旅游资源使用价值评估的ZTCM和TCIA方法比较——以北京奥林匹克森林公园为例

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201708.034

应用生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (8): 2605-2610.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201708.034

旅游资源使用价值评估的ZTCM和TCIA方法比较——以北京奥林匹克森林公园为例

董天, 郑华, 肖燚, 欧阳志云^*

中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京 100085

收稿日期:2017-01-06 发布日期:2017-08-18
通讯作者: * E-mail: zyouyang@rcees.ac.cn
作者简介:董天,女,1987年生,博士研究生.主要从事生态环境影响评价、生态规划、生态系统服务功能评价研究.E-mail:evedongtian@163.com
基金资助:
本文由国家自然科学基金项目(71533005)资助

Comparison of ZTCM and TCIA methods for evaluating the use value of tourism resources: Taking Beijing Olympic Forest Park as an example

DONG Tian, ZHENG Hua, XIAO Yi, OUYANG Zhi-yun^*

Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China

Received:2017-01-06 Published:2017-08-18
Contact: * E-mail: zyouyang@rcees.ac.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71533005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 分区旅行费用模型(ZTCM)和旅行费用区间模型(TCIA)是两种常用的旅游资源使用价值评估方法,但两种模型因构建的出发点不同而可能导致不同的研究结果.比较两种方法的评估结果对于准确评估旅游资源使用价值具有重要意义.本文采用问卷调查,应用ZTCM和TCIA对北京奥林匹克森林公园的使用价值进行评估.结果表明: 基于ZTCM,研究区的景观使用价值为162.36亿元;基于TCIA,景观使用价值为37.32亿元.与ZTCM相比,TCIA对追加费用和旅游人数的拟合度更高.对于同一出发地旅行费用差异较大的样本,TCIA可以有效改进ZTCM假设同一出发地平均消费一致的前提,研究结果更符合实际,更适合准确评估旅游资源的使用价值.

Abstract: The zonal travel cost model (ZTCM) and travel cost interval analysis (TCIA) are two commonly used tourism resources valuation methods. However, the two models may lead to different results because of different starting points. Comparing the evaluation results of the two methods is very important for the accurate evaluation of the tourism resource use value. In this study, Beijing Olympic Forest Park was used to study the use value of this scenic spot by using the questionnaire and ZTCM and TCIA. The results showed that the landscape use value was 16.236 and 3.732 billion yuan by using ZTCM and TCIA, respectively. The fitness of the additional cost and tourist number by TCIA was higher than that by ZTCM. TCIA could effectively improve the ZTCM assumption in the same departure place for the sample of travel expenses that varied greatly at the same place of departure. The results were more realistic and more suitable for the accurate evaluation of the use value of tourism resources evaluation.

董天, 郑华, 肖燚, 欧阳志云. 旅游资源使用价值评估的ZTCM和TCIA方法比较——以北京奥林匹克森林公园为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2605-2610.

DONG Tian, ZHENG Hua, XIAO Yi, OUYANG Zhi-yun. Comparison of ZTCM and TCIA methods for evaluating the use value of tourism resources: Taking Beijing Olympic Forest Park as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(8): 2605-2610.

