耦合生态系统服务价值与生态风险评估的河西走廊生态分区

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202601.021

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 河西走廊作为我国重要的生态安全屏障,其生态分区研究对河西走廊实现精准修复、优化资源配置有重要意义。本研究通过估算河西走廊的生态系统服务价值,借助“源地-阻力面-廊道-战略点”的基本范式构建出河西走廊的生态安全格局,并耦合景观生态风险评估结果划定生态分区,优化生态安全格局。结果表明: 2000—2020年,研究区生态质量向好;其生态系统服务价值共增加157.41亿元;高生态风险区面积减少14324 km²,中、低生态风险区面积分别增加4778、9546 km²。研究区生态要素在空间分布上具有一致性,主要位于河西走廊的南部。识别出生态源地10个,面积为20643.12 km²;提取生态廊道45条,长度为2685.69 km,其中,重要生态廊道15条,长度为1053.16 km;共识别出生态战略点64个。本研究将河西走廊划分为生态保障区、生态整治区、生态改善区和生态保育区4个生态分区,其中,生态源地、廊道主要位于生态保障区、生态保育区。研究结果可为河西走廊乃至西北地区的生态修复研究提供理论参考。

关键词: 河西走廊, 生态安全格局, 生态系统服务价值, 景观生态风险

Abstract: Hexi Corridor is an important ecological security barrier in China. Ecological zoning of this area is of great significance for the precise restoration and optimal resource allocation. We estimated the ecosystem service value of the Hexi Corridor and constructed ecological security pattern with the basic paradigm of “source-resistance surface-corridor-strategic point”. We further coupled the results of the landscape ecological risk assessment to deli-neate ecological zoning and optimize the ecological security pattern. The results showed that ecological quality in the study area improved from 2000 to 2020, with total ecosystem service value increasing by 15.741 billion yuan. The area with high ecological risk decreased by 14324 km², and the area with medium and low ecological risk increased by 4778 and 9546 km², respectively. The ecological components exhibited consistent spatial distribution, primarily concentrated in the southern part of the Hexi Corridor. Ten ecological source areas were identified, covering 20643.12 km². A total of 45 ecological corridors were extracted, totaling 2685.69 km in length, including 15 key ecological corridors spanning 1053.16 km. We identified 64 ecological strategic points. Hexi Corridor could be classified into four ecological zones: ecological safeguard zone, ecological rehabilitation zone, ecological improvement zone, and ecological conservation zone. The ecological sources and corridors were mainly located in the ecological safeguard zone and ecological conservation zone. Our results could provide theoretical references for ecological restoration research in the Hexi Corridor as well as in the northwestern China.

Key words: Hexi Corridor, ecological security pattern, ecosystem service value, landscape ecological risk

陈春阳, 贾夏, 赵永华, 单立山, 司绍诚, 赵明, 张鹏. 耦合生态系统服务价值与生态风险评估的河西走廊生态分区[J]. 应用生态学报, 2026, 37(1): 213-222.

CHEN Chunyang, JIA Xia, ZHAO Yonghua, SHAN Lishan, SI Shaocheng, ZHAO Ming, ZHANG Peng. Ecological zoning of Hexi Corridor, Northwest China with coupled ecosystem service value and ecological risk assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(1): 213-222.

