、福建省“百人计划”人才项目(〔2015〕08)、福建省自然科学基金项目(2019J01375)和闽台作物特色种质创制与绿色栽培协同创新中心(福建2011项目No.2015-75)资助。

Research advances in histone modification-regulated plant stress memory and defense priming.

ZHENG Yue-qin^1,2, WANG Qiong-li², CHEN Dao-qian^2,3, CHEN Dong-mei^2,3, ZENG Ren-sen^2,3, SONG Yuan-yuan^2,3*

¹Institute of Plant Protection, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350013, China;
²Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crop, College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
³Institute of Crop Resistance and Chemical Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China

Received:2021-04-29 Accepted:2021-11-30 Online:2022-03-15 Published:2022-09-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 植物扎根土壤,面对不利的环境胁迫无法逃避。然而,植物已经进化出对环境胁迫的记忆(stress memory)与警备抗性(或防御警备defense priming)等机制适应环境。环境胁迫在短时间内无法改变植物的DNA碱基序列,因此表观遗传被认为是植物对环境胁迫产生记忆和产生防御警备的主要机制,而组蛋白修饰被认为是最重要的机制,为胁迫记忆提供了可能。本文综述了非生物和生物胁迫下植物分别以胁迫记忆和防御警备机制为主导的组蛋白修饰参与抵御不良环境的最新进展,并提出该研究领域存在的问题和今后研究的重点与方向。深入探究组蛋白修饰与植物适应环境胁迫的关系,可为提高植物抗性、植物表型塑造、器官再生和作物改良等方面提供理论和技术指导。

关键词: 组蛋白修饰, 胁迫记忆, 防御警备, 生物胁迫, 非生物胁迫

Abstract: Plants, grown in the immobile soils, have evolved various strategies in response to environmental stresses, including the “stress memory” and “defense priming” mechanisms. The environmental stresses cannot immediately change the DNA base sequence in plants in the short-term. Therefore, epigenetic inheritance is a key mechanism for stress memory and defense priming. In particular, histone modification is considered to be the most important mechanism, which offers the possibility of stress memory. We summarized research advances in plant histone modifications involved in stress memory and defense priming under biotic and abiotic stresses, and proposed pro-blems in the field and the focus and directions in the future research. In-depth understanding of the relationship between histone modification and environmental stresses would facilitate the quick adaptation of plants to harsh environments, and provide theoretical and technical guidance for plant phenotype shaping, organ regeneration, and crop genetic improvement.

Key words: histone modification, stress memory, defense priming, biotic stress, abiotic stress

郑月琴, 王琼丽, 陈道钳, 陈冬梅, 曾任森, 宋圆圆. 组蛋白修饰调控植物对胁迫的记忆与警备抗性的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3): 844-854.

ZHENG Yue-qin, WANG Qiong-li, CHEN Dao-qian, CHEN Dong-mei, ZENG Ren-sen, SONG Yuan-yuan. Research advances in histone modification-regulated plant stress memory and defense priming.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(3): 844-854.

