黄土高原封禁林地藓结皮呼吸速率对放牧踩踏干扰强度的响应

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202207.009

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 1783-1790.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202207.009

黄土高原封禁林地藓结皮呼吸速率对放牧踩踏干扰强度的响应

窦韦强¹, 肖波^2*, 王彦峰³, 江子昊¹, 余星兴², 李胜龙¹

¹中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院/农业农村部华北耕地保育重点实验室, 北京 100193;
²中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
³中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院, 兰州 730000

收稿日期:2021-12-01 接受日期:2022-04-27 出版日期:2022-07-15 发布日期:2023-01-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: xiaobo@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:窦韦强, 男, 1994年生, 博士研究生。主要从事干旱和半干旱气候区生物土壤结皮碳循环研究。E-mail: dwq18513262537@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42077010)、中国科学院“西部之光”人才培养引进计划项目(2019)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2021TC038)和中国农业大学2115人才工程项目(1191-00109011)资助。

Responses of moss biocrusts respiration to simulated grazing and trampling disturbance with different intensities on the fenced forestland of Loess Plateau, China

DOU Wei-qiang¹, XIAO Bo^2*, WANG Yan-feng³, JIANG Zi-hao¹, YU Xing-xing², LI Sheng-long¹

¹College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation in North China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China;
²State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
³Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2021-12-01 Accepted:2022-04-27 Online:2022-07-15 Published:2023-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 放牧踩踏造成的土壤属性变化是引起土壤呼吸速率和碳固排波动的重要原因,但目前有关不同强度放牧踩踏对生物结皮呼吸的影响尚不明确。本研究针对黄土高原风沙土发育的藓结皮,以未干扰为对照,分别进行强度为10%、30%、50%和70%的模拟放牧踩踏干扰,连续测定了藓结皮呼吸速率的变化,分析了藓结皮呼吸速率对不同干扰强度的响应规律。结果表明: 1)适度干扰会激发藓结皮呼吸速率,而重度干扰则会抑制其呼吸速率。与未干扰相比,干扰10%和30%的藓结皮呼吸速率分别增加了41.1%和22.2%,而干扰50%和70%的藓结皮呼吸速率则分别降低了8.9%和15.3%。2)踩踏干扰显著改变了土壤温度,但对土壤含水量的影响不显著。与未干扰相比,干扰10%和30%的土壤温度分别显著降低了0.4和1.2 ℃,干扰50%和70%则分别显著增加了1.1和1.0 ℃。3)不同干扰强度下藓结皮呼吸速率与土壤温度和含水量分别呈显著指数和线性正相关关系,但与藓结皮基本特性无显著相关关系,土壤温度和水分可分别解释藓结皮呼吸速率动态变化的70.6%～96.3%和49.1%～70.0%。综上,放牧踩踏显著影响了藓结皮呼吸速率,短期适度放牧踩踏会激发藓结皮呼吸速率,而过度放牧踩踏则会抑制其呼吸速率。因此,在未来黄土高原地区土壤碳收支平衡研究中应考虑不同强度放牧踩踏对生物结皮呼吸的影响。

