不同起源樟子松林水分利用的差异及机制

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.027

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 2619-2628.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202310.027

不同起源樟子松林水分利用的差异及机制

刘春颖¹, 党宏忠^1*, 陈帅², 李明阳¹, 葛金楠³, 乔一娜⁴, 刘玉国¹

¹中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所, 北京 100091;
²中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院, 北京 100193;
³内蒙古红花尔基樟子松林国家级自然保护区管理局, 内蒙古呼伦贝尔 021112;
⁴陕西省治沙研究所, 陕西榆林毛乌素沙地荒漠生态系统国家定位观测研究站, 陕西榆林 719000

收稿日期:2023-06-13 接受日期:2023-08-20 出版日期:2023-10-15 发布日期:2024-04-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: hzdang@caf.ac.cn
作者简介:刘春颖, 女, 1998年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事干旱区生态水文研究。E-mail: LCY19981008@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32071836)和承德国家可持续发展议程科技专项(202008F014)

Differences and mechanisms on water use of Pinus sylvestris var mongolica forests with different origins

LIU Chunying¹, DANG Hongzhong^1*, CHEN Shuai², LI Mingyang¹, GE Jinnan³, QIAO Yina⁴, LIU Yuguo¹

¹Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
²College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
³Honghuaerji Mongo-lian Scots Pine Plantation National Nature Reserve Administration, Hulunbuir 021112, Inner Mongolia, China;
⁴Mu Us Sandy Land Ecosystem National Observation Station, Shaanxi Institute of Sand Control, Yulin 719000, Shaanxi, China

Received:2023-06-13 Accepted:2023-08-20 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2024-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 明确同一树种不同起源林分(天然林与人工引种林)间水分利用特征的差异,对于指导林分的可持续经营具有重要意义。本研究以樟子松这一“三北”工程中重要的造林树种为例,选择2种起源的林分为试验林,利用热扩散技术监测了试验林生长季树干边材液流速率(J_s),分析樟子松水分传输过程及其与环境因子间的关系。结果表明: 在整个生长季的典型晴天下,樟子松人工林的日液流速率(J_s-daily)显著高于樟子松天然林,二者J_s-daily平均值分别为132.98和114.86 cm·d^-1,樟子松人工林表现出了更高的水分传输潜力。在樟子松天然林中,大气水分亏缺(VPD)对树木水分利用过程主要表现为驱动效应,而在樟子松人工林中出现了明显的阈值效应,VPD拐点约在1.91 kPa,此时液流速率(J_s-hour)边界函数值接近最大值17.88 cm·h^-1。观测期间,2种起源樟子松林受大气驱动的蒸腾潜力(J_s-hour/VPD)随土壤干旱的加剧而下降,但樟子松人工林对干旱的敏感性比樟子松天然林更高,反映出这一树种对水分利用过程较强的调控能力。

关键词: 樟子松天然林, 樟子松人工林, 水分利用特征, 树干液流, 水分传输潜力

Abstract: Determining the differences of water use characteristics of a tree species with different origins (natural forests and introduced plantations) is significantly important for forest sustainable management. Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica is an important tree species of afforestation in the ‘Three North’ project in China. In this study, with Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica from two origins, we monitored the sap flow velocity of sapwood (J_s) of trees by thermal dissipation sap flow probes, and analyzed the relationship between water transportation and the environmental factors during the growing season. The results showed that under the typical sunny day, daily sap flow velocity (J_s-daily) of trees from plantations was significantly higher than that from natural forests. The mean value of J_s-daily was 132.98 and 114.86 cm·d^-1 for the two origins, respectively. Trees from plantations showed higher water transportation potential than natural forests. Vapor pressure deficit (VPD) mainly showed the driving effect on the water use process of trees from natural forests. In the plantations, there was an obvious threshold effect, and the inflection point of VPD was about 1.91 kPa, with the boundary function of J_s-hour increased to the maximum of 17.88 cm·h^-1. Atmospheric driven transpiration potential (J_s-hour/VPD) of P. sylvestris var. mongolica trees with two origins decreased with the aggravation of soil drought, but sensitivity to drought was higher in the plantations than in the natural forests, suggesting the strong ability of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica to regulate water use process.

Key words: Pinus sylvestris var mongolica natural forest, P sylvestris var mongolica plantation, water use cha-racteristic, sap flow, water transportation potential

刘春颖, 党宏忠, 陈帅, 李明阳, 葛金楠, 乔一娜, 刘玉国. 不同起源樟子松林水分利用的差异及机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2619-2628.