参考文献 122

[1]	王杰, 宋圆圆, 胡林, 等. 植物抗虫“防御警备”: 概念、机理与应用. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6): 2068-2078
[2]	Frost CJ, Mescher MC, Carlson JE, et al. Plant defense priming against herbivores: Getting ready for a different battle. Plant Physiology, 2008, 146: 818-824
[3]	Mauch-Mani B, Baccelli I, Luna E, et al. Defense priming: An adaptive part of induced resistance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2017, 68: 485-512
[4]	Rasmann S, De Vos M, Casteel CL, et al. Herbivory in the previous generation primes plants for enhanced insect resistance. Plant Physiology, 2012, 158: 854-863
[5]	Worrall D, Holroyd GH, Moore JP, et al. Treating seeds with activators of plant defence generates long-lasting priming of resistance to pests and pathogens. New Phytologist, 2012, 193: 770-778
[6]	Bernsdorff F, Doring AC, Gruner K, et al. Pipecolic acid orchestrates plant systemic acquired resistance and defense priming via salicylic acid-dependent and-independent pathways. Plant Cell, 2016, 28: 102-129
[7]	Keeping MG, Meyer JH. Calcium silicate enhances resistance of sugarcane to the African stalk borer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2002, 4: 265-274
[8]	Tja B, Matthes MC, Napier JA, et al. Stressful “memories” of plants: Evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Science, 2007, 173: 603-608
[9]	Espinas NA, Saze H, Saijo Y. Epigenetic control of defense signaling and priming in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1201, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01201
[10]	Hilker M, Schwachtje J, Baier M, et al. Priming and memory of stress responses in organisms lacking a ner-vous system. Biological Reviews, 2016, 91: 1118-1133
[11]	Avramova Z. Transcriptional ‘memory' of a stress: Transient chromatin and memory (epigenetic) marks at stress-response genes. Plant Journal, 2015, 83: 149-159
[12]	Oudet P, Gross-Bellard M, Chambon P. Electron microscopic and biochemical evidence that chromatin structure is a repeating unit. Cell, 1975, 4: 281-300
[13]	Thomas JO, Kornberg RD. An octamer of histones in chromatin and free in solution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1975, 72: 2626-2630
[14]	Kornberg RD, Lorch Y. Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell, 1999, 98: 285-294
[15]	Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature, 1997, 389: 251-260
[16]	Deribe YL, Pawson T, Dikic I. Post-translational modifications in signal integration. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2010, 17: 666-672
[17]	Loidl P. A plant dialect of the histone language. Trends in Plant Science, 2004, 9: 84-90
[18]	Cosgrove MS. Histone proteomics and the epigenetic regulation of nucleosome mobility. Expert Review of Proteomics, 2007, 4: 465-478
[19]	Kebede AF, Schneider R, Daujat S. Novel types and sites of histone modifications emerge as players in the transcriptional regulation contest. FEBS Journal, 2015, 282: 1658-1674
[20]	Inagaki S, Takahashi M, Takashima K, et al. Chromatin-based mechanisms to coordinate convergent overlapping transcription. Nature Plants, 2021, 7: 295-302
[21]	Lamke J, Brzezinka K, Altmann S, et al. A hit-and-run heat shock factor governs sustained histone methylation and transcriptional stress memory. EMBO Journal, 2016, 35: 162-175
[22]	Du Z, Li H, Wei Q, et al. Genome-wide analysis of histone modifications: H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27ac in Oryza sativa L. Japonica. Molecular Plant, 2013, 6: 1463-1472
[23]	Liu N, Fromm M, Avramova Z. H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 chromatin environment at super-induced dehydration stress memory genes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant, 2014, 7: 502-513
[24]	Crespo-Salvador O, Escamilla-Aguilar M, Lopez-Cruz J, et al. Determination of histone epigenetic marks in Arabidopsis and tomato genes in the early response to Botrytis cinerea. Plant Cell Reports, 2018, 37: 153-166
[25]	Qian SM, Lv XC, Scheid RN, et al. Dual recognition of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 by a plant histone reader SHL. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 2425, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04836-y
[26]	Wang Y, Zhou X, Luo J, et al. Recognition of H3K9me1 by maize RNA-directed DNA methylation factor SHH2. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2021, 63, doi: 10.1111/jipb.13103
[27]	Ding Y, Wang X, Su L, et al. SDG714, a histone H3K9 methyltransferase, is involved in Tos17 DNA methylation and transposition in rice. Plant Cell, 2007, 19: 9-22
[28]	Qin FJ, Sun QW, Huang LM, et al. Rice SUVH histone methyltransferase genes display specific functions in chromatin modification and retrotransposon repression. Molecular Plant, 2010, 3: 773-782
[29]	Zhao S, Cheng L, Gao Y, et al. Plant HP1 protein ADCP1 links multivalent H3K9 methylation readout to heterochromatin formation. Cell Research, 2019, 29: 54-66