关键词: 适度放牧, 生物土壤结皮, 土壤呼吸速率, 土壤温度, 土壤含水量

Abstract: The changes in soil properties caused by grazing and trampling are important reasons for the changes in soil respiration rates, carbon fixation, and emission. However, the effects of different intensities of grazing and trampling on biocrusts respiration rate are unclear. In this study, we simulated grazing and trampling disturbances of 10%, 30%, 50%, and 70% intensity on moss biocrusts developed in aeolian sandy soil on Loess Plateau, with undisturbed moss biocrusts serving as a control. The changes in respiration rate of moss biocrusts were monitored continuously, and its responses to different disturbance intensities were analyzed. The results showed that: 1) moderate disturbance stimulated moss biocrusts respiration, while heavy disturbance inhibited that. The respiration rate of moss biocrusts was increased by 41.1% and 22.2% at disturbance intensities of 10% and 30%, but was decreased by 8.9% and 15.3% at disturbance intensities of 50% and 70%, respectively. 2) The trampling disturbance significantly changed soil temperature but did not affect soil water content. In comparison to the control, soil temperature of biocrusts was decreased by 0.4 and 1.2 ℃ at disturbance intensities of 10% and 30%, but it was increased by 1.1 and 1.0 ℃ at disturbance intensities of 50% and 70%, respectively. 3) The respiration rate of moss biocrusts showed a significant exponential relationship with soil temperature and a linear positive relationship with soil water content under different disturbance intensities. However, the correlation between respiration rate of moss biocrust and the characteristics of moss biocrust was not significant. Soil temperature and water content could explain 70.6%-96.3% and 49.1%-70.0% of the total variation of respiration rate of moss biocrusts, respectively. In conclusion, grazing and trampling affected the respiration rate of moss biocrusts, with short-term moderate grazing and trampling would have positive effects. On the other hand, excessive grazing and trampling would reduce the rate of moss biocrust respiration. As a result, future studies on soil carbon balance of the Loess Plateau should consider the effects of grazing and trampling on biocrust respiration.

Key words: conservative grazing, biological soil crusts, soil respiration rate, soil temperature, soil water content

窦韦强, 肖波, 王彦峰, 江子昊, 余星兴, 李胜龙. 黄土高原封禁林地藓结皮呼吸速率对放牧踩踏干扰强度的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1783-1790.

DOU Wei-qiang, XIAO Bo, WANG Yan-feng, JIANG Zi-hao, YU Xing-xing, LI Sheng-long. Responses of moss biocrusts respiration to simulated grazing and trampling disturbance with different intensities on the fenced forestland of Loess Plateau, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(7): 1783-1790.

