Variations and drivers of zooplankton community β diversity in the Yangtze River Estuary

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202606.037

Abstract

Abstract: To investigate the spatiotemporal patterns of zooplankton community β diversity and reveal the environmental driving mechanisms in the Yangtze River Estuary, we analyzed the structure of the zooplankton community and β diversity and its components based on the survey data of the Yangtze River Estuary and adjacent waters in spring and autumn of 2020-2021. We further explored the effects of environmental factors and spatial distance on the formation of β diversity patterns by using the Mantel test and the generalized dissimilarity model (GDM). A total of 99 zooplankton species were recorded. Among all the species, 40 species were copepods, accounting for 40.4% of the total species, and were the dominant group. The abundance values were higher in spring than in autumn, and the abundance distribution in spring exhibited a trend of higher in nearshore areas and lower in offshore areas, while the abundance distribution in autumn showed significant spatial heterogeneity. Sinocalanus sinensis, Schmackeria poplesia, Tortanus vermiculus, and Sinocalanus dorrii had relatively high occurrence frequencies at all the stations. Turnover components dominated the zooplankton community β diversity in both spring and autumn, indicating that species replacement was the main source of community variations. The mean value of β diversity (0.639 vs 0.519) and the contribution rate of the turnover component (78.1% vs 70.5%) in spring were both higher than those in autumn. The results of Mantel test showed that spatial distance and salinity were the key factors influencing β diversity and its turnover component of zooplankton communities, suggesting that both diffusion limitation and salinity gradient jointly driving the spatial differentiation of the community. The GDM model revealed that the community construction in spring was jointly influenced by environmental selection and diffusion limitation, with salinity, pH, and inorganic nitrogen being the main environmental contributing factors, with contribution rates of 31.7%, 18.4%, and 8.3% respectively. In autumn, environmental selection played a dominant role, with the influence of salinity and active phosphate being relatively higher, with contribution rates of 50.2% and 18.0% respectively.

Key words: Yangtze River Estuary, zooplankton, β diversity, environmental factor, generalized dissimilarity modeling

WU Fan, YU Songning, SHI Liyan, CHAO Min. Variations and drivers of zooplankton community β diversity in the Yangtze River Estuary[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2026, 37(6): 2031-2040.

