福建安溪县乡镇土地生态系统服务价值的演变机制

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202110.011

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 4457-4466.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202110.011

福建安溪县乡镇土地生态系统服务价值的演变机制

江文甲¹, 林满红², 翁佩莹², 魏道智³, 林文雄³, 苏凯^1*

¹福建农林大学安溪茶学院, 福建泉州 362400;
²福建农林大学农学院, 福州 350002;
³福建农林大学生命科学学院, 福州 350002

收稿日期:2021-03-08 修回日期:2021-06-15 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2022-06-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: sukai51618@163.com
作者简介:江文甲, 男, 1987年生, 博士。主要从事生态资源评价。E-mail: jiangwenjia23@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300508)和福建省自然科学基金项目(2018J01652)资助

Evolution mechanism of ecosystem service value at the township-scale in Anxi County of Fujian Province, China

JIANG Wen-jia¹, LIN Man-hong², WENG Pei-ying², WEI Dao-zhi³, LIN Wen-xiong³, SU Kai^1*

¹Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362400, Fujian, China;
²College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
³College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China

Received:2021-03-08 Revised:2021-06-15 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2022-06-15
Contact: *E-mail: sukai51618@163.com
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFD0300508) and the National Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (2018J01652)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了厘清土地利用变化与生态系统服务之间的互作关系,本研究采用生物量因子和社会经济因子调整系数修正传统生态系统服务价值评估模型,对1999—2019年安溪县所属24个乡镇生态系统服务价值(ESV)进行评估,探究其对土地利用变化的生态响应。结果表明: 研究期间,安溪县24个乡镇ESV呈整建制递减,减幅为0.004～0.295亿元;林地和耕地对ESV的贡献率最大,其次为草地和水域,其余地类对ESV的贡献为负值;将其他地类转变为林地可提高ESV,而转变为园地面积(主要是茶园面积)则导致ESV降低。采用化肥单一化宿根栽培管理茶园导致ESV降低,而茶园生态栽培能有效提高茶园土壤微生物多样性,改善土壤肥力,提高ESV。

关键词: 茶园, 土地利用, 生态系统服务价值, 通径分析, 土地退化

Abstract: To clarify the interaction between land-use change and ecosystem service, the traditional ecosystem service valuation model was modified using the adjustment coefficients of biomass factor and socio-economic factor to evaluate ecosystem service value (ESV) of 24 towns in Anxi County from 1999 to 2019, aiming to understand the ecological response to land-use change. The results showed that ESV of 24 towns in Anxi County decreased gradually during the study period, with a decrease of 0.004 to 0.295 million yuan. Forestland and cultivated land made the largest contribution to ESV, followed by grassland and water bodies, whereas the contribution of other land types were negative. ESV could be increased by converting other land types into forestland, but be decreased by converting other land types into orchard land area (mainly tea plantation). The chemical fertilizer-monoculture management pattern of ratooning tea plantation reduced ESV, while the ecological cultivation of tea plantation could effectively improve soil microbial diversity and soil fertility, and finally enhance ESV.

Key words: tea plantation, land use, ecosystem service value, path analysis, land degradation

江文甲, 林满红, 翁佩莹, 魏道智, 林文雄, 苏凯. 福建安溪县乡镇土地生态系统服务价值的演变机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12): 4457-4466.

JIANG Wen-jia, LIN Man-hong, WENG Pei-ying, WEI Dao-zhi, LIN Wen-xiong, SU Kai. Evolution mechanism of ecosystem service value at the township-scale in Anxi County of Fujian Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(12): 4457-4466.