LIU Chunying, DANG Hongzhong, CHEN Shuai, LI Mingyang, GE Jinnan, QIAO Yina, LIU Yuguo. Differences and mechanisms on water use of Pinus sylvestris var mongolica forests with different origins[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(10): 2619-2628.

参考文献

[1] Choat B, Brodribb TJ, Brodersen CR, et al. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature, 2018, 558: 531-539
[2] Cook BI, Mankin JS, Anchukaitis KJ. Climate change and drought: From past to future. Current Climate Change Reports, 2018, 4: 164-179
[3] Barbeta A, Mejía-Chang M, Ogaya R, et al. The combined effects of a long-term experimental drought and an extreme drought on the use of plant-water sources in a Mediterranean forest. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21: 1213-1225
[4] Leo M, Oberhuber W, Schuster R, et al. Evaluating the effect of plant water availability on inner alpine conife-rous trees based on sap flow measurements. European Journal of Forest Research, 2014, 133: 691-698
[5] Touchan R, Anchukaitis KJ, Meko DM, et al. Long term context for recent drought in northwestern Africa. Geophysical Research Letters, 2008, 35: L13705
[6] Van Nieuwstadt MGL, Sheil D. Drought, fire and tree survival in a Borneo rain forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Ecology, 2005, 93: 191-201
[7] Bigler C, Bräker OU, Bugmann H, et al. Drought as an inciting mortality factor in Scots pine stands of the Valais, Switzerland. Ecosystems, 2006, 9: 330-343
[8] Bréda N, Huc R, Granier A, et al. Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: A review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Annals of Forest Science, 2006, 63: 625-644
[9] Kurz WA, Dymond CC, Stinson G, et al. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature, 2008, 452: 987-990
[10] Rolim SG, Jesus RM, Nascimento HE, et al. Biomass change in an Atlantic tropical moist forest: The ENSO effect in permanent sample plots over a 22-year period. Oecologia, 2005, 142: 238-246
[11] Li MY, Fang LD, Duan CY, et al. Greater risk of hydraulic failure due to increased drought threatens pine plantations in Horqin Sandy Land of northern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 461: 117980
[12] Hartmann H, Moura CF, Anderegg WRL, et al. Research frontiers for improving our understanding of drought-induced tree and forest mortality. New Phytologist, 2018, 218: 15-28
[13] 宋立宁, 朱教君, 郑晓. 基于沙地樟子松人工林衰退机制的营林方案. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(11): 3249-3256
[14] Song LN, Zhu JJ, Zheng X, et al. Transpiration and canopy conductance dynamics of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in its natural range and in an introduced region in the sandy plains of Northern China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2020, 281: 107830
[15] Song LN, Zhu JJ, Yan QL, et al. Comparison of intrinsic water use efficiency between different aged Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica wide windbreaks in semiarid sandy land of northern China. Agroforestry Systems, 2015, 89: 477-489
[16] Zhu JJ, Kang HZ, Tan H, et al. Natural regeneration characteristics of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forests on sandy land in Honghuaerji, China. Journal of Fores-try Research, 2005, 16: 253-259
[17] Song LN, Li MC, Zhu JJ, et al. Comparisons of radial growth and tree-ring cellulose δ¹³C for Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in natural and plantation forests on sandy lands. Journal of Forest Research, 2017, 22: 160-168
[18] Zheng X, Zhu JJ, Yan QL, et al. Effects of land use changes on the groundwater table and the decline of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in southern Horqin Sandy Land, Northeast China. Agricultural Water Management, 2012, 109: 94-106
[19] Song LN, Zhu JJ, Zhang JX, et al. Divergent growth responses to warming and drying climates between native and non-native tree species in Northeast China. Trees, 2019, 33: 1143-1155
[20] Deng JF, Yao JQ, Zheng X, et al. Transpiration and canopy stomatal conductance dynamics of Mongolian pine plantations in semiarid deserts, Northern China. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 249: 106806
[21] Song LN, Zhu JJ, Zheng X, et al. Comparison of canopy transpiration between Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica and Pinus tabuliformis plantations in a semiarid sandy region of Northeast China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2022, 314: 108784
[22] 陈立欣, 李湛东, 张志强, 等. 北方四种城市树木蒸腾耗水的环境响应. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(12): 2861-2870
