黄土丘陵区生物结皮空间分布的代表性景观指数

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202207.005

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 1878-1884.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202207.005

黄土丘陵区生物结皮空间分布的代表性景观指数

吉静怡^1,2,4, 赵允格^1,2,3*, 张万涛³, 谷康民⁵

¹中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
²中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
³西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
⁴中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
⁵西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2021-11-10 接受日期:2022-04-24 出版日期:2022-07-15 发布日期:2023-01-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: zyunge@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:吉静怡, 女, 1996年生, 博士研究生。主要从事生物结皮空间分布特征及其生态功能研究。E-mail: Jjingyi123@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41830758)和中国科学院“西部之光”交叉团队项目-重点实验室合作研究专项(2019)资助。

Representative landscape indices of biological soil crusts distribution in the hilly Loess Plateau of China

JI Jing-yi^1,2,4, ZHAO Yun-ge^1,2,3*, ZHANG Wan-tao³, GU Kang-min⁵

¹State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, the Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
²Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
³Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A＆F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
⁴University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
⁵College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A＆F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

Received:2021-11-10 Accepted:2022-04-24 Online:2022-07-15 Published:2023-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 景观指数可量化表征生物结皮的分布特征,但景观指数存在数量众多、冗余度较高的问题。本研究以位于典型黄土丘陵区的陕西省吴起县合沟小流域不同分布格局的58个样方的生物结皮为对象,计算其15个常用景观格局指数,基于相关分析、因子分析和敏感性分析,筛选出可描述生物结皮景观格局、具有特定生态学意义的代表性景观指数,并以陕西省定边县杨井镇鹰窝山涧小流域退耕地不同盖度的生物结皮为例,检验所选景观格局指数的可靠性和合理性。结果表明: 15个景观指数中,10个指数之间具有显著相关关系,而边缘长度(TE)和边缘密度(ED)分别与斑块数量(NP)、斑块密度(PD)、丛生度(CLUMPY)和散布与并列指数(IJI)无显著相关性。斑块占景观比例(PLAND)、ED、斑块连结度(COHESION)和分离度(SPLIT),分别从盖度、长度、连通度和破碎度方面描述了生物结皮空间分布特征,其代表的3个公因子在刻画生物结皮空间分布格局时累计贡献率达91.6%。本研究确定了可量化生物结皮空间分布复杂性的代表性景观指数,为研究生物结皮格局变化及其与生态过程的关系提供了理论依据。

关键词: 生物土壤结皮, 分布特征, 景观格局, 敏感性分析, 景观指数

Abstract: Landscape indices can quantitatively describe the distribution characteristics of biological soil crusts (biocrusts). However, there are too many landscape indices, with high redundancy. We investigated 58 plots of biocrusts with different distribution patterns in the Hegou watershed of Wuqi County, Shaanxi Province, located in the hilly Loess Plateau. First, we calculated 15 common landscape indices, and selected representative landscape indices that could describe the biocrust landscape pattern and had specific ecological significance, based on correlation analysis, factor analysis, and sensitivity analysis. The reliability and rationality of the representative landscape indices were verified with data of the different biocrusts coverage in the Yingwoshanjian watershed of Yangjing Town, Dingbian County, Shaanxi Province. The results showed that 10 of the 15 landscape indices had significant correlations. Total edge (TE) and edge density (ED) were not significantly correlated with number of patches (NP), patch density (PD), clumpiness (CLUMPY), and interspersion juxtaposition index (IJI), respectively. The percentage of landscape (PLAND), ED, patch cohesion index (COHESION), and splitting index (SPLIT) described the spatial distribution characteristics of biocrust from coverage, length, connectivity, and fragmentation, respectively. The cumulative contribution of the three common factors represented in describing the spatial distribution of biocrusts was 91.6%. The study identified the representative landscape indices that could quantify the complexity of biocrusts distribution and thus would provide a theoretical basis for studying the pattern evolution of biocrusts and their relationship with ecological processes.

