Advances in proteomic research on plant responses to metal-based nanomaterial stress

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202005.031

Abstract

Abstract: Soil is gradually becoming the main sink of metal-based nanomaterials (MNMs) in the environment. Plants, as a vital component in the ecosystem, play a critical role in determining the fate of nanomaterials. Previous studies showed that MNMs could affect the growth and development of various plant species via altering protein expression. In this review, we described the differences in plant protein expression caused by various typical MNM stresses, and summarized the impact factors including physicochemical properties of MNMs, plant characteristics and stress conditions on plant protein response under the stress of MNMs. Moreover, the response mechanisms of plant protein to MNMs stress were reviewed, including energy synthesis and metabolic response, amino acid synthesis and information transmission response, and oxidative stress and defense response. Finally, further research directions were proposed.

Key words: nanoparticles, differential protein, uptake and accumulation, metabolic pathway, antioxidant enzyme

XIA Yu-qi, PENG Cheng, XIONG Mei-yu, YUAN Peng. Advances in proteomic research on plant responses to metal-based nanomaterial stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(5): 1763-1772.

References

[1] Hossain Z, Mustafa G, Komatsu S. Plant responses to nanoparticle stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2015, 16: 26644-26653
[2] Kabir E, Kumar V, Kim KH, et al. Environmental impacts of nanomaterials. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 225: 261-271
[3] Keller AA, McFerran S, Lazareva A, et al. Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2013, 15: 1692
[4] 杨悦锁, 王晨, 袁雪梅, 等. 天然水环境中纳米银的来源、分析与转化. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6): 2073-2082 [Yang Y-S, Wang C, Yuan X-M, et al. Silver nanoparticles in natural water environment: Source, analysis and transformation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(6): 2073-2082]
[5] Calderon-Jimenez B, Johnson ME, Montoro Bustos AR, et al. Silver nanoparticles: Technological advances, societal impacts, and metrological challenges. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2017, 5: 6
[6] Tolaymat T, El Badawy A, Genaidy A, et al. Analysis of metallic and metal oxide nanomaterial environmental emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 143: 401-412
[7] Ghasemi Y, Peymani P, Afifi S. Quantum dot: Magic nanoparticle for imaging, detection and targeting. Acta Bio-medica: Atenei Parmensis, 2009, 80: 156-165
[8] Favero P, Souza-Parise MD, Fernandez J, et al. Surface properties of CdS nanoparticles. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2006, 36: 1032-1034
[9] Zheng L, Hong F, Lu S, et al. Effect of nano-TiO₂ on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biological Trace Element Research, 2005, 104: 83-91
[10] Khan Z, Upadhyaya H. Impact of nanoparticles on abio-tic stress responses in plants: An overview// Tripathi DK, eds. Nanomaterials in Plants, Algae and Microorganisms. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2019: 305-322
[11] Khot LR, Sankaran S, Maja JM, et al. Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: A review. Crop Protection, 2012, 35: 64-70
[12] Yu B, Zeng J, Gong L, et al. Investigation of the photocatalytic degradation of organochlorine pesticides on a nano-TiO₂ coated film. Talanta, 2007, 72: 1667-1674
[13] Balinova A, Mladenova R, Shtereva D. Solid-phase extraction on sorbents of different retention mechanisms followed by determination by gas chromatography-mass spectrometric and gas chromatography-electron capture detection of pesticide residues in crops. Journal of Chromatography A, 2007, 1150: 136-144
[14] Yao KS, Li SJ, Tzeng KC, et al. Fluorescence silica nanoprobe as a biomarker for rapid detection of plant pathogens. Advanced Materials Research, 2009, 79-82: 513-516
[15] Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, et al. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomate-rials (TiO₂, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43: 9216-9222
[16] Ma X, Geisler-Lee J, Deng Y, et al. Interactions between engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) and plants: Phytotoxicity, uptake and accumulation. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408: 3053-3061
[17] 刘涛, 向垒, 余忠雄, 等. 水稻幼苗对纳米氧化铜的吸收及根系形态生理特征响应. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(5): 1480-1486 [Liu T, Xiang L, Yu Z-X, et al. Responses of morphological and physiological characteristics in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedling roots to its uptake of CuO nanoparticles. China Environmental Science, 2015, 35(5): 1480-1486]
[18] Shaw AK, Hossain Z. Impact of nano-CuO stress on rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Chemosphere, 2013, 93: 906-915
[19] 封文强. CuO纳米颗粒对玉米的毒性效应及其在玉米体内的吸收和转运. 硕士论文. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2011 [Feng W-Q. Phytotoxicity of Engineered CuO Nanoparticles and Their upwards Translocation in Maize. Master Thesis. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2011]
[20] Atha DH, Wang H, Petersen EJ, et al. Copper oxide nanoparticle mediated DNA damage in terrestrial plant models. Environmental Science and Technology, 2012, 46: 1819-1827