参考文献

[1] Li SD, Li YY, Nan J, et al. Development of key ecolo-gical conservation and restoration projects in the past century. Ecological Frontiers, 2025, 45: 1-6
[2] 董文卓, 苏维词, 勾容, 等. 生态系统服务和生态系统健康视角下的贵州省生态风险时空演变. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 1211-1221
[3] Pan NH, Du QQ, Guan QY, et al. Ecological security assessment and pattern construction in arid and semi-arid areas: A case study of the Hexi Region, NW China, Ecological Indicators, 2022, 138: 108797
[4] Lu X, Hu MS, Wang Y. Integrating ecosystem services value and uncertainty into regional ecological risk assessment: A case study of Hubei Province, Central China. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 740: 140126
[5] 彭建, 党威雄, 刘焱序, 等. 景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4): 664-677
[6] 赵际剀, 于强, 徐呈龙, 等. 基于景观生态风险评估的景观生态网络的构建: 以资源型城市临汾为例. 煤炭学报, 2024, 49(6): 2811-2825
[7] 于婧, 汤昪, 陈艳红, 等. 山水资源型城市景观生态风险评价及生态安全格局构建: 以张家界市为例. 生态学报, 2022, 42(4): 1290-1299
[8] 舒翰俊, 范顺祥, 姜亚东, 等. 内蒙古耕地景观生态风险评价及生态修复分区. 地球科学与环境学报, 2023, 45(4): 895-906
[9] Yang J, Wang SY, Zhou J, et al. Optimisation of ecological security patterns in ecologically transition areas under the perspective of ecological resilience: A case of Taohe River. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 166: 112315
[10] 魏建兵, 郑泓, 程雨露, 等. 基于CiteSpace的生态安全格局研究进展. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 835-844
[11] Yu Q, Yue DP, Wang JP, et al. The optimization of urban ecological infrastructure network based on the changes of county land-scape patterns: A typical case study of ecological fragile zone located at Deng Kou (Inner Mongolia). Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 163: S54-S67
[12] 马克明, 傅伯杰, 黎晓亚, 等. 区域生态安全格局: 概念与理论基础. 生态学报, 2004, 24(4): 761-768
[13] 何雄伟, 盛方富. 国家级自然保护区生态预警指标体系构建与生态安全评价: 以江西鄱阳湖国家级自然保护区为例. 生态经济, 2021, 37(12): 190-195
[14] 谢婧, 李文. 1990—2017年哈尔滨市城乡生态耦合及其安全格局构建. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(1): 317-326
[15] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3): 407-419
[16] 王欣妍, 冯启源, 王辰星, 等. 基于生态适应性理论的粤港澳大湾区生态安全格局构建. 生态学报, 2025, 45(12): 5769-5782
[17] 孙宝娣, 钟城豪, 崔东旭, 等. 区域协同视角下黄河流域生态安全格局构建. 生态学报, 2024, 44(11): 4624-4636
[18] 杨凯, 曹银贵, 冯喆, 等. 基于最小累积阻力模型的生态安全格局构建研究进展. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37(5): 555-565
[19] Yi J, Wang B, Zhang SL. Construction of ecological security pattern of the Chinese section of the “Silk Road Economic Belt” based on the minimum cumulative resistance model. GeoJournal, 2023, 88: 409-424
[20] 崔嵩, 杜显磊, 贾朝阳, 等. 黑龙江省生态系统服务价值估算及其生态安全格局构建. 环境科学, 2024, 45(11): 6489-6500
[21] 田锐, 郑嘉鑫, 宋东阳, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值与生态安全格局的国土空间生态修复区域识别: 以天津市蓟州区为例. 兰州大学学报:自然科学版, 2024, 60(4): 456-465
[22] 易浪, 孙颖, 尹少华, 等. 生态安全格局构建: 概念、框架与展望. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(4): 845-856
[23] 甘肃省人民政府办公厅. 关于印发《“十四五”兰州经济圈发展规划》等3项省级区域规划的通知. (2021-10-22) [2025-11-02]. https://www.gansu.gov.cn
[24] 薄立明, 尹力, 魏伟, 等. 2000—2020年河西走廊国土空间格局演变特征及驱动力分析. 干旱区地理, 2024, 47(5): 885-897
[25] 王晓峰. 中国国家生态屏障区: 全球变化数据大百科辞条. (2020-12-12) [2025-01-01]. https://www.geodoi.ac.cn/WebCn/doi.aspx?Id=1453
