欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 376-382.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202502.026

• 黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于生态脆弱性的乌兰察布生态网络构建与优化

曹维佳, 杨庆康, 贾国秀, 白惠婷, 郭子譞, 王振兴, 王立新, 温璐*   

  1. 内蒙古大学生态与环境学院/草原生态安全省部共建协同创新中心/蒙古高原生态学与资源利用教育部重点实验室/内蒙古草地生态学重点实验室, 呼和浩特 010021
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-11 接受日期:2024-12-10 出版日期:2025-02-18 发布日期:2025-08-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: wenlu@imu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:曹维佳, 女, 2000年生, 博士研究生。主要从事景观生态学研究。E-mail: caoweijia0930@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(2023YFHH0053,2022YFHH0017,2022YFHH0024)和国家自然科学基金项目(32460288,32160279)

Construction and optimization of ecological network based on ecological vulnerability in Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia, China.

CAO Weijia, YANG Qingkang, JIA Guoxiu, BAI Huiting, GUO Zixuan, WANG Zhenxing, WANG Lixin, WEN Lu*   

  1. College of Ecology and Environment of Inner Mongolia University/Collaborative Innovation Center for Grassland Ecological Security/Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau/Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, Hohhot 010021, China
  • Received:2024-07-11 Accepted:2024-12-10 Online:2025-02-18 Published:2025-08-18

摘要: 自然条件的变化及人类活动的干扰会引发一系列生态环境问题,构建生态网络对于平衡区域发展与生态保护的矛盾具有至关重要的作用。本研究以乌兰察布地区为研究对象,提出格局-服务耦合的生态脆弱性评价方法,并据此构建区域生态网络。结果表明: 研究区共识别生态源地面积12951.2 km2,占研究区总面积的23.8%,主要分布在研究区北部;识别生态廊道113条,总长度为2397.1 km,主要分布在研究区中部和南部;生态夹点主要分布在研究区中部,与部分生态廊道重合;生态障碍点主要分布在破碎的生态源地的周围。基于生态网络各生态要素的空间分布,形成三区一带(生态安全保护区、典型草原修复区、自然生态保育区和生态廊道建设带)的生态网络优化布局方案。研究结果为区域未来生态保护及修复提出了科学的理论依据,对维护区域生态安全及优化空间格局具有重要意义。

关键词: 生态脆弱性, 电路理论, 生态网络, 生态格局优化, 乌兰察布

Abstract: Natural condition change and human disturbance can trigger a series of ecological and environmental problems. The construction of ecological network plays a crucial role in balancing contradictions between regional development and ecological protection. We employed the ecological vulnerability assessment method based on pattern-service coupling to construct the ecological network of Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia. The results showed a total area of 12951.2 km2 of ecological sources, accounting for 23.8% of the study area, mainly located in the northern part. Additionally, 113 ecological corridors were identified, with a total length of 2397.1 km, which were primarily located in the central and southern parts. Ecological pinch points were mainly situated in the central part of the study area, overlapping with some ecological corridors. Ecological barriers were predominantly distributed around the fragmented ecological sources. Based on the spatial distribution of ecological components within the ecological network, an optimized layout was formed, comprising three zones and one belt (ecological security protection zone, typical grassland restoration zone, natural ecological conservation zone, and ecological corridor development belt). These results provided a scientific theoretical basis for future ecological protection and restoration in this region, which were crucial for maintaining regional ecological security and optimizing the spatial patterns.

Key words: ecological vulnerability; circuit theory; ecological network; optimization of ecological pattern; Ulanqab