Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 837-843.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.024
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Yan-ge1*, ZHANG Bo-ran1, ZHAO Rui2
Received:
2021-08-10
Accepted:
2021-11-04
Online:
2022-03-15
Published:
2022-09-15
WANG Yan-ge, ZHANG Bo-ran, ZHAO Rui. Influence of species interaction on species distribution simulation and modeling methods.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(3): 837-843.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjae.net/EN/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.024
[1] | Pulliam HR. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters, 2000, 3: 349-361 |
[2] | Hengl T, Sierdsema H, Radovi A, et al. Spatial prediction of species' distributions from occurrence-only records: Combining point pattern analysis, ENFA and regression-kriging. Ecological Modelling, 2009, 220: 3499-3511 |
[3] | Busby JR. BIOCLIM-A bioclimate analysis and prediction system. Plant Protection Quarterly, 1991, 6: 8-9 |
[4] | Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, et al. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 2005, 25: 1965-1978 |
[5] | Karger DN, Conrad O, Böhner J, et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth's land surface areas. Scientific Data, 2016, 4: 170122 |
[6] | 宗敏, 韩广轩, 栗云召, 等. 基于MaxEnt模型的黄河三角洲滨海湿地优势植物群落潜在分布模拟. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6): 1833-1842 |
[7] | Schliep EM, Lany NK, Zarnetske PL, et al. Joint species distribution modelling for spatio-temporal occurrence and ordinal abundance data. Global Ecology and Biogeo-graphy, 2018, 27: 142-155 |
[8] | 沈涛, 张霁, 申仕康, 等. 西南地区红花龙胆分布格局模拟与气候变化影响评价. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2499-2508 |
[9] | Anderson BJ, Arroyo BE, Collingham YC, et al. Using distribution models to test alternative hypotheses about a species' environmental limits and recovery prospects. Biological Conservation, 2009, 142: 488-499 |
[10] | 武晓宇, 董世魁, 刘世梁, 等. 基于MaxEnt模型的三江源区草地濒危保护植物热点区识别. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(2): 138-148 |
[11] | 张爱平, 王毅, 熊勤犁, 等. 末次间冰期以来3种云杉属植物的历史分布变迁及避难所. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(7): 2411-2421 |
[12] | 张殷波, 刘彦岚, 秦浩, 等. 气候变化条件下山西翅果油树适宜分布区的空间迁移预测. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(2): 496-502 |
[13] | Mateo RG, Broennimann O, Normand S, et al. The mossy north: An inverse latitudinal diversity gradient in European bryophytes. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 25546, DOI: 10.1038/srep25546 |
[14] | Guisan A, Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 2005, 8: 993-1009 |
[15] | Dubuis A, Giovanettina S, Pellissier L, et al. Improving the prediction of plant species distribution and community composition by adding edaphic to topo-climatic variables. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2013, 24: 593-606 |
[16] | Condita R, Engelbrechta BMJ, Pinob D, et al. Species distributions in response to individual soil nutrients and seasonal drought across a community of tropical trees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110: 5064-5068 |
[17] | Summers DM, Bryan BA, Crossman ND, et al. Species vulnerability to climate change: Impacts on spatial conservation priorities and species representation. Global Change Biology, 2012, 18: 2335-2348 |
[18] | Scoble J, Lowe AJ. A case for incorporating phylogeography and landscape genetics into species distribution modelling approaches to improve climate adaptation and conservation planning. Diversity & Distributions, 2010, 16: 343-353 |
[19] | Hosseini SZ, Kappas M, Chahouki MAZ, et al. Modelling potential habitats for Artemisia sieberi and Artemisia aucheri in Poshtkouh area, central Iran using the maximum entropy model and geostatistics. Ecological Informatics, 2013, 18: 61-68 |
[20] | Titeux N, Henle K, Mihoub JB, et al. Biodiversity scenarios neglect future land-use changes. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22: 2505-2515 |
[21] | Urban MC, Bocedi G, Hendry AP, et al. Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science, 2016, 353: aad8466, DOI: 10.1126/science.aad8466 |
[22] | Davis AJ, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH, et al. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature, 1998, 391: 783-786 |
[23] | Gomes VHF, Ijff SD, Raes N, et al. Species Distribution Modelling: Contrasting presence-only models with plot abundance data. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8:1003, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18927-1 |
[24] | Wisz MS, Pottier J, Kissling WD, et al. The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: Implications for species distribution modelling. Biological Reviews, 2013, 88: 15-30 |
[25] | Guisan A, Rahbek C. SESAM: A new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio-temporal patterns of species assemblages. Journal of Biogeography, 2011, 38: 1433-1444 |
