黄土塬沟壑区典型植被沟头土壤渗透性和抗剪强度特征

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202307.020

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 1862-1870.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202307.020

黄土塬沟壑区典型植被沟头土壤渗透性和抗剪强度特征

杨浩¹, 王文龙^1,2*, 娄义宝¹, 冯兰茜², 朱亚男¹

¹西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
²中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2023-01-03 接受日期:2023-05-04 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2024-01-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: wlwang@nwsuaf.edu.cn
作者简介:杨浩, 男, 1999年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事土壤侵蚀机理研究。E-mail: 2679266562@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42077079)

Infiltration and shear strength characteristics of gully heads soil of typical vegetation on the gullied Loess Plateau, Northwest China

YANG Hao¹, WANG Wenlong^1,2*, LOU Yibao¹, FENG Lanqian², ZHU Ya’nan¹

¹State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
²Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

Received:2023-01-03 Accepted:2023-05-04 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2024-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 沟头是沟蚀的主要活跃部位,严重影响沟头溯源侵蚀发生。为明确典型植被沟头根系分布及土壤物理和力学特征,本研究以自然植被恢复沟头和人工植被恢复沟头为对象,分析0～1 m不同土层土壤入渗、根系分布以及根-土复合体物理和力学性质特征。结果表明: 不同植被沟头土壤容重和总孔隙变异较小,容重在1.10～1.37 g·cm^-3,土壤总孔隙在48.3%～58.4%;各入渗指标总体随土层增加呈减小趋势,自然植被恢复沟头不同土层入渗速率在20～30 min趋于稳定,人工植被恢复沟头在40 min趋于稳定,人工植被恢复沟头的稳定入渗速率、平均入渗速率总体大于自然植被恢复沟头;根长密度、根表面积密度、平均直径均随土层的增加呈降低趋势,除20～40 cm土层,自然植被恢复沟头的根长密度、根表面积密度、平均直径皆小于人工植被恢复沟头,两种植被沟头根系主要由0～0.5 mm根系构成,占总根长的84.2%～93.6%;在垂直深度上,随着含水率的增加,黏聚力随土层由上至下迅速线性衰减,变化范围为0.42～22.67 kPa,在相同含水率条件下,人工植被恢复沟头平均黏聚力总体大于自然植被恢复沟头。本研究揭示了植被对沟头溯源侵蚀的阻控作用,可为该区域有效防治水土流失提供科学基础。

关键词: 沟头, 土壤抗剪强度, 土壤入渗, 根系特征, 黄土高塬沟壑区

Abstract: Gully head is the main active part of gully erosion, which seriously affects the occurrence of gully headcut erosion. To investigate root distribution and soil physical and mechanical characteristics of typical vegetation gully head, we analyzed the infiltration, root distribution, physical and mechanical properties of soil-root complex of soil in different layers (0-1 m) in natural restoration gully head and artificial restoration gully head. The results showed that the variability of soil bulk and total porosity among different vegetation gully heads was low, with bulk density ranging from 1.10 to 1.37 g·cm^-3 and total porosity ranging from 48.3% to 58.4%. Infiltration index of different vegetation gully heads generally decreased with increasing soil depth. The infiltration rate of different soil layers in natural restoration gully head tended to stabilize in 20-30 min, while that of artificial restoration gully head tended to stabilize in 40 min. The infiltration capacity and average infiltration rate of artificial restoration gully head were generally higher than those of natural restoration gully head in all soil layers. Root length density, root surface area density, and average diameter all tended to decrease with increasing soil depth. Except for the 20-40 cm soil layer, root length density, root surface area density and average diameter of natural restoration gully head were all lower than those of artificial restoration gully head. Root system of both vegetation gully heads mainly consisted of 0-0.5 mm roots, accounting for 84.2%-93.6% of the total root length. In the vertical depth, with the increases of water content, the cohesion force decreased linearly with the deepening of soil layer, ranging from 0.42 to 22.67 kPa. The average cohesion force of artificial restoration gully head was higher than natural restoration gully head at each level of water content. The study revealed the effects of vegetation on the gully head cut erosion, which could provide scientific basis for the effective prevention and control of soil erosion in the region.

Key words: gully head, soil shear strength, soil infiltration, root characteristic, Loess Plateau gully region

杨浩, 王文龙, 娄义宝, 冯兰茜, 朱亚男. 黄土塬沟壑区典型植被沟头土壤渗透性和抗剪强度特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1862-1870.

YANG Hao, WANG Wenlong, LOU Yibao, FENG Lanqian, ZHU Ya’nan. Infiltration and shear strength characteristics of gully heads soil of typical vegetation on the gullied Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(7): 1862-1870.