[21] Buzea C, Pacheco II, Robbie K. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointerphases, 2007, 2: MR17-MR71
[22] Thwala M, Musee N, Sikhwivhilu L, et al. The oxidative toxicity of Ag and ZnO nanoparticles towards the aquatic plant Spirodela punctuta and the role of testing media parameters. Environmental Science: Processes Impacts, 2013, 15: 1830-1843
[23] 赵桂琦, 周燕, 尹颖, 等. 纳米氧化锌暴露对沉水植物金鱼藻的毒性效应. 南京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 53(5): 894-902 [Zhao G-Q, Zhou Y, Yin Y, et al. The toxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles exposure on submersed macrophyte Ceratophyllum demersum. Journal of Nanjing University: Natural Science, 2017, 53(5): 894-902]
[24] Scherer MD, Sposito JC, Falco WF, et al. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles on meristematic cells of Allium cepa roots: A close analysis of particle size dependence. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 660: 459-467
[25] Sadak MS. Impact of silver nanoparticles on plant growth, some biochemical aspects, and yield of fenugreek plant (Trigonella foenum-graecum). Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 2019, 43: 38
[26] 徐江兵, 王艳玲, 罗小三, 等. 纳米Fe₃O₄对生菜生长及土壤细菌群落结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(9): 3003-3010 [Xu J-B, Wang Y-L, Luo X-S, et al. Influence of Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) growth and soil bacterial community structure. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(9): 3003-3010]
[27] Twyman R. 王恒樑, 袁静, 刘先凯, 等, 译. 蛋白质组学原理. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2007 [Twyman R. Trans: Wang H-L, Yuan J, Liu X-K, et al. Principles of Proteomics. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2007]
[28] Wang DZ, Kong LF, Li YY, et al. Environmental microbial community proteomics: Status, challenges and perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Scien-ces, 2016, 17: 1275
[29] Yan S, Tang Z, Su W, et al. Proteomic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics, 2005, 5: 235-244
[30] Stefanic PP, Cvjetko P, Biba R, et al. Physiological, ultrastructural and proteomic responses of tobacco see-dlings exposed to silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate. Chemosphere, 2018, 209: 640-653
[31] Vannini C, Domingo G, Onelli E, et al. Phytotoxic and genotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles exposure on germinating wheat seedlings. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2014, 171: 1142-1148
[32] Mirzajani F, Askari H, Hamzelou S, et al. Proteomics study of silver nanoparticles toxicity on Oryza sativa L. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2014, 108: 335-339
[33] Hossain Z, Mustafa G, Sakata K, et al. Insights into the proteomic response of soybean towards Al₂O₃, ZnO, and Ag nanoparticles stress. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 304: 291-305
[34] Yasmeen F, Raja NI, Mustafa G, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of post-flooding recovery in soybean root exposed to aluminum oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Proteomics, 2016, 143: 136-150
[35] Alharby HF, Metwali EM, Fuller MP, et al. Impact of application of zinc oxide nanoparticles on callus induction, plant regeneration, element content and antioxidant enzyme activity in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) under salt stress. Archives of Biological Sciences, 2016, 68: 723-735
[36] Venkatachalam P, Jayaraj M, Manikandan R, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) alleviate heavy metal-induced toxicity in Leucaena leucocephala seedlings: A physiochemical analysis. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 2017, 110: 59-69
[37] Majumdar S, Almeida IC, Arigi EA, et al. Environmental effects of nanoceria on seed production of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): A proteomic analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49: 13283-13293
[38] Salehi H, Chehregani A, Lucini L, et al. Morphological, proteomic and metabolomic insight into the effect of cerium dioxide nanoparticles to Phaseolus vulgaris L. under soil or foliar application. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 616: 1540-1551
[39] Licausi F, Ohme-Takagi M, Perata P. APETALA 2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP 2/ERF) transcription factors: Mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytologist, 2013, 199: 639-649
[40] Mizoi J, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta-Gene Regula-tory Mechanisms, 2012, 1819: 86-96
[41] Tumburu L, Andersen CP, Rygiewicz PT, et al. Mole-cular and physiological responses to titanium dioxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles in Arabidopsis. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, 2017, 36: 71-82
[42] Hebelstrup KH, Shah JK, Igamberdiev AU. The role of nitric oxide and hemoglobin in plant development and morphogenesis. Physiologia Plantarum, 2013, 148: 457-469
[43] Marmiroli M, Imperiale D, Pagano L, et al. The proteomic response of Arabidopsis thaliana to cadmium sulfide quantum dots, and its correlation with the transcriptomic response. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6: 1104
[44] Majumdar S, Pagano L, Wohlschlegel JA, et al. Proteomic, gene and metabolite characterization reveal the uptake and toxicity mechanisms of cadmium sulfide quantum dots in soybean plants. Environmental Science: Nano, 2019, 6: 3010-3026
