欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是

应用生态学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 563-571.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202602.023

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

粤港澳大湾区国土空间生态修复路径

朱晋立, 赵庆*, 罗皓, 章驰   

  1. 广东省林业科学研究院/广东省森林培育与保护利用重点实验室, 广州 510520
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-03 接受日期:2025-12-01 出版日期:2026-02-18 发布日期:2026-08-18
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: zhaoqing@sinogaf.cn
  • 作者简介:朱晋立, 男, 1999年生, 博士研究生。主要从事国土空间生态修复研究。E-mail: 1499043274@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    广东省林业科技创新项目(2024KJCX017)

Ecological restoration path of territorial space in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China

ZHU Jinli, ZHAO Qing*, LUO Hao, ZHANG Chi   

  1. Guangdong Academy of Forestry/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Silviculture, Protection and Utilization, Guangzhou 510520, China
  • Received:2025-07-03 Accepted:2025-12-01 Online:2026-02-18 Published:2026-08-18

摘要: 粤港澳大湾区是我国经济体量最大的城市群之一,城市化快速发展带来生态系统破碎化、生态系统功能失衡等一系列生态问题。生态修复关键区域的精准识别和优化是开展国土空间生态修复的关键路径,对于维护大湾区生态安全具有重要价值。本研究以粤港澳大湾区为研究区域,结合MSPA-InVEST模型和电路理论,综合运用生境质量评估和生态网络构建对生态修复关键区域进行识别,进而提出粤港澳大湾区国土空间生态修复优化建议。结果表明: 2023年,粤港澳大湾区全域生境质量平均值为0.69,整体生境质量水平良好,极高水平生境质量区域面积26431.8 km2,极低水平生境质量区域面积8662.9 km2;结合生态网络构建与生境质量评估结果,提取41处生态源地优化区,面积742.8 km2,151处生态夹点提升区,面积12.4 km2,499处生态障碍点修复区,面积158.5 km2;针对性提出生态源地结构优化、生态夹点功能提升、生态障碍点区域-地块系统性修复的国土空间生态修复措施。研究结果可为粤港澳大湾区国土空间生态修复提供科学依据和实践指导。

关键词: 生态修复, 生境质量, 关键区域, 粤港澳大湾区

Abstract: The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) is one of China’s largest urban agglomera-tions in terms of economic aggregate. However, accelerated urbanization have led to a series of ecological problems, including ecosystem fragmentation and imbalances in ecosystem functions. The precise identification and optimization of key ecological restoration areas are critical pathways for conducting territorial spatial ecological restoration, holding significant value for safeguarding the ecological security of the GBA. We integrated the MSPA-InVEST model with circuit theory to assess habitat quality of GBA and construct an ecological network, with which we identified key regions for ecological restoration. Based on the findings, we proposed optimization strategies for territorial spatial ecological restoration in the GBA. The results showed that the average habitat quality value across the GBA was 0.69 in 2023, indicating an overall favorable level of habitat quality. Extremely high-quality habitat areas covered 26431.8 km2, while extremely low-quality habitat areas spanned 8662.9 km2. By integrating ecological network construction and habitat quality assessment, we identified 41 ecological source optimization zones (total area: 742.8 km2), 151 ecological pinch point improvement zones (total area: 12.4 km2), and 499 ecological barrier restoration zones (total area: 158.5 km2). We proposed targeted measures for territorial spatial ecological restoration in the GBA, including structural optimization of ecological source, functional enhancement of ecological pinch point, and systematic restoration of ecological barrier areas at the regional-plot level. Our results would provide a scientific basis and practical guidance for territorial spatial ecological restoration in the GBA.

Key words: ecological restoration, habitat quality, key area, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area