欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 3202-3210.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202510.035

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    下一篇

热带海洋牧场生态安全研究进展

王凤霞, 李建*, 朱辉   

  1. 海南大学国际旅游与公共管理学院, 海口 570228
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-10 修回日期:2025-08-27 发布日期:2026-05-04
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: 17538386642@163.com
  • 作者简介:王凤霞, 女, 1975年生, 博士, 教授。主要从事海洋生态环境遥感监测研究。E-mail: summer_wangfx@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFD2401301)和海南省哲学科学研究基地课题(HNSK(JD)24-07)

Research progress in ecological security of tropical marine ranching

WANG Fengxia, LI Jian*, ZHU Hui   

  1. College of International Tourism and Public Administration, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
  • Received:2025-03-10 Revised:2025-08-27 Published:2026-05-04

摘要: 在全球海洋资源开发与保护并重的背景下,海洋牧场已成为促进渔业资源可持续利用和改善近海生态环境的重要模式。热带海洋牧场位于高温、高盐、高生物多样性且扰动频发的海域,其生态安全评估面临较高的不确定性与管理难度。本文基于国内外文献,从生态安全评价指标体系、评价方法与权重设置等维度系统梳理了相关研究进展:现有成果多建立在温带及亚热带海洋牧场的评价框架之上,近年虽有面向热带的探索,但在高温胁迫生物响应参数、旅游承载压力、高频扰动因子等方面关注不足;方法上已从静态综合评价发展到融合因果分析、机器学习与系统动力学的动态预测,但在热带场景的适用性验证上仍有限;权重设置方面,主客观赋权及组合赋权已被采用,但尚缺针对热带特有生态因子的权重优化研究。针对上述不足,本文提出未来研究应重点关注以下内容:1)构建融合自然与人为扰动的多源不确定性评估框架,提高风险预警精度;2)建立体现热带生态特征与产业耦合关系的综合评价体系,突破评价指标的“气候带迁移”局限;3)开发时序嵌入型评价工具,实现生态安全状态的动态监测与管理优化。

关键词: 海洋资源, 热带海洋牧场, 生态安全评价

Abstract: Under the background of balancing marine resource exploitation and ecosystem conservation, marine ranching has become an important approach to enhance the sustainable use of fishery resources and to improve coastal environmental quality. Tropical marine ranching, situated in high-temperature, high-salinity, biodiversity-rich, and disturbance-prone waters, faces greater uncertainty and management challenges in ecological security. Based on a systematic review of literature, we summarized research progress on evaluation index systems, assessment methods, and weighting approaches. Most frameworks originate from temperate and subtropical marine ranch studies. Although recent efforts have begun to address tropical contexts, less attention has been paid on high-temperature stress responses, tourism carrying pressure, and high-frequency disturbance factors. With respect to metho-dology, studies have evolved from static composite evaluations to dynamic predictions integrating causal analysis, machine learning, and system dynamics, yet validation in tropical scenarios is still limited. Weighting approaches have applied subjective, objective, and combined methods, but optimization for tropical-specific ecological factors is lacking. To address these knowledge gaps, we proposed that the following directions for future studies: 1) develo-ping a multi-source uncertainty assessment framework integrating natural and anthropogenic disturbances to enhance the accuracy of risk early-warning; 2) constructing a comprehensive evaluation system reflecting tropical ecological characteristics and industry coupling to avoid ‘climate-zone transfer’ bias in indicators; and 3) creating time-series-embedded tools for dynamic monitoring and adaptive management of ecological security.

Key words: marine resource, tropical marine ranching, ecological security assessment