参考文献

[1] 金钊. 黄土塬——千沟万壑之中的平坦之地. 地球环境学报, 11(1): 119-124
[2] Castillo C, Gómez JA. A century of gully erosion research: Urgency, complexity and study approaches. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016, 160: 300-319
[3] Vanmaercke M, Panagos P, Vanwalleghem T, et al. Measuring, modelling and managing gully erosion at large scales: A state of the art. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016, 218: 103637
[4] 郑粉莉, 徐锡蒙, 覃超. 沟蚀过程研究进展. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(8): 48-59
[5] Allen PM, Arnold JG, Auguste L, et al. Application of a simple headcut advance model for gullies. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 2018, 43: 202-217
[6] Guo MM, Wang WL, Wang TC, et al. Impacts of different vegetation restoration options on gully head soil resistance and soil erosion in loess tablelands. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 2020, 45: 1038-1050
[7] 王文鑫, 王文龙, 郭明明, 等. 黄土高塬沟壑区植被恢复对沟头土壤团聚体特征及土壤可蚀性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(16): 2845-2857
[8] 沙小燕, 李魁, 王文龙, 等. 黄土高塬沟壑区草地沟头立壁土壤抗冲性特征. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 133-140
[9] 万保华, 赵毅鑫, 王宁, 等. 地震和降水对边坡稳定性的影响. 世界地震工程, 2015, 31(4): 165-169
[10] 李叶鑫, 史东梅, 吕刚, 等. 降雨强度对紫色土工程堆积体边坡稳定性的影响. 土壤通报, 2017, 48(6): 1475-1480
[11] 黄盛锋, 陈志波, 郑道哲. 基于灰色关联度法和强度折减法的边坡稳定性影响因素敏感性分析. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2020, 31(3): 35-40
[12] 李威, 庄建琦, 王颖. 饱和重塑黄土抗剪强度影响因素的试验研究. 工程地质学报, 2018, 26(3): 626-632
[13] Horn R, Taubner H, Wuttke M, et al. Soil physical properties related to soil structure. Soil & Tillage Research, 1993, 30: 187-216
[14] Zhang CL, Wang XS, Zou XY, et al. Estimation of surface shear strength of undisturbed soils in the eastern part of northern China’s wind erosion area. Soil & Tillage Research, 2018, 178: 1-10
[15] Knapen A, Poesen J, Govers G, et al. Resistance of soils to concentrated flow erosion: A review. Earth-Science Reviews, 2007, 80: 75-109
[16] Mickovski SB, Stokes A, van Beek R, et al. Simulation of direct shear tests on rooted and non-rooted soil using finite element analysis. Ecological Engineering, 2011, 37: 1523-1532
[17] Bourrier F, Kneiba F, Chareyre B, et al. Discrete mo-deling of granular soils reinforcement by plant roots. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 61: 646-657
[18] 李佳, 汪霞, 贾海霞. 浅层滑坡多发区典型灌木根系对边坡土体抗剪强度的影响. 生态学报, 2019, 39(14): 5117-5126
[19] Horn R. Stress-strain effects in structured unsaturated soils on coupled mechanical and hydraulic processes. Geoderma, 2003, 116: 77-88
[20] 张素, 熊东红, 杨丹, 等. 干热河谷不同活跃度冲沟土体抗剪强度分异及理化性质. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(6): 124-129
[21] 张玉斌, 郑粉莉. 近地表土壤水分条件对坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响. 中国水土保持科学, 2007(2): 5-10
[22] 朱乐红, 唐科明, 李豪, 等. 土壤理化性质对土壤侵蚀影响研究综述. 现代农业科技, 2018(14): 189-191
[23] 胡斐南, 魏朝富, 许晨阳, 等. 紫色土区水稻土抗剪强度的水敏性特征. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(3): 107-114
[24] 韦杰, 史炳林, 李进林. 紫色土坡耕地埂坎土壤抗剪性能对含水率的响应. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(20): 153-160
[25] 张健乐, 史东梅, 刘义, 等. 土壤容重和含水率对紫色土坡耕地耕层抗剪强度的影响. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3): 162-167
[26] Kompan-Zare M, Soufi M, Hamzehzarghani H, et al. The effect of some watershed, soil characteristics and morphometric factors on the relationship between the gully volume and length in Fars Province, lran. Catena, 2011, 86: 150-159
[27] 娄义宝, 康宏亮, 王文龙, 等. 黄土高原沟壑区沟头植被根系垂直分布及其对土壤抗侵蚀性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(1): 90-103
[28] 林金石, 庄雅婷, 黄炎和, 等. 不同剪切方式下崩岗红土层抗剪特征随水分变化规律. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(24): 106-110
[29] 邢书昆, 张光辉, 朱平宗. 黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕年限对根-土复合体抗剪强度的影响. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(4): 41-48
[30] 蒋芳市, 黄炎和, 林金石, 等. 崩岗崩积体土壤渗透特性分析. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(3): 49-54
[31] 解文艳, 樊贵盛. 土壤质地对土壤入渗能力的影响. 太原理工大学学报, 2004, 35(5): 537-540
[32] 杨亚辉, 赵文慧, 木热提江·阿不拉, 等. 不同植被对土壤理化性质影响——以王东沟小流域为例. 水土保持通报, 2016, 36(1): 249-252
[33] 宋丽萍, 牛伊宁, 罗珠珠, 等. 黄土高原苜蓿及后茬作物土壤水分恢复效应及蒸散特征. 草业科学, 2019, 36(5): 1231-1239
[34] 刘目兴, 聂艳, 于婧. 不同初始含水率下粘质土壤的入渗过程. 生态学报, 2012, 32(3): 871-878
[35] Liu JT, Li XP, Chen X, et al. Distribution characteristics of initial soil water content in profile during hiatus rainfall-infiltration events and its effects on infiltration. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23: 96-100
[36] 郭茹茹, 杨磊, 李宗善, 等. 半干旱黄土高原苜蓿草地撂荒过程土壤水分变化特征. 生态学报, 2020, 40(23): 8618-8626
[37] 寇萌, 焦菊英, 王巧利, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被带植物群落的细根分布特征. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(2): 161-171
[38] 张轩铭, 戴翠婷, 李朝霞, 等. 三峡库区紫色砂岩不同发育程度土壤入渗特征及其影响因素. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(4): 92-98
[39] 徐远慧, 冯璐, 屈媛媛, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕还草年限对土壤性质和入渗性能的影响. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(2): 57-63
[40] Chang Z, Ye X, Zhang J. Soil water infiltration of subalpine shrub forest in Qilian Mountains, northwest of China. Agronomy Journal, 2021, 113: 829-839
[41] 王国梁, 刘国彬, 周生路. 黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域植被恢复对土壤稳定入渗的影响. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(5): 529-535
[42] 云慧雅, 毕华兴, 王珊珊, 等. 不同林分类型土壤理化特征及其对土壤入渗过程的影响. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(6): 183-189
[43] 李卓, 刘永红, 杨勤. 土壤水分入渗影响作用机制研究综述. 灌溉排水学报, 2011, 30(5): 124-130
[44] 申春妮, 方祥位, 王和文, 等. 吸力、含水率和干密度对重塑非饱和土抗剪强度影响研究. 岩土力学, 2009, 30(5): 1347-1351
[45] 王力, 李喜安, 洪勃, 等. 黏粒含量对黄土抗剪强度影响试验. 煤田地质与勘探, 2019, 47(3): 179-185
[46] 王娟娟, 张秀丽, 王铁行. 考虑含水量和密度影响的压实黄土抗剪强度特性研究. 西安建筑科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2014, 46(5): 687-691
[47] 张淑光, 蔡庆, 邓岚. 我国南方崩岗形成机理的研究. 水土保持通报, 1993, 13(2): 43-46