Key words: biological soil crust, distribution characteristic, landscape pattern, sensitivity analysis, landscape index

吉静怡, 赵允格, 张万涛, 谷康民. 黄土丘陵区生物结皮空间分布的代表性景观指数[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1878-1884.

JI Jing-yi, ZHAO Yun-ge, ZHANG Wan-tao, GU Kang-min. Representative landscape indices of biological soil crusts distribution in the hilly Loess Plateau of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(7): 1878-1884.

参考文献

[1] Belnap J, Büdel B, Lange OL. Biological soil crusts: Characteristics and distribution// Belnap J, Lange OL, eds. Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function, and Management. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003: 3-30
[2] Belnap J. The potential roles of biological soil crusts in dryland hydrologic cycles. Hydrological Processes, 2006, 20: 3159-3178
[3] Chamizo S, Cantón Y, Rodríguez-Caballero E, et al. Biocrusts positively affect the soil water balance in semiarid ecosystems. Ecohydrology, 2016, 9: 1208-1221
[4] Chamizo S, Rodríguez-Caballero E, Román JR, et al. Effects of biocrust on soil erosion and organic carbon losses under natural rainfall. Catena, 2017, 148: 117-125
[5] Belnap J. Factors influencing nitrogen fixation and nitrogen release in biological soil crusts// Belnap J, Lange OL, eds. Biological Soil Crusts: Structure, Function and Management. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003: 241-261
[6] 肖波, 赵允格, 许明祥, 等. 陕北黄土区生物结皮条件下土壤养分的积累及流失风险. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(5): 1019-1026
[7] Pietrasiak N, Regus JU, Johansen JR, et al. Biological soil crust community types differ in key ecological functions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 65: 168-171
[8] Yang K, Zhao YG, Gao LQ, et al. Nonlinear response of hydrodynamic and soil erosive behaviors to biocrust coverage in drylands. Geoderma, 2022, 405: 115457
[9] 杨雪芹, 许明祥, 赵允格, 等. 黄土丘陵区踩踏干扰对生物土壤结皮有机碳组分及碳矿化潜力的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4): 1283-1290
[10] 赵允格, 许明祥, Belnap J. 生物结皮光合作用对光温水的响应及其对结皮空间分布格局的解译——以黄土丘陵区为例. 生态学报, 2010, 30(17): 4668-4675
[11] 杨巧云, 赵允格, 包天莉, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同类型生物结皮下的土壤生态化学计量特征. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2699-2706
[12] 张培培, 赵允格, 王媛, 等. 黄土高原丘陵区生物结皮土壤的斥水性. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(3): 657-663
[13] 吉静怡, 赵允格, 杨凯, 等. 黄土丘陵区生物结皮坡面产流产沙与其分布格局的关联. 生态学报, 2021, 41(4): 1381-1390
[14] 邬建国. 景观生态学——概念与理论. 生态学杂志, 2000, 19(1): 42-52
[15] 陈利顶, 刘洋, 吕一河, 等. 景观生态学中的格局分析: 现状、困境与未来. 生态学报, 2008, 28(11): 5521-5531
[16] Turner MG. Landscape ecology in north America: Past, present, and future. Ecology, 2005, 86: 1967-1974
[17] Fu BJ. The progress and perspectives of landscape ecology in China. Progress in Physical Geography, 2006, 30: 232-244
[18] Wu JG, Hobbs RJ. Key Topics in Landscape Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 39-40
[19] 吕一河, 陈利顶, 傅伯杰. 景观格局与生态过程的耦合途径分析. 地理科学进展, 2007, 26(3): 1-10
[20] 宋冬梅, 肖笃宁, 张志城, 等. 甘肃民勤绿洲的景观格局变化及驱动力分析. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(4): 535-539
[21] 王计平, 杨磊, 卫伟, 等. 黄土丘陵区景观格局对水土流失过程的影响——景观水平与多尺度比较. 生态学报, 2011, 31(19): 5531-5541
[22] 吉静怡, 赵允格, 杨凯, 等. 生物结皮分布格局对坡面流水动力特征的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 1015-1022
[23] 赵允格, 许明祥, 王全九, 等. 黄土丘陵区退耕地生物结皮理化性状初报. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(8): 1429-1434
[24] 杨丽娜, 赵允格, 明姣, 等. 黄土高原不同侵蚀类型区生物结皮中蓝藻的多样性. 生态学报, 2013, 33(14): 4416-4424
[25] McGarigal K, Marks BJ. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-351, Corvallis, 1995
[26] Saltelli A, Marivoet J. Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output: A comparison of selec-ted techniques. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1990, 28: 229-253
[27] 何鹏, 张会儒. 常用景观指数的因子分析和筛选方法研究. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(4): 470-474
[28] 张元明, 陈晋, 王雪芹, 等. 古尔班通古特沙漠生物结皮的分布特征. 地理学报, 2005, 60(1): 53-60
[29] 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 徐建英, 等. 基于“源-汇”生态过程的景观格局识别方法——景观空间负荷对比指数. 生态学报, 2003, 23(11): 2406-2413
[30] 布仁仓, 胡远满, 常禹, 等. 景观指数之间的相关分析. 生态学报, 2005, 25(10): 2764-2775