[30]	Veiseth SV, Rahman MA, Yap KL, et al. The SUVR4 histone lysine methyltransferase binds ubiquitin and converts H3K9me1 to H3K9me3 on transposon chromatin in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics, 2011, 7, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001325
[31]	Ma Z, Castillo-González C, Wang Z, et al. Arabidopsis serrate coordinates histone methyltransferases ATXR5/6 and RNA processing factor RDR6 to regulate transposon expression. Developmental Cell, 2018, 45: 769-784.e6
[32]	Zhang C, Du X, Tang K, et al. Arabidopsis AGDP1 links H3K9me2 to DNA methylation in heterochromatin. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 4547, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06965-w
[33]	Li T, Chen X, Zhong X, et al. Jumonji C domain protein JMJ705-mediated removal of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation is involved in defense-related gene activation in rice. Plant Cell, 2013, 25: 4725-4736
[34]	Liu B, Wei G, Shi J, et al. SET DOMAIN GROUP 708, a histone H3 lysine 36-specific methyltransferase, controls flowering time in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytologist, 2016, 210: 577-588
[35]	Lin X, Zhong Z, Dong A, et al. Di- and tri- but not monomethylation on histone H3 lysine 36 marks active transcription of genes involved in flowering time regulation and other processes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2008, 28: 1348-1360
[36]	Zhao W, Neyt P, Van Lijsebettens M, et al. Interactive and noninteractive roles of histone H2B monoubiquitination and H3K36 methylation in the regulation of active gene transcription and control of plant growth and development. New Phytologist, 2019, 221: 1101-1116
[37]	François R, Ikhlak A, Caroline B, et al. Integrative epigenomic mapping defines four main chromatin states in Arabidopsis. EMBO Journal, 2011, 30: 1928-1938
[38]	Chanchal S, Santosh K, Gautam S, et al. H3K4/K9 acetylation and Lr28-mediated expression of six leaf rust responsive genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2018, 294: 227-241
[39]	Zhao L, Wang P, Yan S, et al. Promoter-associated histone acetylation is involved in the osmotic stress-induced transcriptional regulation of the maize ZmDREB2A gene. Physiologia Plantarum, 2014, 151: 459-467
[40]	Benhamed M, Bertrand C, Servet C, et al. Arabidopsis GCN5, HD1, and TAF1/HAF2 interact to regulate histone acetylation required for light-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell, 2006, 18: 2893-2903
[41]	Kim S, Piquerez SJM, Ramirez-Prado JS, et al. GCN5 modulates salicylic acid homeostasis by regulating H3K14ac levels at the 5' and 3' ends of its target genes. Nucleic Acids Research, 2020, 48: 5953-5966
[42]	Wang L, Zhang F, Rode S, et al. Ethylene induces combinatorial effects of histone H3 acetylation in gene expression in Arabidopsis. BMC Genomics, 2017, 18: 538, doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3929-6
[43]	Lu L, Chen X, Sanders D, et al. High-resolution mapping of H4K16 and H3K23 acetylation reveals conserved and unique distribution patterns in Arabidopsis and rice. Epigenetics, 2015, 10: 1044-1053
[44]	Yan W, Chen D, Schumacher J, et al. Dynamic control of enhancer activity drives stage-specific gene expression during flower morphogenesis. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 1705, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09513-2
[45]	Mahrez W, Arellano MS, Moreno-Romero J, et al. H3K36ac is an evolutionary conserved plant histone modification that marks active genes. Plant Physiology, 2016, 170: 1566-1577
[46]	Wang Z, Casas-Mollano JA, Xu J, et al. Osmotic stress induces phosphorylation of histone H3 at threonine 3 in pericentromeric regions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112: 8487-8492
[47]	Bíró J, Farkas I, Domoki M, et al. The histone phosphatase inhibitory property of plant nucleosome assembly protein-related proteins (NRPs). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2012, 52: 162-168
[48]	Wang P, Zhang H, Hou H, et al. Cell cycle arrest induced by inhibitors of epigenetic modifications in maize (Zea mays) seedling leaves: Characterization of the process and possible mechanisms involved. New Phytologist, 2016, 211: 646-657
[49]	Katja B, Huan S, Hirsch-Hoffmann M, et al. Diurnal changes in the histone H3 signature H3K9ac\|H3K27ac\|H3S28p are associated with diurnal gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2016, 39: 2557-2569
[50]	Sanchez Mde L, Gutierrez C. Novel insights into the plant histone code: Lessons from ORC1. Epigenetics, 2009, 4: 205-208
[51]	Ding B, Bellizzi Mdel R, Ning Y, et al. HDT701, a histone H4 deacetylase, negatively regulates plant innate immunity by modulating histone H4 acetylation of defense-related genes in rice. Plant Cell, 2012, 24: 3783-3794