[23] Du S, Wang YL, Kume T, et al. Sapflow characteristics and climatic responses in three forest species in the semi-arid Loess Plateau region of China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011, 151: 1-10
[24] Lagergren F, Lindroth A. Transpiration response to soil moisture in pine and spruce trees in Sweden. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 112: 67-85
[25] Grossiord C, Sevanto S, Dawson TE, et al. Warming combined with more extreme precipitation regimes modifies the water sources used by trees. New Phytologist, 2017, 213: 584-596
[26] 杨帆, 刘康, 王效科, 等. 内蒙古红花尔基沙地樟子松群落多样性变异研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2005, 19(4): 192-196
[27] 包光, 刘治野, 刘娜, 等. 呼伦贝尔沙地樟子松径向生长特征的VS模型模拟分析. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3448-3458
[28] Zhu JJ, Fan ZP, Zeng DH, et al. Comparison of stand structure and growth between artificial and natural forests of Pinus sylvestiris var. mongolica on sandy land. Journal of Forestry Research, 2003, 14: 103-111
[29] 李明阳, 党宏忠, 陈帅, 等. 毛乌素沙地南缘樟子松树干液流特征及其对环境因子的响应. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(4): 153-161
[30] 赵晓彬, 曹双成, 高静, 等. 毛乌素沙地植物多样性保护防沙治沙示范. 中国野生植物资源, 2021, 40(6): 64-72
[31] 党宏忠, 冯金超, 韩辉. 沙地樟子松边材液流速率的方位差异特征. 林业科学, 2020, 56(1): 29-37
[32] Dang HZ, Han H, Chen S, et al. A fragile soil moisture environment exacerbates the climate change-related impacts on the water use by Mongolian Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) in northern China: Long-term observations. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 251: 106857
[33] Lu P, Urban L, Zhao P. Granier’s thermal dissipation probe (TDP) method for measuring sap flow in trees: Theory and practice. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2004, 46: 631-646
[34] 李自豪, 卢志朋, 马澜桐, 等. 辽西北半干旱区沙地樟子松树干液流变化特征及影响因素. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2020, 51(3): 271-278
[35] 党宏忠, 张学利, 韩辉, 等. 樟子松固沙林林水关系研究进展及对营林实践的指导. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(9): 971-983
[36] 殷秀辉, 程飞, 张硕新. 油松树干液流特征及其与环境因子的关系. 西北林学院学报, 2011, 26(5): 24-28
[37] 刘建立, 王彦辉, 管伟, 等. 六盘山北侧生长季内华北落叶松树干液流速率研究. 华中农业大学学报, 2008, 27(3): 434-440
[38] 孙慧珍, 孙龙, 王传宽, 等. 东北东部山区主要树种树干液流研究. 林业科学, 2005, 41(3): 36-42
[39] 魏潇, 常学向, 杨淇越, 等. 祁连山青海云杉(Picea crassifolia)夜间树干液流特征及影响因素. 冰川冻土, 2015, 37(1): 87-94
[40] 鲁小珍. 马尾松、栓皮栎生长盛期树干液流的研究. 安徽农业大学学报, 2001, 28(4): 401-404
[41] 党宏忠, 却晓娥, 冯金超, 等. 晋西黄土区苹果树边材液流速率对环境驱动的响应. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3): 823-831
[42] Li W, Si JH, Yu TF, et al. Response of Populus euphratica Oliv. sap flow to environmental variables for a de-sert riparian forest in the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China. Journal of Arid Land, 2016, 8: 591-603
[43] 李宝, 常顺利, 孙雪娇, 等. 天山北坡雪岭云杉森林的蒸腾耗水规律. 西部林业科学, 2022, 51(5): 106-112
[44] 党宏忠, 杨文斌, 李卫, 等. 民勤绿洲二白杨树干液流的径向变化及时滞特征. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(9): 2501-2510
[45] Whitehead D. Regulation of stomatal conductance and transpiration in forest canopies. Tree Physiology, 1998, 18: 633-644
[46] Mitchell PJ, Veneklaas E, Lambers H, et al. Partitioning of evapotranspiration in a semi-arid eucalypt woodland in south-western Australia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009, 149: 25-37
[47] 张锦春, 徐先英, 孙学兵, 等. 民勤荒漠梭梭茎干液流动态. 草业科学, 2023, 40(1): 169-178
[48] 黄雅茹, 马迎宾, 李永华, 等. 库姆塔格沙漠东南部胡杨液流变化及其对环境因子的响应. 草业科学, 2021, 38(2): 335-347
[49] Gartner K, Nadezhdina N, Englisch M, et al. Sap flow of birch and Norway spruce during the European heat and drought in summer 2003. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 258: 590-599
[50] Olchev A, Cermák J, Nadezhdina N, et al. Transpiration of a mixed forest stand: Field measurements and simulation using SVAT models. Boreal Environment Research, 2002, 4: 389-397
[51] Jiang P, Wang H, Meinzer FC, et al. Linking reliance on deep soil water to resource economy strategies and abundance among coexisting understory shrub species in subtropical pine plantations. New Phytologist, 2020, 225: 222-233
[52] Yu Z, Liu SR, Wang JX, et al. Natural forests exhibit higher carbon sequestration and lower water consumption than planted forests in China. Global Change Biology, 2018, 25: 68-77
[53] 曹恭祥, 王绪芳, 熊伟, 等. 宁夏六盘山人工林和天然林生长季的蒸散特征. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(8): 2089-2096
[54] Bao G. Mongolian pines (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) in the Hulun Buir steppe, China, respond to climate in adjustment to the local water supply. Interna-tional Journal of Biometeorology, 2015, 59: 1-10
[55] 牛丽, 岳广阳, 赵哈林, 等. 利用液流法估算樟子松和小叶锦鸡儿人工林蒸腾耗水. 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(6): 1-8