黄土丘陵区生物结皮空间分布的代表性景观指数

Representative landscape indices of biological soil crusts distribution in the hilly Loess Plateau of China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黎贝, 焦胜, 周敏, 周媛. “城市-街区”尺度下绿地景观格局对雨洪滞蓄效能的影响研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(2): 533-542.
[2]	刘亦晟, 侯鹏, 王平, 朱健. 生态系统水源涵养服务功能定量评估方法研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1): 275-288.
[3]	谢卓洪, 雷敏, 刘利杰, 莫燕卿, 战国强, 刘萍. 珠三角城市群景观生态格局评价与优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2481-2488.
[4]	连虎刚, 曲张明, 刘春芳, 贺扬希. 北方防沙带河西走廊段景观格局时空演变及其防风固沙服务响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2518-2526.
[5]	龚政, 文天翼, 靳闯, 赵堃, 苏敏. 江苏中部潮滩湿地土壤有机碳分布特征及影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 2978-2984.
[6]	张峻铭, 孙永玉, 周姗, 邱昕腾, 孙仕仙, 欧朝蓉. 2000—2020年金沙江干热河谷景观生态风险的时空变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2767-2776.
[7]	盛菲, 刘士余, 张婷, 余敏琪. 濂水流域降雨变化和景观格局演变的径流效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 196-202.
[8]	李月辉, 胡远满, 王正文. 山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复工程与景观生态学 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 249-256.
[9]	庞景文, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 江熳, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 毛乌素沙地区域尺度生物结皮有机碳 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1755-1763.
[10]	窦韦强, 肖波, 王彦峰, 江子昊, 余星兴, 李胜龙. 黄土高原封禁林地藓结皮呼吸速率对放牧踩踏干扰强度的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1783-1790.
[11]	张冠华, 易亮, 丁文峰, 王一然, 牛俊, 李建明, 孙宝洋. 三峡库区苔藓生物结皮对土壤水分入渗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1835-1842.
[12]	岳艳鹏, 成龙, 孙迎涛, 庞营军, 吴波, 石麟, 何金军, 贾晓红. 毛乌素沙地生物结皮覆盖区土壤水分收支变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1861-1870.
[13]	郝永佩, 宋晓伟, 徐仪红. Pu同位素示踪技术在土壤侵蚀研究中的应用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1482-1488.
[14]	刘澄静, 角媛梅, 徐秋娥, 杨艳芬, 丁银平, 刘志林. 哈尼梯田景观格局对地表水δ¹⁸O海拔效应的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 1083-1090.
[15]	元冰瑜, 高建华, 池源, 扎边, 龚照辉. 1990—2020年江苏省海岸带景观生态状况指数跨尺度时空特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 489-499.