[52]	Su Y, Wang S, Zhang F, et al. Phosphorylation of histone H2A at serine 95: A plant-specific mark involved in flowering time regulation and H2A.Z deposition. Plant Cell, 2017, 29: 2197-2213
[53]	Dong Q, Han F. Phosphorylation of histone H2A is associated with centromere function and maintenance in meiosis. Plant Journal, 2012, 71: 800-809
[54]	Cao Y, Yan D, Cui S, et al. Histone H2B monoubiquitination in the chromatin of FLOWERING LOCUS C regulates flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 2008, 20: 2586-2602
[55]	Liu Y, Koornneef M, Soppe WJ. The absence of histone H2B monoubiquitination in the Arabidopsis hub1 (rdo4) mutant reveals a role for chromatin remodeling in seed dormancy. Plant Cell, 2007, 19: 433-444
[56]	Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell, 2007, 128: 693-705
[57]	Lawrence M, Daujat S, Schneider R. Lateral thinking: How histone modifications regulate gene expression. Trends in Genetics, 2016, 32: 42-56
[58]	Allfrey VG, Faulkner R, Mirsky AE. Acetylation and methylation of histones and their possible role in the regulation of RNA synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1964, 51: 786-794
[59]	Ueda M, Seki M. Histone modifications form epigenetic regulatory networks to regulate abiotic stress response. Plant Physiology, 2020, 182: 15-26
[60]	Liu C, Lu F, Cui X, et al. Histone methylation in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2010, 61: 395-420
[61]	Pokholok DK, Harbison CT, Levine S, et al. Genome-wide map of nucleosome acetylation and methylation in yeast. Cell, 2005, 122: 517-527
[62]	Zhou J, Wang X, He K, et al. Genome-wide profiling of histone H3 lysine 9 acetylation and dimethylation in Arabidopsis reveals correlation between multiple histone marks and gene expression. Plant Molecular Biology, 2010, 72: 585-595
[63]	Chang YN, Zhu C, Jiang J, et al. Epigenetic regulation in plant abiotic stress responses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2020, 62: 563-580
[64]	Zhou H, Liu Y, Liang Y, et al. The function of histone lysine methylation related SET domain group proteins in plants. Protein Science, 2020, 29: 1120-1137
[65]	Jiang P, Wang S, Jiang H, et al. The COMPASS-like complex promotes flowering and panicle branching in rice. Plant Physiology, 2018, 176: 2761-2771
[66]	Fiorucci AS, Bourbousse C, Concia L, et al. Arabidopsis S2Lb links AtCOMPASS-like and SDG2 activity in H3K4me3 independently from histone H2B monoubiquitination. Genome Biology, 2019, 20: 100, doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1705-4
[67]	Song ZT, Zhang LL, Han JJ, et al. Histone H3K4 methyltransferases SDG25 and ATX1 maintain heat-stress gene expression during recovery in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal, 2021, 105: 1326-1338
[68]	Liu K, Yu Y, Dong A, et al. SET DOMAIN GROUP701 encodes a H3K4-methytransferase and regulates multiple key processes of rice plant development. New Phytologist, 2017, 215: 609-623
[69]	Ding Y, Avramova Z, Fromm M. The Arabidopsis trithorax-like factor ATX1 functions in dehydration stress responses via ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways. Plant Journal, 2011, 66: 735-744
[70]	Liu Y, Zhang A, Yin H, et al. Trithorax-group proteins ARABIDOPSIS TRITHORAX4 (ATX4) and ATX5 function in abscisic acid and dehydration stress responses. New Phytologist, 2018, 217: 1582-1597
[71]	Li Z, Fu X, Wang Y, et al. Polycomb-mediated gene silencing by the BAH-EMF1 complex in plants. Nature Genetics, 2018, 50: 1254-1261
[72]	Liu X, Zhou C, Zhao Y, et al. The rice enhancer of zeste [E(z)] genes SDG711 and SDG718 are respectively involved in long day and short day signaling to mediate the accurate photoperiod control of flowering time. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 5: 591, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00591
[73]	Nallamilli BR, Zhang J, Mujahid H, et al. Polycomb group gene OsFIE2 regulates rice (Oryza sativa) seed development and grain filling via a mechanism distinct from Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics, 2013, 9, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003322
[74]	Liu Y, Huang Y. Uncovering the mechanistic basis for specific recognition of monomethylated H3K4 by the CW domain of Arabidopsis histone methyltransferase SDG8. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2018, 293: 6470-6481
[75]	Wei G, Liu K, Shen T, et al. Position-specific intron retention is mediated by the histone methyltransferase SDG725. BMC Biology, 2018, 16: 44, doi: 10.1186/s12915-018-0513-8
[76]	Pedersen MT, Helin K. Histone demethylases in development and disease. Trends in Cell Biology, 2010, 20: 662-671
[77]	Roberto B, Alexandre B. Histone methylation-A cornerstone for plant responses to environmental stresses? // Arun S, ed. Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants-Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. London: Intech, 2016: 31-61