参考文献

[1] Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-560
[2] Daily GC. Nature’s Services. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1997
[3] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Ecosystems and Well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005
[4] 许丁雪, 吴芳, 何立环, 等. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响——以张家口-承德地区为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7493-7501 [Xu D-X, Wu F, He L-H, et al. Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: Case study of the Zhangjiakou-Chengde area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7493-7501]
[5] Lele S, Springate-Baginski O, Lakerveld R, et al. Ecosystem services: Origins, contributions, pitfalls, and alternatives. Conservation and Society, 2013, 4: 343-358
[6] Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TKE, et al. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2007, 1: 67-98
[7] Farley J, Costanza R. Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 2060-2068
[8] Farley J, Voinov A. Economics, socio-ecological resi-lience and ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 2: 389-398
[9] Grimsrud KAKG, Graesse MA, Lindhjem HA. Using the generalised Q method in ecological economics: A better way to capture representative values and perspectives in ecosystem service management. Ecological Economics, 2020, 170: 106588
[10] Mosammam HM, Nia JT, Khani H, et al. Monitoring land use change and measuring urban sprawl based on its spatial forms. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2017, 20: 103-116
[11] 赵文武, 刘月, 冯强, 等. 人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(1): 139-151 [Zhao W-W, Liu Y, Feng Q, et al. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37 (1): 139-151]
[12] 欧阳志云, 王如松, 赵景柱. 生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(5): 635-639 [Ouyang Z-Y, Wang R-S, Zhao J-Z. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999, 10(5): 635-639]
[13] 欧阳志云, 郑华. 生态系统服务的生态学机制研究进展. 生态学报, 2009, 29(11): 6183-6188 [Ouyang Z-Y, Zheng H. Ecological mechanisms of ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(11): 6183-6188]
[14] 傅伯杰, 张立伟. 土地利用变化与生态系统服务: 概念、方法与进展. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(4): 441-446 [Fu B-J, Zhang L-W. Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(4): 441-446]
[15] 傅伯杰, 于丹丹. 生态系统服务权衡与集成方法. 资源科学, 2016, 38(1): 1-9 [Fu B-J, Yu D-D. Trade-off analyses and synthetic integrated method of multiple ecosystem services. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1): 1-9]
[16] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 189-196 [Xie G-D, Lu C-X, Leng Y-F, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003, 18(2): 189-196]
[17] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919 [Xie G-D, Zhen L, Lu C-X, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919]
[18] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254 [Xie G-D, Zhang C-X, Zhang L-M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8): 1243-1254]
[19] 李怡, 郭力宇, 温豪. 陕西渭北旱源区土地利用与生态系统服务价值变化——以陇县为例. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(1): 368-373 [Li Y, Guo L-Y, Wen H. Dynamic changes of land use and ecosystem service values in the Arid-Highland, North of Weihe River in Shaanxi Province: A case study of the Long County. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(1): 368-373]
[20] Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, et al. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biology, 2006, 4(11): e379
[21] Rodríguez JP, Beard JTD, Bennett EM, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 28
[22] 李双成, 张才玉, 刘金龙, 等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题. 地理研究, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390 [Li S-C, Zhang C-Y, Liu J-L, et al. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390]
[23] Liu L. A sustainability index with attention to environmental justice for eco-city classification and assessment. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 85: 904-914
[24] Su K, Wei DZ, Lin WX. Evaluation of ecosystem ser-vices value and its implications for policy making in China: A case study of Fujian Province. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 108: 105752
[25] 马帅, 程浩, 林晨, 等. 江淮生态经济区土地利用景观格局时空变化. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(1): 292-299 [Ma S, Cheng H, Lin C, et al. Spatiotemporal changes of land use and landscape pattern in Jianghuai Ecological Economic Zone. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(1): 292-299]
[26] 唐丽芳. 福建省安溪县山地茶园水土流失现状及防治对策. 亚热带水土保持, 2017, 29(2): 29-31 [Tang L-F. Soil and water loss of tea plantation in Anxi County of Fujian Province and its countermeasures. Subtropical Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 29(2): 29-31]
[27] 吴思颖, 汪小钦, 曾舒娇, 等. 基于CSLE的安溪县土壤侵蚀估算与分析. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(4): 112-121 [Wu S-Y, Wang X-Q, Zeng S-J, et al. Estimation and analysis of soil erosion in Anxi County based on CSLE. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 17(4): 112-121]
[28] Gao PP, Li YP, Gong JW, et al. Urban land-use planning under multi-uncertainty and multiobjective consi-dering ecosystem service value and economic benefit: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Ecological Complexity, 2021, 45: 100886
[29] 国土资源部. 土地利用现状分类 GB/T 21010—2017. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017 [Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Current Land Use Classification GB/T 21010-2017. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2017]
[30] 安溪县统计局. 安溪县统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2000—2020 [Anxi Statistics Bureau. Anxi Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2000-2020]
[31] Jiang YH, Arafat Y, Letuma P, et al. Restoration of long-term monoculture degraded tea orchard by green and goat manures applications system. Sustainability, 2019, 11: 1011
[32] 周艳, 骆云中, 凌丽, 等. 茶园生态系统服务功能. 西南农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2007, 5(2): 8-11 [Zhou Y, Luo Y-Z, Ling L, et al. Service functions of the ecosystem in tea gardens. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University: Social Science, 2007, 5(2): 8-11]
[33] 汪旭明, 曾冬萍, 张礼宏, 等. 福州鼓山茶园生态系统服务功能价值评估. 亚热带农业研究, 2014, 10(3): 156-163 [Wang X-M, Zeng D-P, Zhang L-H, et al. Value assessment of ecosystem service function of tea plantations in Gushan Mountain of Fuzhou. Subtropical Agriculture Research, 2014, 10(3): 156-163]
[34] 税伟, 陈毅萍, 苏正安, 等. 专业化茶叶种植影响下的农业生态系统服务功能价值评价——以福建省安溪县为例. 生态学报, 2017, 37(10): 3311-3326 [Shui W, Chen Y-P, Su Z-A, et al. Agricultural ecosystem services function value evaluation under the influence of specialized tea planting: A case study in Anxi, Fujian Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(10): 3311-3326]
[35] 苏培凌. 福建安溪茶产业助力乡村振兴的经验启示. 中国茶叶加工, 2021(1): 66-68 [Su P-L. Experience of Anxi tea industry in rural revitalization. China Tea Processing, 2021(1): 66-68]
[36] 王海斌, 陈晓婷,丁力, 等. 福建省安溪县茶园土壤酸化对茶树产量及品质的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(6): 1398-1403 [Wang H-B, Chen X-T, Ding L, et al. Effect of soil acidification on yield and quality of tea tree in tea plantations from Anxi County, Fujian Province. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2018, 24(6): 1398-1403]
[37] 李艳春, 李兆伟, 林伟伟, 等. 施用生物质炭和羊粪对宿根连作茶园根际土壤微生物的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4): 1273-1282 [Li Y-C, Li Z-W, Lin W-W, et al. Effects of biochar and sheep manure on rhizospheric soil microbial community in continuous ratooning tea orchards. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(4): 1273-1282]
[38] Wu ZY, Li JJ, Zheng J, et al. Soil microbial community structure and catabolic activity are significantly degenera-ted in successive rotations of Chinese fir plantations. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 6691
[39] 崔文超, 焦雯珺, 闵庆文, 等. 土地流转背景下不同经营规模青田稻鱼共生系统的环境影响差异——基于碳足迹的实证研究. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12): 4125-4133 [Cui W-C, Jiao W-J, Min Q-W, et al. Environmental impact differences in Qingtian rice-fish culture system at different management scales in the context of land transfer: An empirical study with the carbon footprint method. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(12): 4125-4133]
[40] 刘岑薇, 张燕, 陈锦辉, 等. 南方山地茶园小流域径流演变规律. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(7): 85-89 [Liu C-W, Zhang Y, Chen J-H, et al. Evolvement rule of small watershed runoff in hillslope tea garden in Southern area. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(7): 85-89]
[41] 蒋宇航, 林生, 林伟伟, 等. 不同肥料对退化茶园根际土壤微生物代谢活性和群落结构的影响. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(10): 2894-2902 [Jiang Y-H, Lin S, Lin W-W, et al. Effects of different fertilizer applications on microbial metabolic activity and community structure in tea rhizosphere soil. Chinese Journal of Eco-logy, 2017, 36(10): 2894-2902]
[42] 中国茶叶流通协会. 安溪: 每年安排百座茶山造绿戴帽 [EB/OL]. (2009-09-10) [2021-02-06]. http://www.ctma.com.cn/news/dt/2009/0910/12995.html [China Tea Marketing Association. Anxi: Arrange a Hundred Tea Mountain to Make Green Every Year [EB/OL]. (2009-09-10) [2021-02-06]. http://www.ctma.com.cn/news/dt/2009/0910/12995.html]