黄土塬沟壑区典型植被沟头土壤渗透性和抗剪强度特征

Infiltration and shear strength characteristics of gully heads soil of typical vegetation on the gullied Loess Plateau, Northwest China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	沙小燕, 李魁, 王文龙, 娄义宝, 康宏亮, 冯兰茜, 聂慧莹. 黄土高塬沟壑区草地沟头立壁土壤抗冲性特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 133-140.
[2]	索改弟1,谢永生1,2**,田飞1,揣峻峰1,景民晓1. 土壤中人工防渗层的水分特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(9): 2569-2575.
[3]	齐瑞鹏1，张磊1，颜永毫2，文曼1,郑纪勇1,2**. 定容重条件下生物炭对半干旱区土壤水分入渗特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(8): 2281-2288.
[4]	李建兴,何丙辉**,梅雪梅,梁艳玲,熊建. 紫色土区坡耕地不同种植模式对土壤渗透性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(3): 725-731.
[5]	杨永辉^1,3;赵世伟^1,2;雷廷武^1,4;刘汗⁴. 宁南黄土丘陵区不同植被下土壤入渗性能 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(05): 1040-1045 .
[6]	杜建会^1,2;严平^1,2;展秀丽^1,2;俄有浩³. 民勤绿洲白刺灌丛沙堆不同演化阶段表面抗蚀性及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(04): 763-768 .