欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 317-324.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202601.019

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    

荒漠区土地砾化监测样方适宜大小及数量

叶虎1, 裴浩2*, 王盈3, 范磊4, 莫宇4, 张坤4, 徐丽娜1   

  1. 1内蒙古自治区气象服务中心, 呼和浩特 010051;
    2内蒙古自治区气象局, 呼和浩特 010051;
    3呼和浩特市气象局, 呼和浩特 010020;
    4内蒙古大学生态与环境学院, 呼和浩特 010030
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-15 修回日期:2025-12-01 发布日期:2026-07-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: peihao5217@sohu.com
  • 作者简介:叶 虎, 男, 1980年生, 高级工程师。主要从事气象应用技术研究。E-mail: yehu_135@sina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区科技重大专项(2021ZD0011-1)、内蒙古自治区自然科学基金项目(2025MS04036)和内蒙古自治区气象局科技创新项目(nmqxkjcx202458,nmqxkp202402)

Appropriate size and quantity of land gravelization monitoring quadrats in desert areas

YE Hu1, PEI Hao2*, WANG Ying3, FAN Lei4, MO Yu4, ZHANG Kun4, XU Lina1   

  1. 1Inner Mongolia Service Center of Meteoro-logy, Hohhot 010051, China;
    2Inner Mongolia Meteorological Bureau, Hohhot 010051, China;
    3Meteorological Bureau of Hohhot, Hohhot 010020, China;
    4School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010030, China
  • Received:2025-03-15 Revised:2025-12-01 Published:2026-07-18

摘要: 为提升土地砾化程度定量化监测精度,选取内蒙古荒漠区为研究区,设计10 cm×10 cm、25 cm×25 cm、50 cm×50 cm、75 cm×75 cm、100 cm×100 cm样方布设方法。以100 cm×100 cm样方测量结果作为样地砾石覆盖度和单位面积砾石质量的标准值,与其他样方布设方法的测量结果进行对比分析,以明确荒漠区土地砾化监测样方适宜大小及数量。结果表明: 所选不同尺寸样方均可用于土地砾化监测,在不考虑时间成本的情况下,随着样方面积的增大,测量精度增加,需要测定的样方数量减少;加入时间成本后,10 cm×10 cm或25 cm×25 cm较小面积样方优势凸显。受砾石粒径、成分等因素的影响,样方间单位面积砾石质量的差异远大于砾石覆盖度,样方面积过小会增大单位面积砾石质量测量结果的不稳定性,为了确保测量结果的稳定性,就需要增加样方的数量,进而增加时间成本。综合考虑监测精度及工作效率,土地砾化监测样方适宜面积为25 cm×25 cm,适宜样方数量为9。

关键词: 土地砾化监测, 样方适宜大小, 样方适宜数量, 样本, 荒漠区

Abstract: To improve the quantitative monitoring accuracy of land gravelization, we designed quadrats of 10 cm×10 cm, 25 cm×25 cm, 50 cm×50 cm, 75 cm×75 cm, and 100 cm×100 cm in the desert area of Inner Mongolia. Using the measurement results of the 100 cm×100 cm quadrat as the standard values for gravel coverage and unit area gravel mass, we conducted a comparative analysis with the results of other quadrat configurations to determine the appropriate size and quantity of quadrats for monitoring land gravelization in desert areas. The results showed that quadrats of different sizes could all be used for monitoring land gravelization. Without considering time costs, measurement accuracy improved and the number of quadrats required decreased with increasing quadrat area. When time costs were factored in, the advantages of smaller quadrats (10 cm×10 cm or 25 cm×25 cm) became more pronounced. Due to factors such as gravel particle size and composition, the differences in unit area gravel mass between quadrats were much greater than those in gravel coverage. An excessively small quadrat area increased the instability of unit area gravel mass measurements. To ensure measurement stability, the number of qua-drats should be increased, which would raise time costs. Considering both monitoring accuracy and work efficiency, the appropriate quadrat area for land gravelization monitoring could be 25 cm×25 cm, with a recommended quadrat quantity of 9.

Key words: land gravelization monitoring, appropriate size of quadrat, appropriate quantity of quadrats, sample, desert area