[78]	Liu X, Zhou S, Wang W, et al. Regulation of histone methylation and reprogramming of gene expression in the rice inflorescence meristem. Plant Cell, 2015, 27: 1428-1444
[79]	Luo M, Hung FY, Yang S, et al. Histone lysine demethylases and their functions in plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2014, 32: 558-565
[80]	Zheng M, Liu X, Lin J, et al. Histone acetyltransferase GCN5 contributes to cell wall integrity and salt stress tolerance by altering the expression of cellulose synthesis genes. Plant Journal, 2019, 97: 587-602
[81]	Roca Paixão JF, Gillet FX, Ribeiro TP, et al. Improved drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis by CRISPR/dCas9 fusion with a histone acetyltransferase. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 8080, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44571-y
[82]	Chung PJ, Kim YS, Jeong JS, et al. The histone deacetylase OsHDAC1 epigenetically regulates the OsNAC6 gene that controls seedling root growth in rice. Plant Journal, 2009, 59: 764-776
[83]	Zhao J, Li M, Gu D, et al. Involvement of rice histone deacetylase HDA705 in seed germination and in response to ABA and abiotic stresses. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2016, 470: 439-444
[84]	Zheng Y, Ding Y, Sun X, et al. Histone deacetylase HDA9 negatively regulates salt and drought stress responsiveness in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016, 67: 1703-1713
[85]	Lee HG, Seo PJ. MYB96 recruits the HDA15 protein to suppress negative regulators of ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications, 2019, 10: 1713, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09417-1
[86]	Zhu JK. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell, 2016, 167: 313-324
[87]	Xu Y, Zhang S, Lin S, et al. WERAM: A database of writers, erasers and readers of histone acetylation and methylation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Research, 2017, 45: D264-D270
[88]	Luo M, Liu X, Singh P, et al. Chromatin modifications and remodeling in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2012, 1819: 129-136
[89]	Kim JM, Sasaki T, Ueda M, et al. Chromatin changes in response to drought, salinity, heat, and cold stresses in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6: 114, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00114
[90]	To TK, Kim JM. Epigenetic regulation of gene responsiveness in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 4: 548, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00548
[91]	Kim JM, To TK, Ishida J, et al. Transition of chromatin status during the process of recovery from drought stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2012, 53: 847-856
[92]	Ding Y, Fromm M, Avramova Z, et al. Multiple exposures to drought ‘train' transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications, 2012, 3: 740, doi: 10.1038/ncomms1732
[93]	Ding Y, Liu N, Virlouvet L, et al. Four distinct types of dehydration stress memory genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biology, 2013, 13: 229, doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-229
[94]	Ding Y, Virlouvet L, Liu N, et al. Dehydration stress memory genes of Zea mays; comparison with Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biology, 2014, 14: 141, doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-141
[95]	Liu N, Avramova Z. Molecular mechanism of the priming by jasmonic acid of specific dehydration stress response genes in Arabidopsis. Epigenetics and Chromatin, 2016, 9: 8, doi: 10.1186/s13072-016-0057-5
[96]	Sokol A, Kwiatkowska A, Jerzmanowski A, et al. Up-regulation of stress-inducible genes in tobacco and Arabidopsis cells in response to abiotic stresses and ABA treatment correlates with dynamic changes in histone H3 and H4 modifications. Planta, 2007, 227: 245-254
[97]	Yolcu S, Ozdemir F, Guler A, et al. Histone acetylation influences the transcriptional activation of POX in Beta vulgaris L. and Beta maritima L. under salt stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2016, 100: 37-46
[98]	Sani E, Herzyk P, Perrella G, et al. Hyperosmotic priming of Arabidopsis seedlings establishes a long-term somatic memory accompanied by specific changes of the epigenome. Genome Biology, 2013, 14: R59, doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r59
[99]	Feng XJ, Li JR, Qi SL, et al. Light affects salt stress-induced transcriptional memory of P5CS1 in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113: E8335-E8343
[100]	Luo M, Wang YY, Liu X, et al. HD2C interacts with HDA6 and is involved in ABA and salt stress response in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63: 3297-3306
[101]	Scharf I, Wexler Y, MacMillan HA, et al. The negative effect of starvation and the positive effect of mild thermal stress on thermal tolerance of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Naturwissenschaften, 2016, 103: 20, doi: 10.1007/s00114-016-1344-5