参考文献

[1] Blaine TW, Lichtkoppler FR, Bader TJ, et al. An exa-mination of sources of sensitivity of consumer surplus estimates in travel cost models. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 151: 427-436
[2] Xiao Y, Fukuda D. On the cost of misperceived travel time variability. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 75: 96-112
[3] Barrio M, Loureiro ML. A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 1023-1030
[4] Rolfe J, Windle J. Multifunctional recreation and nouveau heritage values in plantation forests. Journal of Forest Economics, 2015, 21: 131-151
[5] Beharry-Borg N, Scarpa R. Valuing quality changes in Caribbean coastal waters for heterogeneous beach visitors. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 1124-1139
[6] Chaudhry P, Singh B, Vindhya P. Non-market econo-mic valuation in developing countries: Role of participant observation method in CVM analysis. Journal of Forest Economics, 2007, 13: 259-275
[7] Windle J, Rolfe J. Estimating nonmarket values of Brisbane (state capital) residents for state based beach recreation. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2013, 85: 103-111
[8] Tourkoliasa C, Skiada T, Diakoulaki D, et al. Application of the travel cost method for the valuation of the Poseidon temple in Sounio, Greece. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2015, 16: 567-574
[9] Parsons GR. Reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences// Shogren JF, ed. Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economi-cs. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elesvier, 2013: 349-358
[10] Rolfe J, Dyack B. Valuing recreation in the Coorong Australia, with travel cost and contingent behaviour models. Economic Record, 2011, 87: 282-293
[11] Glaesenera ML, Caruso G. Neighborhood green and services diversity effects on land prices: Evidence from a multilevel hedonic analysis in Luxembourg. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 143: 100-111
[12] Helena M, Madureira GL, Nunes LC, et al. Using choice modeling to estimate the effects of environmental improvements on local development: When the purpose modifies the tool. Ecological Economics, 2014, 108: 79-90
[13] Hoyos D, Riera P. Convergent validity between revealed and stated recreation demand data: Some empirical evidence from the Basque Country, Spain. Journal of Forest Economics, 2013, 19: 234-248
[14] Xu H (徐宏). Study on Resources Assessment and Ecosystem Services Value of Urban Wetlands. PhD Thesis. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2013 (in Chinese)
[15] Randall A. A difficulty with the travel cost method. Land Economics, 1994, 70: 88-96
[16] Ovaskainen V, Neuvonen M, Pouta E. Modelling recreation demand with respondent-reported driving cost and stated cost of travel time: A Finnish case. Journal of Forest Economics, 2012, 18: 303-317
[17] Englin J, Shonkwiler JS. Modeling recreation demand in the presence of unobservable travel costs: Toward a tra-vel price model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1995, 29: 368-377
[18] Common M, Bull T, Stoeckl N. The travel cost method: An empirical investigation of Randall’s difficulty. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1999, 43: 457-477
[19] Fleming CM, Cook A. The recreational value of Lake McKenzie, Fraser Island: An application of the travel cost method. Tourism Management, 2008, 29: 1197-1205
[20] Armbrecht J. Use value of cultural experiences: A comparison of contingent valuation and travel cost. Tourism Management, 2014, 42: 141-148
[21] Dharmaratne GS, Brathwaite AE. Economic valuation of the coastline for tourism in Barbados. Journal of Travel Research, 1998, 37: 138-144
[22] Zhang F, Wang XH, Nunes PALD, et al. The recreational value of gold coast beaches, Australia: An application of the travel cost method. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 11: 106-114
[23] Li W (李巍), Li W-J (李文军). Using a modified travel cost method to evaluate the recreational benefits of Jiuzhaigou nature reserve. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis (北京大学学报:自然科学版), 2003, 39(4): 548-555 (in Chinese)
[24] Yuan W (袁维), Zhang J (张杰), Tan J-Q (谭继强), et al. Sustability of spatial pattern of camping sites in Langxiang Natural Reserve, Northeast China, based on GIS technology. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2015, 26(9): 2785-2793 (in Chinese)
[25] Peng W-J (彭文静), Yao S-B (姚顺波), Feng Y (冯颖). Recreational value assessment by TCIA and CVM: A case study of Taibai Mountain National Forest Park. Economic Geography (经济地理), 2014(9): 186-192 (in Chinese)
[26] Hanley N, Spash C. Cost-benefit Analysis and the Environment. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1993
[27] Smith VK. Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources: An interpretive appraisal. Land Economics, 1993, 69: 1-26
[28] Ojeda-Cabral M, Chorus CG. Value of travel time changes: Theory and simulation to understand the connection between Random Valuation and Random Utility methods. Transport Policy, 2016, 48: 139-145
[29] Börjesson M, Eliasson J. Experiences from the Swedish value of time study. Transportation Research Part A, 2014, 59: 144-158
[30] Daly A, Tsang F. Improving Understanding of Choice Experiments to Estimate Values of Travel Time [EB/OL]. (2016-10-10) [2017-01-02]. https://trid.trb.org/view/1107490
[31] Fosgerau M. Using non-parametrics to specify a model to measure the value of travel time. Transportation Research Part A, 2007, 41: 842-856
[32] Egan JK, Herriges JA. Multivariate count data regression models with individual panel data from an onsite sample. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2006, 52: 567-581
[33] Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013
[34] Bestard BA. Substitution patterns across alternatives as a source of preference heterogeneity in recreation demand models. Journal of Environmental Management, 2014, 144: 212-217
[35] Hanley N, Koop G, Farizo BA, et al. Go climb a mountain: An application of recreation demand modelling to rock climbing in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001, 52: 36-52
[36] Scarpa R, Thiene M. Destination choice models for rock climbing in the northeastern Alps: A latent-class approach based on intensity of preferences. Land Economi-cs, 2005, 81: 426-444
[37] Greene WH, HensherDA, Rose J. Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models. Transportation Research Part B, 2006, 40: 75-92
[38] Greene WH, Hensher DA. Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logit.Transportation Research Part E, 2007,43: 610-623
[39] Hynes N, Hanley N, Scarpa R. Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2008, 90: 1011-1027
[40] Hess S, Rose JM. Allowing for intra-respondent variations in coefficients estimated on repeated choice data. Transportation Research Part B, 2009, 43: 708-719
[41] He F (贺锋), Dong J-K (董金凯), Xie X-L (谢小龙), et al. Ecosystem services valuation on nonuse value for the constructed wetland in Beijing Olympic Forest Park. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin (长江流域资源与环境), 2010, 19(7): 782-789 (in Chinese)

旅游资源使用价值评估的ZTCM和TCIA方法比较——以北京奥林匹克森林公园为例

Comparison of ZTCM and TCIA methods for evaluating the use value of tourism resources: Taking Beijing Olympic Forest Park as an example

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价