Effects of phytase Q9 on the yield and senescence characteristics of summer maize shaded in the field

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202010.024

Abstract

Abstract: Light shortage in the canopy of summer maize resulted from the decrease of solar radiation and the increase of planting density in Huanghuaihai region could reduce maize yield. In order to explore the effects of phytase Q9 on leaf senescence characteristics of summer maize, three sha-ding treatments with summer maize hybrid ‘Denghai 605' (DH605) were conducted, including shading at flowering to maturity stage (S₁), shading at ear stage (S₂), and shading at whole growth stage (S₃) with natural lighting in the field as control (CK). Chemical control reagent phytase Q9 was used to regulate the shading treatments (the original solution was diluted by 100 times) and the CK exogenously, namely shading at flowering to maturity stage-phytase Q9 (S₁Q), shading at ear stage-phytase Q9 (S₂Q), and shading at whole growth stage-phytase Q9 (S₃Q), and natural lighting-phytase Q9 (CKQ), with spraying water at the same stage as the control. The results showed that leaf area index (LAI), soil-plant analysis development (SPAD) value and net photosynthetic rate of summer maize was significantly reduced by shading, which led to decreases of yield. The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) in ear-leaf decreased. The content of malondialdehyde (MDA) and free proline increased, and that of soluble protein decreased. The spraying phytase Q9 significantly increased LAI, SPAD and net photosynthetic rate in S₃Q and S₂Q. MDA and free proline content in S₃Q, S₂Q, and S₁Q were significantly decreased, and soluble protein content and POD activity was significantly increased. SOD and CAT activities in S₂Q and S₃Q were significantly increased. The yield of S₃Q, S₂Q and S₁Q were 19%, 8% and 7% higher than that of S₃, S₂ and S₁ respectively. There was no significant difference between CKQ and CK. In conclusion, phytase Q9 could effectively alleviate the negative impact of low light on yield formation of summer maize, and increase grain yield by improving photosynthetic capacity of leaves and delaying leaf senescence.

Key words: shade, summer maize, phytase Q9, senescence characteristics

HUANG Xin-hui, REN Bai-zhao, ZHAO Bin, LIU Peng, ZHANG Ji-wang. Effects of phytase Q9 on the yield and senescence characteristics of summer maize shaded in the field[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(10): 3433-3444.