福建安溪县乡镇土地生态系统服务价值的演变机制

Evolution mechanism of ecosystem service value at the township-scale in Anxi County of Fujian Province, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	于海霞, 王禹骁. 东江流域生态系统服务价值的时空演变及空间分异机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2498-2506.
[2]	祁育汀, 张平, 刘雷, 马雪楠, 王欢, 赵娟. 关中平原城市群土地利用结构多情景优化和生态系统服务价值预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2507-2517.
[3]	马扩, 郝丽娜, 童新, 段利民, 曹文梅, 康雪儿, 刘小勇, 刘廷玺. 科尔沁沙丘-草甸相间地区生态安全格局的时空演变 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2215-2225.
[4]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[5]	付建新. 1980—2020年汾河流域“三生空间”土地利用功能变化及其驱动力 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1901-1911.
[6]	李久林, 胡大卫, 储金龙, 尹海伟. 基于未来情景模拟的安徽省潜山市生态网络构建与优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1474-1482.
[7]	徐彩瑶, 任燕, 孔凡斌. 浙江省土地利用变化对生态系统固碳服务的影响及其预测 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1610-1620.
[8]	苟国花, 樊军, 王茜, 周明星, 杨学亭. 基于最小数据集的青藏高原南北部不同土地利用方式土壤质量评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1360-1366.
[9]	白金珂, 李笑雨, 王力. 1980s与2020s青藏高原南部土壤质量变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1367-1374.
[10]	王佳楠, 贾燕锋, 范昊明. 辽西低山棕壤丘陵区小流域泥沙连通性与土壤侵蚀的空间分布特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 726-732.
[11]	韩星, 于海洋, 郑宁国, 葛超荣, 姚槐应. 茶园氧化亚氮排放研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 805-814.
[12]	叶静, 关瑜, 陈影. 滨海盐碱区土地利用功能权衡与协同关系及分区——以河北省黄骅市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 423-432.
[13]	郝嘉元, 智烈慧, 李晓文, 董世魁, 李巍. 青藏高原土地利用格局和生态系统服务的时空演变特征及关系 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3053-3063.
[14]	谈旭, 王承武. 伊犁河谷生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2747-2756.
[15]	谭昭昭, 陈毓遒, 丁憬枫, 刘梦迪, 王浩, 王江. 浙江东部沿海城市土地利用模拟及生态系统服务价值评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2777-2787.