参考文献

[1] Bond-Lamberty B, Thomson A. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature, 2010, 464: 579-582
[2] Su YG, Wu L, Zhou ZB, et al. Carbon flux in deserts depends on soil cover type: A case study in the Gurbantunggute Desert, North China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 58: 332-340
[3] 杨延哲, 张侃侃, 杨永胜, 等. 毛乌素沙地苔藓结皮的野外人工培育技术. 水土保持通报, 2016, 36(2): 165-170
[4] 李胜龙, 肖波, 孙福海. 黄土高原干旱半干旱区生物结皮覆盖土壤水汽吸附与凝结特征. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(15): 111-119
[5] Xiao B, Bowker MA. Moss-biocrusts strongly decrease soil surface albedo, altering land-surface energy balance in a dryland ecosystem. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 741: 140425
[6] Yao XM, Bowker MA, Xiao B. Estimation of annual CO₂ efflux of moss biocrust through measuring and simulating its respiration rate in a semiarid climate. Geoderma, 2020, 376: 114560
[7] 管超, 张鹏, 李新荣. 腾格里沙漠东南缘生物结皮土壤呼吸对水热因子变化的响应. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(3): 301-310
[8] 吴林, 苏延桂, 张元明. 模拟降水对古尔班通古特沙漠生物结皮表观土壤碳通量的影响. 生态学报, 2012, 32(13): 4103-4113
[9] 杨杰峰, 张曼胤, 康晓明, 等. 人为干扰对滨海湿地生态系统的影响. 湿地科学与管理, 2016, 12(1): 42-45
[10] 阚雨晨, 黄欣颖, 王宇通, 等. 干扰对草地碳循环影响的研究与展望. 草业科学, 2012, 29(12): 1855-1861
[11] White PS, Jentsch A. The search for generality in stu-dies of disturbance and ecosystem dynamics. Progress in Botany, 2001, 62: 399-449
[12] 刘昊, 赵宁, 曹喆, 等. 干扰对草地植被与土壤的影响之研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(5): 8-16
[13] Guan C, Zhang P, Zhao CM, et al. Effects of warming and rainfall pulses on soil respiration in a biological soil crust-dominated desert ecosystem. Geoderma, 2021, 381: 114683
[14] 杨雪芹, 许明祥, 赵允格, 等. 黄土丘陵区踩踏干扰对生物土壤结皮有机碳组分及碳矿化潜力的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4): 1283-1290
[15] 冯伟, 叶菁. 踩踏干扰下生物结皮的水分入渗与水土保持效应. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(1): 34-37
[16] Mrtensson L, Olsson PA. Reductions in microbial biomass along disturbance gradients in a semi-natural grassland. Applied Soil Ecology, 2012, 62: 8-13
[17] 陶冶, 张元明. 3种荒漠植物群落物种组成与丰富度的季节变化及地上生物量特征. 草业学报, 2011, 20(6): 1-11
[18] 肖波, 赵允格, 邵明安. 陕北水蚀风蚀交错区两种生物结皮对土壤理化性质的影响. 生态学报, 2007, 27(11): 4662-4670
[19] 傅子洹, 王云强, 安芷生. 黄土区小流域土壤容重和饱和导水率的时空动态特征. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(13): 128-134
[20] 包天莉, 赵允格, 高丽倩, 等. 踩踏干扰下生物结皮土壤可培养微生物数量. 中国沙漠, 2019, 39(1): 119-126
[21] 徐冰鑫, 胡宜刚, 张志山, 等. 模拟增温对荒漠生物土壤结皮-土壤系统CO₂、CH₄和N₂O通量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(8): 809-820
[22] 王博, 段玉玺, 王伟峰, 等. 库布齐沙漠东部不同生物结皮发育阶段土壤温室气体通量. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3): 857-866
[23] 董雄德, 刘恺, 李若雨, 等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤呼吸对极端降水脉冲的响应. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(12): 67-72
[24] 李玉强, 赵哈林, 赵学勇, 等. 不同强度放牧后自然恢复的沙质草地土壤呼吸、碳平衡与碳储量. 草业学报, 2006, 15(5): 25-31
[25] Bao TL, Gao LQ, Wang SS, et al. Moderate disturbance increases the PLFA diversity and biomass of the microbial community in biocrusts in the Loess Plateau region of China. Plant and Soil, 2020, 451: 499-513
[26] Bao TL, Zhao YG, Yang XQ, et al. Effects of distur-bance on soil microbial abundance in biological soil crusts on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 2019, 163: 59-67
[27] Lange OL, Meyer A, Zellner H, et al. Photosynthesis and water relations of lichen soil crusts: Field measurements in the coastal fog zone of the Namib Desert. Functional Ecology, 1994, 8: 253-264
[28] Zhang ZS, Li XR, Nowak RS, et al. Effect of sand-stabilizing shrubs on soil respiration in a temperate desert. Plant and Soil, 2013, 367: 449-463
[29] Zhang YY, Zhao WZ, Fu L, et al. Land use conversion influences soil respiration across a desert-oasis ecoregion in Northwest China, with consideration of cold season CO₂ efflux and its significance. Catena, 2020, 188: 104460
[30] Maestre FT, Escolar C, de Guevara ML, et al. Changes in biocrust cover drive carbon cycle responses to climate change in drylands. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19: 3835-3847
[31] Castillo-Monroy AP, Maestre FT, Rey A, et al. Biological soil crust microsites are the main contributor to soil respiration in a semiarid ecosystem. Ecosystems, 2011, 14: 835-847
[32] Escolar C, Maestre FT, Rey A. Biocrusts modulate warming and rainfall exclusion effects on soil respiration in a semi-arid grassland. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 80: 9-17
[33] 李炳垠, 卜崇峰, 李宜坪, 等. 毛乌素沙地生物结皮覆盖土壤碳通量日动态特征及其影响因子. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(4): 174-180
[34] Zhu MX, De Boeck HJ, Xu H, et al. Seasonal variations in the response of soil respiration to rainfall events in a riparian poplar plantation. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 747: 141222
[35] Chen LD, Gong J, Fu BJ, et al. Effect of land use conversion on soil organic carbon sequestration in the loess hilly area, Loess Plateau of China. Ecological Research, 2007, 22: 641-648
[36] Huang G, Li Y, Su YG. Effects of increasing precipitation on soil microbial community composition and soil respiration in a temperate desert, Northwestern China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2015, 83: 52-56
[37] Xu WF, Li XL, Liu W, et al. Spatial patterns of soil and ecosystem respiration regulated by biological and environmental variables along a precipitation gradient in semi-arid grasslands in China. Ecological Research, 2016, 31: 505-513
[38] Yang ZL, Wei YY, Fu GY, et al. Asymmetric effect of increased and decreased precipitation in different periods on soil and heterotrophic respiration in a semi-arid grassland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2020, 291: 108039
[39] 窦韦强, 田乐乐, 肖波, 等. 黄土高原藓结皮土壤呼吸速率对降雨量变化的响应. 生态学报, 2022, 42(5): 1703-1715
[40] Miralles I, Ladrón-de-Guevara M, Chamizo S, et al. Soil CO₂ exchange controlled by the interaction of biocrust successional stage and environmental variables in two semiarid ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 124: 11-23
[41] Thomas AD. Impact of grazing intensity on seasonal varia-tions in soil organic carbon and soil CO₂ efflux in two semiarid grasslands in southern Botswana. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2012, 367: 3076-3086