不同起源樟子松林水分利用的差异及机制

Differences and mechanisms on water use of Pinus sylvestris var mongolica forests with different origins

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高翔, 周宇, 孟平, 裴松义, 张劲松. 辽西樟子松人工林净生态系统碳交换 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1183-1190.
[2]	刘美君, 吕金林, 陈秋文, 杨洁, 李国庆, 杜盛. 黄土丘陵区两典型造林树种生长季树干直径微变化动态及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1673-1680.
[3]	秦颢萍, 刘泽彬, 郭建斌, 王彦辉, 于松平, 王蕾. 环境和冠层结构对华北落叶松林树干液流的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1681-1689.
[4]	马玉洁, 张含含, 李春友, 张劲松, 马长明. 间断加热模式下热扩散技术在侧柏树干液流测定中的适用性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(9): 2935-2942.
[5]	韩永贵, 高阳, 韩磊, 黄晓宇. 基于模糊规则的人工神经网络模拟新疆杨蒸腾耗水 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5): 1525-1534.
[6]	马玉洁, 武鹏飞, 王晓, 张劲松, 尹昌君, 马长明. 基于整树称重法的Granier经验公式对毛白杨树干液流测定的适用性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5): 1518-1524.
[7]	杨洁, 吕金林, 何秋月, 闫美杰, 李国庆, 杜盛. 黄土丘陵区辽东栎和刺槐树干液流时滞效应与蒸腾特征的关联性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2607-2613.
[8]	杜梦鸽, 王胜, 樊军. 五针热脉冲探头在测定树干液流中的应用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2438-2444.
[9]	卢森堡, 陈云明, 唐亚坤, 吴旭, 温杰. 黄土丘陵区混交林中油松和沙棘树干液流对降雨脉冲的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(11): 3469-3478.
[10]	罗超, 查同刚, 朱梦洵, 朱志俊, 王子尧, 刘文娜. 浅层地下水对华北地区河岸杨树林树干液流的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5): 1401-1407.
[11]	陈宝强, 张建军, 张艳婷, 田宁宁. 晋西黄土区辽东栎和山杨树干液流对环境因子的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3): 746-754.
[12]	胡彦婷,赵平**,牛俊峰,孙振伟,朱丽薇 . 三种植被恢复树种的冠层气孔导度特征及其对环境因子的敏感性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(9): 2623-2631.
[13]	王胜1,2,樊军1,3**. 热脉冲技术3种方法组合在测量树干液流中的应用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8): 2244-2252.
[14]	刘军1,陈文荣2,徐金良3,邹军2,姜景民1**,李彦杰1,刁松峰1. 毛红椿人工林树干液流动态变化对坡位的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(8): 2209-2214.
[15]	黄德卫1,2,张德强1,周国逸1,刘世忠1,Otieno Dennis1,李跃林1**. 鼎湖山针阔叶混交林优势种树干液流特征及其与环境因子的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(05): 1159-1166.