欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 657-663.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202303.026

• • 上一篇    下一篇

中国西北内陆季风区基于不同时间尺度和回归方法的大气水线比较

韦昊延1, 陆彦玮2, 李敏1*, 华溢1, 潘君佐2, 张子瑶2   

  1. 1西北农林科技大学旱区农业水土工程教育部重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
    2长安大学水利与环境学院旱区地下水文与生态效应教育部重点实验室, 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-07 接受日期:2023-01-03 发布日期:2023-09-15
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: limin2016@nwafu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:韦昊延, 男, 1997年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事同位素水文过程研究。E-mail: why2020@nwafu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFD1900700)和国家自然科学基金项目(42107068,41877017)

Comparison of meteoric water lines at different temporal scales and regression methods in inland monsoon region, Northwest China.

WEI Haoyan1, LU Yanwei2, LI Min1*, HUA Yi1, PAN Junzuo2, ZHANG Ziyao2   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
    2Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecological Effect in Arid Region of Ministry of Education, School of Water and Environment, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China
  • Received:2022-07-07 Accepted:2023-01-03 Published:2023-09-15

摘要: 局地大气水线(LMWL)是氢氧稳定同位素示踪地区水文过程的重要基础之一,建立能代表当地降水稳定同位素总体特征的LMWL对于准确揭示相关水文过程十分关键。基于中国西北内陆季风区典型区域长武塬9年的降水稳定同位素观测数据,比较不同时间尺度与回归方法对LMWL的影响。结果表明: 对于不同回归方法,除年尺度降水稳定同位素建立的LMWL基本保持不变外,次、月降水数据建立的LWML均会随回归方法的不同发生明显改变;在最小二乘(OLSR)、主轴(MA)和简约主轴(RMA)3种不同回归方法下,基于次、月、年降水数据建立的LMWL也明显不同;只有使用考虑降水量加权的OLSR、MA和RMA方法,次、月、年降水尺度数据建立的LMWL才较为接近。表明在降水量和稳定同位素特征随时间存在明显异质性的地区建立LMWL时,需格外注意降水稳定同位素数据尺度和回归方法的选择。对于降水稳定同位素观测困难、数据有限的地区,建议使用降水量加权的简约主轴回归或主轴回归方法建立具有代表性的LMWL。

关键词: 稳定同位素, 大气水线, 时间尺度, 回归方法, 西北内陆季风区

Abstract: The local meteoric water line (LMWL) is an important basis for tracing the regional hydrological processes with stable isotopes. The establishment of LMWL, which can represent the overall characteristics of stable isotopes of local precipitation, is crucial for accurately revealing the hydrological processes. The influences of different temporal scales and regression methods on the established LMWL were analyzed and compared based on nine years of stable isotopic data of precipitation in Changwu Tableland, a typical area of the inland monsoon region of Northwest China. The results showed that, for different regression methods, the LMWL established by stable isotopes of annual precipitation was basically stable, whereas the LWML established by each precipitation event and the monthly precipitation data showed significant differences with different regression methods. The LMWL from the ordinary least squares regression (OLSR), major axis regression (MA) and reduced major axis regression (RMA) methods were significantly different based on the data of precipitation event, monthly precipitation data, and annual precipitation data, respectively. Only when OLSR, MA and RMA considering precipitation weighting were used, the LMWL established by these scale data was relatively close. This suggested that special attention should be paid to the selection of precipitation stable isotope data scale and regression method when LMWL was established in areas with temporal heterogeneity of precipitation and stable isotopic characteristics. For regions where stable isotope observations of precipitation were difficult and data were limited, the precipitation weighted major axis regression or reduced major axis regression methods are recommended during the establishment of representative LMWL.

Key words: stable isotope, meteoric water line, time scale, regression method, northwest inland monsoon region