黄土高原封禁林地藓结皮呼吸速率对放牧踩踏干扰强度的响应

Responses of moss biocrusts respiration to simulated grazing and trampling disturbance with different intensities on the fenced forestland of Loess Plateau, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱向明, 彭伟, 冉恩华, 富美玲, 郑月姮, 张于. 典型黑土区春玉米茎流特征及其环境影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 921-927.
[2]	李瑞平, 罗洋, 隋鹏祥, 郑洪兵, 明博, 李少昆, 王浩, 郑金玉. 玉米秸秆不同还田方式对黑土耕层温度影响的短期效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2693-2702.
[3]	张冠华, 易亮, 丁文峰, 王一然, 牛俊, 李建明, 孙宝洋. 三峡库区苔藓生物结皮对土壤水分入渗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1835-1842.
[4]	岳艳鹏, 成龙, 孙迎涛, 庞营军, 吴波, 石麟, 何金军, 贾晓红. 毛乌素沙地生物结皮覆盖区土壤水分收支变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1861-1870.
[5]	吉静怡, 赵允格, 张万涛, 谷康民. 黄土丘陵区生物结皮空间分布的代表性景观指数 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1878-1884.
[6]	杜梦鸽, 王善举, 樊军, 葛红元. 祁连山青海云杉低液流特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 931-938.
[7]	马红娇, 马东豪, 刘志鹏, 张佳宝, 姜晓文, 陆荣生. 顺磁物质对土壤低场核磁共振信号特征及含水量测定的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 3037-3045.
[8]	杨柳生, 高若允, 俞陈辉, 韩润宇, 田雪, 孙凡, 林勇明, 王道杰. 干热河谷失稳性坡面植物碳氮磷化学计量特征对土壤性质的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2743-2752.
[9]	杨席席, 徐小忠, 阮振, 葛晓改, 王斌, 巫东豪, 王志平, 于明坚. 人工陆桥岛屿系统土壤呼吸速率及其影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2753-2759.
[10]	张思琪, 张科利, 曹梓豪, 朱彤, 魏梦瑶. 喀斯特坡面生物结皮发育特征及其对土壤水分入渗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2875-2885.
[11]	王国华, 宋冰, 席璐璐, 缑倩倩. 晋西北丘陵风沙区不同林龄人工柠条生长与繁殖动态特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2079-2088.
[12]	刘美君, 吕金林, 陈秋文, 杨洁, 李国庆, 杜盛. 黄土丘陵区两典型造林树种生长季树干直径微变化动态及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1673-1680.
[13]	吉静怡, 赵允格, 杨凯, 张万涛, 高丽倩, 明姣, 王闪闪. 生物结皮分布格局对坡面流水动力特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 1015-1022.
[14]	丁兵兵, 张永娥, 余新晓, 贾国栋, 王渝淞, 郑鹏飞, 蒋涛, 夏娟娟. 土壤水分胁迫和大气CO₂浓度对光合分馏及后光合分馏的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6): 1800-1806.
[15]	王红丽, 张绪成, 于显枫, 侯慧芝, 方彦杰, 马一凡. 半干旱区周年全膜覆盖对玉米田土壤冻融特性和水热分布的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4): 1146-1154.