References

[1] Wu LJ, Tian L, Wang SX, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of the response of maize (Zea mays L.) leaves to long photoperiod condition. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 752
[2] Chandra B, Howard G. Acclimation of C4 metabolism to low light in mature maize leaves could limit energetic losses during progressive shading in a crop canopy. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014, 65: 3725-3736
[3] 刘仲发, 勾玲, 赵明, 等. 遮荫对玉米茎秆形态特征、穿刺强度及抗倒伏能力的影响. 华北农学报, 2011, 26(4): 91-96 [Liu Z-F, Gou L, Zhao M, et al. Effects of shading on stalk morphological characteristics, rind penetration strength and lodging-resistance of maize. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2011, 26(4): 91-96]
[4] 吴亚男, 朱海燕, 张春玲, 等. 遮阴对春玉米物质生产及产量形成的影响. 玉米科学, 2015, 23(1): 97-102 [Wu Y-N, Zhu H-Y, Zhang C-L, et al. Effect of shading on dry matter accumulation and yield of maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2015, 23(1): 97-102]
[5] 王富贵, 于晓芳, 高聚林, 等. 不同类型玉米品种冠层结构及其光合特性对深松增密的响应. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2019, 47(2): 33-44 [Wang F-G, Yu X-F, Gao J-L, et al. Response of ca-nopy structure and photosynthetic characteristics of different maize varieties to subsoilng tillage and increasing density. Journal of Northwest A&F University: Natural Science, 2019, 47(2): 33-44]
[6] 陶苏林, 戚易明, 申双和, 等. 中国1981—2014年太阳总辐射的时空变化. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(11): 143-147 [Tao S-L, Qi Y-M, Shen S-H, et al. The spatial and temporal variation of solar radiation over China from 1981 to 2014. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(11): 143-147]
[7] 孙富, 杨丽涛, 谢晓娜, 等. 低温胁迫对不同抗寒性甘蔗品种幼苗叶绿体生理代谢的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(4): 732-739 [Sun F, Yang L-T, Xie X-N, et al. Effect of chilling stress on physiological metabolism in chloroplasts of seedlings of sugarcane varieties with different chilling resistance. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(4): 732-739]
[8] 李璇, 岳红, 王升, 等. 影响植物抗氧化酶活性的因素及其研究热点和现状. 中国中药杂志, 2013, 38(7): 973-978 [Li X, Yue H, Wang S, et al. Research of different effects on activity of plant antioxidant enzymes. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2013, 38(7): 973-978]
[9] 李潮海, 赵亚丽, 王群, 等. 遮光对不同基因型玉米叶片衰老和产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2005, 13(4): 70-73 [Li C-H, Zhao Y-L , Wang Q, et al. Effects of shading on the senescence of leaves and yield of different genotype maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2005, 13(4): 70-73]
[10] 牛丽, 潘利文, 王彦坡, 等. 不同基因型玉米根系对弱光胁迫的生理响应. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(2): 69-76 [Niu L, Pan L-W, Wang Y-P, et al. Physiological response of the roots of two different genotypic maize under shade stress. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(2): 69-76]
[11] 詹静, 王秀萍, 杜子璇, 等. 花期弱光持续时间对玉米果穗发育及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(2): 145-150 [Zhan J, Wang X-P, Du Z-X, et al. Effects of low light duration since tasselling on maize ear development and yield. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2017, 32(2): 145-150]
[12] Li JY, Khan ZU, Tao XY, et al. Effects of exogenous auxin on pigments and primary metabolite profile of postharvest tomato fruit during ripening. Scientia Horticulturae, 2017, 219: 90-97
[13] Jiang C, Zu C, Lu D, et al. Effect of exogenous sele-nium supply on photosynthesis, Na⁺ accumulation and antioxidative capacity of maize (Zea mays L.) under salinity stress. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 42039
[14] 田晓东, 边大红, 蔡丽君, 等. 高密条件下化学调控对夏玉米抗茎倒伏能力的影响. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(suppl.1): 249-254 [Tian X-D, Bian D-H, Cai L-J, et al. Effect of chemical regulation on stalk lodging resistance of high-density summer maize. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2014, 29(suppl.1): 249-254]
[15] 闫慧萍, 彭云玲, 赵小强, 等. 外源24-表油菜素内酯对逆境胁迫下玉米种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响. 核农学报, 2016, 30(5): 988-996 [Yan H-P, Peng Y-L, Zhao X-Q, et al. Effect of exogenous 24-epibrassino-lide on seed germination and seedling growth of maize under different stress. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 30(5): 988-996]
[16] 庞强强, 孙光闻, 蔡兴来, 等. 硝酸盐胁迫下黄腐酸对小白菜活性氧代谢及相关基因表达的影响. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(17): 5812-5820 [Pang Q-Q, Sun G-W, Cai X-L, et al. Effects of fulvic acid on reactive oxygen metabolism and related gene expression in pakchoi under NO₃^- stress. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(17): 5812-5820]