References

[1] 李立群, 王艳, 王彪, 等. 2009—2021年夏季长江口海域浮游生物群落结构时空分布特征及其影响因素研究. 环境科学研究, 2024, 37(2): 233-245
[2] 李立群. 长江口海域浮游生物群落结构特征及其影响因素研究. 硕士论文. 沈阳: 沈阳大学, 2024
[3] 杨位迪, 郑连明, 李伟巍, 等. 长江口邻近海域夏季大中型浮游动物物种多样性、年际变化及其影响因素. 厦门大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 57(4): 517-525
[4] Rosas RS, Azevedo-Cutrim ACG, Cutrim MVJ, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of zooplankton community in an eutrophicated tropical estuary. Aquatic Sciences, 2024, 86: 102-102
[5] 徐念, 熊美华, 邵科, 等. 长江中下游环境DNA宏条形码生物多样性检测技术初步研究. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(5): 1187-1196
[6] Socolar JB, Gilroy JJ, Kunin WE, et al. How should beta-diversity inform biodiversity conservation? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2016, 31: 67-80
[7] Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. Journal of Animal Ecology, 1943, 12: 42-58
[8] Koleff P, Gaston KJ, Lennon JJ. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2003, 72: 367-382
[9] Legendre P, De Cáceres M. Beta diversity as the variance of community data: Dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecology letters, 2013, 16: 951-963
[10] Fu H, Yuan GX, Jeppesen E, et al. Local and regional drivers of turnover and nestedness components of species and functional beta diversity in lake macrophyte communities in China. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 687: 206-217
[11] Andrés B. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2010, 19: 134-143
[12] Boschilia SM, de Oliveira EF, Schwarzbold A. Partitioning beta diversity of aquatic macrophyte assemblages in a large subtropical reservoir: Prevalence of turnover or nestedness? Aquatic Sciences, 2016, 78: 615-625
[13] Bergamin RS, Bastazini VAG, Vélez-Martin E, et al. Linking beta diversity patterns to protected areas: Lessons from the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. Biodiversity Conservation, 2017, 26: 1557-1568
[14] 国家海洋标准计量中心. 海洋调查规范第6部分: 海洋生物调查: GB/T 12763.6—2007. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007
[15] 全国海洋标准化技术委员会. 海洋监测规范第4部分: 海水分析: GB 17378.4—2007. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007
[16] 徐兆礼, 陈亚瞿. 东黄海秋季浮游动物优势种聚集强度与鲐鲹渔场的关系. 生态学杂志, 1989, 8(4): 13-15, 19
[17] Baselga A, Orme CDL. Betapart: An R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2012, 3: 808-812
[18] 杨玉澍, 李茵茵, 宋晨, 等. 瓯江口春秋两季大型底栖动物群落β多样性格局及其驱动因素分析. 海洋与湖沼, 2024, 55(6): 1478-1487
[19] 戴美霞, 朱艺峰, 林霞, 等. 象山港浮游动物 β 多样性及其成分变化的环境因子解释. 生态学报, 2017, 37(17): 5780-5789
[20] 朱艺峰, 戴美霞, 周晓红, 等. 环境因子对国华电厂温排水海域浮游动物群落β多样性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(8): 2543-2552
[21] 邵倩文, 刘镇盛, 章菁, 等. 长江口及邻近海域浮游动物群落结构及季节变化. 生态学报, 2017, 37(2): 683-691
[22] 郭沛涌, 沈焕庭, 刘阿成, 等. 长江河口中小型浮游动物数量分布、变动及主要影响因素. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8): 3517-3526
[23] 杨阳阳, 杨杰青, 王云龙, 等. 长江口浮游动物群落结构时空变化特征研究. 海洋渔业, 2023, 45(4): 447-459
[24] 徐兆礼. 长江口邻近水域浮游动物群落特征及变动趋势. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(7): 780-784
[25] 徐兆礼, 王云龙, 陈亚瞿, 等. 长江口最大浑浊带区浮游动物的生态研究. 中国水产科学, 1995, 2(1): 39-48
[26] Silva NJ, Lansac-Tôha FM, Lansac-Tôha FA. Environmental, spatial, and temporal drivers of multiple facets of beta diversity from a zooplankton metacommunity in two tropical urbanized rivers. Limnologica, 2024, 107: 126185
[27] Gutierrez MF, Epele LB, Mayora G, et al. Hydro-climatic changes promote shifts in zooplankton composition and diversity in wetlands of the Lower Paraná River Delta. Hydrobiologia, 2022, 849: 3463-3480
[28] Barros F, Blanchet H, Hammerstrom K, et al. A framework for investigating general patterns of benthic β-diversity along estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2014, 149: 223-231
[29] Liu P, Xu SL, Lin JH, et al. Urbanization increases biotic homogenization of zooplankton communities in tropical reservoirs. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 110: 105899
[30] Nekola JC, White PS. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. Journal of Biogeography, 1999, 26: 867-878
[31] 杨阳阳. 长江河口典型浮游动物群落时空变动及其主要驱动因素研究. 硕士论文. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2022
[32] Elliott M, McLusky DS. The need for definitions in understanding estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2002, 55: 815-827
[33] 徐兆礼. 中国近海浮游动物多样性研究的过去和未来. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(6): 635-645
[34] 高原, 赖子尼, 李捷, 等. 连江浮游动物多样性的空间分布. 生物多样性, 2013, 21(6): 699-708
[35] 周淑青, 沈志良, 李峥, 等. 长江口最大浑浊带及邻近水域营养盐的分布特征. 海洋科学, 2007, 31(6): 34-42
[36] 师艳丽, 张依章, 闫祯, 等. 天津市近岸海域秋季浮游动物群落结构与环境因子相关性. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(6): 1995-2001