欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

河北省沿海开发活动的生态环境效应评估

崔力拓1**,李志伟2   

  1. 1中国环境管理干部学院, 河北秦皇岛 066004; 2河北农业大学海洋学院, 河北秦皇岛 066003)
  • 出版日期:2014-07-18 发布日期:2014-07-18

Assessment of ecological environment effects of coastal development in Hebei Province, China.

CUI Li-tuo1, LI Zhi-wei2   

  1. (1Environmental Management College of China, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, China; 2College of Oceanology, Agricultural University of Hebei, Qinhuangdao 066003, Hebei, China)
  • Online:2014-07-18 Published:2014-07-18

摘要:

通过对河北省沿海开发活动及生态环境的分析,建立了由压力、状态、响应3个子系统28个指标组成的沿海开发活动的生态环境效应综合评估指标体系,采用综合指数法进行定量评价,并在此基础上构建了生态环境综合效应指数及其分级评判标准.结果表明: 1984—2010年,河北省沿海开发活动的生态环境效应呈现较小→一般→较大的变化,接受程度由可接受发展变为不可接受的水平.由于沿海开发利用所造成的资源、环境压力依然严峻,再加上状态对于响应的反应有一定滞后性,响应子系统各种措施的改善对状态的好转并没有表现出积极作用,海域质量状况呈现退化趋势.由于沿海各地开发方式和强度的差异,开发活动的生态环境效应呈现一定的空间差异,表现为秦皇岛沿海开发的生态环境效应最小,其次为沧州,唐山最大,且沧州和唐山都已达到不可接受的水平,需要进一步加强生态环境的恢复和保护工作.

 

Abstract: Through the analysis of the development activities and the ecological environment in coastal of Hebei Province, China, an index system for evaluating the ecological environment effect, composed of 28 indices, was set up by the pressure, state and response subsystems. Using the comprehensive index evaluation method, the integrated effects of ecological environment index (EI) was calculated and its grading criterion was founded. The results showed that the ecological environment effect of Hebei Province coastal development varied from being relatively small, normal and then relatively large from 1984 to 2010, and its acceptance degree evolved from being acceptable to being unacceptable. Because the resource and environment pressures caused by coastal development were serious and a delay existed in the state relative to the response, the improvement of various measures in the response subsystem did not show a positive effect on the state, and the environmental quality of ocean showed a degrading trend. Due to the differences in coastal development pattern and strength, the ecological environment effect of development activities showed some spatial differences. The ecological environment effect of Qinhuangdao coastal development was the minimum, followed by Cangzhou and Tangshan. Cangzhou and Tangshan had reached unacceptable levels and needed to further strengthen the restoration and protection of ecological environment.