[17] 张彩凤, 吴云彬, 宋珍. 黄腐酸促进超氧化物歧化酶形成的作用机制探究. 腐植酸, 2017(3): 56-62 [Zhang C-F, Wu Y-B, Song Z. A preliminary study on the mechanism of formation of superoxide dismutase affected by fulvic acid. Humic Acid, 2017(3): 56-62]
[18] Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dismutases. Ⅰ. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiology, 1977, 59: 309-314
[19] Durner J, Klessing DF. Salicylic acid is a modulator of tobacco and mammalian catalases. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1996, 271: 28492-28502
[20] Hammerschmidt R, Nuckles EM, Kuc J. Association of enhanced peroxidase activity with induced systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrchum lagenarium. Physiological Plant Pathology, 1982, 20: 73-82
[21] 付中香, 范秀蒙, 史冬燕. 低温胁迫下2种羽衣甘蓝叶片中渗透物质含量比较. 现代农业科技, 2019(24): 33-34 [Fu Z-X, Fan X-M, Shi D-Y. Comparison of osmotic substance contents in leaves of two varieties of kale under low temperature stress. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(24): 33-34]
[22] 陈杰忠, 徐春香, 梁立峰. 低温对香蕉叶片中蛋白质及脯氨酸的影响. 华南农业大学学报, 1999, 20(3): 54-58 [Chen J-Z, Xu C-X, Liang L-F. Effect of low temperature on protein and proline in banana (Musa spp.) leaves. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 1999, 20(3): 54-58]
[23] 任佰朝, 张吉旺, 李霞, 等. 大田淹水对夏玉米叶片衰老特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(4): 1022-1028 [Ren B-Z, Zhang J-W, Li X, et al. Effect of waterlogging on leaf senescence characteristics of summer maize in the field. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(4): 1022-1028]
[24] 王玉莲, 杜震宇, 童淑媛. 玉米叶片自然衰老过程中光合特性变化的研究进展. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2010, 22(2): 12-14 [Wang Y-L, Du Z-Y, Tong S-Y. Research advance on the changes of photosynthetic characteristics in naturally senescence of maize leaves. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2010, 22(2): 12-14]
[25] 张吉旺, 董树亭, 王空军, 等. 大田遮荫对夏玉米光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33(2): 216-222 [Zhang J-W, Dong S-T, Wang K-J, et al. Effects of shading in field on photosynthetic characteristics in summer corn. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(2): 216-222]
[26] 崔海岩, 靳立斌, 李波, 等. 大田遮阴对夏玉米光合特性和叶黄素循环的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39(3): 478-485 [Cui H-Y, Jin L-B, Li B, et al. Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics and xanthophyll cycle of summer maize in the field. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013, 39(3): 478-485]
[27] 杨虎, 戈长水, 应武, 等. 遮荫对水稻冠层叶片SPAD值及光合、形态特性参数的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(3): 580-587 [Yang H, Ge C-S, Ying W, et al. Effect of shading on leaf SPAD values and the characteristics of photosynthesis and morphology of rice canopy. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2014, 20(3): 580-587]
[28] Zhang YJ, Zhou QL, Li YM, et al. Effects of fulvic acid on agronomic traits and yield of autumn potato. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2017, 18: 1448-1451
[29] 杜成凤, 李潮海, 刘天学, 等. 遮荫对两个基因型玉米叶片解剖结构及光合特性的影响. 生态学报, 2011, 31(21): 6633-6640 [Du C-F, Li C-H, Liu T-X, et al. Response of anatomical structure and photosynthetic characteristics to low light stress in leaves of different maize genotypes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(21): 6633-6640]
[30] 高佳, 崔海岩, 史建国, 等. 花粒期光照对夏玉米光合特性和叶绿体超微结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3): 883-890 [Gao J, Cui H-Y, Shi J-G, et al. Effects of light intensities after anthesis on the photosynthetic characteristics and chloroplast ultrastructure in mesophyll cell of summer maize (Zea mays L.). Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(3): 883-890]
[31] 黄鑫慧, 高佳, 任佰朝, 等. 植酶Q9对大田遮阴夏玉米产量形成的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(19): 3309-3322 [Huang X-H, Gao J, Ren B-Z, et al. Effects of phytase Q9 on yield formation of summer maize shading in the field. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(19): 3309-3322]
[32] 亓艳艳, 骆洪义, 公华锐, 等. 黄腐酸对基质栽培番茄生长、产量及品质的影响. 山东农业科学, 2018, 50(5): 87-91 [Qi Y-Y, Luo H-Y, Gong H-R, et al. Effects of fulvic acid treatments on development, yield and quality of tomato in substrate culture. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 50(5): 87-91]
[33] 彭玲, 刘晓霞, 何流, 等. 不同黄腐酸用量对‘红将军’苹果产量、品质和¹⁵N-尿素去向的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(5): 1412-1420 [Peng L, Liu X-X, He L, et al. Effects of different fulvic acid application rates on fruit yield, quality and fate of ¹⁵N-urea in ‘Red General’ apple. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(5): 1412-1420]