[26] | Araújo MB, Luoto M. The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2007, 16: 743-753 |
[27] | Baselga A, Araújo MB. Do community-level models describe community variation effectively? Journal of Biogeography, 2010, 37: 1842-1850 |
[28] | Meier ES, Kienast F, Pearman PB, et al. Biotic & abiotic variables show little redundancy in explaining tree species distributions. Ecography, 2010, 33: 1038-1048 |
[29] | Bakkenes M, Alkemade R, Ihle F, et al. Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biology, 2002, 8: 390-407 |
[30] | Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Virkkala R, et al. Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2007, 16: 754-763 |
[31] | Leathwick JR, Austin MP. Competitive interactions between tree species in New Zealand old-growth indigenous forests. Ecology, 2001, 82: 2560-2573 |
[32] | Pellissier L, Bråthen KA, Pottier J, et al. Species distribution models reveal apparent competitive and facilitative effects of a dominant species on the distribution of tundra plants. Ecography, 2010, 33: 1004-1014 |
[33] | Kissling WD, Dormann CF, Groeneveld J, et al. Towards novel approaches to modelling biotic interactions in multispecies assemblages at large spatial extents. Journal of Biogeography, 2012, 39: 2163-2178 |
[34] | Lany NK, Zarnetske PL, Gouhier TC, et al. Incorporating context dependency of species interactions in species distribution models. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2017, 57: 159-167 |
[35] | Suttle KB, Thomsen MA, Power ME. Species interactions reverse grassland responses to changing climate. Science, 2007, 315: 640-642 |
[36] | Mpakairi KS, Ndaimani H, Tagwireyi P, et al. Missing in action: Species competition is a neglected predictor variable in species distribution modeling. PLoS One, 2017, 12(7): e0181088 |
[37] | Araújo MB, Guisan A. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography, 2006, 33: 1677-1688 |
[38] | Schurr FM, Pagel J, Cabral JS, et al. How to understand species' niches and range dynamics: A demographic research agenda for biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 2012, 39: 2146-2162 |
[39] | Warton DI, Blanchet FG, O'Hara RB, et al. So many variables: Joint modeling in community ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2015, 30: 766-779 |
[40] | Lany NK, Zarnetske PL, Finley AO, et al. Complementary strengths of spatially-explicit and multi-species distribution models. Ecography, 2020, 43: 456-466 |
[41] | Thompson PR, Fagan WF, Staniczenko PPA. Predictor species: Improving assessments of rare species occurrence by modeling environmental co-responses. Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 10: 3293-3304 |
[42] | Mod HK, le Roux PC, Guisan A, et al. Biotic interactions boost spatial models of species richness. Ecography, 2015, 38: 913-921 |
[43] | le Roux PC, Virtanen R, Heikkinen RK, et al. Biotic interactions affect the elevational ranges of high-latitude plant species. Ecography, 2012, 35: 1048-1056 |
[44] | le Roux PC, Pellissier L, Wisz MS, et al. Incorporating dominant species as proxies for biotic interactions strengthens plant community models. Journal of Ecology, 2014, 102: 767-775 |
[45] | Kissling WD, Field R, Korntheuer H, et al. Woody plants and the prediction of climate-change impacts on bird diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2010, 365: 2035-2045 |
[46] | le Roux PC, Lenoir J, Pellissier L, et al. Horizontal, but not vertical, biotic interactions affect fine-scale plant distribution patterns in a low energy system. Ecology, 2013, 94: 671-682 |
[47] | Singer A, Schweiger O, Kühn I, et al. Constructing a hybrid species distribution model from standard large-scale distribution data. Ecological Modelling, 2018, 373: 39-52 |
[48] | Schweiger O, Settele J, Kudrna O, et al. Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology, 2008, 89: 3472-3479 |
[49] | Schweiger O, Heikkinen RK, Harpke A, et al. Increasing range mismatching of interacting species under global change is related to their ecological characteristics. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2012, 21: 88-99 |
[50] | Meier ES, Lischke H, Schmatz DR, et al. Climate, competition and connectivity affect future migration and ranges of European trees. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2011, 21: 164-178 |
[51] | Godsoe W, Franklin J, Blanchet FG. Effects of biotic interactions on modeled species' distribution can be masked by environmental gradients. Ecology and Evolution, 2016, 7: 654-664 |
[52] | Gavish Y, Marsh CJ, Kuemmerlen M, et al. Accounting for biotic interactions through alpha-diversity constraints in stacked species distribution models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2017, 8: 1092-1102 |
