欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (06): 1457-1464.

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

太阳辐射减弱对冬小麦旗叶光合速率的影响

郑有飞1,2,3**,倪艳利3,麦博儒3,吴荣军1,3,冯妍3,孙健3,李健3,徐静馨3   

  1. 1江苏省大气环境监测与污染控制高技术研究重点实验室, 南京 210044;2南京信息工程大学气象灾害省部共建教育部重点实验室, 南京 210044;3南京信息工程大学环境科学与工程学院, 南京 210044
  • 出版日期:2011-06-18 发布日期:2011-06-18

Effects of reduced solar radiation on winter wheat flag leaf net photosynthetic rate.

ZHENG You-fei1,2,3, NI Yan-li3, MAI Bo-ru3, WU Rong-jun1,3, FENG Yan3, SUN Jian3, LI Jian3, XU Jing-xin3   

  1. 1Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environmental Monitoring and Pollution Control High-tech Research, Nanjing 210044, China;2Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China; 3College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
  • Online:2011-06-18 Published:2011-06-18

摘要: 以冬小麦扬麦13号为供试材料,设计了15%(T15)、20%(T20)、40%(T40)、60%(T60)和100%(CK)自然光5个处理,在大田条件下研究了模拟太阳辐射减弱对
冬小麦旗叶光合速率日变化及其影响因素的影响.结果表明:太阳辐射减弱显著提高了冬小麦叶绿素和叶黄素含量,降低了光合速率(Pn).不同辐射减弱条件下冬小麦Pn日变化差异较大,日最高值表现为CK>60%自然光>40%自然光>20%自然光>15%自然光,其中CK呈双峰曲线变化,有明显的“午休”现象,其他各处理均呈单峰型曲线变化,“午休”现象不明显,但峰值出现时间滞后.相关分析表明,太阳辐射减弱是影响Pn日变化的主导因子,但其他因子也显著影响Pn.与CK相比,60%和40%自然光处理中光合有效辐射(PAR)、叶温(Tl)、气孔导度(Gs)和蒸腾速率(Tr)与Pn均呈显著正相关,表明上述因子对Pn有正效应;冬小麦叶片胞间二氧化碳浓度(Ci)和气孔导度限制值(Ls)在60%和40%自然光处理中与Pn呈显著负相关,但在20%和15%自然光处理中与Pn呈显著正相关,说明太阳辐射强度高于40%自然光时CiLsPn有负效应,太阳辐射强度低于40%自然光时则为正效应.

关键词: 太阳辐射减弱, 冬小麦, 光合日变化

Abstract: Taking winter wheat Triticum aestivum L. (cv.Yangmai 13) as test material, a field experiment was conducted in Nanjing City to study the effects of simulated reduced solar radiation on the diurnal variation of winter wheat flag leaf photosynthetic rate and the main affecting factors. Five treatments were installed, i.e., 15% (T15), 20% (T20), 40% (T40), 60% (T60), and 100% (CK) of total incident solar radiation. Reduced solar irradiance increased the chlorophyll and lutein contents significantly, but decreased the net photosynthetic rate (Pn). Under different solar irradiance, the diurnal variation of Pn had greater difference, and the daily maximum Pn was in the order of CK>T60>T40>T20>T15. In CK, the Pn exhibited a double peak diurnal curve; while in the other four treatments, the Pn showed a single peak curve, and the peak was lagged behind that of CK. Correlation analysis showed that reduced solar irradiance was the main factor affecting the diurnal variation of Pn, but the physiological parameters also played important roles in determining the diurnal variation of Pn. In treatments T60 and T40, the photosynthesis active radiation (PAR), leaf temperature (Tl), stomatal conductance (Gs),and transpiration rate (Tr) were significantly positively correlated with Pn, suggesting their positive effects on Pn. The intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and stomatal limitation (Ls) had significant negative correlations with Pn in treatments T60 and T40 but significant positive correlations with Pn in treatments T20 and T15, implying that the Ci and Ls had negative (or positive) effects on Pn when the solar irradiance was higher (or lower) than 40% of incident solar irradiance.

Key words: reduced solar radiation, winter wheat, diurnal variation of photosynthesis