[26] 李洁, 刘春芳. 气候变化下河西走廊生态系统健康时空变化及应对策略. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 537-546
[27] 连虎刚, 曲张明, 刘春芳, 等. 北方防沙带河西走廊段景观格局时空演变及其防风固沙服务响应. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2518-2526
[28] 李红英. 甘肃省景观生态风险评价与生态安全格局构建. 博士论文. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2022
[29] 孙丽蓉, 马静, 周冬梅, 等. 石羊河流域景观生态风险时空分布特征. 生态科学, 2022, 41(2): 194-203
[30] 中华人民共和国自然资源部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 21010—2017土地利用现状分类. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017
[31] 国家发展和改革委员会价格司. 全国农产品成本收益汇编2023. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2024
[32] 甘肃省统计局. 甘肃农村统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2024
[33] 张百婷, 李宗省, 冯起, 等. 基于土地利用变化的祁连山地区生态系统服务价值演化分析. 生态学报, 2024, 44(10): 4187-4202
[34] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254
[35] 赵永华, 张玲玲, 王晓峰. 陕西省生态系统服务价值评估及时空差异. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(10): 2662-2672
[36] 张梦瑶, 易桂花, 张廷斌, 等. 川西高原荒野地优先保护区识别研究. 生态学报, 2025, 45(14): 7105-7122
[37] 高梦雯, 胡业翠, 李向, 等. 基于生态系统服务重要性和环境敏感性的喀斯特山区生态安全格局构建:以广西河池为例. 生态学报, 2021, 41(7): 2596-2608
[38] 阚恒, 丁冠乔, 郭杰, 等. 基于生态安全格局分析的国土空间生态修复关键区域识别: 以环太湖城市群为例. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(8): 2217-2227
[39] 杨金礼, 吴洋洋, 李思亮, 等. 雄安新区“三生空间”耦合协调评估及生态安全格局优化. 生态环境学报, 2024, 33(11): 1816-1826
[40] Li L, Huang XJ, Wu DF, et al. Optimization of ecological security patterns considering both natural and social disturbances in China’s largest urban agglomeration. Ecological Engineering, 2022, 180: 106647
[41] 孔繁花, 尹海伟. 济南城市绿地生态网络构建. 生态学报, 2008, 28(4): 1711-1719
[42] 俞孔坚. 景观生态战略点识别方法与理论地理学的表面模型. 地理学报, 1998, 53(增刊1): 11-20
[43] 干靓, 汪钊. 基于景观生态风险和生态系统服务价值的上海市海岸带生态保护修复分区识别与优化策略研究. 应用海洋学学报, 2025, 44(1): 131-145
[44] Li JL, Hu DW, Wang YZ, et al. Study of identification and simulation of ecological zoning through integration of landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service value. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 107: 105442
[45] 张学斌, 石培基, 罗君, 等. 基于景观格局的干旱内陆河流域生态风险分析: 以石羊河流域为例. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(3): 410-419
[46] 杨石岭, 陈祚伶, 黄晓芳, 等. 全球变暖对水循环的影响: 回顾与展望. 第四纪研究, 2024, 44(5): 1079-1092
[47] Bi ML, Xie GD, Yao CY. Ecological security assessment based on the renewable ecological footprint in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 116: 106432
[48] 唐见, 曹慧群, 陈进. 生态保护工程和气候变化对长江源区植被变化的影响量化. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 76-86
[49] 赵文智, 任珩, 杜军, 等. 河西走廊绿洲生态建设和农业发展的若干思考与建议. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(3): 424-434
[50] Shen Q, Ma Y. Did water diversion projects lead to sustainable ecological restoration in arid endorheic basins? Lessons from long-term changes of multiple ecosystem indicators in the lower Heihe River Basin. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 701: 134785
[51] 李雪婷, 杨亮洁, 杨永春, 等. 河西走廊经济带城镇化与生态韧性的耦合协调分析. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(2): 547-558
[52] 李明清, 过双飞, 郑凯. 耦合价值与风险评价的矿产资源型城市生态安全格局构建: 以马鞍山市为例. 湖南城市学院学报: 自然科学版, 2025, 34(1): 43-52