[102]	Stief A, Brzezinka K, Lämke J, et al. Epigenetic responses to heat stress at different time scales and the involvement of small RNAs. Plant Signal & Behavior, 2014, 9, doi: 10.4161/15592316.2014.970430
[103]	Bond DM, Dennis ES, Finnegan EJ. The low temperature response pathways for cold acclimation and vernalization are independent. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2011, 34: 1737-1748
[104]	Song J, Angel A, Howard M, et al. Vernalization: A cold-induced epigenetic switch. Journal of Cell Science, 2012, 125: 3723-3731
[105]	Kwon CS, Lee D, Choi G, et al. Histone occupancy-dependent and -independent removal of H3K27 trimethylation at cold-responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal, 2009, 60: 112-121
[106]	Pavangadkar K, Thomashow MF, Triezenberg SJ. Histone dynamics and roles of histone acetyltransferases during cold-induced gene regulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Molecular Biology, 2010, 74: 183-200
[107]	Park J, Lim CJ, Shen M, et al. Epigenetic switch from repressive to permissive chromatin in response to cold stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115: E5400-E5409
[108]	Gatehouse JA. Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: A dynamic interaction. New Phytologist, 2002, 156: 145-169
[109]	Conrath U, Pieterse CM, Mauch-Mani B. Priming in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends in Plant Science, 2002, 7: 210-216
[110]	Conrath U, Beckers GJ, Flors V, et al. Priming: Getting ready for battle. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2006, 19: 1062-1071
[111]	Conrath U, Beckers GJ, Langenbach CJ, et al. Priming for enhanced defense. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2015, 53: 97-119
[112]	Wilkinson SW, Mageróy MH, López Sánchez A, et al. Surviving in a hostile world: Plant strategies to resist pests and diseases. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2019, 57: 505-529
[113]	Zogli P, Libault M. Plant response to biotic stress: Is there a common epigenetic response during plant-pathogenic and symbiotic interactions? Plant Science, 2017, 263: 89-93
[114]	Luna E, Bruce TJ, Roberts MR, et al. Next-generation systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiology, 2012, 158: 844-853
[115]	Jaskiewicz M, Conrath U, Peterhänsel C. Chromatin modification acts as a memory for systemic acquired resistance in the plant stress response. EMBO Reports, 2011, 12: 50-55
[116]	Lämke J, Bäurle I. Epigenetic and chromatin-based mechanisms in environmental stress adaptation and stress memory in plants. Genome Biology, 2017, 18: 124, doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1263-6
[117]	Ando S, Jaskiewicz M, Mochizuki S, et al. Priming for enhanced ARGONAUTE2 activation accompanies induced resistance to cucumber mosaic virus in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2021, 22: 19-30
[118]	Duan CG, Zhu JK, Cao XF. Retrospective and perspective of plant epigenetics in China. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2018, 45: 621-638
[119]	Hewezi T, Lane T, Piya S, et al. Cyst nematode parasitism induces dynamic changes in the root epigenome. Plant Physiology, 2017, 174: 405-420
[120]	Herrera CM, Bazaga P. Epigenetic correlates of plant phenotypic plasticity: DNA methylation differs between prickly and nonprickly leaves in heterophyllous Ilex aquifolium (Aquifoliaceae) trees. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2013, 171: 441-452
[121]	Kim J, Felton GW. Priming of antiherbivore defensive responses in plants. Insect Science, 2013, 20: 273-285
[122]	Cedar H, Bergman Y. Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: Patterns and paradigms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2009, 10: 295-304

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

179

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	179

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	77	102
比例	43%	57%

摘要

326

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	326

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	203	123
比例	62%	38%

组蛋白修饰调控植物对胁迫的记忆与警备抗性的研究进展

Research advances in histone modification-regulated plant stress memory and defense priming.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 122

相关文章 4

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	邵坤仲, 吕昕培, 李佳吕, 陈佳, 赵玲玉, 任伟, 张金林. 高等植物热激转录因子生物学特性及其在非生物胁迫适应中的作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2286-2296.
[2]	李娇娇, 曾明. 丛枝菌根对植物根际逆境的生态学意义 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(9): 3216-3226.
[3]	宋圆圆, 夏明, 林熠斌, 林娴慧, 丁朝晖, 王杰, 胡林, 曾任森. 丛枝菌根真菌摩西管柄囊霉侵染增强番茄对机械损伤的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11): 3811-3818.
[4]	周晓冬, 周娟, 张雪松, 江晓东, 杨连新, 王余龙. 非生物胁迫影响水稻颖花育性机理的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(12): 4127-4133.