[45] Mustafa G, Sakata K, Hossain Z, et al. Proteomic study on the effects of silver nanoparticles on soybean under flooding stress. Journal of Proteomics, 2015, 122: 100-118
[46] Vannini C, Domingo G, Onelli E, et al. Morphological and proteomic responses of Eruca sativa exposed to silver nanoparticles or silver nitrate. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e68752
[47] Mustafa G, Sakata K, Komatsu S. Proteomic analysis of flooded soybean root exposed to aluminum oxide nano-particles. Journal of Proteomics, 2015, 128: 280-297
[48] 张海, 彭程, 杨建军, 等. 金属型纳米颗粒对植物的生态毒理效应研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(3): 885-892 [Zhang H, Peng C, Yang J-J, et al. Eco-toxicological effect of metal-based nanoparticles on plants: Research progress. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(3): 885-892]
[49] Mustafa G, Komatsu S. Insights into the response of soybean mitochondrial proteins to various sizes of aluminum oxide nanoparticles under flooding stress. Journal of Proteome Research, 2016, 15: 4464-4475
[50] Pradas del Real AE, Vidal V, Carrière M, et al. Silver nanoparticles and wheat roots: A complex interplay. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51: 5774-5782
[51] Rao S, Shekhawat GS. Toxicity of ZnO engineered nanoparticles and evaluation of their effect on growth, meta-bolism and tissue specific accumulation in Brassica juncea. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2014, 2: 105-114
[52] Matysik J, Alia A, Bhalu B, et al. Molecular mechanisms of quenching of reactive oxygen species by proline under stress in plants. Current Science, 2002, 82: 525-532
[53] Villiers F, Ducruix C, Hugouvieux V, et al. Investigating the plant response to cadmium exposure by proteomic and metabolomic approaches. Proteomics, 2011, 11: 1650-1663
[54] Nanjo Y, Skultety L, Ashraf Y, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings responses to flooding by using gel and gel-free techniques. Journal of Proteome Research, 2010, 9: 3989-4002
[55] 彭程. 氧化铜纳米颗粒在土壤-水稻系统中的形态转化机制研究. 博士论文. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2016 [Peng C. Transformation of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles in the System of Paddy Soil and Rice (Oryza sativa L.). PhD Thesis. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2016]
[56] Ruotolo R, Maestri E, Pagano L, et al. Plant response to metal-containing engineered nanomaterials: An omics-based perspective. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52: 2451-2467
[57] DalCorso G, Farinati S, Furini A. Regulatory networks of cadmium stress in plants. Plant Signaling & Beha-vior, 2010, 5: 663-667
[58] Gelli A, Higgins VJ, Blumwald E. Activation of plant plasma membrane Ca²⁺-permeable channels by race-specific fungal elicitors. Plant Physiology, 1997, 113: 269-279
[59] Jones AM, Assmann SM. Plants: The latest model system for G-protein research. EMBO Reports, 2004, 5: 572-578
[60] Kumbhakar DV, Datta AK, Das D, et al. Assessment of oxidative stress, antioxidant enzyme activity and cellular apoptosis in a plant based system (Nigella sativa L.; black cumin) induced by copper and cadmium sulphide nanomaterials. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management, 2019, 11: 100196
[61] Moghadam NK, Hatami M, Rezaei S, et al. Induction of plant defense machinery against nanomaterials exposure// Ghorbanpour M, eds. Advances in Phytonanotechnology. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. 2019: 241-263
[62] Tesfaye M, Temple SJ, Allan DL, et al. Overexpression of malate dhydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhances organic acid synthesis and confers tolerance to aluminum. Plant Physiology, 2001, 127: 1836-1844
[63] Zhao L, Huang Y, Hu J, et al. ¹H NMR and GC-MS based metabolomics reveal defense and detoxification mechanism of cucumber plant under nano-Cu stress. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50: 2000-2010
[64] Shaw AK, Ghosh S, Kalaji HM, et al. Nano-CuO stress induced modulation of antioxidative defense and photosynthetic performance of syrian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2014, 102: 37-47
[65] Tang Y, He R, Zhao J, et al. Oxidative stress-induced toxicity of CuO nanoparticles and related toxicogenomic responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 212: 605-614
[66] Majumdar S, Peralta-Videa JR, Bandyopadhyay S, et al. Exposure of cerium oxide nanoparticles to kidney bean shows disturbance in the plant defense mechanisms. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 278: 279-287
[67] Kissen R, Bones AM. Nitrile-specifier proteins involved in glucosinolate hydrolysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2009, 284: 12057-12070
[68] Falk KL, Tokuhisa JG, Gershenzon J. The effect of sulfur nutrition on plant glucosinolate content: Physiology and molecular mechanisms. Plant Biology, 2007, 9: 573-581
[69] Gondikas AP, Morris A, Reinsch BC, et al. Cysteine-induced modifications of zero-valent silver nanomate-rials: Implications for particle surface chemistry, aggregation, dissolution, and silver speciation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46: 7037-7045
[70] Peumans WJ, Van Damme E. Lectins as plant defense proteins. Plant Physiology, 1995, 109: 347