[53] | Leach K, Montgomery WI, Reid N. Modelling the influence of biotic factors on species distribution patterns. Ecological Modelling, 2016, 337: 96-106 |
[54] | Henderson EB, Ohmann JL, Gregory MJ, et al. Species distribution modelling for plant communities: Stacked single species or multivariate modelling approaches? Applied Vegetation Science, 2014, 17: 516-527 |
[55] | Clark JS, Gelfand AE, Woodall CW, et al. More than the sum of the parts: Forest climate response from joint species distribution models. Ecological Applications, 2014, 24: 990-999 |
[56] | Wilkinson DP, Golding N, Guillera-Arroita G, et al. Defining and evaluating predictions of joint species distribution models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 12: 394-404 |
[57] | Thorson JT, Scheuerell MD, Shelton AO, et al. Spatial factor analysis: A new tool for estimating joint species distributions and correlations in species range. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2015, 6: 627-637 |
[58] | Thorson JT, Pinsky ML, Ward EJ. Model-based inference for estimating shifts in species distribution, area occupied, and center of gravity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2016, 7: 990-1002 |
[59] | Tikhonov G, Abrego N, Dunson D, et al. Using joint species distribution models for evaluating how species-to-species associations depend on the environmental context. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2017, 8: 443-452 |
[1] | XING Yankuo, KANG Bin, LU Zhichuang, GAO Xianggang, WANG Zhen, TIAN Jiashen. Suitable habitat of Lepidochelys olivacea and the changes under climate change [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(8): 2267-2273. |
[2] | LIU Zun-lei, YANG Lin-lin, YUAN Xing-wei, JIN Yan, YAN Li-ping, CHENG Jia-hua. Overwintering distribution and its environmental determinants of small yellow croaker based on ensemble habitat suitability modeling [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(6): 2076-2086. |
[3] | ZHANG Ai-ping, WANG Yi, XIONG Qin-li, WU Xiao-gang, SUN Xiao-ming, HUANG Yan-meng, ZHANG Lin, PAN Kai-wen. Distribution changes and refugia of three spruce taxa since the last interglacial. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(7): 2411-2421. |
[4] | ZHU Yuan-jun, SHAN Dan, ZHANG Xiao, LIU Yan-shu, SHI Zhong-jie, YANG Xiao-hui. Advances in joint species distribution models to reveal community structure and its environmental response [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(12): 4217-4225. |
[5] | BAI Wen-lian, ZHANG Meng-yao, REN Jia-bing, TANG Li, ZHENG Yi, XIAO Jing-xiu. Simulation of crop growth curve and analysis of interspecific interaction in wheat and faba bean intercropping system [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(12): 4037-4046. |
[6] | SHEN Tao, ZHANG Ji, SHEN Shi-kang, ZHAO Yan-li, WANG Yuan-zhong. Distribution simulation of Gentiana rhodantha in Southwest China and assessment of climate change impact [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(8): 2499-2508. |
[7] | YANG Xiao-long, YANG Chao-jie, HU Cheng-ye, ZHANG Xiu-mei. Application of species distribution models in the prediction of marine potential habitat: A review [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(6): 2063-2072. |
[8] | LUO Mei, WANG Hao, LYU Zhi. Evaluating the performance of species distribution models Biomod2 and MaxEnt using the giant panda distribution data [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(12): 4001-4006. |
[9] | GAO Bei, HU Ning, GUO Yan-long, GU Wei, ZOU Ji-ye. Comparison of the potential geographical distribution of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) predicted by different models. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(10): 3331-3340. |
[10] | YU Hai-bin1,2, ZHANG Yi-li1, LI Shi-cheng1,2, QI Wei1,2, HU Zhong-jun1,2. Predicting the dispersal routes of alpine plant Pedicularis longiflora (Orobanchaceae) based on GIS and species distribution models. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(6): 1669-1673. |
[11] | . Monopolization of honeydew sources by Crematogaster macaoensis and its effects on lac production. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(01): 229-234. |
[12] | LI Hai-bo1,2; KONG Chui-hua1. Changes of microbial biomass carbon and enzyme activities in rice-barnyard grass coexisted soils. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(10): 2234-2238 . |
[13] | WANG Peng, LIANG Wenju, KONG Chuihua, JIANG Yong, ZHANG Maoxin, ZHANG Chaoxian . Chemical mechanism of exotic weed invasion [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, (4): 707-711. |
[14] | WANG Peng, LIANG Wenju, KONG Chuihua, JIANG Yong, ZHANG Maoxin, ZHANG Chaoxian . Chemical mechanism of exotic weed invasion [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, (4): 707-711. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||