欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 3603-3611.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202512.001

• 山水林田湖草沙保护修复专栏(专栏策划: 岳文泽、肖武) • 上一篇    下一篇

山水林田湖草沙一体化保护修复的理论基础与实施路径

周妍1, 林盟皓2, 仲崇峻1*, 郑华3, 白中科4, 肖武2, 陈妍1, 王金满4   

  1. 1自然资源部国土整治中心, 北京 100035;
    2浙江大学公共管理学院, 杭州 310058;
    3中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 北京 100085;
    4中国地质大学(北京)土地科学技术学院, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-18 修回日期:2025-10-14 出版日期:2025-12-18 发布日期:2026-07-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: Cjzhong@vip.sina.cn
  • 作者简介:周妍, 女, 1981年生, 博士, 正高级工程师。主要从事生态保护与修复研究。E-mail: zhouyan053991@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1303205)

Theoretical foundation and implementation pathway for the holistic ecological conservation and restoration of mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, grasslands, and deserts

ZHOU Yan1, LIN Menghao2, ZHONG Chongjun1*, ZHENG Hua3, BAI Zhongke4, XIAO Wu2, CHEN Yan1, WANG Jinman4   

  1. 1Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China;
    2School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China;
    3Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
    4School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2025-08-18 Revised:2025-10-14 Online:2025-12-18 Published:2026-07-18

摘要: 近10年来,以“山水工程”、“三北”工程和自然保护地体系建设为代表的生态保护修复活动取得了诸多生态治理经验,为全要素整合、全周期管控等深层“一体化”的实现奠定了良好基础。为推动一体化保护修复的理论深化和模式优化,本研究运用“问题-理论-路径”三位一体的分析框架,基于对其现实问题的归纳总结形成了协同治理逻辑体系和五位一体实施路径。结果表明: 一体化保护修复在目标传导、组织协作与过程控制方面具有亟待填补的结构性裂隙;一体化保护修复可通过耦合生态环境科学、管理学、地理学、系统论和控制论等学科理论,形成“目标协同-组织协同-过程协同”的治理逻辑体系;一体化保护修复的治理形态将从“物理拼合”迈向“有机融合”,在此过程中,“谋划-策划-设计-实施-管理”五位一体的实施路径构成了理论向实践转化的核心枢纽。上述治理逻辑与实施路径有助于一体化保护修复建立健全“统一认知-统一实施-统一管理”的治理模式,为其实践活动的深入发展提供了系统性的理论指导和体系化的模式参考。

关键词: 山水林田湖草沙, 一体化保护修复, 理论基础, 实施路径

Abstract: Over the past decade, initiatives such as the Shan-Shui Initiative, the “Three-North” Project, and the construction of nature reserve system, have accumulated valuable experience of ecological governance for the ecological conservation and restoration, thereby establishing a solid foundation for achieving deeper “holism”, including full-factor integration and full-cycle monitoring. To promote theoretical advancement and model optimisation of holistic ecological conservation and restoration, we applied a three-in-one analytical framework of “problem, theory, and pathway” to develop a collaborative governance logic system, alongside a five-in-one implementation pathway based on the induction of practical challenges. The results showed that holistic ecological conservation and restoration is confronted with structural gaps that urgently need to be addressed in terms of objective transmission, organizational collaboration, and process control. By coupling theories from fields such as ecological environmental science, management, geography, systems theory, and cybernetics, a governance logic system comprised of “objective collaboration, organizational collaboration, and process collaboration” can be established for holistic ecological conservation and restoration. The governance form of holistic ecological conservation and restoration is expected to evolve from “physical combination” to “organic fusion”, wherein the implementation pathway encompassing “strategy, planning, design, implementation, and management” serves as the pivotal mechanism for translating theory into practice. Collectively, the proposed governance logic and implementation pathway contribute to the establishment and improvement of a governance model characterized by “unified understanding, unified implementation, and unified management”, thereby providing systematic theoretical guidance and structured model references for the in-depth development for practical activities of holistic ecological conservation and restoration.

Key words: mountains-rivers-forests-farmlands-lakes-grasslands-deserts, holistic ecological conservation and restoration, theoretical foundation, implementation pathway